臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Essays on the Effects of S&P 500 Component Revisions and the Smart Money Effects of Mutual Funds
作者：王慶昌 引用關係
作者(外文)：Ching-Chang Wang
校院名稱：國立中正大學
系所名稱：財務金融所
指導教授：何加政
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2007
主題關鍵詞：conditional smart money effect；shadow cost；star effect；conditional smart money effect；shadow cost；star effect
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:37
Essay 1.
Our study examines whether the “star effect” of the S&P 500 index compositions revisions can cause a significant shift in firms’ visibility and value through the channel of public media. Using additions and deletions announcements of S&P 500 index components over a long period ranging from September 1976 to December 2002, we find that the degree of a firm’s transparency seems to be negatively correlated with its required rate of return but positively related to its dividend payout level. The positive increase in firms'' media coverage entailed by the S&P 500 index component revisions not only helps enhance visibility of companies but also reinforce the outside monitoring power that could force managers to distribute surplus cash flow in the form of cash dividends. Overall, our findings suggest that the higher intensive press coverage is able to force the agents to act in shareholders'' interest, which could reduce the chance of value-ruining decisions. In sum, our evidence suggests that changes in firms'' value caused by the S&P 500 index composition revisions are related to changes in media exposure, which might be a more effective proxy for investors'' awareness and bear a direct relation with the agency problem embedded within these firms.
Essay 2.
This paper derives a theoretical equilibrium condition to describe the influence of managerial self-interest incentives on the degree of utilization of fund flows. We further use fund flows data supplied by Taiwan Economic Journal Data Bank to study the empirical relationship between fund flows and subsequent fund performance for the mutual fund industry in Taiwan. Although we find that mutual funds which are associated with new money arrival are more likely to earn abnormally positive returns, the utilization of the money governed by pecuniary incentives of fund managers probably plays a key role in making subsequent good performers. In universe, smart money effect appears to exist in Taiwan''s mutual fund market, but if funds managers are reluctant to raise their holdings level in response to fund flows, even a smart investor still works in vain. That is, the effectiveness of smart money may be conditional on the fund manager''s behavior. Consistent with our theoretical model and empirical findings, if an investor is going to follow smarts in the mutual fund market, he had better keep a close eye on fund managers.
Essay 1.
Our study examines whether the “star effect” of the S&P 500 index compositions revisions can cause a significant shift in firms’ visibility and value through the channel of public media. Using additions and deletions announcements of S&P 500 index components over a long period ranging from September 1976 to December 2002, we find that the degree of a firm’s transparency seems to be negatively correlated with its required rate of return but positively related to its dividend payout level. The positive increase in firms'' media coverage entailed by the S&P 500 index component revisions not only helps enhance visibility of companies but also reinforce the outside monitoring power that could force managers to distribute surplus cash flow in the form of cash dividends. Overall, our findings suggest that the higher intensive press coverage is able to force the agents to act in shareholders'' interest, which could reduce the chance of value-ruining decisions. In sum, our evidence suggests that changes in firms'' value caused by the S&P 500 index composition revisions are related to changes in media exposure, which might be a more effective proxy for investors'' awareness and bear a direct relation with the agency problem embedded within these firms.
Essay 2.
This paper derives a theoretical equilibrium condition to describe the influence of managerial self-interest incentives on the degree of utilization of fund flows. We further use fund flows data supplied by Taiwan Economic Journal Data Bank to study the empirical relationship between fund flows and subsequent fund performance for the mutual fund industry in Taiwan. Although we find that mutual funds which are associated with new money arrival are more likely to earn abnormally positive returns, the utilization of the money governed by pecuniary incentives of fund managers probably plays a key role in making subsequent good performers. In universe, smart money effect appears to exist in Taiwan''s mutual fund market, but if funds managers are reluctant to raise their holdings level in response to fund flows, even a smart investor still works in vain. That is, the effectiveness of smart money may be conditional on the fund manager''s behavior. Consistent with our theoretical model and empirical findings, if an investor is going to follow smarts in the mutual fund market, he had better keep a close eye on fund managers.
Essay 1.new window
Amihud, Yakov, and Kefei Li, 2002, The declining information content of dividend announcements and the effect of institutional holdings, Working paper, New York University.
Antweiler, Werner, and Murray z. Frank, 2004, Is all that talk just noise? The information content of Internet stock message boards, Journal of Finance 59, 1259-1293.
Beneish, Messod D., and John C. Gardner, 1995, Information costs and liquidity effects from changes in the Dow Jones Industrial Average list, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30, 135-157.
Cai, Jie, 2004, Are the S&P 500 index additions free of information? Evidence form the price and volume reaction of the industry and size matching firms, Working paper, Iowa University.
Campbell, John Y., Sanford J. Grossman, and Jiang Wang, 1993, Trading volume and serial correlation in stock returns, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 9058-939.
Chen, Honghui, Gregory Noronha, and Vijay Singal, 2004, The price response to S&P 500 Index additions and deletions: Evidence of asymmetry and a new explanation, Journal of Finance 59, 1901-1929.
Culter, David M., James M. Poterba, and Lawrence H. Summers, 1989, What moves stock prices? Journal of Portfolio Management 15, 4-12.
Delong, J. Bradford, Andrei Shleifer, and Lawrence H. Summer, and Robert J. Waldmann, 1990a, Noise trader risk in financial markets, Journal of Political Economy 98, 703-738.
Denis, Diane K., John J. McConnell, Alexei V. Ovtchinnikov, and Yun Yu, 2003, S&P 500 index additions and earnings expectations, Journal of Finance 58, 1821-1840.
Dhillon, Upinder, and Herb Johnson, 1991, Changes in the Standard and Poor’s 500 list, Journal of Business 64, 75-85.
Edmister, Robert O., Steven Graham, and Wendy Pirie, 1994, Excess returns of index replacement stocks: Evidence of liquidity and substitutability, Journal of Financial Research 17, 333-346.
Elliott, William B., and Richard S. Warr, 2003, Price pressure on the NYSE and NASDAQ: Evidence from S&P 500 index changes, Financial Management 32, 85-99.
Erfle, Stephen, and Henry McMillan, 1990, Media, Political Pressure, and the Firm: The Case of Petroleum Pricing in the Late 1970s The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 115-134.
Erwin, Gayle R. and James M. Miller, 1998, The liquidity effects associated with additions of a stock to the S&P index: Evidence from bid/ask spreads, Financial Review 33, 131-146.
Gervais, Simon, Ron Kaniel, and Daniel Mingelgrin, 2001, The high-volume return premium, Journal of finance 56, 877-919.
Goetzmann, William N., and Mark Garry, 1986, Does delisting from the S&P 500 affect stock price? Financial Analyst Journal 42, 64-69.
Harris, Lawrence, and Eitan Gurel, 1986, Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P 500: New evidence for the existence of price pressure, Journal of Finance 41, 815-830.
Hegde, Shantaram, and John McDermott, 2003, The liquidity effects of revisions to the S&P 500 index: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Market 6, 413-459.
Jain, Prem C., 1987, The effect on stock price of inclusion or exclusion from the S&P 500, Financial Analyst Journal 43,58-65.
Jensen, Michael C., 1986, Agency cost of free cash flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.
Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
Kadlec, Gregory B., and John J. McConnell, 1994, The effect of market segmentation and illiquidity on asset prices: Evidence from exchange listings, Journal of Finance 49, 611-636.
Kaniel, Ron, Dong Li, and Laura T. Starks, 2003, The investor recognition hypothesis: International evidence and determinants, Working Paper, AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings; University of Texas at Austin.
Kaul, Aditya, Vikas Mehrotra, and Randall Morck, 2000, Demand curves for stocks do slope down: New evidence from an index weights adjustment, Journal of Finance 55, 893-912.
Lamoureux, Christopher G.. and James W. Wansley, 1987, Market effects of changes in the Standard and Poor’s 500 index, Financial Review 22, 53-69.
Lynch, Anthony W., and Richard R. Mendenhall, 1997, New evidence on stock price effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 index, Journal of Business 70, 351-383.
Malkiel Burton G.. and Radisich Alekssander, 2001, The growth of index funds and the pricing of equity securities, Journal of Portfolio Management 27, 9-21.
Pruitt, Stephen W., and K.C. John Wei, 1989, Institutional ownership and changes in the S&P 500, Journal of Finance 44, 509-514.
Ross, Stephen A., 1973, The determinants of financial structure: The incentive-signaling approach, Bell Journal of Economics 8, 23-40.
Shleifer, Andrei, 1986, Does demand curves for stocks slope down? Journal of Finance 41, 579-590.
Woolridge, R. and C. Ghosh, 1986, Institutional trading and security prices: The case of changes in the composition of the S&P 500 index, Journal of Financial Review 9, 13-24.
Wurgler, Jeffrey, and Katia Zhuravskaya, 2002, Does arbitrage flatten demand curves for stocks? Journal of Business 75, 583-608.

Essay 2.
Baks, Klaas, Andrew Metrick, and Jessica Watcher, 2001, Should investors avoid all actively managed mutual funds? A study in Bayesian performance evaluation, Journal of Finance 56, 45-85.
Becker, Stan, and Greg Vaughan, 2001, Small is beautiful, Journal of Portfolio Management (Summer), 9-17.
Blume, Marshall, 1998, An anatomy of Morningstar Ratings, Financial Analysts Journal (March/April), 19-27.
Brown, Keith C., W. V. Harlow, and Laura T. Starks, 1996, Of tournaments and temptations: An analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry, Journal of Finance 51, 85-110.
Brown, Stephen J., and William N. Goetzmann, 1995, Performance persistence, Journal of Finance 50, 679-698.
Busse, Jeffrey A., 2001, Another look at mutual fund tournaments, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36, 53-73.
Carhart, Mark M., 1997, On persistence in mutual fund performance, Journal of Finance 52, 57-82.
Carhart, Mark M., Ron Kanile, David K. Musto, and Adam V. Reed, 2002, Learning for the tape: Evidence of gaming behavior in equity mutual funds, Journal of Finance 57, 661-693.
Chen, Joseph, Harrison Hong, Ming Huang, and Jeffrey D. Kubik, 2004, does fund size erode performance? The role of liquidity and organization, American Economic Review 94, 1276-1302.
Chevalier, Judith, and Glenn Ellison, 1997, Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives, Journal of Political Economy 105, 1167-1200.
Christoffersen, Susan E. K., and David K. Musto, 2002, Demand curves and the pricing of money management, Review of Financial Studies 15, 1499-1524.
Edelen, Roger M., and Jerold B. Warner, 2001, Aggregate price effects of institutional trading: A study of mutual fund flows and market returns, Journal of Financial Economics 59, 195-220.
Elton, J.Edwin, Martin J. Gruber, and Christopher R. Blake, 1996, The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance, Journal of Business 69, 133-157.
Goetzmann, William N. and Nadav Peles, 1997, Cognitive dissonance and mutual fund investors, Journal of Financial Research 20, 145-158.
Goetzmann, William, and Roger Ibbotson, 1994, Do winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund performance, Journal of Portfolio Management 20, 9-18.
Greene, Jason. T. and Charles W. Hodges, 2002, The dilution impact of daily fund flows on open-end mutual funds, Journal Financial Economics 65, 131-158.
Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan Titman 1989, Mutual fund performance: an analysis quarterly portfolio holdings, Journal of Business 62, 393-416.
Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan Titman 1992, The persistence of mutual fund performance, Journal of Finance 47, 1877-1984.
Gruber, Martin J., 1996, Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds, Journal of Finance 51, 783-810.
Howe, Thomas, S., and Ralph A. Pope, 1996, Equity mutual fund historical performance ratings as predictors of future performance, Journal Financial and Strategic Decision 9, 33-43.
Hendricks, Darryll, Jayendu Patel, and Richard Zeckhauser, 1993, Hot hands in mutual fund: short run persistence of relative performance, 1974-1988, Journal of Finance 48, 93-130.
Indro, Daniel C., Christine X. Jiang, Michael Y. Hu, and Wayne Y. Lee, 1999, Mutual fund performance: does fund size matter? Financial Analysts Journal 55, 74-87.
Ippolito, R. A., 1992, Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: evidence from the mutual fund industry, Journal of Law and Economics 40, 403-427.
Jegadeesh, Narasimhan, and Sheridan Titman, (1993), Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, Journal of Finance 48, 65-91.
Jensen, Michael C., 1969, Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and evaluation of investment portfolios, Journal of Business 42, 167-247.
Khorana, Ajay, 1996, Top management turnover: An empirical investigation of mutual fund managers, Journal of Financial Economics 40, 403-427.
Sandmo, Agnar, 1971, On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty, American Economic Review 61, 65-73.
Santini, Donald, L., and Jack W. Aber, 1998, Determinants of net money flow to the equity mutual fund industry, Journal of Economics and Business 50, 419-429.
Sapp, Travis, and Ashish Tiwari, 2004, Does stock return momentum explain the “smart money” effect? Journal of Finance 59, 2605-2622.
Sawicki, Julia, and Frank Finn, 2002, Smart money and small funds, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 29, 825-846.
Shu, Pei-Gi, Yin-Hua Yeh, and Takeshi Yamada, 2002, The behavior of Taiwan mutual fund investors—performance and fund flows, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 10, 583-600.
Sirri, Erik, and Peter Tufano, 1998, Costly search and mutual fund flows, Journal of Finance 53, 1589-1622.
Wang, Ching-Chang, and C. Jerry Yu, 2007, The holdings mark-up behavior of mutual funds—Evidence from an emerging market, 2007 FMA Annual Meeting International, Orlando, Florida.
Warther, Vincent A., 1995, aggregate mutual fund flows and security returns, Journal of Financial Economics 39, 209-235.
Wermers, Russ, 2000, Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock picking talent, style transaction costs and expenses, Journal of Finance 55, 1655-1695.
Zeckhauser, Richard, Jayendu Patel, and Darryll Hendricks, 1991, Nonrational actors and financial market behavior, Theory and Decision 31, 257-287.
Zheng, Lu, 1999, Is money smart? A study of mutual fund investors’ fund selection ability, Journal of Finance 54, 901-933.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：832（臺灣：830，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2602775 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68400143
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上