:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣的醫療責任、糾紛與訴訟﹣﹣理論與實證的回顧
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:謝啟瑞
出版日期:1991
卷期:19:1
頁次:頁87-114
主題關鍵詞:糾紛理論責任訴訟實證臺灣醫療
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:30
     近年來,臺灣地區的醫療糾紛案件已有日益增加的趨勢,因此,現行醫療責任制度是否能有效運作,達到事前的阻遏效果和事後的補償效果,即成為各界所關注的議題。本文即針對此一問題,廣泛地討論醫療責任制度的理想與實際執行時所面臨的問題,並檢討臺灣現行規範醫療責任的相關法規及其執行時所造成的影響。本文的研究發現,我國現行的醫療責任制度醫師與病人雙方皆不滿意。現行制度不但無法有效發揮醫療責任制度所希望達到的阻遏作用與補償作用,同時也對醫療體系產生了許多不良的影嚮。因此尋求改革現行的醫療責任制度,如加強事前的醫療品質管制措施與實施無過失賠償制度,應是未來研究的方 向。
     The purpose of this paper is to investigate the operation of the current medical liability system in Taiwan. The primary issues that I address are on the following three aspects: (1) How the current medical liability system is used to assure the quality of medical care and to prevent medical injury;(2) How the system determines the liability if an injury occurs; (3) Whether the system can achieve its dual goals of deterrence and compensation. If rst provide a conceptual framework to analyze the goals of medical liability system. I then review the tort law used in Taiwan and discuss the major economic factors that affect the patient's decision of filing a claim . Finally, I present descriptive evidence on characteristics of medical malpractice claims in Taiwan for the past four decades. The analytic resultsshow that the current system cannot effectively achieve the goals of deterrence and compensation because the probability of finding physicians' negligence is too low. Also, the operation of the current system has many sideeffects that may hurt the quality of medical care. Thus, the reform of current medical liability system is needed.
期刊論文
1.Danzon, Patricia M.(1985)。Liability and Liability Insurance for Medical Malpractice。Journal of Health Economics,4(4),309-331。  new window
2.Reynolds, R. A.、Rizzo, J. A.、Gonzales, M. L.(1987)。The Cost of Medical Professional Liability。Journal of American Medical Association,257,2776-2781。  new window
3.Kolstad, Charles D.、Ulen, Thomas S.、Johnson, Gary V.(1990)。Ex Post Liability for Harm vs. Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes or Complements?。American Economic Review,80(4),888-901。  new window
4.Manuel, Barry M.(1990)。Professional Liability--A No-Fault Solution。New England Journal of Medicine,322(9),627-630。  new window
5.Polinsky, A. Mitchell、Steven, Shavell(1989)。Legal Error, Litigation, and the Incentive to Obey the Law。Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,5(1),99-108。  new window
6.古慧雯(19910600)。訴訟費用分攤問題:英美制度之比較。經濟論文叢刊,19(2),197-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Priest, George L.、Klein, Benjamin(1984)。The Selection of Disputes for Litigation。The Jouramal of Legal Studies,13(1),1-55。  new window
8.Shavell, Steven(1982)。Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Costs。Journal of Legal Studies,11(1),55-81。  new window
9.Brown, John P.(1998)。Toward an economic theory of liability。Journal of Legal Studies,2(2),323-350。  new window
10.呂鴻基(1990)。我國兒童的健康:過去,現在和將來。小兒科醫學會雜誌,31(Supplement B),77-78。  延伸查詢new window
11.邱清華(1990)。醫療過失能免除刑責嗎?。消費者報導,105,26-28。  延伸查詢new window
12.林世宗(1989)。最年輕的消費者控訴--摔嬰記。消費者報導,100,8-3。  延伸查詢new window
13.消費者報導編輯部(1986)。為什麼病人都是輸家?。消費者報導,66,10-13。  延伸查詢new window
14.May, Marlynn L.、Stengel, Daniel B.(1990)。Who Sues Their Doctors? How Patients Handle Medical Grievances。Law & Society Review,24(1),105-120。  new window
15.Shavell, Steven(1980)。Strict Liability vs Negligence。Journal of Legal Studies,9(1),9-25。  new window
16.Wittman, Donald(1988)。Dispute Resolution, Bargaining, and the Selection of Cases for Trial: A Study of the Generation of Biased and Unbiased Data。Journal of Legal Studies,17(2),313-352。  new window
學位論文
1.蕭錦鐘(197805)。醫療行為刑事責任之研究(碩士論文)。中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.朱明康(1979)。醫療過誤民事法律問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陶百川、王澤鑑、葛克昌、劉宗榮(1988)。最新綜合六法全書。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hsien, Chee Ruey(1990)。Disposition of Medical Disposition of Medical Malpractice Claims: Theory and Evidence。The Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica。  new window
3.U.S. Department of Health & Human Service(1987)。Report of the Task Force on Medical Liability and Malpractice。Washington D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
4.U.S. General Accounting Office(1987)。Medical Malpractice : Characteristics of Claims Closed in 1984。Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
5.Danzon, Patricia M.(1985)。Medical Malpractice: Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
6.吳基福(1984)。台灣地區醫療糾紛實況。台灣醫界雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Shavell, Steven(1987)。Economic Analysis of Accident Law。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
8.李聖隆(1990)。醫護法規概論。華杏公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Landes, William M.、Posner, Richard A.(1987)。The Economic Structure of Tort Law。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.李聖隆(1988)。淺談醫療法規與訴訟。消費指南--醫藥保健篇。消費者文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE