:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:同儕評量於華語文師資培育學習成效探究
書刊名:人文研究期刊
作者:彭妮絲 引用關係
作者(外文):Peng, Ni-se
出版日期:2013
卷期:11
頁次:頁99-118
主題關鍵詞:同儕評量華語文師資培育教師知能批判思考合作學習Peer assessmentCultivation of teacher of Chinese languageTeacher competenceCritical thinkingCooperative learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:182
  • 點閱點閱:272
評量於整個教學過程中實居於關鍵性的地位,一方面可做為學生學習的回饋,一方面可提供教師教學的參考。傳統評量側重總結性的功能,學生的學習是孤立的,缺乏互動的;同儕評量則側重評量的形成性功能,學生是互相合作的、互動頻繁的。同儕評量已被廣泛的應用到各種學科教學上,目的主要是提升學生主動學習的意願、訓練學生給予或接受他人批評而改進,讓學生瞭解社會共同評量的過程。本研究以研究所及大學部同學為研究對象,評量內容主要為教學模擬演練與口頭發表,課堂使用同儕評量,進行為期一學期的研究。研究結果顯示,對於華語文教師職能較瞭解之研究生,於同儕評量的態度比大學生正面,華語文教學經驗使得同學能夠深切體認同儕評量對於學生學習的助益。其次,同儕評量可以有效幫助學生學習,對於思想日趨成熟的大學生而言,更能幫助其表達溝通技巧的改進與批判思考能力的發展;不過其尚於學習階段,對於同儕評量評分內容與方式,當施予更多說明,經過適當的訓練或練習,以提高學習成效。
Assessments are critical in the process of teaching and learning. It not only gives feedback to students but provides teachers with valuable information. The conventional assessment addresses the summative function, which isolates students and lacks of interaction. The peer assessment, on the contrary, focuses on the formative function and keeps students cooperate and interact with each other more frequently. The peer assessment as a tool has been applied to various subjects and aims at improving student’s willingness to active learning, teaching students how to criticize and receive criticisms from others and thereby to enhance their learning, and helping them understand the process of social critique. This study, undergone for one term, takes both postgraduates and undergraduates as its subjects and assesses their oral presentation and simulative teaching in class using the method of peer assessment. The result shows that these postgraduates, who understand the competence of Chinese language teachers better, have a more positive attitude towards peer assessment and the experience of teaching Chinese helps them know more deeply about the advantage of peer assessment for learning. Furthermore, for these undergraduates, who are getting mature in thinking, the peer assessment helps them learn effectively, as well as improve their skills of communication and critical thinking. To enhance the learning effect, these undergraduates, however, need more proper explanation and training as to the process of peer assessment in this respect.
期刊論文
1.蔡文榮(20031200)。師資培育的另類教學取向:三重省思的挑戰。教育科學期刊,3(2),124-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Connor, U.、Asenavage, K.(1994)。Peer response in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision。Journal of Second Language Writing,3,257-276。  new window
3.Freeman, M.(1995)。Peer assessment by groups of group work。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,20(3),289-300。  new window
4.Purchase, H. C.(2000)。Learning about interface design through peer assessment。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,25(4),341-352。  new window
5.Mendonça, C. O.、Johnson, K. E.(1994)。Peer review negotiation: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction。TESOL Quarterly,28(4),745-769。  new window
6.Nattiv, A.(1994)。Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning。The Elementary School Journal,94(3),285-297。  new window
7.Topping, K.(2005)。Trends in peer learning。Educational Psychology,25(6),631-645。  new window
8.Miao, Y.、Badger. R.、Zhen, Y.(2006)。A comparative study of peer and teacherfeedback in a Chinese EFL writing class。Journal of Second Language Writing,15,179-200。  new window
9.Dochy, F.、Segers, M.、Sluijsmans, D.(1999)。The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review。Studies in Higher Education,24(3),331-350。  new window
10.王金國、張新仁(20031200)。國小六年級教師實施國語科合作學習之研究。教育學刊,21,53-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Orsmond, P.、Merry, S.、Reiling, K.(2000)。The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,25(1),23-38。  new window
12.魏麗敏(19950500)。後設認知學習理論與策略。學生輔導,38,66-75。  延伸查詢new window
13.Davies, P.(2000)。Computerized peer assessment。Innovations in Education and Training International,37(4),346-355。  new window
14.Falchikov, N.(1995)。Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment。Innovations in Education and Training International,32(2),175-187。  new window
15.Searby, M.、Ewers, T.(1997)。An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the school of music, Kingston University。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,22(4),371-384。  new window
16.Orsmond, P.、Merry, S.、Reiling, K.(1996)。The importance marking criteria in the use peer and self-assessment。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,21(3),239-249。  new window
17.Webb, N. M.(1989)。Peer interaction and learning in small groups。International Journal of Educational Research,13,21-39。  new window
18.于富雲、鄭守杰(20040300)。網路同儕互評與標準建構歷程對國小學生後設認知影響的實證性研究。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,17(1),197-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.盧富美(19921000)。談合作學習及其教學流程。教師之友,33(4),3-8。  延伸查詢new window
20.Topping, Keith J.(1998)。Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities。Review of Educational Research,68(3),249-276。  new window
會議論文
1.Danis, M.F.(1982)。Weaving the web of meaning: Interaction patterns in peer-response groups。the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication。San Francisco。  new window
學位論文
1.林欣曉(2010)。同儕學習輔導運用於國中英語教學之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,台中。  延伸查詢new window
2.李武祥(2008)。網路同儕互評在國小六年級「非水墨」教學之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱靖雅(2006)。運用合作評量與團體獎勵於線上寫作與合作評量系統對高中生英語寫作成效與態度之研究(博士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.杜紹萍(1999)。合作學習對成人英語學習成就、行為、及滿意度影響之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.卓宜青(2001)。網路化學習歷程檔案系統及同儕評量(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
6.周立勳(1994)。國小班級分組合作學習之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉旨峰(2002)。網路同儕評量之研究(博士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Orlich, D. S.(1990)。Teaching strategies: A guide to better instruction。Lexington. M.A.:C.D. Heath。  new window
2.林生傳(19880000)。新教學理論與策略:自由開放社會中的個別化教學與後個別化教學。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫春在、林珊如(20070000)。網路合作學習:數位時代的互動學習環境、教學與評量。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Duin, A. H.(1984)。Implementing cooperative learning groups in the writing curriculum: What research shows and what you can do?(ED 251849)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Slavin, R. E.(1985)。An instruction to cooperative learning research。Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
2.簡妙娟(2003)。合作學習理論與教學運用。學習與教學新趨勢。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gere, A. R.、Stevens, R.(1985)。The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision。The acquisition of written language: Response and revision。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE