:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:泰國的軍人與文人關係
作者:陳佩修 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Pei-Hsiu
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:政治學系
指導教授:陳鴻瑜
學位類別:博士
出版日期:1999
主題關鍵詞:泰國軍人與文人關係泰國研究軍事政變泰王官僚政體市民社會ThailandCivil-Military RelationsThai StudiesMilitary Coupthe Kingbureaucratic politycivil society
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:73
摘要
泰國是一個典型的軍事政權國家,自1932年實行憲政以迄1991年政變的60年期間,共舉行了19次全國大選,也經歷了19次軍事政變。雖然政治陷入「惡性循環」,但泰國在全球「第三波」民主化浪潮中,也建立了所謂「半民主」政治;而「軍人與文人關係」的前景是攸關泰國政治民主化發展的關鍵。
本文從檢討「泰國研究」的理論與「軍文關係」的途徑開始,建構泰國「軍文關係」的分析架構,探討泰國軍人政治優勢的取得、軍事政權維持的策略、文人控制機制的建立,以及「軍人脫離政治」趨勢形成與展望。本文基本論證如下:
一、泰國軍文關係的發展脈絡印證了學界自1980年代末期以來所進行軍文關係研究「反思」的基本論點:「軍文
關係」問題不是在民主化初期就可以獲得解決,反而成為民主轉型以迄民主鞏固階段都將面臨的關鍵議題。
二、泰國軍文關係由「軍人支配政治」向「軍人脫離政治」的演變,是由「市民社會的力量」、「泰王的政治威 望」以及「軍文菁英的妥協」所互動形成。在促進此一軍文關係「轉型」方面,前兩項因素優於第三項因素 ;但在「鞏固」軍文關係消長的結果方面,則第三項因素優於前兩項因素。
三、「軍事政變」是觀察泰國軍文關係的最重要指標;經由計算這些政變發生的「頻率」及政變發生「時間點」 的分布,可以區劃出政變的「密集期」與「間歇期」,做為分析政變「成因」與評估政變「再發生率」的依 據。據此,可以推論:泰國軍事政變的再發生率將逐漸降低;而1991年政變後展開的間歇期愈長,則政變再 發生率愈低。
Abstract
Thailand is a typical example of military regime. Since the first constitution was promulgated in 1932, there have been 19 general elections accompanied by 19 military coups. Despite this ''vicious circle'', the Thais have created a ''semi-democracy'' in the third wave of global democratization in which the "civil-military relations" plays a key role in the fulfillment of the path of Thai democracy.
This dissertation begins with an examination of the theories and approaches of "Thai studies" and "civil-military relations". It then attempts to build up a dynamic model for the analysis of Thai civil-military relations. The issue area of this thesis includes: the military achievement of political dominance, the developing strategies of military regimes, the establishment and operation of civilian control, and the formation of military "disengagement " from politics.
This thesis argues that Thailand is a typical example to demonstrate that "civil-military relations" is a key issue not only in the phase of democratic transition, but in the process of consolidation of democracy. Besides, three elements of the dynamic model decide the outcome of the development of Thai civil-military relations, they are "the power of civil society ", "the political prestige of the King" and "the compromise between civilian and military elite". Moreover, "military coup" is the most important element to evaluate Thai civil-military relations. This thesis demonstrates the ''intermittence'' and ''phases'' of Thai coups by way of calculating their ''frequencies'', and try to explain the causes, as well as the outcome and effects, of Thai coups through two dimensions : the mass movement and the role of the King. The longer the last "intermittence" (since 1991) lasts, the more stable Thai civilian control regime is.
參考書目 ( 部分列舉 ) 英文期刊
Akin Rabibhadana, 1975. "Clientship and Class Structure in the Early Bangkok Period." in Skinner, William G. and Thomas Kirsch, eds., 1975. Change and Persistence in Thai Society: Essays in Honor of Lauriston Sharp, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press., pp. 43-59.
Anek Laothamatas. 1993. "Sleeping Giant Awakens? The Middle Class in Thai Politics." Asian Review 7 (Fall): 78-125.
Ayal, Eliezer. 1969. "Value Systems and Economic Development in Japan and Thailand." in Tilman, Robert O. ed. Man, State and Society in Comparative Southeast Asia. New York: Praeger Publishers, Inc.
Ben-Eliezer, Uri, 1997. "Rethinking the Civil-Military Relations Paradigm: the Inverse Relation Between Militarism and Praetorianism Through the Example of Israel." Comparative Political Studies 30,3 (June): 356-374.
Blair, Harry. 1994. "Civil Society and Democratic Development."a working paper of U.S. Agency for International Development (AID), February 18, 1994.
Burk, James. 1993. "Morris Janowitz and the Origins of Sociological Research on Armed Forces and Society." Armed Forces and Society 19,2 (Winter): pp.167-185.
Charnvit Kasetsiri. 1976. "Amnart Tangkarnmuang Khong Anachak Sukhothai." [ Political Power of the Sukhothai Kingdom] (in Thai with English transcription) Worasarn Thammasat (Thammasat University Journal) 5, 2 (October 1975- January 1976): 21-32.
Chen, Pei-Hsiu. 1999. "Non-Government Organizations and Democratization in Thailand, a Civil Society Approach." paper presented at the the 7th International Conference on Thai Studies, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, July 4-8, 1999.
Christensen, Scott. "Thailand After the Coup." Journal of Democracy 2,3 (Summer): 94-105.
Cox, Robert W. 1995. "Critical Political Economy." in Hettne, B. ed. 1995. International Political Economy: Understanding Global Disorder. London: Zed Books., pp. 55-74.
Dalpino, Catherine. 1991. "Thailand''s Search for Accountability." Journal of Democracy 2,4 (Fall): 61-72.
Darling, Frank C. 1971. "Political Party in Thailand." Pacific Affairs 24,2 (Summer): 228-241.
Embree, John F. 1950. "Thailand - A Loosely Structured Social System." American Anthropologist 11 : 1-12.
Feaver, Peter D. 1996. "The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control." Armed Forces and Society 22,4 (Winter): 149-178.
Gearing, Julian. and Roger Mitton. 1999 "The Military Must Reform: Chuan Leekpai Speaks as Defense Minister." Asiaweek, November 19, 1999, p.48.
Gearing, Julian. 1999. "A Fresh Approach: Like A lot of Armies Elsewhere, Thailand''s Is Undergoing Changes-for the Better." Asiaweek, November 19, 1999, pp.45-46.
Ghosh, Suchita. 1977. "Role of the Military in Thailand." Journal of Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis 10,2 (October-December): 142-156.
Hewison, Kevin. 1989. "Bankers and Bureaucrats: Capital and State in Thailand." New Haven, CT: Yale University Southeast Asian Monographs, No.34., pp. 14-23.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1956. "Civil Control of the Military: A Theoretical Statement." in Heirz-Eulau, Samuel J. and Morris Janowitz, eds. 1956. Political Behavior: A Reader in Theory and Research. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press., pp. 381-397.
Janowitz, Morris. 1974. "Armed Forces and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal." Armed Forces and Society 1,1 (Fall): 3-4.
Juree Vichit-Vadakan, "Thailand in 1984." Asian Survey 25,2 (February): 232-240.
Karniol, Robert. 1992. "Thailand''s Armed Forces: From Counter-Insurgency to Conventional Warfare." International Defense Review (February): 97-106.
Keyes, Charles F. 1999. "Buddhism Fragmented and Thai Political Culture in the Wake of Hok Tula, " paper presented as a key note talk at the 7th International Conference on Thai Studies. Amsterdam, 4-8 July, 1999.
King, Daniel and Jim LoGerfo. 1996. "Thailand: Toward Democratic Stability." Journal of Democracy 7,1 (January): 102-117
Kobkua Suwannathat-Pian. 1999. "The Post-1972 Constitutions: Preliminary analysis of Constitutional Monarchy a la Thailand." paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Thai Studies, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 4-7 July, 1999.
Lasswell, Harold D. 1941. "The Garrison-State." American Journal of Sociology 46 (1941) in Stanley, Jay. ed.1997 Essays on the Garrison State-Harold Lasswell. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Likhit Dhiravegin. 1970. "Contrasting Modernization in Chulalongkorn''s Siam (1868-1910) and Meiji''s Japan (1867-1912)." The Journal of Social Science 2,1 (January):
Marks, Thomas A. 1977. "The Military and Politics in Thailand: An Analysis of the Two October Coups (1976-1977)." Issue and Studies (January): 58-90.
McBeth, John. "A Profile of the Young Turks'' Camp." Far Eastern Economic Review 112,26 (19 June 1981): 44-53.
McCargo, Duncan. 1997. "Thailand''s Political Parties: Real, Authentic and Actual." in Hewison, Kevin. ed., Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. London: Routledge, pp. 114-131.
McCargo, Duncan. 1998. "Alternative Meanings of Political Reform in Contemporary Thailand." The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 13 (March): 5-30.
Nakata, Thinapan. 1987. "Political Culture: Problem of Development." in Xuto, Somsakdi. ed. Government and Politics of Thailand. Singapore: Oxford University Press, pp. 168-195.
Nakharin Mektrairat. 1991. "The Economic Base and Power of Modern Thai Political Parties." in Murashima Eiji, Nakharin Mektrairat and Somkiet Wanthana, eds. The Making of Modern Thai Political Parties. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economics, Joint Research Programme Series No. 86, pp. 55-87.
Neher, Ckark D. 1992. "Political Succession in Thailand." Asian Survey 32,7 (July): 585-605.
Niksch, Larry A. 1982. "Thailand in 1981: The Prem Government Feels the Heat." Asian Survey 22,2 (February): 191-199.
O''Donnell, Guillermo. 1978. "Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic Authoritarian State." Latin American Review, 13,1, (Spring): 3-38.
