:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:由股東行動主義探討公司法第一七三條之一的「股東會召集權」
書刊名:國立中正大學法學集刊
作者:林喆睿
作者(外文):Lin, Jhe-ruei
出版日期:2020
卷期:66
頁次:頁181-234
主題關鍵詞:股東行動主義門口野蠻人門口狼群新資本金融主義避險基金公司法第一七三條之一臨時股東會Shareholder activismBarbarians at the gateThe wolf at the doorNew finance capitalismThe hedge fundArticle 173-1 of the Company ActProvisional shareholder's meeting
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.洪秀芬(20100600)。公司表決權制度之變革--公司法修正草案關於電子投票及董監事選舉制度之評析。月旦法學,181,63-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Choi, Stephen J.、Fisch, Jill E.(2008)。On beyond Calpers: survey evidence on the Developing role of Public pension funds in corporate governance。Vanderbilt Law Review,61(2),315-354。  new window
3.楊岳平(20181000)。評析公司法修正對股東行動主義的影響。月旦裁判時報,76,63-71。  延伸查詢new window
4.王志誠(20180200)。論股東之股東會召集權:以「公司法部分條文修正草案」第173條之1為中心。萬國法律,217,82-91。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳彥良(20181000)。持股過半股東召集股東會相關問題。月旦法學教室,192,22-25。  延伸查詢new window
6.王志誠(20131000)。股東召集股東會之權限及保障。華岡法粹,55,1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.姚志明(20130600)。少數股東之股東會召集權研究。中原財經法學,30,1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.今周刊(20180523)。地產大亨搶經營權掌控52%股權,大同恐變天。今周刊,2018(5月號)。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉承愚(20180800)。新時代公司法下股東會的新風貌。月旦會計實務研究,8,35-46。  延伸查詢new window
10.Coffee, John C. Jr.、Palia, Darius(2016)。The Wolf at the Door: The Impact of Hedge Fund Activism on Corporate Governance。Journal of Corporation Law,41,504-608。  new window
11.Fichtner, Jan、Heemskerk, Eelke M.、Garcia-Bernardo, Javier(2017)。Hidden Power of the Big Three? Passive Index Funds, Re-Concentration of Corporate Ownership, and New Financial Risk。Business and Politics,19(2),298-326。  new window
12.王志誠(20181200)。持股過半數股東之股東臨時會自行召集權。月旦法學教室,194,30-34。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳盈德(20181200)。評析公司法增訂第173條之1之若干議題。財金法學研究,1(3),367-380。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳彥良(20180400)。我國公司法現代化--2017行政院版公司法修正草案初探。全國律師,22(4),4-14。  延伸查詢new window
15.Dent, George W. Jr.(2014)。A Defense of Proxy Advisors。Michigan State Law Review,2014(5),1287-1329。  new window
16.Sharfman, Bernard S.(2015)。A Theory of Shareholder Activism and Its Place in Corporate Law。Tennessee Law Review,82(4),791-832。  new window
17.Tingle, Bryce C.(2014)。Bad Company! The Assumptions Behind Proxy Advisors' Voting Recommendations。Dal L. J.,37(2)。  new window
18.Tingle, Bryce C.(2016)。The Agency Cost Case for Regulating Proxy Advisory Firms。U. B. C. Law Review,49(2),725-787。  new window
19.Malenko, Nadya、Shen, Yao(2014)。The Role of Proxy Advisory Firms: Evidence from a Regression-Discontinuity Design。Review of Financial Studies,29(12),3394-3427。  new window
20.Fairfax, Lisa M.(2008)。Shareholder Democracy on Trial: International Perspective on the Effectiveness of Increased Shareholder Power。Va. L. & Bus. Rev.,3。  new window
21.Davis, Gerald F.(2008)。A new finance capitalism? Mutual funds and ownership re‐concentration in the United States。EMR,5(1),11-21。  new window
22.Hill, Jennifer G.(2018)。Good Activist/Bad Activist: The Rise of International Stewardship Codes。Seattle U. L. Rev.,41。  new window
23.Rapaccioli, Danielle A.(2016)。Keeping Shareholder Activism Alive: A Comparative Approach to Outlawing Dead Hand Proxy Puts in Delaware。Fordham L. Rev.,84。  new window
24.Choi, Stephen J.、Fisch, Jill E.、Kahan, Marcel(2010)。The Power of Proxy Advisors: Myth or Reality?。Emory Law Journal,59(4),869-918。  new window
25.Fairfax, Lisa M.(2011)。The Model Business Corporation Act at Sixty: Shareholders and Their Influence。Law and Contemporary Problems,74,19-30。  new window
會議論文
1.王志誠(2018)。論股東之股東會召集權:以「公司法部分條文修正草案」第173條之1為中心。股東行動主義與公營經營穩定平衡研討會,台灣法學基金會、臺灣上市櫃公司協會主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳蕙君(2018)。公司法增訂第173條之1股東自行召集股東臨時會之法解釋與適用。新公司法解釋與適用研討會,台灣法學基金會主辦 。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉連煜(2018)。現代公司法。新學林出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Balotti, Frankin、Finkelstein, Jesse A.(2006)。The Delaware Law of Corporations & Business Organization。Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory U.S.。  new window
3.Berle, A.、Means, G.(2013)。The Modern Corporation and Private Property。New York:Commerce Clearing House。  new window
4.Emanuel, Steven L.(2013)。Corporations and Other Business Entities。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
5.王文宇(2018)。公司法論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20180405)。老牌電梯廠永大爆經營權之爭,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/3070276。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20090701)。金鼎證改選鬧雙包 開發金42.9%股權遭封存 兩派皆稱合法,https://tw.appledaily.com/finance/daily/20090701/31749943。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20180514)。〈封面故事〉台灣股東會之最 拼湊出股東會發展史,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/weeklybiz/paper/1200244。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘姿羽(20180707)。大同條款牴觸證交法有解 顧立雄:二法擇一適用,https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201807075003.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉憶如(20191125)。陸資買大同恐成國安漏洞? 金管會重啟調查,https://udn.com/news/story/7251/4185922。  延伸查詢new window
6.(20171226)。就是要搶經營權!今年4起股東會鬧雙胞 股東領兩份禮,https://www.ettoday.net/news/20171226/1080029.htm#ixzz5bqj77iKf。  延伸查詢new window
7.張家瑋(20190604)。虹冠電 經營權變天?,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5710/3851965。  延伸查詢new window
8.(20180626)。寶佳攻台新金 宣告三年後捲土重來,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5641/3218889。  延伸查詢new window
9.(20180521)。寶佳持股逾76萬張 躍升台新金第一大股東,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5641/3153891。  延伸查詢new window
10.Starkman, Dean(20060123)。A Proxy Adviser's Two Sides: Some Question Work of ISS for Companies It Scrutinizes,http://www.hrpolicy.org/downloads/2006/WashPost_ISS_ProxyAdvisor_012306.pdf。  new window
11.Government Accountability Office。Report to Congressional Requesters: Corporate Shareholder Meetings: Issues Relating to Firms That Advise Institutional Investors on Proxy Voting,www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07-765/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-07_765.pdf,(GAO-07-765)。  new window
12.Larcker, David F.,McCall, Allan L.,Tayan, Brian(2012)。The Influence of Proxy Advisory Firm Voting Recommendations on Say-on-Pay Votes and Executive Compensation Decisions,https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/sites/gsb/files/publication-pdfcgri-survey-2012-proxy-voting_0.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.劉連煜(2005)。股東表決權之行使與公司治理。現代公司法制之新課題--賴英照大法官六秩華誕祝賀論文集。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳彥良、方嘉麟(2018)。股東會及經營權爭奪。變動中的公司法制:17堂案例學會《公司法》。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.游聖佳(2019)。試評公司法第173-1條「大同條款」。清溪公司法研究會論文集II,2018年新修正公司法評析。五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top