:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:環境稅的企業綠色投資效應研究--基於面板分位數回歸的實證研究
書刊名:中國人口.資源與環境
作者:畢茜于連超
出版日期:2016
卷期:2016(3)
頁次:76-82
主題關鍵詞:環境稅企業綠色投資面板分位數回歸Environmental taxEnterprise green investmentPanel quantile regression
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
企業綠色投資有助于我國企業建立良好的社會聲譽,實現企業的可持續發展。本文試圖從環境稅的角度,探討環境稅對企業綠色投資的邊際效應是正向還是負向?環境稅對企業綠色投資效應是否具有異質性?本文運用我國重污染行業上市公司的2008-2013年的經驗數據,用分位數回歸的研究方法對環境稅的企業綠色投資效應進行了研究。分位數回歸方法相比普通最小二乘法回歸,分位數能夠更全面的描述自變量對于因變量的變化范圍以及條件分布形狀的影響;分位數回歸方法與最小二乘法使用殘差平方和為最小化的目標函數相比,不易受到極端值的影響,估計結果更為穩健。研究發現:環境稅對企業綠色投資的邊際效應為正向并具有異質性,表現在:1從平衡面板的固定效應模型估計結果來看,環境稅對企業綠色投資投資額的影響是正向的,換句話說,在其他因素不變的情況下,隨著環境稅額的不斷提高,企業綠色投資額也會隨之提高;2從面板分位數回歸的估計結果來看,環境稅對企業綠色投資的邊際效應為正向并具有異質性,即低分位企業的環境稅綠色投資效應為正,但并不顯著;高分位企業的環境稅綠色投資效應為正,但呈遞減趨勢;中間分位企業的環境稅綠色投資效應為正,并呈遞增趨勢。本文研究結果的啟示是:1環境稅的出臺具有積極的意義;2環境稅的相關法律制定要注意因企業制宜,考慮企業承擔能力的同時兼顧效率和公平。本文研究結果為環境稅的出臺提供了證據支持、為完善環境稅的設計提供了經驗證據。
Enterprise green investment assists China’s enterprises in improving their environmental sustainability and international reputation. The present article examines the marginal effects on enterprise green investment of China’s environmental tax structure. In particular,it asks: Do environmental taxes have a positive or negative effect on green investment? And,are these green investment effects uniform or heterogeneous across firm categories? Environment tax effects on enterprise green investment are estimated with quantile regression methods,drawing on the companies listed among China’s heavy-pollution industries in the 2008- 2013 periods.For this purpose,the quantile regression method is compared with ordinary least squares regression( OLS). The quantile approach is more flexible than OLS is in representing the effects on the dependent variable of changes in the independent variables. It particular,it allows for the separate influences of conditional distribution shapes on statistical outcomes. Because OLS is comparatively insensitive to regression effects near the extreme values of the data,quantile regression is the more accurate and more robust when effects near the extremes differ from those near the center. In general,it is found that an environmental tax’s marginal effects on enterprise green investment are positive,but differ widely across enterprise sub-samples. In a fixed-effects OLS model,an environmental tax is observed to have a broadly positive impact on enterprise green investment. In other words,holding factors other than the environmental tax constant,enterprise green investment rises continuously with a rise in the environmental tax. In a quantile regression model,the environmental tax also has positive effects on green investment,but in magnitudes that differ across the sub-groups of firms employed in the analysis. And to be specific: 1Among firms with relatively low green investment,the environmental tax’s green investment effects are positive but not significantly different from zero. 2Among firms with very high green investment,the tax’s investment effects are positive and statistically significant,but are rather low,and very low among the very high-green-investment companies. 3Among firms with an intermediate amount of green investment,a green tax ’s green investment effects are not only positive and statistically significant,but are especially large. Furthermore,the effects rise as the larger green-investment companies in this intermediate group are encountered. In summary,the study finds that: 1 The environmental tax has a significantly positive effect on enterprise green investment,especially among firms with currently intermediate amounts of green investment; 2 In structuring environmental taxes,government should consider not only economically efficient pollution control,but factors such as the enterprise’s financial endurance.These conclusions have direct relevance for the environmental taxes soon to be instituted in China.
期刊論文
1.Koenker, Roger(2004)。Quantile regression for longitudinal data。Journal of Multivariate Analysis,91(1),74-89。  new window
2.包群、邵敏、楊大利(2013)。環境管制抑制了污染排放嗎?。經濟研究,2013(12),42-54。  延伸查詢new window
3.傅京燕、李麗莎(2010)。環境規制、要素稟賦與產業國際競爭力的實證研究--基於中國製造業的面板數據。管理世界,2010(10),87-98。  延伸查詢new window
4.唐國平、李龍會、吳德軍(2013)。環境管制、行業屬性與企業環保投資。會計研究,2013(6),83-89。  延伸查詢new window
5.張海星(2014)。開徵環境稅的經濟分析與制度選擇。稅務研究,2014(4),34-40。  延伸查詢new window
6.Arouri, M. E. H.、Caporale, G. M.、Rault, C.(2010)。Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Evidence from Romania。Social Science Electronic Publishing,81(5),130-139。  new window
7.Farzin, Y. H.、Kort, P. M.(2000)。Pollution Abatement Investment when Environmental Regulation Is Uncertain。Journal of Public Economic Theory,2(2),183-212。  new window
8.Maxwell, J. W.、Decker, C. S.(2006)。Voluntary Environmental Investment and Responsive Regulation。Environmental & Resource Economics,33(4),425-439。  new window
9.王金南、逯元堂、吳舜澤(2009)。環保投資與宏觀經濟關聯分析。中國人口.資源與環境,19(4),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
10.何淩雲、祝婧然、邊丹冊(2013)。我國環保投資對環保產業發展的影響研究:基於全國和區域樣本數據的經驗分析。軟科學,27(1),37-41。  延伸查詢new window
11.頡茂華、劉向偉、白牡丹(2010)。環保投資效率實證與政策建議。中國人口.資源與環境,20(4),100-105。  延伸查詢new window
12.畢茜、顧立盟、張濟建(2015)。傳統文化、環境制度與企業環境信息披露。會計研究,2015(3),12-19。  延伸查詢new window
13.沈田華、彭珏、龔曉麗(2012)。環境稅經濟效應分析的再擴展。財經科學,2012(12),82-89。  延伸查詢new window
14.彭峰、李本東(2005)。環境保護投資概念辨析。環境科學與技術,28(3),72-74。  延伸查詢new window
15.Orsato, R. J.(2003)。Competitive Environmental Strategies: When Does It Pay to Be Green?。California Management Review,48(2),127-143。  new window
16.Koenker, Roger W.、Bassett, Gilbert W. Jr.(1978)。Regression Quantiles。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,46(1),33-50。  new window
17.La Porta, Rafael、López-de-Silanes, Florencio、Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1997)。Legal Determinants of External Finance。Journal of Finance,52(3),1131-1150。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE