政策資訊擴散與多元觀點決策分析法之研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	政策資訊擴散與多元觀點決策分析法之研究
書刊名：	政治科學論叢
作者：	翁興利
作者(外文)：	Wong, Seng-Lee
出版日期：	1994
卷期：	5
頁次：	頁211-244
主題關鍵詞：	政策資訊；資訊擴散；多元觀點；決策分析
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:0 點閱:77

　　　　　以技術、組織與個人觀點為內涵之多元點決策分析法，主要係用以分析結構不良之政策問題。在任何社會科技問題中，例如公共政策制訂、策略規劃、社會影響評估、環境影響評估及其他領域，皆與多元點點之概念息息相關。根據多元點決策分析法，本文主要目的有二： 1.指出國內對擴散之不足； 2.從政策分析之巨視觀點，提出政策資訊之擴散研究以結合組織與個人之決策觀點。本文分成三大部分。首先，回顧多元觀點決策分析法之內涵。然後，說明擴散研究之重要性，研究貢獻，研究偏誤，與其克服之道。最後，根據文中所討論之理論背景，提出本文所發展之概念性分析架構。

以文找文

　　　　　Building on a technical perspective (T), an organizational perspective (O), and a personal perspective (P), multiple perspective analysis (TOP model) is expressly designed to address ill-structured nature of the policy problems. Concept of multiple perspectives is relevant to any sociotechnological problem found in areas of public policy-making, strategic planning, social impact assessment, environment impact statements, and other domains. Based on TOP model, the purposes of this study are: 1) to point out the lack of diffusion of diffusion research in this country, and 2) to propose an ideal macrosystem for policy analysis by creating a missing linkage between O and P perspective: diffusion of policy-relevant information. This paper is organized into three major sections: section one briefly overviews the substances of TOP model. Section two justifies the importance of diffusion research, and then looks at contributions and biases of diffusion research. Based on the theoretical background described in this paper, section three presents a conceptual framework for policy analysis developed by this study.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Dunn, William N.、Holzner, Burkart(1988)。Knowledge in Society: Anatomy of an Emergent Field。Knowledge in Society，1(1)，3-26。
2.	Cdvello, V.(1983)。The Perception of Technological Risks: An Overview。Technological Forecasting and Social Change，23，285-297。
3.	Maxur, A.(1973)。Disputes Between Experts。Minerva，11，55-81。
4.	Mitroff, I. I.、Sagasti, F.(1973)。Epistemology as General Systems Theory: An Approach to the Design of Complex Decision-Making Experiments。Philosophy of the Social Sciences，3(2)，117-134。
5.	Sjoberg, L.(1979)。Strength of Belief and Risk。Policy Sciences，2，39-52。
6.	Tversky, Amos、Kahneman, Daniel(1981)。The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice。Science，211(4481)，453-458。
7.	Allison, Graham T.(1969)。Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis。The American Political Science Review，63(3)，689-718。
8.	Kahneman, Daniel、Tversky, Amos(1973)。On the psychology of prediction。Psychological Review，80(4)，237-251。
9.	Kahneman, Daniel、Tversky, Amos(1979)。Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society，47(2)，263-292。
10.	Tversky, Amos、Kahneman, Daniel(1974)。Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty。Science，185(4157)，1124-1131。

學位論文
1.	Anderson, D. F.(1977)。Mathematical models and Decision Making in Bureaucracies: A Case Story Told from Three Points of View(博士論文)。MIT。

圖書
1.	EPA(1990)。Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection. The report of the Science Advisory Board Relative Risk Reduction Strategies Committee。Washington, D.C.：US Environmental Protection Agency。
2.	Kruschke, E. R.、Jackson, B. M.(1987)。The public policy dictionary。Santa Barbara, California：ABC-CLIO。
3.	Mitroff, I. I.、Mason, R. O.(1981)。Creating a dialectical social science: concepts, methods, and models。D. Reidel Publishing Co.。
4.	Festinger, Leon(1963)。A theory of cognitive dissonance。Stanford University Press。
5.	Churchman, C. W.(1971)。The design of inquiring systems, basic concepts of systems and organizations。New York：Basic books。
6.	Von Neumann, J.、Morgenstern, O.(1947)。Theory of games and economic behavior。Princeton University Press。
7.	Allison, Graham T.(1971)。Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis。Boston, Mass.：Little, Brown and Co.。
8.	Steinbruner, John D.(1974)。The Cybernetic Theory of Decision。Princeton University Press。
9.	Dror, Yehezkel(1968)。Public Policy-making Re-examined。San Francisco：Chandler Press。
10.	Linstone, Harold A.(1984)。Multiple Perspectives for Decision Making: Bridging the Gap Between Analysis and Action。New York：North-Holland。
11.	Ashby, W. R.(1956)。An Introduction to Cybernetics。London：Chapman and Hall, Ltd。
12.	EPA(1990)。Reducing Risk. Appendix A. The report of the Ecology and Welfare Subcommittee, Relative Risk Reduction Project。Washington, D. C.：US Environmental Protection Agency。
13.	EPA(1990)。Reducing Risk. Appendix B. The report of the Human Health Subcommittee, Relative Risk Reduction Project。Washington, D.C.：US Environmental Protection Agency。
14.	EPA(1990)。Reducing Risk. Appendix C. The Report of the Strategic Options Subcommittee, Relative Risk Reduction Project。Washington, D.C.：US Environmental Protection Agency。
15.	Quade, E. S.、Boucher, W. I.(1967)。Systems Analysis and Policy Planning。New York：Elsevier。
16.	Warner, M. L.(1974)。Environmental Impact Analysis: An Examination of Three Methodologies。Madison：University of Wisconsin。
17.	Wildavsky, A.、Tenenbaum, E.(1981)。The Politics of Mistrust。Beverly Hills, Calif.：Sage Publications。
18.	White, G. F.(1972)。Human Responses to Natural Hazard, Perspectives on Benefit-Risk Decision Making。Washington, D.C：National Academy of Engineering, Committee on Public Engineering Policy。
19.	Starling, Grover(1988)。Strategies for Policy Making。Dorsey Press。
20.	Almond, Gabriel A.、Powell, G. Bingham Jr.(1978)。Comparative Politics: System, Process, and Policy。Little, Brown and Company。
21.	Dunn, William N.(1994)。Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction。Prentice-Hall International Inc.。
22.	Holzner, Burkart、Marx, John H.(1979)。Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society。Allyn & Bacon。
23.	Rogers, Everett M.(1983)。Diffusion of Innovations。Free Press。
24.	Cyert, Richard M.、March, James G.(1963)。A Behavioral Theory of the Firm。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。
25.	March, James G.、Simon, Herbert Alexander、Guetzkow, Harold(1958)。Organizations。New York：Wiley。

圖書論文
1.	Slovic, Paul、Fischhoff, Baeuch、Lichtenstein, Sarach(1980)。Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk。Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?。New York, NY：Plenum Press。
2.	Freud, S.(1937)。Analysis Terminable and Interminable。Collected Papers。
3.	Lindblom, C. E.(1973)。The Science of Muddling Through。Perspectives on Public Bureaucracy。Cambridge：Winthrop Publishers。
4.	Slovic, P.、Lichtenstein, S.、Fischhoff, B.(1979)。Images of Disaster: Perception and Acceptance of Risks from Nuclear Power。Energy Risk Management。London：Academic。
5.	Thompson, M.(1982)。The Cultural Approach to Risk: The Case of Poverty。Risk: A Seminar Series, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis。Laxenburg。
6.	Watt, K. E. F.(1966)。Systems Analysis and Ecology。The Nature of Systems Analysis。New York：Academic Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	臺灣閱讀起步走計畫政策擴散相關因素之空間分析
2.	從公私協力觀點剖析非營利組織之功能與社會價值--以長期照顧政策為例

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