:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:法治原則包含民主嗎?一個當代理論的反省
書刊名:思與言
作者:顏厥安 引用關係
作者(外文):Yen, Chueh-an
出版日期:2022
卷期:60:3
頁次:頁90-164
主題關鍵詞:海耶克拉茲司法違憲審查史考特案包含式的法治觀HayekRazJudicial reviewDred Scott v. SandfordInclusive conception of the rule of law
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:0
期刊論文
1.莊世同(20170900)。論海耶克的自由主義法治觀:一個批判性的探索。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,46(3),665-702。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Fehrenbacher, Don E.(1977)。Roger B. Taney and the Sectional Crisis。The Journal of Southern History,43(4),555-566。  new window
3.Finkelman, Paul(2011)。Coming to Terms with Dred Scott: A Response to Daniel A. Farber。Pepperdine Law Review,39(1),49-74。  new window
4.Graber, Mark A.(2005)。Dred Scott as Centrist Decision。North Carolina Law Review,83(5),1229-1274。  new window
5.Higginbotham, Aloysius L.(1995)。The Ten Precepts of American Slavery Jurisprudence: Chief Justice Roger Taney's Defense and Justice Thurgood Marshall's Condemnation of the Precept of Black Inferiority。Cardozo Law Review,17(6),1695-1710。  new window
6.Marshall, Thurgood(1987)。Reflections on the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution。Harvard Law Review,101(1),1-5。  new window
7.Raz, Joseph(2019)。The Law's Own Virtue。Oxford Journal of Legal Studies,39(1),1-15。  new window
會議論文
1.顏厥安(2014)。平等與自由的限制--由第三種自由概念討論法治的概念觀。2013年世界華人法哲學大會。圓桌文化。263-287。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Sunstein, Cass R.(1996)。Constitutional Myth-Making: Lessons from the Dred Scott Case。The University of Chicago。  new window
圖書
1.Hamilton, Alexander、Madison, James、Jay, John、Goldman, Lawrence(2008)。The Federalist Papers。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Rawls, John(2001)。Justice as Fairness: A Restatement。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Hayek, Friedrich A.(1982)。Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy。Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
4.Raz, Joseph(1979)。The Authority of Law。Clarendon Press。  new window
5.Tamanaha, Brian Z.(2004)。On The Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Dworkin, Ronald(1986)。Law's Empire。Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Haye, Friedrich A.、周德偉(1973)。自由的憲章。臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hayek, Friedrich A.、楊玉生(2012)。自由憲章。中國社會科學。  延伸查詢new window
9.Allen, Austin(2010)。Origins of the Dred Scott Case: Jacksonian Jurisprudence and the Supreme Court, 1837-1857。University of Georgia Press。  new window
10.Fehrenbacher, Don E.(1979)。The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics。Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Finkelman, Paul(2018)。Supreme Injustice。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Hayek, Friedrich A.(2011)。The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek。University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.Jackson, Robert H.(1941)。The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Power Politics。Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
14.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition。Harvard University Press。  new window
15.Shiffrin, Seana V.、Kolodny, Niko、Brooks, Richard R. W.、Stilz, Anna、Ginsborg, Hannah(2021)。Democratic Law。Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Dworkin, Ronald M.(1977)。Taking Rights Seriously。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.(2019)。Dred Scott,https://www.biography.com/activist/dred-scott.。  new window
2.Finkelman, Paul(2020)。John Marshall's Proslavery Jurisprudence: Racism, Property, and the "Great" Chief Justice,https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/2020/08/31/marshallslavery-pt2/。  new window
3.Oyez。Roger B. Taney,https://www.oyez.org/justices/roger_b_taney。  new window
4.United States Courts(2021)。Overview-Rule of Law,https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/overview-rule-law。  new window
5.謝世民(2018)。拉茲的新法治觀,https://voicettank.org/2018-10-07-joseph-raz/。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Finkelman, Paul(2006)。Dred Scott v. Sandford。The Public Debate Over Controversial Supreme Court Decisions。CQ Press。  new window
2.Kagan, Elena(20070406)。Welcome Letter to the 150th Anniversary of Dred Scott v. Sandford Conference。Program of 150th Anniversary of Dred Scott v. Sandford: Race, Citizenship & Justice。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE