:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:反傾銷保護可改善臺灣提控廠商技術效率?
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:林家慶 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chia-ching
出版日期:2017
卷期:29:3
頁次:頁453-483
主題關鍵詞:反傾銷技術效率臺灣廠商Anti-dumpingTechnical efficiencyTaiwanese firms
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:3
目前臺灣仍缺乏反傾銷保護對臺灣廠商技術效率影響的系統性研究,本研究以臺灣1984~2010年所有包含上市公司的反傾銷控訴案例為研究對象,探討反傾銷相關事件對臺灣提控廠商技術效率之影響。研究結果指出,雖然平均而言反傾銷控訴對提控廠商技術效率有正面影響,但仍有約三成案例的實證結果是負面的。其中,對於低技術水準之提控廠商,反傾銷保護可使其技術效率有較大的改善,但這類廠商保護時間拉長後,卻反而會使其技術效率降低;同時,課徵反傾銷稅的時間拉長後,也會導致反效果。這些研究結果可提供政府在審理反傾銷控訴案件時做為參考。
Currently, Taiwan lacks a systematic study on the effect of anti-dumping protection on the technical efficiency of Taiwanese firms. As such, in this study, all cases of anti-dumping complaints of companies listed in Taiwan during 1984 and 2010 are used to investigate the effects of anti-dumping complaints on the technical efficiency of Taiwanese firms. Our research results indicate that, although the average effect of anti-dumping complaints has a positive impact on the technical efficiency of complaining firms, there are still negative results in 30% of cases. Among them, anti-dumping protections can lead to great improvements in the low-technology manufacturers. However, if the protection time for these manufacturers is prolonged, their technical efficiency declines. Additionally, if the duration of imposed anti-dumping duties increases, it could also have the opposite effect. These results can serve as a reference for the government when presiding over anti-dumping complaints.
期刊論文
1.黃智輝(20081000)。銅版紙課徵反傾銷稅經濟效果與國家整體利益分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策,39(1),69-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Prusa, Thomas J.(2001)。On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping。The Canadian Journal of Economics,34(3),591-611。  new window
3.陳坤銘、楊光華、陳財家(20000700)。反傾銷制度與產業保護效果--臺灣個案研究。貿易調查專刊,5,297-329。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃智輝(20080300)。水泥課徵反傾銷稅的政策效果與競爭力分析--臺灣實證分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策,38(2),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Blundell, Richard、Griffith, Rachel、Van Reenen, John(1999)。Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms。The Review of Economic Studies,66(3),529-554。  new window
6.Nickell, Stephen J.(1996)。Competition and Corporate Performance。Journal of Political Economy,104(4),724-746。  new window
7.Aghion, Philippe、Bloom, Nick、Blundell, Richard、Griffith, Rachel、Howitt, Peter(2005)。Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship。Quarterly Journal of Economics,120(2),701-728。  new window
8.Konings, Jozef、Vandenbussche, Hylke(2005)。Antidumping Protection and Markups of Domestic Firms。Journal of International Economics,65(1),151-165。  new window
9.Miyagiwa, Kaz、Ohno, Yuka(1995)。Closing the technology gap under protection。American Economic Review,85(4),755-770。  new window
10.Herander, Mark G.、Schwartz, J. Brad(1984)。An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties。Southern Economic Journal,51(1),59-79。  new window
11.Cohen, Wesley M.、Klepper, Steven(1996)。Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D。Review of Economics and Statistics,78(2),232-243。  new window
12.Cohen, Wesley M.、Klepper, Steven(1996)。A reprise of size and R&D。Economic Journal,106(437),925-951。  new window
13.林家慶(20121200)。臺灣反傾銷控訴效果之實證分析。人文及社會科學集刊,24(4),469-496。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林家慶(20140300)。臺灣反傾銷控訴傷害了下游廠商?。人文及社會科學集刊,26(1),103-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Baily, Martin Neil、Gersbach, Hans(1995)。Efficiency in Manufacturing and the Need for Global Competition。Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics,1995,307-358。  new window
16.Boone, Jan(2000)。Competitive Pressure: The Effects on Investments in Product and Process Innovation。The Rand Journal of Economics,31(3),549-569。  new window
17.Crowley, Meredith A.(2006)。Do Safeguard Tariffs and Antidumping Duties Open or Close Technology Gaps?。Journal of International Economics,68(2),469-484。  new window
18.Hansen, Wendy L.、Prusa, Thomas J.(1997)。The Economics and Politics of Trade Policy: An Empirical Analysis of ITC Decision Making。Review of International Economics,5(2),230-245。  new window
19.黃智輝(20080700)。The Economic Effects of Taiwan's Anti-dumping Duty on PC Prestress Steel。經濟研究. 臺北大學經濟學系,44(2),245-292。new window  new window
20.Kao, Kuo-feng、Peng, Cheng-hau(2016)。Anti-dumping Protection, Price Undertaking and Product Innovation。International Review of Economics & Finance,41,53-64。  new window
21.Lio, Mon-chi、Hu, Jin-li(2009)。Governance and Agricultural Production Efficiency: A Cross-Country Aggregate Frontier Analysis。Journal of Agricultural Economics,60(1),40-61。  new window
22.Battese, George E.、Coelli, Timothy J.(1995)。A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data。Empirical Economics,20(2),325-332。  new window
23.Färe, Rolf、Grosskopf, Shawna、Norris, Mary、Zhang, Zhongyang(1994)。Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries。American Economic Review,84(1),66-83。  new window
24.Golany, Boaz、Roll, Yaakov(1989)。An application procedure for DEA。OMEGA: International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250。  new window
25.Van Reenen, John、Griffith, Rachel、Blundell, Richard(1995)。Dynamic count data models of technological innovation。The Economic Journal,105(429),333-344。  new window
26.Gao, Xiwang、Miyagiwa, Kaz(2005)。Antidumping Protection and R&D Competition。The Canadian Journal of Economics,38(1),211-227。  new window
會議論文
1.陳坤銘、陳財家(1999)。反傾銷與股價--臺灣鋼鐵產業個案研究。台灣經濟學會年會。臺北:台灣經濟學會。71-101。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林柏生、陳坤銘、洪德欽、溫偉任、陳建維、陳財家(2001)。反傾銷制度產業損害經濟分析--美國鋼鐵與高科技產業案例研究。臺北:經濟部貿易調查委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.林柏生、陳坤銘、洪德欽、溫偉任、陳建維、陳財家(2002)。貿易救濟案件產業損害調查經濟分析之研究。臺北:經濟部貿易調查委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃鴻、辛炳隆(1998)。產業損害計量經濟分析方法之研究。臺北:經濟部貿易調查委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.經濟部國際貿易局(2016)。中華民國進出口貿易統計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張振邦(2000)。台灣汽車工業發展的政治經濟分析:一個歷史結構的觀點(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Coelli, Timothy J.、Rao, Dodla Sai Prasada、O'Donnell, Christopher J.、Battese, George Edward(2005)。An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis。Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.。  new window
2.行政院主計總處(2016)。中華民國行業標準分類。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃鏡如、傅祖壇、黃美瑛(2008)。績效評估--效率與生產力之理論與應用。台北:新陸書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.經濟部貿易調查委員會(2016)。我國反傾銷稅案件處理情形一覽表,https://www.moeaitc.gov.tw/ITC/main/case/wfrmAntidumpingCases1.aspx?menu_id=1167。  延伸查詢new window
2.Konings, Jozef,Vandenbussche, Hylke(2007)。Antidumping Protection and Productivity of Domestic Firms: A Firm Level Analysis,LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven。  new window
3.World Trade Organization(2016)。Trade Topics: Anti-dumping,http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dunning, John H.(1977)。Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach。The International Allocation of Economic Activity。London:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE