:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:結業實習教師如何因應衝突情境--個案研究
書刊名:花蓮師院學報
作者:劉唯玉 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Wei-yu
出版日期:1997
卷期:7
頁次:頁45-76
主題關鍵詞:結業實習教師衝突情境
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
     本研究主要是以質的研究方法-持續深度訪談,企圖描述一位師院結業實習教師在 分發實習第一學期所經歷的衝突情境、其對衝突情境的因應策略,及其彼此互動所產生的現 象。 研究發現報導人經歷了四個衝突情境,分別是1.教師是專業人員,但學校卻是個科層體制 ;2.學校行政實際與教育法令規定不符;3.無法有效教導學生的不良行為和作業缺繳行 為;4.有些藝能科目不是教師自己的專長,卻要硬著頭皮教。 報導人因應衝突情境的方式分別是:1.滿足於過程自主而非目標自主;2.避免被排擠, 表現從眾行為;3.不斷變化獎懲辦法;4.自己想辦法。 第一個衝突情境和因應方式互動的結果產生了四個現象,分別是1.以學業成績達到某一水 準為目標,於教學過程中修正自己的教育理念,在嘗試錯誤中學習適合的教學方法;2.目 標至上、由結果來決定過程的正當性;3.達到學校所定的目標,在過程中實踐教師個人的 教育理念;4.形式主義。 第二個衝突情境和因應方式互動的結果產生了兩個現象,分別是1.不知何所遵循;2.「 理論」祇能用來「批判」,對於實務的引導卻完全派不上用場。 第三個衝情境和因應方式互動的結果產生了四個現象,分別是1.放任主義-天助自助者; 2.公平性受到挑戰;3.厭倦、無力感;4.改變期望,讓自己過得比較好一點。 第四個衝突情境和因應方式互動的結果產生兩個現象,分別是1.教學一定出問題;2.學 生的五育無法均衡發展。 最後研究者並根據發現提出建議。
     The purpose of this study is to describe a student teacher in his first semester the conflict situations he faced, his handling difficult situations' strategies and the interaction phenomena. This study found that the reporter experienced four conflict situations. First, the teacher is a profession but the school is a bureaucracy. Second, the reality of school administration is different from that of educational regulations. Third, the reporter is unable to correct students' misbehaviors and homework no delivering. Four, some artistic skills are not the reporter's professional specialty, but he still needs to teach. The reporter's handling difficult situations' strategies are first, satisfying the process autonomy instead of the purpose autonomy. Second, behaving like most people to avoid be excluded. Third, unceasingly change the rewards and punishments' regulations. Four, one need to figure out ways by oneself. The interaction of the first conflict situation and the handling difficult situation's strategy produced four phenomena. They are trying errors for suitable educational methods according to student school achievements; the end justifying the process; attaining school's goal, in the process fulfilling one's educational ideal and formalism. The interaction of the second conflict situation and the handling difficult situation's strategy produced two phenomena. First, the reporter does not know what to observe. Second, the theory is to criticize instead of guiding the practice. The interaction of the third conflict situation and the handling difficult situation's strategy produced four phenomena. They are lassie-faire; the justice being challenged; the sense of incompetence and changing one's anticipation. The interaction of the fourth conflict situation and the handling difficult situation's strategy produced two phenomena. First, the teaching will have problems. Second, the five educational goals can not achieve equally. Finally, the researcher offers suggestions according to the findings.
會議論文
1.劉唯玉(1996)。我國師範學院教育實習現況--一位結業實習男教師教學世界之探討。國小師次培育與教育實習學術研討會,國立台北師範學院承辦 。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳添球(1989)。國民小學教師教學自主性之研究--一所國民小學日常生活世界的探討(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張芬芬(1984)。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意願之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳美玉(1996)。教師專業實踐理論與應用。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Graham, H.、David, H.(1992)。Research and the Teacher: A Qualitative Introduction to School-based Research。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Guba、Lincoln(1988)。Effecve Evaluation。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.陳奎熹(1990)。教育社會學研究。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.郭秋勳(1995)。教師學生的權利與義務。教育概論。台北市:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE