:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以臺灣原住民部落文化與生態永續發展里山韌性指標評估模式之研究--以南投仁愛鄉南豐村為例
書刊名:觀光與休閒管理期刊
作者:王嘉勳陳榮俊李鎮洋施美琴馮詩維梁大慶 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Chia-hsunChen, Jung-chunLee, Zhen-yangShih, Mei-chinFeng, Shi-weiLiang, Ta-ching
出版日期:2019
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁139-156
主題關鍵詞:里山三摺法眉溪部落賽德克農村再生SatoyamaThree-fold approachMeixi-tribeSeediqRural rejuvenation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:3
國際「里山倡議」目標之永續產業及生物多樣性,在「生態」與「經濟」作為自然保育與在地發展並重的目標,也是近期政府推動農業發展的政策與方向,農村是主要的糧食生產的根源,提供當地社區需要的自然資源,但卻需要維護這種生態系統的永續性和土地資源不會匱乏。近年經常出現以「里山」為名的多樣相關活動、營隊、研習等,但部分僅為初期,目前正處於發展階段,尚缺乏明確評估及示範案例。為協助整體部落或農村發展正確的里山目標,在本研究中實際導入參考SEPLS(社會-生態的生產地景)之規劃概念以及里山倡議的「願景-方法-行動三摺法」,並選擇南投縣仁愛鄉南豐村一處具農村再生社區潛力的原住民聚落(眉溪部落)為研究目標,據此韌性指標評估里山之作法,試圖協同規劃的理論和質性研究方法,以參與式行動研究方式,促進在地村民、地方主管機關官員和相關專家之間的夥伴關係。協助主管機關和地方社區等權益關係者,分析傳統文化與復育生態或產業地景間之競合關係,經評估得到初步結果:原住民傳統概念「夠用就好」恰與里山精神不謀而合,大部分指標都相符,且部落居民對於整體部落發展認知度高。但在里山韌性指標框架下,在「治理與社會公平」及「知識與創新」之部分指標發現認知差異,未來值得再深入探討。
The International Satoyama Initiative's target on the sustainable industry and biodiversity is taking "ecology" and "economy" as the goal for both nature conservation and local development, which are also the policies and directions for the agricultural development that Taiwanese government pressing ahead shortly. The rural areas are the major source of food production, and it provides the natural resources needed by the local community, however, we need to maintain the sustainability of the ecosystem and the land resources. In recent years, there have been many kinds of activities, camps, and studies that appeared in the name of Satoyama, but some of them are only in the development stage, and still no clear assessments and demonstration cases. To assist the rural areas in developing the correct Satoyama targets, the planning concept of SEPLS (Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes) and the vision of the three-fold approach of the Satoyama Initiative are introduced in this study. We selected an indigenous community (Alang Tongan) with the potential of rural regeneration in Ren'ai Township, Nantou County as the research target. Based on the indicators of resilience from the Satoyama Initiative, we tried to coordinate the theoretical and qualitative research method that we planned, and promoted partnerships between residents, competent authority, and relevant experts. We assisted the competent authority, local communities, and other stakeholders to analyze the competitive relationship between traditional culture, ecological restoration, and industrial landscapes. The preliminary result of the appraisal shows that the indigenous traditional values "Just enough" track with the concept of the Satoyama Initiative. Most of the indicators are consistent, and the residents have a high cognition of the overall community development. However, under the framework of the indicators of resilience, cognitive differences are found in some of the indicators such as ''governance and social fairness'' and ''social Welfare''. There is something that deserves consideration in the future.
期刊論文
1.Healey, P.(1998)。Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning。Environment and Planning A,30(9),1531-1546。  new window
2.方韻如(20110600)。貢寮水梯田對里山倡議的實踐嘗試。林業研究專訊,18(3)=101,32-37。  延伸查詢new window
3.李光中(2013)。TPSI GO! 建立台灣里山倡議夥伴關係網絡。大自然季刊,125,70-77。  延伸查詢new window
4.李光中(20160600)。地景尺度著眼的里山倡議與生態農業。地景保育通訊,42,12-18。  延伸查詢new window
5.卓清波(2014)。「里山倡議」的概念框架與蝴蝶保育。蝶季刊,2,2-4。  延伸查詢new window
6.袁浩雲、曾竫萌(2017)。強化有機栽培花蓮區農業改良場發展屬於臺灣的里山倡議。豐年雜誌,67(10),70-74。  延伸查詢new window
7.梁大慶(20170600)。以結構方程式探討農村社區組織能力與發展面向之模式--以雲林縣農村再生發展進程為例。鄉村旅遊研究,10(1),41-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳本翰、徐培修(2019)。利用養蜂實踐里山倡議之台日研究交流。苗栗區農情月刊,230,3-3。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳美惠、林穎楨(20171200)。整合協同經營與里山倡議的森林治理--以阿禮與大武部落生態旅遊及資源保育為例。臺灣林業科學,32(4),299-316。  延伸查詢new window
10.曾竫萌、林立、范美玲、袁浩雲(2015)。當生態農業遇上里山倡議激盪出與自然和諧共生的台灣農村發展。花蓮區農業專訊,94,2-6。  延伸查詢new window
11.趙敏(2017)。臺灣里山倡議下一步--林務局從點至面串聯國土綠網。豐年雜誌,67(11),76-80。  延伸查詢new window
12.趙榮台(20141200)。社會-生態的生產地景:里山。自然保育季刊,88,4-13。  延伸查詢new window
13.趙榮台(20151000)。何謂「里山地景」?。林業研究專訊,22(5)=127,41-43。  延伸查詢new window
14.賴瑞聲、林立、楊舒涵、張素貞(20190600)。日本里山倡議交流及生態農業技術研習。苗栗區農業專訊,86,20-24。  延伸查詢new window
15.謝佳倫、方韻如、謝傳鎧、鍾國芳(20151200)。濕地植物保育新思維:由貢寮水梯田的植物多樣性談其保育價值的生態學基礎。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告,29(4)=290,279-291。  延伸查詢new window
16.鍾明光、盧道杰(20181200)。失落的里山:臺灣淺山客家聚落的發展歷程與環境資源保育。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告,32(4)=302,249-258。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Dunbar, W.(2019)。Concept of resilience in SEPLS。The International Workshop on Resilienece Assessment of SEPLS。  new window
2.松本郁子(2019)。如何在社區進行評估工作。社會-生態生產地景的韌性評估國際工作坊,行政院農業委員會水土保持局 。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.UNU-IAS(2011)。Biodiversity in Kanazawa. Through the four seasons。Kanazawa:United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies Operating Unit Ishikawa。  new window
2.仁愛鄉公所(2008)。仁愛鄉志。南投縣仁愛鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE