References
Ali, S. (1993). The reader-response approach: An alternative for teaching literature in a second language. Journal of Reading, 37(4), 288-296.
Allen, C. (1988). Louise Rosenblatt and theories of reader-response. Reader, essays in reader-oriented theory, criticism, & pedagogy, 20, 32-39. Also in J. Cliff (Ed.), The Experience of Reading (pp. 15-22). Porthmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Alwasilah, A. C. (2002). Critical thinking crucial to global success. Jakarta Post,
May, 2.
Anderson, G. et al. (1985). Differences in the free-reading books selected by high, average, and low achievers. Reading Teacher, 39(3), 326-330.
Applebee (1978). The child’s concept of story. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
Appleman, D. (2000). “I understood the grief”: Theory-based instruction to
ordinary people. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader-response in secondary and
college classrooms. 2nd ed. (pp.123-134). Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates. Also in N. J. Karolides (Ed.). (1992). Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and interpreting meaning in literature. (pp. 92-101). Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.
Asselin, M. (2000). Reader response in literature and reading instruction. Teacher Librarian,27(4), 14811782.
Atwell, N. (1988). A special writer at work. In T. Newkirk & N. Atwell (Eds.),
Understanding writing: Ways of observing, learning and teaching. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Benton, M. (1992). Secondary worlds: Literature teaching and the visual arts.
Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open UP.
Benton, M., et al. (1988). Young readers responding to poems. London:
Routledge.
Berger, L. R. (1996). Reader response journals: You make the meaning?—and
how? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(5), 380-385.
Bleich, D. (1980). The identity of pedagogy and research in the study of response to literature. College English 42(4): 350-366.
Bleich, D. (1978). Subjective criticism. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP.
Booth, W. C. (1983). The Rhetoric of fiction. 2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
Bosma, B. (1992). Fairy tales, fables, legends, and myths: Using folk literature in your classroom. New York and London: Teachers College Columbia U.
Boyum, J. G. (2000). Reader response at the movies. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader response in secondary and college classrooms. 2nd ed. (p. 77-92). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bottigheimer, R. B. (Ed.). (1992). Fairy tales and society: Illusion, allusion, and paradigm. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P.
Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Brown, J. & T. Gifford. (1989). Teaching A level English literature: A
Student-Centered Approach. London: Routledge.
Brumfit C. & R. Carter. (Ed.). (1986). Literature and language teaching. Oxford:
Oxford UP.
Buckley, M. H. (1992). Falling into the white between the black lines: When teachers transact with text. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and interpreting meaning in literature. (pp. 45-58). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carico, K. M. (2001). Negotiating meaning in classroom literature discussions.
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 44(6), 510-518.
Carlisle, A. (2000). Reading logs: An application of reader-response theory in ELT. ELT Journal 54(1), 12-19.
Carter, R. (1988). The integration of language and literature in the English curriculum: A narrative on narratives. In S. Holden (Ed.), Literature and language. Oxford: Modern English Publications.
Carrell, P. (1989). SLA and classroom instruction: Reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1988, 9, 233-242.
Chase, N. D. & C. R. Hynd. (1987). Reader response: an alternative way to teach students to think about text. Journal of Reading, 30(6), 530-539.
陳靖奇. (1992). 文學與臺灣地區的英文教學. The English Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 73-82.
Chin, Ching-fang. (2004). The effects of reader response approach on English poetry teaching in senior high school. A Master Thesis, National Chengchi University.
Chuang, W. S. & S. M. Wu. (2002, Febulary 22). Time to deliver educational reform. Taipei Time, 12.
Church, G. W. (1998). The significance of Louise Rosenblatt on the field of teaching literature. Doctoral Dissertation, University of New York at Buffalo.[UMI No: 9822124]
Clifford, J. (Ed.). (1991). The experience of reading: Louise Rosenblatt and reader-response theory. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Cooper, C. R. (Ed.). (1989). Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature. San Diego: U of California.
Corcoran, B. (1991). From transaction to resistance: An antipodean journey. In J. Clifford (Ed.), The experience of reading: Louise Rosenblatt and reader-response theory (pp. 147-164). Porthmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Cronin, F. C. (1992). A reader-response approach to The Catcher in the Rye: Key issues/Developmental questions. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader response in the classroom (pp.164-175). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crumbley, D. L. (2000). Using short stories to teach critical thinking and
communication skills to tax students. Accounting Education, 9(3): 291-296.
Daidone, J. (1991). Gallup study finds student attitudes on CPA career mixed.
Journal of Accountancy, 170(2), 20-21.
Davies, J. (1970). Language and learning. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Davis, T. F.& K. Womack.(2002). Formalist Criticism and Reader-Response Theory. New York: Palgrave.
Day, R. (2002). Critical thinking in the EFL classroom. In Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/Fourth Pan Asian Conference. 72-78. Taipei: English Teachers’ Association.
de Beaugrande, R. (1985). Poetry and the ordinary reader: A study of immediate responses. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, 1-21.
Dekker, M. (1991). Books, reading, and response: A teacher-researcher tells a story. The New Advocate, 4, 37-46.
Demers, P. (Ed.). (1986). The creating word. New York and London: MacMillan.
Dewey, J. (1984). The public and its problems. In A. Boydston (Ed.), vol.2 of John Dewey: The later works. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
Dias, P (1987). Making sense of poetry: patterns in the process. Ottawa: Canadian Council of Teachers of English.
Dias, P. & M. Hayhoe. (1988). Developing response to poetry. Milton Keynes: Open UP.
Dilenschneider, R. L. (2001). Critical thinking. Executive Excellence, May, 5.
Dillon, J. T. (1988). Questioning and teaching: A Manual of practice. London &
Sydney: Croom Helm.
Dorocak, J. R. & Purvis, S. E. C. (1998). Using fiction in accounting courses: Why not admit it? Advances in Accounting Education, 1, 69-92.Dressman, M., & J. P. Webster. (2001). Retracing Rosenblatt: A textual archaeology. Research in the Teaching of English, 36(1),110-145.Duff, O. B. (1992). Empathizing with the African-American experience: Role visualization through composition. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and interpreting meaning in literature (pp. 207-219). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dugan, J. (1997). Transactional literature discussions: Engaging students in the appreciation and understanding of literature. The Reading Literature, 51(2), 86-96.
Duke, C. R. (1984). The role of reflection, problem-solving and discussion in the teaching of literature. Paper presented at The 3rd Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English Spring Conference. 10p.
Durant, A. & N. Fabb. (1990). Literary studies in action. London and New York:
Routledge.
Eeds, M. & D. Wells. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning
construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English,
23(1), 4-9.Evans, E. (1991). Transactions overseas: Louise Rosenblatt and the pedagogy of literature in school in the United Kingdom and Elsewhere. In J. Clifford (Ed.), The Experience of reading (pp.63-76). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Fillion, B. (1981). Reading as inquiry: An approach to literature learning. English Journal, 70(1), 39-45.Flood, J., & D. Lapp. (1988). Research and practice: a reader response approach to the teaching of literature. Reading Research and Instruction, 27(4), 61-66.
Freund. E. (1987). The Return of the reader: reader-response criticism. London and New York: Methuen.
Furniss, D. W. (1992). Reading and teaching from the outside: Responding to native American literature. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and interpreting meaning in literature (pp. 198-206). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
Galda, L., & S. Guice. (1997). Response-based reading instruction in the elementary grades. In S. A. Stall & D. A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Gopen, G. D. (1984). Rhyme and reason: Why the study of poetry is the best preparation for the study of law. College English, 46(4), 333-347.
Graves, D. (1989). When children respond to fiction. Language Arts, 66,
776-783.
Griffithe, P. L., & K. L. Laframboise. (1998). Literature case studies: Case method and reader response come together in teacher education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(5), 364-375.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York:
Teacher Collage P.
Hancock, M. R. (1991). A case study investigation of the process and content of six-grade literature response journals (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1239A. (University Microfilms No. 91-27667)
Hancock, M. R. (2000). A celebration of literature and response: Children, books, and teachers in K-8 classrooms. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
Hancock, M. R. (1993). Exploring and extending personal response through literature journals. The Reading Teacher, 46(6), 466-474.
Hancock, M. R. (1992). Literature response journals: Insights beyond the printed page. Language Arts, 69(1), 36-42.Helliwell, R. (2000). Keys to critical. Management, July, 44-45.
Herz, S. K., & D. R. Gallo. (1996). From Hinton to Hamlet: Building bridges
between young adult literature and the classics. Westport, Connecticut:
Greenwood Publishing Group.
Hirvela, A. (1996). Reader-response theory and ELT. EFL Journal, 50(2), 127-134.
Holbrook, H. T. (1987). Reader response in the classroom. Journal of Reading, 30, 556-559.
Holland, N. N. (1989). The dynamics of literary response. New York: Columbia
UP.
Howes, A. B. (1968). Teaching literature to adolescents. Oakland: Scott,
Foresman and Company.
Hsueh, Y. P. (2001). Transaction-based senior high EFL literature Instruction
in Taiwan. A Master Thesis, National Chung Chen U.
Hu, B. T. (2003). Teaching English through literature: A study in the application of reader response theory in the teaching of literary works to senior high school students in Taiwan. A Master Thesis, National Chengchi U.
Huang, W. L. (1996). The head starters. Free China Review, 46(10), 4-11.
Jackson, D. (1983). Encounters with books: Teaching fiction 11-16. New York and London: Methuen.
John, J. (1986). Language versus literature in university departments. English
Teaching Forum, 24(4), 18-22.
Johnson, P. (1975). Getting acquainted with a poem. College English, 37,358-367.
Karolides, N. J. (Ed.). (2000). Reader response in secondary and college classrooms. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Karolides, N. J. (Ed.). (1992). Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and
Interpreting meaning in literature. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associations, Publishers. In Karolides, N. J. (Ed.), Reader response in secondary and college classrooms. (pp. 207-223). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Karolides, N. J. (2000). Role-playing experiences: Exploring readers’ responses to literature. In Karolides, N. J. (Ed.). Reader response in secondary and college classrooms. 2nd ed. (pp. 207-223). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kazemek, F. E. (1985). Functional literacy is not enough: Adult literacy as a development process. Journal of Reading, 28(4), 332-335.
Kintgen, E. (1983). The perception of poetry. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
Knapp, J. V. (2002). Teaching poetry via HEI (Hypothesis-Experiment-
Instruction). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 45(8), 718-729.
Knapp, J. V. (2000). Wandering between two worlds: The MLA and English
department follies. Style, 34, 635-669.
Kuo, C. H. (1997). Teaching literature to science students. The Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching. 350-357.
Langer, J. A. (1989). The process of understanding literature. Technical Report. Center for the Learning and Teaching of literature. Albany, New York.
Langer, J. A. (Ed.). (1992a). Literature instruction: A focus on student response.
Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Langer, J. A. (1992b). Rethinking literature instruction. In J. A. Langer (Ed.).
Literature instruction: A focus on literary response. Urbana, IL: National
Council of Teachers of English.
Langer, J. A. (1995). Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction. New York: Teachers College P.
Langer, J. A. & A. N. Applebee. (1986). Moving toward excellence: Writing and learning in the secondary school. Final Report to the National Institute of Education (Grant No. NIE-G-82-0027). Stanford: Stanford University.
Lazar, Gillian. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. New York, NY: Cambridge UP.
LeNoir, W. D. (1992). Influences of reader response pedagogical theory found in
teaching materials for three widely-anthologized short stories. Doctoral
Dissertation: Auburn U.
林伯英. (1987). 如何以較整合的方式改進國內大一英文教學. Papers from the
Third Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 57-74.
Lin, H. C., & H. J. Sher. (2000). Reader’s response approach to English poetry teaching. Selected Papers from the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching. 411-420.
Lin, Yi-Wen. (2000). The application of young adult realistic fiction and the reader response approach in EFL reading instruction in senior high school. Masters Thesis: National Kaohsiung Normal U.
Luce, R. (2000). Mending walls: Using a reader-response approach to teach poetry. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader-response in secondary and college classrooms. 2nd ed. (pp. 93-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Also in N. J. Karolides (Ed.). (1992), Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and interpreting meaning in literature (pp. 61-74). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
Lynch, B., & T. Hudson. (1991). EST reading. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. (2nd ed., pp. 216-232). New York: Newbury House.
Lytle, S. (1982). Exploring comprehension style: A study of twelfth-grade readers’ transactions with text. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University).
Mailloux, S. (1982). Interpretive conventions. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
Maitino, J. R. & D. R. Peck. (Ed.). (1996). Teaching American ethnic literatures:
Nineteen essays. Albuquerque: U of New Mexico P.
Many, J. & C. Cox. (1992). Reader stands and literary understanding: Exploring the theories, research and practice. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
Marckwardt, A. H. (1978). The place of literature in the teaching of English as a
second or foreign language. Hawaii: UP of Hawaii.
Marshall, J. D. (1987). The effects of writing on students’ understanding of literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 30-63.
Mathis, J. B. (2001). Respond to stories with stories: Teachers discuss multicultural children’s literature. Social Studies, 92(4), 155-160.
McAlpine, C. G. (1995). An analysis of the new criticism and reader response theories of criticism with implications for teaching literature in the secondary schools. Ann Arbor: UMI.
McCormick, K. (1991). “First steps” in “Wandering Rocks”: Students’
differences, literary transactions, and pleasures. In J. Clifford (Ed.), The experience of reading (pp.127-146). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Mcintosh, J. L. (1992). Student reader response journals in secondary English
classrooms as a meaningful base for the study of literature. Master’s Thesis:
York U.
Mezirow, J., & Associates. (1991). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A
guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Inc.
Nardocchio, E. F. (Ed.). (1993). Reader response to literature: The empirical
dimension. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1981). Reading, thinking and writing: Results from the 1979-1980 National Assessment of reading and literature. Denver, Co.: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Newell, J. (1984). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/protocol
analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 265-287.
Newell, G. E. (1996). Reader-based and teacher-centered instructional tasks: Writing and learning about a short story in middle-track classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 28(1), 147-172.Newell, G.E., & Winograd, P. (1989). The effects of writing on learning from
expository text. Written Communication, 6(2), 196-217.
Nissel, M. (1987). The oral responses of three fourth graders to realistic fiction and fantasy. (Doctoral dissertation, Fordham University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 4894A.
Nunan, D. (1997). Contemporary trends in English language teaching. The Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching, 422-435.
Ole, B. P. (1991). On the language-literature rift and the case for using
literature in language classes. Selected Papers from the Seventh Conference on English Teaching and Learning. (pp. 27-46). Taipei: Crane.
Parker, J. (1999). Thinking critically about literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(4), 473-483.
Petrosky, Anthony. (1982). From story to essay: Reading and writing. College
Composition and Communication, 33, 19-32.
Poe, E. A. (2000). Intensifying transactions through multiple text exploration. In N. J. Karolides (Ed.), Reader Response in secondary and college classrooms. 2nd ed. (pp. 193-205). Also in N. J. Karolides (Ed.). (1992), Reader response in the classroom: Evoking and interpreting meaning in literature (pp. 155-163). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
Price, M. (1989). Reader-Response Criticism: A Test of Its Usefulness in Writing
about Literature. New York: Peter Lang.
Probst, R. E. (1986a). Mom, Wolfgang, and me: Adolescent literature, critical theory, and the English classroom. English Journal, 75(6), 33-39.
Probst, R. E. (1986b). Three relationships in the teaching of English. English Journal, 75(1), 60-68.Probst, R. E. (1988). Response and analysis: Teaching literature in junior and senior high school. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
Probst, R. E. (1989). Transactional theory and response to student writing. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response (pp. 68-79). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Probst, R. E. (1992a). Five kinds of literary knowing. In J. Langer (Ed.), Literature instruction: A focus on student response. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
Probst, R. E. (1992b). Reader response theory and the problem of meaning. Publishing Research Quarterly, 8(1), 64-73.Probst, R. E. (1994). Reader response theory and the English curriculum. English
Journal, 83(3), 37-44.
Purves, A. C. (1988). The aesthetic mind of Louise Rosenblatt. Reader Essay in
Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, & Pedagogy, 20, 68-76.
Purves, A. C., & Rippere, V. (1968). Elements of writing about a literary work: A study of response to literature.(Research Report No. 9). Urbana, Il: National Council of Teachers of English.
Purves, A. C. (1979). That sunny dome: Those caves of ice: a model for research in reader response. College English, 40(7): 802-812.
Purves, A. C., T. Rogers, & A. O. Soter. (1990). How porcupines make love II:
Teaching response-centered literature curriculum. New York & London:
Longman.
Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical Criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
Roen, D. H. (2000). A writing-to-learn/ Reader-response approach to teaching Antigone. In N. J. Karolides. (Ed.), Reader response in secondary and college classrooms. (pp. 225-234). See also in N. J. Karolides (1992). (Ed.), Reader response in the classroom. (pp. 176-184). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rogers, T. & A. O. Soter. ( 1997). Reading across cultures: Teaching in diverse
society. New York and London: Teachers College, Columbia U.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1968). A way of happening. Educational Record. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1971). Patterns and process—a polemic. Use of English, 22(3), 203-211.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1985a). The transactional theory of the literary work: Implications for research. In C. Cooper.(Ed.). Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure. (pp.33-53). New Jersey: Ablex.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1985). Viewpoints: Transaction versus interaction—a terminological rescue operation. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(1), 96-107.Rosenblatt, L. M. (1988). Writing and reading: The transactional theory. Reader,
Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, & Pedagogy, 20, 7-31.
Rosenblatt, L. M.. (1991). Literature—S. O. S.! Language Arts, 68, 444-448.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1993a). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. In K. E. Holland, R. A. Hungerford, & S. B. Ernst (Eds.), Journeying: Children
responding to literature. Portmouth: Heinrmann.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1993b). Transactional theory: Against dualisms. College English, 5(4): 377-386.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory
of the literary work, with a new preface and epilogue. Carbondale and
Edwardsville: Southern Illinois UP.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1999). Literature as exploration. 5th ed. New York: MLA. Original ed. 1938.
Rouse, J. (1991). A transactional affair. In J. Clifford (Ed.), The experience of
reading (pp.197-208). Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Rubinstein, S. L. (1967). Composition: A collision with literature. In G. Tate & P. J. Corbett (Eds.), (pp. 79-83). New York: Oxford UP.
Salvatori, M. (1986). The pedagogical implications of reader-response theory. Reader, Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, & Pedagogy, 16, 1-19.
Salvatori, M. (1983). Reading and writing a text: Correlations between reading and writing patterns. College English, 45(7): 657-666.
Short, M. (Ed.). (1989). Reading, analyzing and teaching literature. London and
New York: Longman.
Sims, J. (2004). Analysis of incoming freshman: Listening improving, grammar and reading declining. Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching, 166-177.
Sloan, G. D. (1991). The child as critic: Teaching literature in elementary and
middle schools. New York and London: Teachers College, Columbia U.
Smell, R. D. (Ed.). (1995). Literature throughout foreign language education: The implications of pragmatics. Trowbridge, Wiltshire: Modern English Publications and the British Council.
Soter, A. O. (1999). Young adult literature and the new literary theories:
Developing critical readers in middle school. New York and London: Teachers College, Columbia U.
Squire, J. (1964). The responses of adolescents while reading four short stories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Stevenson, F. (1997). Literature as reflection on/of language. The Proceedings of the Six International Symposium on English Teaching, 686-691.
Stibbs, A. (1991). Reading narrative as literature: Signs of life. Milton Keynes:
Open UP.
Suleiman, S. R. & I. Crosman. (Ed.). (1980). The reader in the text: Essays on
audience and interpretation. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Thomson, J. (1987). Understand teenager’s reading. Melbourne: Methueu.
Tiemey, R. J. Sota, A., O’Flahavan, J. F., & McGinley,W. (1989). The effects of
reading and writing upon thinking critically. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 134-169.
Tompikins, J. P. (Ed.). (1992). Reader-response criticism: From Formalism to
Post-structualism. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins UP.
Tseng, Heng-hsiung. (1993). The triangular relationship among English teaching,
literature and linguistics: On Andersen’s “Paper Pills.” Papers from the Tenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning. Taipei: Crane.
Tzeng, J. L. (2001). National reading week for children. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China, 522-524.
Varvel, L. (2000). Reader response to drama: Prospecting for human understandings and connections. In Karolides, N. J. (Ed.). (2000). Reader response in secondary and college classrooms. 2nd ed. (pp. 159-177). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Vipond, D., Hunt, R. (1984). Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary reading. Poetics, 13, 261-277.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thought and language. P. D. Arnott (Trans & Ed. 1962), New York: MIT.
Wang, Bernice Y. L., et al. (2002). Effects of guided journal writing on students’ story understanding. Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 179-192.
Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Widdowson, H. (1985). The teaching, learning, and study of literature. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Ed.), English in the world. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Teaching Materials Cited
de Maupassant, G. (2003). The necklace. In B. Goodman, Literature for English: Intermediate level (pp. 92-97, 104-109). Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill/Contemporary.
Denver, J. (1980). Perhaps love. Cherry Lane Music Publishing Co., Inc.
Hemingway, E. (1953). Cat in the rain. In E. Hemingway, In our time. Macmillan: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Hughes, L. (1995). Thank you, m’am. In G. Fearon, Reading comprehension workshop: Reflections (pp. 14-21). Paramus, NJ: Educational Publisher.
Robinson, N. (2000). Mom, you’re fired! In E. Fry, Reading drills: Jamestown’s reading improvement: Introductory level (pp. 48-51). Lincolnwood, IL: Jamestown Publishers.
Rably, S. (1998). A mother’s story. In R. R. Day & J. Yamanaka. Impact issues: 30 key issues to help you express yourself in English (pp. 29-30). Hong Kong: Longman.
Munro, H. (2000). The open window. In A. Martin & R. Hill (Ed.), Modern short stories (pp. 10-14). Longman: Pearson Education Limited.
Wilde, O. (2000). The nightingale and the rose. In A. Martin & R. Hill (Ed.), Modern short stories (pp. 80-86). Longman: Pearson Education Limited.