:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以技術體制補充技術鑑價方法之探索性研究:以權利金為例
作者:李沿儒
作者(外文):Yan-Ru Li
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
指導教授:陳怡之
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2005
主題關鍵詞:技術鑑價技術體制技術典範技術軌跡技術多樣化技術私有化technological regimetechnology valuationtechnology paradigmtechnology trajectorytechnology appropriabilitytechnology d
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:45
在實務工作上,鑑價是購併(M&A)、合資(joint venture)、策略聯盟(strategic alliance)、共同開發(co-development)、融資借款與授權(licensing)工作之基礎。據學者保守估計西元1999年全球技術授權市場規模高達1100億美金,這個數字是台灣光電產業的2003年總投資金額的15倍或者台積電稅前盈餘的70倍。而技術之鑑價,有別於固定資產之估算,主要的原因是技術價值可由財務、技術與企業策略等不同邏輯來思考,雖然代表技術鑑價有著不可忽視的重要性,但亦具有不可避免的困難性。然而過去的技術鑑價文獻主要是以財務觀點和策略觀點進行研究,本研究則建立了從技術觀點出發的一種理性的分析方法,可以用來補充傳統的鑑價觀點。
本研究透過1990年1月至2005年4月期間的數千筆新聞與期刊資料進行理論文獻之回顧,採取歸納真實現象與理論發展並重的方式來建立本研究之概念性架構,期間為確保本研究架構可包含不同背景專家所陳述的關鍵事件,特別進行一系列的訪談。本研究最後,透過三個科技產業個案之討論,提出實務與學術上之意涵。
Technology valuation is a very important task that has provided the core information of high-tech investments and R&D decision-makings such as M&A, joint ventures, strategic alliances, co-development, and licensing. Researchers estimate the global scale of technology licensing in 1999 at up to $110 billion, and this number is 15 times the total investment of Taiwan’s optical-electronics industry in 2003 and 70 times the pre-tax revenues of TSMC. Technology valuation is not as the same as fixed assets, which should count from financial, technological, and strategic logic; thus, it is difficult in its nature. However, while researchers focus on financial and strategic viewpoints over the past years, this research develops a reasonable structure on the basis of s technological regime in order to complement the traditional viewpoints.
This study reviews the materials of newspaper reports and journal articles from January 1999 to April 2005, and then we establish the conceptual structure on the basis of inductive reasoning. To ensure the construct validity, this study also implements critical incident research to collect experts’ opinions to be included in our constructs. Finally, this study discusses three complete cases and proposes several academic and managerial implications.
中文部分
吳豐祥(2002),「技術鑑價的八大考量」,工商時報,2002年9月24日。
李沿儒(2005),「光儲存產業權利金與技術特性的關係」,《DVD通訊》,第97期。
李沿儒、陳怡之(2002),「威盛對新經濟企業經營的啟示-智慧財產權之個案研究」,《2002年全國科技法律研討會論文集》。
周延鵬(2005),「創新智慧資源規劃擴展全球競爭優勢」,未出版資料。
張孟元(2001),「無形資產中技術價值影響因素與評估模式之研究」,未出版博士論文,國立政治大學資訊管理學系。
陳怡之(1995),《技術移轉與行銷課程教材》,元智大學。
陳怡之(2002),「知識產業發展-無形資產技術鑑價及產業政策意涵」, 《科技發展政策報導》,SR9111期。
陳怡之、李沿儒(2003),「結合專利分析與技術策略之技術鑑價模型發展」,《2003年全國科技法律研討會》。
陳怡之、李沿儒(2004),「威盛對新經濟企業經營的啟示-智慧財產權之個案研究」,《產業管理學報》,第八卷第五期。
陳怡之、李沿儒、巫嘉哲(2003),「技術鑑價方法應用與個案分析」,《2003中華民國科技管理論文研討會論文集》。
陳怡之、林博文(2002),「技術資產評價:工具、策略與政策意涵」,《2002經濟部技術處學界科專非技術領域學術研討會論文集》。
湯谷清(2004),《生技產業技術鑑價模式分析》,經濟部技術處。
英文部分
Abbott, G.B., 2003. Maximizing royalties: converting technology value to income streams. The Licensing Journal, August, 1-5.
Adner, R., 2004. A demand-based perspective on the technology life cycle, in: Baum, J.A.C. and McGahan, A.M. (Eds.), Advances in Strategic Management Volume 21.
Afuah, A., 2003. Innovation Management (2nd edition). Oxford University Press: New York.
Amram, M., 2000. Bank of America roundtable on the real options approach to creating value in the new economy. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 13, 45-63.
Amram, M., Kulatilaka, N., 1999. Real Options. Harvard Business School Press.
Andonian, J.K., 1991. New method to determine royalty rates. Les Nouvelles June, 58-60.
Archibugi, D., Pianta M., 1992. Specialisation and size of technological activities in industrial countries: the analysis of patent data. Research Policy 21, 79-93.
Arnold, T., Headley, T., 2003. Factors in pricing license. In Razgaitis, R., (eds), Valuation and Pricing of Technology-Based Intellectual Property. John Wiley & Sons, 137-144.
Arrow, A., Kossovsky, N., 2001. Valuing intellectual property: the art, the science and the meaning of the mean, Les Nouvelles September, 91-94.
Arrow, K., 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resource for invention. In National Bureau of Economic Research, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. New York.
Astebro, T., 2004. Key Success factors for technological entrepreneurs' R&D projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51, 314-321.
Banerjee, A., 2003. Real option valuation of a pharmaceutical company. The Journal for Decision Makers 28, 61-73.
Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99-120.
Betton, P. 1999. 5% solution to pricing software IP. Les Nouvelles September, 146-148.
Betz, F., 1997. Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change. Wiley.
Betz, F., 2003. Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change. Wiley.
Black, F., Scholes, M., 1973. The real options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654.
Boer, F.P., 1998. Traps, pitfalls and snares in the valuation of technology. Research Technology Management 41, 45-54.
Boer, F.P., 1999. How do you assess the value of your technology? Chemtech 29, 14-21.
Boer, F.P., 2000. Valuation of technology using “Real Options”. Research Technology Management 43, 26-30.
Boer, F.P., 2003. Risk-adjusted valuation of R&D projects’, Research Technology Management 46, 50-58.
Breschi, D., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 2000, Technological regimes and shumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal 110, 388-410.
Buzzacchi, L., Colombo, M.G.., Mariotti, S., 1995. Technological regimes and innovation in services: the case of the Italian banking industry. Research Policy 24, 151-168.
Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W., 1959. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multi-Method Matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56, 81-105.
Carter, R., Edwards, D., 2001. Financial analysis extends management of R&D. Research Technology Management 44, 47-57.
Chen, Y.C., Li, Y.R., 2004. The development of a contingent valuation model integrating technology strategies and valuation: the application of patent analysis. Presented in Portland International Conference on Management of Technology.
Chen, Y.C., Li, Y.R., 2005. Managing technology evaluation process. Presented in 14th International Conference on Management of Technology Proceeding.
Choi, W., Weinstein, R., 2001. An analytical solution to reasonable royalty rate calculations. The Journal of Law and Technology 41, 49-64.
Christensen, C., 1992. Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Production and Operation Management 1, 358 -366.
Christensen, C.M., Leslie, D., 2000. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. High Bridge Company.
Christensen, C.M., Rosenbloom, R.S., 1995. Explaining the Attacker's Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics, and the Value Network. Research Policy 24, 233-257.
Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T., 1976. The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In Dunnette, M.D. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally.
Cope, J., Watts, G., 2000. Learning by doing: an exploration of experiences, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior 6, 104-124.
Damodaran, A. 2001. The Dark Side of Valuation. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Degnan, S.A., 2002. The Use of Conjoint Analysis to Establish the Most Important Evaluation Factors in Technology Transfer and Patent Licensing Negotiation. School of Business, Golden Gate University.
Dixit, A, Pindyck, R., 1995. The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review May-June, 105-115.
Dosi, G., 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical Change, Research Policy 11, 147-162.
Dosi, G., 1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1120-1171.
Drinkwater, D., 2003. IP roadmap to value. Les Nouvelles March, 27-31.
Flanagan, J., 1954. The critical incident technique. Psycological Bullitin 51, 327-358.
Foster, R., 1986. Innovation, the attacker’s advantage. Simon and Schuster: New York.
Foster, R.N., 1982. A call for vision in Managing Technology. Business Week May 24, 24-33.
Funk, J.L., 2003. Standards, dominant designs and preferential acquisition of complementary assets through slight information advantages. Research Policy 32, 1325-1341.
Goldscheider, R., Jarosz, J., Mulhern, C., 2002. Use of the 25 percent rule in valuing IP. Les Nouvelles December, 123-133.
Granstrand, O., 1998. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy 27, 465-489.
Graves, S.B., Ringuest, J.L., 1991. Evaluating competing R&D investments. Research Technology Management 34, 32-35.
Grindley, P.C., Teece, D.J., 1997. Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review 39, 8–41.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F.M., Vopel, K., Citation frequency and the value of patented innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 511-515.
Henderson, R. 1995. Of life cycles real and imaginary: the unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography. Research Policy 24, 631-643.
Hodder, J.E., Riggs, H.E., 1985. Pitfalls in evaluating risky projects. Harvard Business Reviews January-February, 128-135.
