:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:河川濕地景觀美質中介效應之研究--以雲林縣地方型河川區段為例
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:張志銘郭漢鍠 引用關係黃登科陳瓊美蘇致綱
作者(外文):Chang, Chih-mingGwo, Han-hwangHuang, Teng-koChen, Chiung-meiSu, Ju-kong
出版日期:2018
卷期:34:2
頁次:頁69-78
主題關鍵詞:河川濕地景觀景觀元素景觀知覺景觀偏好MediationLandscape elementLandscape cognitionElements preference perception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:5
由已分析單一城鄉河川濕地分布之景觀元素以及對於河川濕地景觀的知覺之相關成果〔1〕,並延續成果之研究,進一步發現一般民眾對於這類型區域之河川濕地景觀偏好的程度,運用迴歸解析得知:(一)濕地景觀元素的不同,會形成不同程度的景觀偏好。(二)對濕地景觀其個人對此類景觀認知亦會產生不同的偏好程度。(三)同時發現三者之間的關聯與關係:利用階層迴歸分析檢視民眾的濕地景觀認知的中介效果,發現在階層迴歸的模型一中控制個人屬性的影響,在模型二中檢驗河川濕地景觀元素對景觀偏好的影響,並在模型三的自變數加入民眾的濕地景觀認知後,利用階層迴歸分析所得知結果顯示,在加入中介變數後,河川濕地景觀元素對景觀偏好的迴歸係數變小,解釋力增加,且皆符合中介變數檢驗的所有四個條件,所以證實河川濕地景觀元素有部分能夠透過民眾的濕地景觀認知的中介效果,對景觀偏好產生影響。這些研究結果可以提供未來河川濕地景觀規劃與環境美質之基礎研究的依據與建議。
It was fruitful (Gwo et al., 2016) what relationship they were between landscape elements and perception of the river wetland image from the zone of Dounan-Huwei town nearby in Yunlin county, it might provide some extent to be deserved what happened by analysis, effects from 3 dimension, landscape elements, landscape cognition and its preference. It was applied by regression to find out whether it existed some relation among 3 dimensions. The results were showed up as follows: 1. they existed difference significantly between wetland landscape elements and landscape preference, that was, they showed up to change extent landscape preference differently when the landscape elements did. 2. It showed to indicate difference between individual landscape cognition and its preference. 3. at the same time, what the relationship was it found to be relative among elements, cognition and preference for wetland landscape. And that, it was predicted as follows:through hierarchical regression whether it produced mediation effect from elements to preference of wetland landscape, it was to find interference from landscape cognition. The result showed to match all the 4 test items of the mediation condition, that was, the mediation of the cognition it certainly produced from elements to preference of wetland landscape. To sum up, the results might provide some basis for suggestion, hopefully, what the landscape of the river wetland it will be higher quality authentically and ecologically in the future.
期刊論文
1.李素馨(19950600)。環境知覺和環境美質評估。規劃與設計學報,1(4),53-74。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭漢鍠、梁大慶、蘇致綱、范植增(20160300)。城鄉河川濕地景觀美質之知覺研究--以雲林縣斗南-虎尾鎮近郊河川區段為例。國立虎尾科技大學學報,33(1),71-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Sheppard, S. R. J.(1989)。Visual simulation: A user's guide for architects, engineers, and planners。Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,15(1/2),80。  new window
4.Zube, Ervin H.、Sell, James L.、Taylor, Jonathan G.(1982)。Landscape perception: Research, application and theory。Landscape Planning,9(1),1-33。  new window
學位論文
1.吳明一(2009)。休閒農業區景觀環境與遊客滿意度之研究--以枕頭山休閒農業區為例(碩士論文)。佛光大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃玉享(2008)。坔‧約會好所在--2008高屏溪左岸濕地生態藝術創作研究(碩士論文)。樹德科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾緯民(2004)。野溪生態工法護岸與護岸草本植栽密度對視覺景觀偏好之影響(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.姜禮堂(2011)。休閒農場遊客之休閒偏好、休閒阻礙及休閒效益之研究--以宜蘭頭城農場為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳良睿(2008)。河川親水空間景觀規劃之研究-以高雄縣大社鄉中圳溪為例(碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.許旭輝(2008)。海岸灘地植栽景觀美質之研究(碩士論文)。中華大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張晉嘉(2010)。高雄愛河環境設施與休閒體驗之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄海洋科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.朱俊璋(2003)。優型樹的型態影響景觀美質之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.洪士翔(2010)。應用電腦模擬技術評估森林景觀美質(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.華鈺菁(1997)。都市堤防與河灘地美化型式對視覺景觀偏好之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.McAndrew, F. T.、危芷芬(1995)。環境心理學。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE