References
Al-Jarf, R. S. (2004). The effects of web-based learning on struggling EFL college writers. Foreign Language Annals,37(1), 49-57.
Amros, M. J. (1997). A new perspective on peer-editing. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 513-523.
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implication (2nd Ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Applebee, A. N. (1979). Trends in written composition. Paper presented at the Midwest School Important Forum, Milwaukee, WI.
Applebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing: Eighty-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 95-113). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Arndt, V. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: a protocol-based study of L1 & L2 writing. ELT Journal, 41(4), 257-267.
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-251.
Beach, R. & Bridwell, L. S. (1984). New directions in composition research. (Eds.) New York: The Guiford Press.
Beason, L. (1993). Feedback and revision in writing across the curriculum classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(4), 395-422.
Beauvois, M. H. (19970. High-tech, high-touch: From discussion to composition in the networked classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 10(1), 57-70.
Bender, C. F. (1989). A study of teacher and peer comments in the revision process of college writers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 437A. (University Microfilms No.90-186, 66)
Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215-241.
Berger, V, (1991). The effects of peer and self feedback. CATESOL Journal, 3, 21-35.
Blanton, L. (1989). Reshaping ESL students’ perspectives of writing. ELT Journal, 41, 112-118.
Blake, R. J. (1992). Second-language reading on the computer. ADFL Bulletin, 24, 17-22.
Braddock, R., Lloyd-Jones, R., & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. (ED003374)
Braine, G. (1997) Beyond word-processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computers and Composition, 14(1), 45-58.
Brett, P. (1997). A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension, System, 25, 39-53.
Breuch, L. K. (2004). Virtual peer review: teaching and learning about writing in online environments. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Bridwell, L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students’ transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197-222.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning & the “conversation of mankind.” College English, 46(7), 635-652.
Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perception of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.
Caudery, T. (1995). What the “process approach” means to practicing teachers of second language writing skills. TESL-EJ, 1(4), 1-16.
Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 181-188.
Chang, P. C. (2002). The effects of the process writing instruction on Taiwan high school students’ overall English writing ability. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: still in search of research. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
Chapelle, C., Jamieson, J., & Park, Y. (1996). Second language classroom research traditions: How does CALL fits? In M. Pennington (Ed.) The Power of CALL (pp.33-53). Houston, Texas: Athelstan.
Chen, H. C. (2001). Diagnosis in English writing difficulties and suggested remedial instructions. Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 300-309). Taipei: Crane.
Chen, C. Y. (2004). Effects of cooperative learning on L2 listening. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 259-267). Taipei: Crane.
Chen, Y. M. (1997). A study of the effects of single-drafted and multi-drafted contexts on EFL students’ writing performances and their perceptions of revision. The Journal of Chung Cheng University, 8, 421-464.
Chen, P. C., Kao, S. M., Scanlon, M., & Lee, Y. (1998). A study of an experiment on teaching English writing through Internet. Journal of National Cheng-Kung University, 33, 65-103.
Cheng, Y. L. (1993). A study of writing theories and strategies of EFL teachers in senior high schools. The journal of National Kaohsiung Normal University, 4, 195-207.
Chi, F. M. (1998). A descriptive study of Taiwanese EFL college students’ revising process: Teacher feedback and peer revision. National Science Council Research Project, NSC 87-2411-H-I94-021. Taiwan, ROC.
Chieh, C. W. (2005). Effects of online peer response on EFL college writing. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin Chu, Taiwan.
Chiu, C. M. (1997). Fusing the World Wide Web and the open hypermedia system technologies (Hypertext, Dynamically Mapped Information System). The State University of New Jersey. AAC 9806875. ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts.
Chou, H. L. (1989). Contractive rhetoric: Chinese and English. Paper presented in the sixth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China.
Chou, M.C. (1998). How peer negotiations shape revisions. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 349-359). Taipei: Crane.
Chun, D. M. & Plass, J. L. (2000). Networked multimedia environments for second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 151-170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cobb, T. & Stevens, V. (1996). A principled consideration of computers and reading in a second language learning. In M. Pennington (Ed.) The Power of CALL (pp.115-136). Houston, Teas: Athelstan.
Cohen, A. D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin. (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cohen, A. D. (1991). Feedback on writing: the use of verbal report. SSLA, 13, 133-159.
Cohen, A. D. & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on composition: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, J. L. (1998). Strategies for struggling writers. New York: Guilford Press.
Conner, U. & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 257-276.
Connar, U. & Farmer, M. (1990). The teaching of topical analysis as a revision strategy: An exploratory study. In In B. Koll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp.126-139). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cottell, P. G. Jr. & Millis, B. J. (1993). Cooperative learning structures in the instruction of Accounting. Issues of Accounting Education, Spring, 40-59.
Crowhurst, M. (1986). Revision strategies of students at three grade level. English Quarterly, 19, 216-226.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1956). The child and the curriculum and the school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dickinson, D. K. (1986). Cooperation, collaboration, and a computer: Integrating a computer into a first-second grade writing program. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(4), 357-378.
DirPardo, A. & Fressman, S. W. (1998). Peer response in the writing classroom: theoretic foundations and new directions, System, 58, 119-149.
Dunkel, P. (1991). Computer-assisted language learning and testing: research issues and practice. New York: Newbury House.
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Fathman, A. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 178-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.
Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.
Ferris, D. R. & Hedgcock, J.S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ferris, D. R. & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41(1), 19-37.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
Fox, R. (1980). Treatment of writing apprehension and its effect on composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 39-49.
Frizler, K. (1995). The Internet as an educational tool in ESOL writing instruction. Master’s thesis. San Francisco State University.
Gamson, Z. F. (1994). Collaborative learning comes of age. Change, 26, 44.
Goldstein, L. M. & Conard, S. M. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 443-461.
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. New York: Longman.
Grande, M. (2003). The effectiveness of writing analytic scoring guide for economically disadvantaged fourth grade students in an urban setting. (Doctoral dissertation, Sate University of New York at Buffalo, 2003). University Microfilms, 3102362.
Hairston, M. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 76-88.
Hartwell, P. (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47, 105-167.
Hedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), 255-276.
Hedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learning receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141-163.
Hertz-Lazrowitz, R. et al. (1984). Understanding interactive behaviors: looking at six mirrors of the classroom. In R. Hertz-Lazrowitz & N, Miller (Ed.), Interaction in cooperative groups (pp. 71-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Huang, A. H. (2003). The effects of on-line peer-evaluation on English writing for students in senior high school. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Huang, L. M. & Tang, G. Z. (1997). Writing conferences and peer group review in teaching English composition in senior high schools. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 261-281). Taipei: Crane.
Huck, S. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research. (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
Jacobs, G. (1987). First experiences with peer feedback on compositions: Student and teacher reaction. System, 15, 325-333.
Jacobs, G., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. Y. (1998). Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 307-317.
James, D. R. (1981). Peer teaching in the writing classroom. English Journal, 70(7), 48-50.
Jensen, M. S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Impact of positive interdependence during electronic quizzes on discourse and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 161-166.
Joe, S. G. & You, Y. L. (2001). Investigating the metacognitive awareness and strategies of English-majored university student writers. Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 106-119). Taipei, Crane.
John, M. (1995). Multimedia-why and why not. The Computing Teacher, 16-18.
Johns, A. M. (1986). Coherence and academic writing: Some definitions and suggestions for teaching. TESOL Quarterly, (20)2, 227-265.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional goal structure: cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44(2), 213-240.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994a). An overview of cooperative learning. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, and A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning (pp.31-44). London: Paul H. Brooks Publishing.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994b). Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. In D. W. Johnson & R. T. Johnson (Eds.), Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Needham Heights, Massachusetts.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria, VA.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998a). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, R. T. & Johnson, D.W. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
Jones, A. M. (1986). Coherence and academic writing: some definitions and suggestions for teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), 247-265.
Joyce, W. B. (1999). Cooperative learning in accounting classes: A case study. Business Education Forum, 54(1), 28-30.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16(1), 1-20.
Kagan, S. (1986). Cooperative learning and sociocultural factors in schooling. In California Department of Education (Ed.), Beyond language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority students (pp. 231-298). Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University, Los Angeles.
Kataoka, K. (2000). Computers for English language learning in Japanese schools (ED439600).
Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44, 394-404.
Kenning, M. M. & Kenning, M. J. (1990). Computers and language learning: Current theory and practice. New York: Ellis Horwood.
Kepner, C. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305-313.
Kern, R.G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects of quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
Kim, H. K. (2003). A study of three ESL teachers’ beliefs about the roles of teachers and L2 learning and their integration of computers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New York at Buffalo.
King, A. (1991). Effects on training strategic questions on children’s problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 307-317.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices of second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1984). Writing: research, theory, and application. New York: Pergamon Press.
Kwok, R. C. & Ma, J. (1999). Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers and Education, 32(2), 109-125.
