:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:傳播管道與健康行為之關係研究:以嚼檳榔為例
書刊名:中華公共衛生雜誌
作者:葛梅貞李蘭蕭朱杏
作者(外文):Ko, Mei-chenYen Lee, LanHsiao, Chuhsing K.
出版日期:1999
卷期:18:5
頁次:頁349-362
主題關鍵詞:成年人檳榔傳播管道AdultBetel-nutCommunication channel
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:87
     目標:本研究在瞭解臺灣地區成年人接收有關檳榔訊息的傳播管道及其與訊息接受者特性、檳榔之知識、態度及行為之關係。方法:以1996年台灣地區1652名成年人之家戶訪視資料進行分析。結果:(1)接收檳榔訊息之管道多為電視、報章雜誌及親友;(2)年齡較輕、教育程度較高、學生及白領階級者較多由報章雜誌、單張小冊、海報、書籍、演講及學校師長等管道接收檳榔訊息,而原住民及居住在東部、山地地區者,較多從親友、醫護衛生人員接收檳榔訊息;(3)曾從電視、醫護衛生人員得到檳榔訊息者,在檳榔危害知識測驗上之得分較高,反對嚼檳榔之態度亦較強;(4)曾 從學校師長上課接收檳榔訊息者,嚼檳榔行為的比率較低。結論:建議檳榔訊息之宣導應針對不同的對象採取不同的訊息傳播管道及訴求,電視、報章雜誌及學校教育、醫護衛生人員之宣導管道應多加利用,以擴大檳榔危害訊息傳播的範圍及效果。
     Objectives: This research investigated the relationship among communication channels regarding betel-nut information, characteristics of the recipient, and betel-nut chewing knowledge, attitude and behavior. Method: A structured questionnaire was used to interview subjects in Taiwan from October, 1995 to February, 1996. Altogether, 1652 adults consisted the sample. Results: (1)The most frequently mentioned channels of betel-nut information were television, journals and relatives/friends. (2)Younger adults, who had a higher education, students or middle-class adults received betel-nut information from magazines, newsletters, brochures, posters, lectures and schooling. Aborigines, eastern Taiwan residents, and those who lived in mountainous areas frequently received betel-nut information from interpersonal channels (i.e., relatives/friends and health professionals ). (3)Those who had received betel-nut information from television, magazines, and health professionals, tended to have higher scores in knowledge about betel-nut chewing. (4)Those who had received information from television, and health professionals, tended to have stronger attitude against the use of betel-nuts. (5)Those who had received betel-nut information in school were less likely to chew betel-nuts. Conclusions: According to these findings, it is recommended that betel-nut information be focused on people who are rarely exposed to the relative information. The right channels should be used to approach the recipients. Communication channels s uch as television, magazines, schooling, and health professionals should be used more frequently to disseminate information related to the harmfulness of betel-nut chewing.
期刊論文
1.Flora, J. A.、Maibach, E. W.、Maccoby, N.(1989)。The role of media across four levels of health promotion intervention。Annual Review of Public Health,10,181-201。  new window
2.McGuire, W. J.(1964)。Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches。Advances in Experimental Social Psychoiogy,l,79-98。  new window
3.Leblanc, A. J.(1993)。Examining HIV-related knowledge among adults in the U.S.。Journal of Health and Social Behavior,34,23-36。  new window
4.Michielutte, R.、Diseker, R. A.(1982)。Racial differences in knowledge of cancer: a pilot study。Social Science and Medicine,16,245-252。  new window
5.張博雅(1996)。衛生署推動檳榔防治工作。衛生教育,17,863。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂昌明(19890300)。衛生所利用者對衛生教育單張、小冊的評價。衛生教育論文集刊,3,61-73。  延伸查詢new window
7.Wolitski, R. J.、Fishbein, M.、Johnson, W. O.(1996)。Source of HIV information among injecting drug users: association with gender, ethnicity, and risk behavior。AIDS Care,8,541-555。  new window
8.Griffiths, W.、Knutson, A.(1960)。The role of mass media in public health。American Journal of Public Health,50,15-23。  new window
9.O'keefe, M. T.(1991)。The anti-smoking commercials: A study of TV's impact on behavior。Public Opinion Quarterly,55,242-248。  new window
10.李蘭(19921200)。嚼檳榔預防教育先驅研究(2):國中生嚼檳榔預防教學實驗。中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌,11(4),295-303。  延伸查詢new window
11.李蘭、林慧宜、晏涵文(19980300)。預防國中生嚼檳榔之教育效果。醫學教育,2(1),49-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李蘭(19921200)。嚼檳榔預防教育先驅研究(1):國中生嚼檳榔現況及影響因素之初探。中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌,11(4),285-294。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃淑貞、徐美苓(19961100)。民國84年大臺北地區愛滋病媒體宣導內容分析研究。衛生教育雜誌,16,49-59。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李蘭、蕭朱杏(1996)。台灣地區青少年與成年人有關嚼樓鄉之認知與行為調查。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃湧澧、林立民、葛應欽(1992)。臺灣地區民眾抽菸、喝酒、嚼檳榔之現況分析。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳建仁(1993)。台灣地區癌症死亡率地圖集。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘家慶、王石番、謝瀛春、鄭自隆(1993)。台灣地區民眾傳播行為研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
5.李蘭(1993)。台灣地區成年人之吸菸行為及對菸害警語、香菸廣告和反菸廣告之認知研究。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ray, E. B.、Donohew, L.(1990)。Communication and Health。New Jersey:Hillsdale。  new window
2.楊孝爍(1987)。傳播社會學。台北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Elder, J. P.、Hovell, M. F.、Mayer, J. A.(1994)。Motivating health behavior-Social marketing and health communication。Delmar。  new window
4.Graeff, J. A.、Elder, J. P.、Booth, E. M.(1993)。Communication for Health and Behavior Change。Washington:Josseybass。  new window
5.行政院衛生署(1996)。中華民國八十二年癌症登記報告。台北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
6.World Health Organization(1988)。Education for Health。Geneva:WHO。  new window
7.Hamilton, L. C.(1992)。Regression with Graphics: A Second Course in Applied Atatistics。California:Wadsworth。  new window
8.Retherford, R. D.(1993)。Statistical models for causal analysis。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
9.Pfau, M.、Parrott, R.(1995)。Persuasive Communication Campaigns。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
10.行政院衛生署(1993)。衛生白皮書。臺北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
11.Rogers, E. M.(1983)。Diffusion of Innovations。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.。  new window
12.行政院衛生署(1996)。中華民國公共衛生概況。臺北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top