臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：科學證據與侵權行為法：美國有關邊得克汀訴訟的省思
書刊名：人文及社會科學集刊
作者：簡資修 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chien, Tze-shiou
出版日期：1999
卷期：11:4
頁次：頁587-613
主題關鍵詞：邊得克汀；證據能力；陪審團；科學證據；普遍接受原則；相對危險；信賴區間；公共利益訴訟；侵權行為法；流行病學；Bendectin；Inadmissible；Torts；Jury；General acceptance test；Daubert；Frye；Relative risk；Confidence interval；Public interest lifigation；Scientific evidence
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:89
　　　　　本文是以在美國進行的有關邊得克汀訴訟為研究個案，說明科學證據與侵權行為法的關係。該藥劑的服用者與其生下的畸形兒，向法院提起民事訴訟，要求該藥劑的生產者負產品的損害賠償責任的訴訟系爭之點是，該藥劑與畸形兒之生成間的是否具因果關係。經過同儕審查而出版的流行病學研究顯示，其在統計上無顯著的關係，則與之衝突的未經同儕審查的所謂專家證言，是否具證據能力? 另外，在涉及科學證據的訴訟，又應如何解決﹖又在訴訟中，如果有極大的差距，因而引發訴訟衝平的問題，往往又是訴訟對立當事人間的財力科學證據處理不當，造成是非不分，有何社會後果?最後，侵權訴訟程序是否終極解決科學爭執的適當場域?
　　　　　Based on the litigation of bendectin a drug prescribed for pregnant women, this paper explores the relationship between scientific evidence and tort law. In the litigation of bendectin, the case focused on whether infants born with deformities were a direct result of their mothers' taking bendectin during pregnancy. According to published and reviewed epidemiological data, the relationship between bendectin and deformed infants was not statistically significant. Consequently, the following questions are raised：Should courts balance equality and law in litigation involving scientific evidence? What are the social consequences of scientific evidence is purposefull misused? Are the courts the appropriate forum in which to resolve scientific disputes?
期刊論文
1.Black, Bert、Ayala, Francisco J.、Saffran-Brinks, Carol(1994)。Science and the Law in the Wake of Daubert: A New Research for Scientific Knowledge。Texas L. Rev.，72(4)，715-802。  new window
2.Brewer, Scott(1998)。Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process。Yale L. J.，107(6)，1535-1681。  new window
3.Giannelli, Paul C.(1980)。The Admissibility of Novel Science Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century Later。Colum. L. Rev.，80(6)，1197-1207。  new window
4.Green, Michael D.(1992)。Expert Witness and Sufficiency of Evidence in Toxic Substances Litigation: The Legacy of Agent Orange and Bendectin Litigation。N. W. Univ. L. Rev.，86(3)，643。  new window
5.Harvard Law Review(1995)。Developments in the Law: Confronting the New Challenges of Scientific Evidence。Harvard Law Review，108(7)，1481-1605。  new window
6.Kolata, Gina B.(1980)。How Safe is Bendectin?。Science，210(4469)，518-519。  new window
7.Skolnick, Andrew(1990)。Key Witness Against Morning Sickness: Drug Faces Scientific Fraud Charges。JAMA，263(11)，1468。  new window
8.Weinstein, Jack B.(1994)。Ethical Dilemmas in Mass Tort Litigation。N. W. Univ. L. Rev.，88(2)，469。  new window
9.簡資修(19960800)。侵權行為法的經濟結構。月旦法學，15(8)，15-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Angell, Marcia(1996)。Science on Trial: The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case。N.Y.：W. W. Norton。  new window
2.Calabresi, Guido(1970)。The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis。Yale University Press。  new window
3.Fleming, John G.(1988)。The American Tort Process。Oxford：Clarendon Press。  new window
4.Foster, Kenneth R.、Huber, Peter W.(1997)。Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts。Cambridge, Mass：MIT Press。  new window
5.Goldberg, Steven(1994)。Culture Clash: Law and Science in America。N.Y. Univ. Press。  new window
6.Huber, Peter W.(1991)。Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom。Basic Books。  new window
7.Jasanoff, Sheila(1995)。Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America, A Twentieth Century Fund Book。Cambridge, Mass.：London：Harv. Univ. Press。  new window
8.Litan, Robert E.、Winston, Clifford(1988)。Liability: Perspectives and Policy。Washington, D.C：The Brookings Institution。  new window
9.Rabin, Robert L.(1988)。Perspectives on Tort Law。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
10.Schuck, Peter H.(1987)。Agent Orange on trial: mass toxic disasters in the courts。Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bailey, Linda A.、Gordis, Leon、Green, Michael(1994)。Reference Guide on Epidemiology。Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence。Washington D.C.：Federal Judicial Center。  new window
2.Kaye, David H.、Freedman, David A.(1994)。Reference Guide on statistics。Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence。Washington D.C.：Federal Judicial Center。  new window
3.Lasagna, Louis、Shulman, Sheila R.(1993)。Bendectin and the Language of Causation。Phantom Risk: Scientific Inference and the Law。Cambridge, Mass：MIT Press。  new window
4.Holmes, Oliver W.(1992)。The Path of the Law。The Essential Holmes。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：936（臺灣：934，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67523944
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上