Lam, C. Y. (1992). Revision processes of college ESL students: How teacher comments, discourse types and writing tools shape revision. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 4248A.
LaReau, P. & Vockell, E. (1989). The computer in the foreign language curriculum. Santa Cruz, CA: Mitchell Publishing, Inc.
Lee, K. W. (2000). English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. Retrieved May 18, 2005 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
Legum, S. E. & Krashen, S. D. (1972). Conceptual framework for the design of a composition program. Los Alamitors, CA: Southwest Regional Laboratory for Educational Research & Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction service NO. ED 108239).
Leki, I. (1990a). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal, 3, 5-19.
Leki, I. (1990b). Coach from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Koll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp.284-294). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annual, 24,204-213.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. New York: Oxford University Pres.
Liou, H. (1997). The impact of WWW texts on EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 10(5), 455-478.
Liu, J. & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Liu, J. & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193-227.
Lo, S. M. (1996). A possible approach to improve teaching of writing. TESL, 29, 10-20.
Lude, K. R. (1990). Using electronic mail as a medium for foreign language study and instruction. CALICO Journal, 7(3), 68-78.
Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46(3), 274-284.
Melograno, V. J. (1997). Integrating assessment into physical education teaching. Journal of Physical Education, 68, 34-37.
Mendonca, C. O. & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769.
Meskill, C. (1999). Computers as tools for sociocollaborative language learning. In K Cameron et al. (Eds.), CALL: Media, Design & Applications. Exton, PA: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Meskill, C. & Mossop, J. (1997). Technologies use with ESL learners in New York State: Preliminary report. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement.
Michaels, J. W. (1977). Classroom reward structures and academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 87-98.
Miller, J. N. (2002). Alternative forms of formative and summative assessment. Retrieved May 18, 2005, from http:// www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/assessment.htm
Min, H. T. (2003). Why peer comments fail. English Teaching & Learning, 27(3), 85-103.
Mittan, R. (1989). The peer review process: Harnessing students’ communicative power. In D. M. Johnson, & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 207-219). New York: Longman.
Moran, C. (1991). We write, but do we read? Computers & Composition, 8(3), 51-61.
Murray, D. (1976). Teaching writing as process, not product. In R. Graves (Ed.), Rhetoric and composition. Rochelle Park, NJ: Hayden Book Company.
Murray, D. (1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. In C. R. Cooper & L. Adello (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 85-103). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Nelson, G. L. & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students’ perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(2), 113-131.
Nelson, G. L. & Murphy, J. M. (1992). An L2 writing group task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Langue Writing, 1, 171-193.
Nelson, G. L. & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer group response: do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts. An L2 writing group task and social dimensions. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 135-141.
Olsen, R. & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning in C. Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning: A teacher’s resource book (pp.1-10). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Orlando, J. E. (1991). Cooperative Learning, Student Achievement, and Attitude in Community College Freshman English Class (Microform). Ann Arbor: MI: UMI.
Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-83.
Paramskas, D. (1993). Computer-assisted language learning (CALL)-Increasingly integrated into an ever more electronic world. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 124-143.
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265-289.
Perl, S. (1978). Five writers writing: Case studies of the composing processes of unskilled college writers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
Perl, S. (1979). The composing process of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
Philips, A. F. (1983). Computer conferences: success or failure? In R. N. Bostron (Ed.) Communication Yearbook 7. Beverly Hills, Sage.
Polio, C. (2001). Research methodology in second language writing research: the case of the text-based studies. In T. Silva & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.) On second language writing (pp. 91-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperation versus competition efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129-143.
Rada, R. (1998). Efficiency & Effectiveness in computer-supported pee- evaluation learning. Computer & Evaluation, 30(3/4), 137-146.
Schnackenberg, H. & Sullivan, H. J. (2000). Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under differing ability levels. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 19-35.
Searby, M. & Ewers, T. (1997). An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the school of music, Kingston University. Assessment of Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), 371-383.
Silva, T. (1993). Toward and Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677.
Sivan, A. (2002). Implementing peer assessment to enhance teaching and learning. New Horizons, 1(2), 10-11.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychology Bulletin, 94(3), 429-445.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Slavin, R. E. (1991a). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(1), 105-115.
Slavin, R. E. (1991b). Group rewards make groupwork work. Educational Leadership, 48(1), 89-91.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Smagorinsky, P. (1992). Models. In A. Purves, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the English studies and Language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Sommers, N. I. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378-388.
Sommers, N. I. (1982). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. Washington DC: National Institute of Education.
Spack, P., & Sadow, C. (1983). Student-teacher working journals in ESL freshman composition. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 575-593.
Spilerman, S. (1971). Raising academic motivation in lower class adolescents: A convergence of two research traditions. Sociology of Education, 44, 103-118.
Stallard, C. (1974). An analysis of the writing behaviors of good student writers. Research in the Teaching English, 8, 206-218.
Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching students writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 217-233.
Storm, R. D. & Storm, P. S. (1998). Student Participation in the Evaluation of Cooperative Learning. Community College Journal, 22(3), 265-278.
Strickland, D. S., Ganske, K., & Monroe, J. K. (2002). Supporting struggling readers & writers: Strategies for classroom intervention 3-6. Portland, ME: Stenhourse.
Sullivan, N. & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environment: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom, System, 24(4), 491-501.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 205-216.
Swain, M. & Smith, B. (1987). Learner English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tagong, K. (1992). Revising strategies of Thai students: Text-level changes in essay written in Thai and in English. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2894A.
Taylor, B. P. (1981). Content and written form: A two-way street. TESOL Quarterly, 15(1), 5-13.
Taylor, R. (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tools, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
Taylor, R. & Perez, L. (1989). Something to do on Monday. La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
Tsai, H. (2003). Examining teacher response to student writing. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on English Teaching & Learning in the Republic of China (pp.739-754). Taipei: Crane.
Tsui, B. M. (1999). Young ESL writers’ responses to peer and teacher comments in writing. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: Crane.
Tyson, R. E. (2000). Increasing the effectiveness of composition instruction in Korean university English classes. English Language Education,21, 205-214,
Villamil, O. S. & DeGuerrero’s (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5,(1), 51-75.
Wall, S. & Petrovsky, A. (1981). Freshman writers and revision: Results from a survey. Journal of Basic Writing, 3,109-122.
Wang, M. J. (2004). A study on online peer feedback. English Teaching & Learning, 29(2), 63-77.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language courses. CALICO Journal, 15(1-3), 129-143.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 8(14), 470-481.
Warschauer, M. & Healey, D. (1998). Computer and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
Warschauer, M. & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M.; Turvee, L., & Roverts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 14(1), 1-14.
Wei, C. L. (2003). Integrating networked multimedia into TEFL: Potentialities and guidelines. Chung Hsing Journal of Humanities, 33, 289-313.
White, E. M. (1984). Post-structural literary criticism and the response to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 35, 186-195.
White, E. M. (1994). Teaching and assessing writing: Recent advances in understanding, evaluating, and improving student performance. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Wolfe, B., Dalton, M., & Neuburger, W. (1993). Oregon statewide writing assessment 1991 and 1992 with student writing grades 3 and 5. Salem, OR: Organ State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED366960)
Yu, C. F. (2001). An integration of new technologies into the course of teaching English as a foreign language. Soochow Journal of Foreign Languages and Cultures, 3, 15-39.
Yueh, J. and Alessi, S. M. (1988). The effects of reward structure and group ability composition on cooperative computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 15(1), 18-22.
Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: the process of discovery meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195-208.
Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. . TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-187.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79-102.
Zhu, W, (1995). Effects of training for peer response on students’ comments and interaction. Written Communication, 12(4), 495-528.
中文部分
孫光天，林永成，陳新豐，林守仁（2000）。資訊融入學科教學研究：以網際網路多媒體教材輔助國小英語教學為例。國教學報，12，229-265。
韋金龍（2001）。多媒體網路電腦在英語教學的應用。英語教學，25（3），55-63。
教育部 (1998) 。 高級中學選修科目英語作文課程標準 。Retrieved on December 11, 2004, from http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/HIGH-SCHOOL/EDU7362001/i1301/course/current/subject_32.htm?open
陳坤田等（1993）。大學入學考試英文作文評分指標研究報告。台北：大考中心。
張武昌等 （2000）。英文寫作能力檢定考試規劃研究III。台北：大考中心。
張武昌（1996）。高中英文教師對大學聯考應否廢除「英文作文」及「中譯英」題型的看法。教育研究資訊雙月刊，6（4），1-12。楊懿麗 （2003）。 高中英文寫作教學之我見。人文及社會學科教學通訊，14（1），92-113。
劉剛慶 （1998）。從另一個角度看英文作文的錯誤。人文及社會學科教學通訊，9（4），8-21。
鐘樹椽（1997）。國小學生電腦合作學習之研究 — 小組友誼、獎勵結構和學生因素之討論。台北︰師大書苑。