OcKey, James.1997. "Thailand: the Crafting of Democracy." in Southeast Asian Affairs. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 66-78.
Owens, Synthia.1992. "Thai Military''s Financial Power Remains." Asian Wall Street Journal, 16 June, 1992.
Pasuk Phongpaichit.1999. "Civilizing the State: State, Civil Society and Politics in Thailand." Amsterdam: the Wertheim Lecture Series,Centre for Asian Studies Amsterdam Press.
Piker, Steven.1969. "Loose Structure and the Analysis of Thai Social Organization." in Evers, Hans-Dieter. ed., Loosely Structured Social System: Thailand in a Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.47-64.
Pornpirom Iamtham.1987. "The Student-led Democratic Movement after 14 October 1973 Incident and Its Relations with the Communist Party of Thailand." Asian Review 1 (January): 4-44.
Prasert Chittiwatanapong. 1976. "The Modernization Base in Japan and Thailand." in The Emergence of Modern States: Thailand and Japan. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Ramsay, Ansil. 1979. "Thailand 1978: Kriangsak - The Thai Who Binds." Asian Survey 9,2 (February): 104-114.
Randolph, Sean R. 1979. "The Limits of Influence: American Aid to Thailand, 1965-1970." Asian Affairs: An American Review 6,4 (March-April): 157-165.
Rose, Elihu. 1982. "The Anatomy of Mutiny. " Armed Forces & Society 8,4 (Summer): 553-565.
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1996. "Foreword." in Danopoulos Constantine P. and Daniel Zirker, eds. Civil-Military Relations in the Soviet and Yogoslav Successor States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. ix-xxi.
Schmitter, Philippe C. and Terry Lynn Karl,1991. "What Democracy Is …and Is Not." Journal of Democracy 2,3 (Summer): 72-87.
Suchit Bunbongkarn. 1988. "The Thai Military''s Effort to Institutionalize Its Political Role.'' The Pacific Review 1,4 (March): 400-411.
Suchit Bunbongkarn. 1992 "Thailand in 1991: Coping with Military Guardianship." Asian Survey 17,2 (February): 131-139.
Suchitra Punyaratabandhu. 1983. "Thailand in 1982: General Arthit Takes Center Stage." Asian Survey 23,2 (February), pp. 172-177.
Surin Maisrikrod. 1993. "Emerging Patterns of Political Leadership in Thailand." Contemporary Southeast Asia 15,1 (June): 80-97.
Suthy Prasartset, 1995. "The Rise of NGOs as Critical Social Movement in Thailand.'' in Jaturong Boonyarattanasoontorn and Gawin Chutima, eds. 1995. Thai NGOs: The Continuing Struggle for Democracy. Bangkok: Thai NGO Support Project., pp. 97-134.
Tarr, Shane P. 1991. "The Nature of Military Intervention in the Countryside of Surat Thani, South Thailand." Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 23,3 (July-September): 24-38.
Thak Chaloemtiarana.1980. "Kwamkid Tangkarnmuang Khong Chompol Sarit Lae Rabob Karnmuang Baeb Pho Khun Upathum." [Political Thought of Field Marshal Sarit and the Political System of Despotism] (in Thai with English transcription), in Rak Muangthai [ We Love Thailand] Bangkok: Social Science Association of Thailand Printing Office, pp.34- 51.
Theerayuh Bunmee. 1973. "The Students Begin to Find Their Targets." Student Society of Thailand, (July 1973): 1-14.
Thomas, M. Ladd. 1988. "Limited Disengagement of the Military from Thai Politics." in Danopoulos, Constantine P. ed. Military Disengagement from Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 72-94.
Thomson, Curtis N. 1994. "Thailand''s May 1992 Uprising: Factors in the Democratic Reform." Asian Profile 22,6 (December): 487-500
Thongchai Winichakul. 1995. "The Changing Landscape of the Past: New Histories in Thailand Since 1973." Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 26,1 (March): 99-101.
Vatikiotis, Michael. 1998. "Young Turks on the Move." Far Eastern Economic Review 161,31 (July 30): 29-30
Wilson, Constance. 1978. "Thai and Western Approaches to the Study of Thai History: Interaction and Growth." in Ayal, Eliezer B. ed. 1978. The Study of Thailand: Analyses of Knowledge, Approaches and Prospects in Anthropology, Art History, Economics, History and Political Science. Athens: Southeast Asia Program, Ohio University, pp. 159-192.
Wilson, David A. 1962. "The Military in Thai Politics." in Johnson, John T. ed. The Role of Military in Underdeveloped Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wyatt, David. 1986. "Family Politics in Nineteenth Century Thailand." Journal of Southeast Asian History 9,2 (April): 16-29.
Yano, Toru. 1978. "Political Structure." in Yoneo Ishii, ed.1978. Thailand: A Rice Growing Society . Honolulu: The University of Hawaii Press, 1978, p. 113-138.
Zimmermann, Ekkart. 1979. "Toward a Causal Model of Military Coups d''Etat." Armed Forces & Society 5,3 (Spring): 387-391.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top