Hoehn, J.P., Randall. A., 1989. Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test. American Economic Review 79, 544-551.new window
Holbrook, D., Cohen, W.M., Hounshell, D.A., 2000. The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1017-1041.
Huchzermeier, A., Loch, C.H., 2001. Project management under risk: using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Science 47, 85-101.
Hur, K.I., Watanabe, C., 2002. Dynamic process of technology spillover: a transfer function approach. Technovation 22, 437-444.
Jick, T.D., 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 602-611.
Kaulio, M.A., 2003. Initial conditions or process of development? Critical incidents in the early stages of new ventures. R & D Management 33, 165-175.
Kemp, R., Schot, J., Hoogma, R., 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10, 175-195.
Khalil, T.M., 2000. Management of Technology. McGraw-Hill.
Khoury S., Daniele J., Germeraad P., 2001. Selection and application of intellectual property valuation methods in portfolio management and value extraction. les Nouvelles September, 77–86.
Kim, Y., 2004a. An analysis of the incentives to licensing in U.S. information technology. Journal of American Academy of Business 5, 31-26.
Kim, Y., 2004b. Market structure and technology licensing: evidence from US manufacturing. Applied Economics Letters 11, 631-637.
Koo, B., 1998. The Economics of Plant Genetic Resources: The Effects of Alternative Intellectual Property Protection Systems and Advances in Biotechnology. University of California, Berkerley.
Kuhn, T., 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago University Press.
Kuhn, T.S., 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Kuwahara, Y., Takeda, Y., 1990. Managerial approach to research and development cost-effectiveness evaluation. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 37, 134-138.
Kwak, M., 2004. Maximizing innovation in alliances. MIT Sloan Management Review. 46, 5-6.
Lander, L., Matheson, D., Menke, M.M., Ransley, D.L., 1995. Improving the R&D decision process. Research Technology Management Jan-Feb. 40-43.
Lee, C.S., 1997. Strategy Formulation in a Newly Industrialized Country’s Strategic Technical Alliances – A Case Study of Taiwan’s Electronics Industry. George Washington University.
Leslie, K.L., Michaels, M.P., 2000. The real power of real options, McKinsey Quarterly Anthology: On Strategy, McKinsey & Company.
Lev, B., 2003. The measurement, valuation, and reporting of intangible assets. FRBNY Economic Policy Review September, 17-22.
Lever, O.W., 1997. Selling and marketing of R&D. Research Technology Management 40, 39-45.
Link, A.N., 1993. Methods for evaluating the return of R&D. In Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice, ed. By Bozeman, B. and Mellers, J. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lint, O., Pennings, E., 2001. An option approach to the new product development process: a case study at Philips Electronics. R&D Management 31, 163-172.
Llerena, P., Oltra, V., 2002. Diversity of innovative strategy as a source of technological performance. Structure Change and Economic Dynamics 13, 179-202.
Luehrman, T.A., 1997. What’s it worth? Harvard Business Reviews May-June, 132-142.
Luehrman, T.A., 1998. Strategy as a portfolio of real options. Harvard Business Review 76, 89-99.
MacMillan, I.C., McGrath, R.G., 2002. Crafting R&D project portfolios. Research Technology Management Sep-Oct, 48-59.
Malerba F., Orsenigo, L., 1997. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change 6, 83-117.
Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., 1993, Technological regimes and firm behavioour. Industrial and Corporate Change 2, 45-72
Mansfield, E., 1981. Composition of R&D expenditures: relationship to size of firm, concentration, and innovative output. Review of Economics and Statistics 63, 610-615.
Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., Wagner, S., 1981. Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study. Economic Journal 91, 907-918.
Marsili, O., 2002. Technological regimes and sources of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 19, 217-231.
Martin, J., 1996. Energy technologies: systemic aspects, technological trajectories, and institutional frameworks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 53, 81-95.
Martino, J.P., 1983. Technological Forecasting for Decision Making. 2nd ed., North-Holland, New York.
Matsunaga, Y., 1983. Determing reasonable royalty rate. LES Nouvelles December, 216-219.
McGavock, D., Haas, D., Patin, M., 1992. Factors affecting royalty rates. Les Nouvelles June, 107-116.
McGrath, R.G., 1997. A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review 22, 974-996.
McGrath, R.G., Nerkar, A., 2004. Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal 25. 1-21.
Merton, R.C., 1973. The theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141-183.
Mitchell, G., Hamilton, W., 1988.. Managing R&D as a strategic option. Research Technology Management 31, 15–22.
Mogee, M.E., 1997. Patent analysis in support of licensing. Presented at the Technology Transfer Society Annual Conference, July 22.
Nelson, L., 1989. University Patents. AUTM.
Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G.., 1977. In search for a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6, 36-76.
Neuenschwander, C.R., 2002. Is that your final offer? Valuing patent licenses in infringement negotiations. Les Nouvelles September, 100-103.
Nichols, N.A., 1994. Scientific management at Merck: an interview with CFO Judy Lewent. Harvard Business Review 72, 88-94.
Park, Y., Park, G., 2004. A new method for technology valuation in monetary value: procedure and application. Technovation 24, 387-391.
Parr, R.L., 1996. Advanced royalty rate determination methods. In Technology Licensing, Parr, R.L., Sullivan, P.H. (ed.). Wiley: New York, 207-248.
Parr, R.L., Smith, G.L., 1987. Investment theory for royalty rates. LES Nouvelles December, 153-155.
Pavitt, K., 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13, 343-373.
Perez-Bustamante, G., 2004. Knowledge management and technology appropriability regimes: an analysis of Spanish health biotech firms. International Journal of Biotechnology 6, 324 - 337
Perlitz, M., Peske, T., Schrank, R., 1999. Real options valuation: the new frontier in R&D project evaluation? R&D Management 29, 255-269.
Peteraf, M.A., 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14, 179-191.
Pike, C.G., 2001. Virtual Monopoly: Building an Intellectual Property Strategy in the Creative Economy--from Patents to Trademarks, Copyrights to Design Rights. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Poh, K.L., Ang, B.W., Bai, F., 2001. A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods. R&D Management 31, 63-75.
Porter, M.E., 1985. Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy 5, 60-77.
Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G., 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review May-June, 79-91.
Rajagopal, P., 2002. An innovation—diffusion view of implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and development of a research model. Information and Management 40, 87-114.
Razgaitis, R., 1999. Early-Stage Technologies: Valuation and Pricing. John Wiley & Sons.
Razgaitis, R., 2003. Valuation and Pricing of Technology-Based Intellectual Property. John Wiley & Sons.
Reilly, R., Schweihs, R., 1999. Valuing Intangible Assets, McGraw Hill.
Reilly, R.F., 1996. The valuation of intangible assets. The National Public Accountant 41, 26-32.
Reitzig, M.,2004. The private values of 'thickets' and 'fences': towards an updated picture of the use of patents across industries. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 13, 457-476.
Rip, A., Kemp, R., 1998. Technological change. In Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change. Resources and Technology, Vol.2 Battelle Press, Columbus, pp. 327-399.
Rivette, K.G., Kline, D., 1999. Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Harvard Business School Press.
Rivette, K.G., Kline, D., 2000. Discovering new value in intellectual property. Harvard Business Review 78, 55-66.
Rumelt, R.P., 1974. Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Rumelt, R.P., 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Competitive Strategic Management. Ed. Richard B. Lamb. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 566-570.
Sandri, S. 1995. Methodology approach to evaluation, LES Nouvelles December, 181-212.
Scandura, T.A., Williams, E.A., 2000, Research methodology in management: current practice, trend, and implication for future research. Academy of Management Journal 43, 1248-1264.
Sechrest, L., Sidani, S., 1995. Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is There an Alternative? Evaluation and Program Planning 18, 77-87.
Sharp, D.J., College, B., 1991. Uncovering the hidden value in high-risk investment. MIT Sloan Management Review 32, 69-74.
Smith, G., Parr, R., 1994. Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, 2nd edition, Wiley.
Somnath Mishra, S.G., Deshmukh, P.V., 2002. Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 69, 1-27.
Suarez, F.F., Utterback, J.M., 1995. Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal 16, 415-430.
Sullivan, P.H., 1996. Key terms and strategic positioning. In Technology Licensing, Parr, R.L., Sullivan, P.H. (ed.). Wiley: New York, 207-248.
Sullivan, P.H., 1998. Profiting from Intellectual Capital. Wiley & Sons: New York.
Sullivan, P.H., 2000. Value-Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Covert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value, John Wiley & Sons: New York.
Suzuki, J., Kodama, F., 2004. Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy 33, 531-549.
Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technology innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15, 285-305.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18, 509-533.
Twiss, B., 1968. Management Technological Innovation, Longman Group, England.
Twiss, B.C., 1992. Managing Technological Innovation. London: Pitman Publishers.
Utterback, J.M., 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
van Braun, C.F., 1997. The Innovation War. Prentice Hall.
van de Ende, J., Kemp, R., 1999. Technological transformations in history: how the computer regime grew out of existing computer regimes. Research Policy 28, 833-851.
van de Poel, I., 2003. The transformation of technological regimes. Research Policy 32, 49-68.
van Dick, M., 2000. Technological regimes and industrial dynamics: the evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change 9, 173-194.
van Putten, A.B., MacMillan, I.C., 2004. Making real option really work. Harvard Business Review December, 134-142.
Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5, 171-180.
Westland, C., 2002. Valuing Technology, John Wiley & Sons.
Yin, R.K., 2003. Applications of Case Study Research, SAGE Publications.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE