In The Feng Shui Detective Goes South (2002), Sri Lankan Hong Kong writer, Nury Vittachi, describes a Singaporean (a Chinese immigrant) Feng Shui
master/detective,master Wong, who travels to Australia for a transnational investigation
of crimes. When he comes to the Sydney Opera House as many international tourists do,
he deviates from the visiting route and transgresses the law by climbing up to the roof of
the Opera House. Accordingly, his “tourist gaze” turns into an “illegal way of seeing by
his personal and unofficial spatial practice. During his tracing and investigation, his
identity turns from an international tourist to a transnational detective/criminal in a
massive moving crowd in Sydney. Besides the truth of a transnational
kidnapping/intentional murder case, what sort of truth/authenticity can he detect under
his tourist gaze upon the scenery and monument buildings in Sydney?
Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space and argument of the “authenticity” for
tourists is mainly applied to the discussion of spatial practice and tourism in this novel.
Besides, Urry’s thoughts on the “tourist gaze” and “stage authenticity/inauthenticity”
conveyed by official tourist guides for boosting tourism industry are also applied to
expound the tourist in a globalization world. In this novel, the Sydney Opera House is
“represented” as a broken-bowl-shaped bad Feng Shui that brings stagnation of economic
第 1 頁
明道學術論壇第 15 卷第 2 期
growth and unrest of social order to Australia. How can an oriental Feng Shui
master/detective in Australia integrate his Feng Shui principles of “flow of ch’i” with
occidental spatial practice? What is the relationship between the spatial practice and a
detective (an international tourist? or a transnational criminal?)? How are they related
to the construction of capitalistic modernity in our contemporary global society?