:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐陳岳《春秋折衷論》輯佚及其思想義旨析探
書刊名:東吳中文學報
作者:姜龍翔 引用關係蔡根祥 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiang, Lung-hsiangTsai, Ken-hsiang
出版日期:2018
卷期:36
頁次:頁25-66
主題關鍵詞:新春秋學古籍輯佚唐代春秋學微言大義春秋三傳New School of Studies on the Spring and Autumn AnnalsCollection and compilation of lost textsThe studies of Annals of Spring and Autumn in the TangSublime words with profound meaningsThree Commentaries of Spring and Autumn Annals
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:3
此文主旨有二,分別針對目前學界對唐代陳岳《春秋折衷論》輯佚成果進行探討補充,並藉由較完整輯佚條文對陳岳《春秋》學思想大旨進行勾勒。此文首先指出北宋杜諤《春秋會義》中收錄有大量《折衷論》條文,並依清代孫氏山淵閣本進行輯錄,再配合其他文獻,可得出目前最完整的《折衷論》佚文計二百三十五條。此文並藉由這些佚文資料分析陳岳對三傳取捨態度及義旨思想,認為陳岳較接受《左傳》,尤重杜預之說,貶低《公》、《穀》,認其為穿鑿取義,這與傳統所認知之唐代新《春秋》學風有所差異。此文又歸納出陳岳探求微言義旨之法,包括《春秋》主於勸懲褒眨,著重闡述王道思想、強調居正思想等。透過此文的研究成果,對於學界長久以來認為以啖助、趙匡等為代表新《春秋》學風重《公》、《穀》,輕《左傳》的說法,提出另一種不同面向,對於晚唐新《春秋》學之研究可有更深入認識。
There are two purports in this paper, one is to provide the supplement to the accomplishments done so far in academia regarding the collection of Chen-Yue's "Chun Chiu Che Chong Lun" and the other is to interpret Chen- Yue's main academic purport through a more complete content. First we indicated an enormous amount of articles recorded in "Chun Chiu Huei Yi" of Du-Ur in earlier Song Dynasty, followed by collecting related information according to the edition of Soon Shih San Yuan Ke in Tsing Dynasty and at last came out a more complete version of Che Chong Lun by referencing other literatures. This paper analyzed the insight of Chen- Yue's thinking via this information and suggests that he has the tendency of accepting "Zhuo Zuang", specially from the part that he valued high on Du-Yu's interpretation while looked down "Kong Yang" and "Ku Liang", which is different from traditional perspectives. In addition, we summarized Chen-Yue's analytic points, including the purport of "Chun Chiu", which conveyed the main idea of urging for goodness and punishing the evilness. It emphasizes on the idea of moderate politics and the concept of legitimism. Through the research results of this paper, we offered a different perspective on the long perceived thinking that new Chun Chiu school emphasized "Kong Yang" and "Ku Liang" but looked down to "Zhuo Zuang", as well as a chance for a deeper understanding of related studies.
期刊論文
1.江右瑜(20091200)。陳岳《春秋》思想析論。彰化師大國文學誌,19,181-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.胡楚生(20090500)。陳岳《春秋折衷論》析評。經學研究集刊,6,83-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.馮曉庭(2009)。陳岳《春秋折衷論》初探。隋唐五代經學國際研討會。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。593-623。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李宇東(2014)。《春秋折衷論》輯釋(碩士論文)。華中師範大學,武漢。  延伸查詢new window
2.段建棟(2014)。《春秋折衷論》輯釋(碩士論文)。華中師範大學,武漢。  延伸查詢new window
3.傅麗敏(2008)。中晚唐《春秋》學研究(碩士論文)。吉林大學,吉林。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.晁公武(1984)。郡齋讀書志。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫光憲(1985)。北夢瑣言。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.汪克寬(1983)。春秋胡傳附錄纂疏。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.歐陽修、宋祁(1988)。新唐書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.杜預、孔穎達(1989)。春秋左傳正義。臺北:大化書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.陸淳(1983)。春秋集傳微旨。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.杜預(1980)。春秋釋例。臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.陸淳(1983)。春秋集傳纂例。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.文廷式(2002)。純常子枝語。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.葛煥禮(2011)。尊經重義:唐代中葉至北宋末年的新《春秋》學。山東大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.何休、徐彥(1989)。春秋公羊傳注疏。臺北:大化書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.范甯、楊士勛(1989)。春秋穀梁傳注疏。臺北:大化書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.司空圖(1985)。司空表聖文集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.王定保(1985)。唐摭言。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.章如愚(1985)。群書考索.續集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.程端學(1983)。三傳辨疑。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
17.徐松、苗書梅(2004)。宋會要輯稿.崇儒。開封:河南大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.皮錫瑞、周予同(1983)。經學歷史。漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.朱彝尊(1998)。經義考。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.張穩蘋(2004)。啖、趙、陸《春秋》學中的「制經論世」觀研究。啖助新《春秋》學派研究論集。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE