:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探索法國左右共治中的微量動能-一個歷史的詮釋
作者:簡赫琳 引用關係
作者(外文):Herlin Chien
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:廖達琪
Martha Feldman
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:適當性邏輯後果性邏輯實作理論法國左右共治憲政研究紀登斯布迪歐結構化理論半總統制constitutional analysisstructurationsemi-presidentialismlogic of appropriateness (LoA)logic of consequence (LoC)BourdieuGiddensFrench CohabitationPractice Theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
近十年來,政治學者逐漸將研究重心從檢驗總統制的危難 (perils of presidentialism),轉移到半總統制的危難 (perils of semipresidentialism)。法國的左右共治模式更是在半總統制研究中 不可忽略的重要課題。為了幫助許多已參照法國對立兩黨共同治理國家模式的新興民主國家,如非洲數國,本研究認為些許\的精力應放在探索左右共治實際運作中的微量動能。動能牽涉到包括左右共治形成過程 (emergence),實際運作 (practice)及 後果 (consequence)三個面向。 本論文共分為九章節做論述。第一章為概論,主要幫助讀者了解左右共治此命題的重要性、研究問題及本論文研究途徑。第二章及第三章分別介紹已存在之法國左右共治相關研究,及論文主要使用之詮釋性方法論 (Interpretive Paradigm of Qualitative Research)。緊接著進入第四章對本研究套用之實作理論 (Practice Theory) 做理論架構討論。在此章,三個實作理論中的重要元素: 時序概念 (temporality)、結構二重性 (duality of structure)、及不可預知的後果 (unanticipated consequences)分別被做深入研討。第五到第八章節則是對之前提出的三個左右共治未知面向,論述經分析質化資料後經驗上的發現,及本博士研究發展出獨特的理論見解及詮釋。法國左右共治在本文探索其中微量動能的視野中,它不再只是第五共和憲法下的被動必然產物。左右共治可從更多層面被了解。它可以是行動者 主動行理性選擇的產物 ; 它可是對憲政組織變革有影響力的動能產生器 ; 它也可以是一種群體陷入過度理想化政治迷思中不可避免的集體自欺。最後,第九章總詰本論文對學術界之貢獻,分別在 理論建構上及實際政策建議上做各別闡釋。
As attention of scholars shift from perils of presidentialism to perils of semipresidentialism in the recent decades, French style of cohabitation power sharing mode in the executive merits our endeavor to understand the micro-dynamics that is embedded in it. It includes how it emerged, how it was practiced and what consequences it produced. Such effort, if wisely applied, can probably be helpful in slowing down the rate of political system breakdown in many of the newly emerged democratic systems that emulate the French model. After an introduction to the blackbox of French cohabitation, the remainder of the dissertation is divided into eight chapters. Chapter 2 briefly reviews the existing literature on French cohabitation. Chapter 3 introduces the interpretive paradigm of qualitative research that is employed to analyze data and to facilitate theory building. In the 4th theoretical discussion chapter, three elements of practice theory approach – temporality, duality of structure and unanticipated consequences are elaborated respectively. The three elements correspond to answer three research questions comprising how cohabitation emerged, how it was practiced and what kinds of consequences it produced. Chapter 5 to 8 display findings to the questions. They unravel for us other faces of French cohabitation which can be an active outcome of rationalization, a dynamic generator and a collective inevitable self-deception. Chapter 9 concludes by delineating theoretical and practical contribution of the dissertation.
Adcock, Robert and David Collier. 2001. “Measurement Vlidity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review. (95)3: 529-546
Alexander, Thomas. 1990. “Pragmatic Imagination.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. XXVI (3): 248-325.
Almass, A. H. 2000. Facets of Unity. Boston: Shambhala.
Amsoi, Danie. 1985. La cohabitation politique en France: La règle de deux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Ardant, Philippe. 1995. Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques: Conseils-exercices. LGDJ / Montchrestien.
Aristotle. 1928. The Oxford Translation of Aristotle, Vo. 1 (translated and edited by G. R. G. Mure) . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Avril, P. 1988, March. “Fin de la Constitution Gaulliste?” Espirit. 136-137.
Balladur, E. 1992. Dictionnaire de la réforme. Paris: Fayard.
Balladur, E. 1995. Deux ans à Matignon. Paris: Plon.
Barley, S. R. 1983. “Semiotics and the study of Occupational and Organizational Cultures”. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28. 393-413.
Bell, D. 2000. Parties and Democracy in France. Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Bell, DE. 1982. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Op Res 30: 961-981
Benamou, G.-M. 1996. Le dernier Mitterrand. Paris: Plon.
Berger-Levrault. 1896. Traité de la juridiction administrative.
Bergson, Henri. 1911. Matter and Memory. Trans. Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Bergson, Henri. 1946. The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics. New York: Kensington Publishing Corp.
Berstein, Serge. “La lute des classes est terminée!” L’Histoire. (4) 143 48-51.
Bettelheim, Bruno. 1960. The Informed Heart. Glencore: Free Press.
Bigaut, C. 1995. Les cohabitations institutionnelles de 1986-1988 et 1993-1995. Regardes sur l''Actualité , 5 (211), 3-30.
Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Boudon, Raymon. 1982. The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. London: Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J-C. 1979. The Inheritors: French Students and their Relation to Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1967 ''Systems of education and systems of thought.'' Social Science Information, Vol. 14 (3), 338-358.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge University press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge &. Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford Press.
Brigouleix, B. 1995. Histoire Indiscrète des Anneées Balladur. Paris: Albin Michel.
Button, Graham, ed. 1991. Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cahiers français: La Ve République. Permanence et mutations. La Documentation française, janvier-févreier 2001.
Callon, Michael. 1986a. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network.” Pp. 19-34 in Michael Callon , John Law and Arie Rip, ed. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. London: Macmillan.
Callon, Michael. 1986b. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieue Bay”. P. 196-223 in John Law, ed. Power, Action and Belief. London: Routledge.
Campbell, Donald T., and D. W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod matrix.” Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81-105.
Carcassonne, Guy. 1999. “Frein ou moteur? La Cohabitation. Pourvoir 91: 97- 107
Carton, D. 2000. Cohabitation, intrigues et confidences. Paris: Albin Michel.
Cathala, J. a.-b. 2002. Nous nous sommes tant..hais. Paris: Seuil.
Chadwick, Ruth. 1992. Immanuel Kant. Routledge
Chevallier, J. 1999. La gauche et la haute administration. In La haute administration et la politique. CURAPP.
Chevallier, J. J. 1977. Histoire des Institutions et des régimes politiques de la France de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Dalloz.
Cohen, S. 2000. “La diplomatie francaise dans la cohabitation.” Esprit. (6) 6
Cohendet, Anne-Marie. 1993. La cohabitation : Leçons d''une experience. Presses Universitaires de France – PUF
Cohendet, M. A. 2002. “2002, le retour du présidentialisme”, in Cités, hors série, “La France et ses demons, radioscopie des passions française”, dir. Y. C. Zarka, PUF, 2002.
Cohendet, M.-A. 2000. Droit constitutionnel. Paris: Montchrestien.
Coleman, James. 1968. “Review of Studies in Ethnomethodology.” American Sociological Review 33:126-130.
Collective, 1999. Mélanges Philippe Ardant: Droit et politique à la croisée des cultures. L.G.D.J.
Collective. 1999. La Cohabitation (Pouvoirs no. 91). Paris: Seuil.
Collective. 2001 Nov.. La nouvelle Ve République (Pouvoirs No. 99). Paris: Seuil.
Collective. 2002, 7. Chap. 8 La course à la présidentielle 1. Une cohabitation de rivalité. Regards sur l''actualité (283), pp. 139-154.
Collective. 2002. Jack Lang: pour "une democratie transformee". Le Monde: Dossiers et Documents , 308.
Colombani, J.-M. a.-Y. 1986. Le Mariage Blanc. Paris: Bernard Grasset.
Cook, T. & Campbell, D. T. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Setting. Chicago: rand McNally.
Cooren, F. 2001. The Organizing Property of Communication. New York: John Benjamins Pub C.
Crozier, M. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crust, David C. 2007. “The Perils of Semipresidentialism”. The Review of Politics. 69: 142-146. Cambridge University Press
Cubertafond, Bernard. 2003. “Le roman de la Ve Republique a l''aube du demo-despotisme”. Pourvoirs. (1) 104.
Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dahl, R. 1966. Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, R. 1971. Polyarchy; Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Daugeron, Bruno. 2004. “La cohabitation et ses faux-semblants: réflexions sur le présidentialisme minoritaire”, Revue du Droit Public. (1) 1: 67-107.
Davis, Michael. “Government of judges: an historical review”. American Journal of Comparative law, 1987, 35: 1501-1521.
Denzin, Norman K. 1978. The Research Act. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Derrida, Jacques, 1967 (French), 1973 (English). Speech and Phenomena (La Voix et le Phénomène), and other Essays on Husserl''s Theory of Signs
Dewey, J. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Holt.
Dewey, John. 1985. Context and Thought. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The Later works. 6:3-21. (1931) Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, John.1984. The quest for certainty. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works. 4:1-250. (1929) Carbondale: Southern University Press.
Diesing, Paul. 1991. How Does Social Science Work? Reflections on Practice. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Drake, H. a. 1996. The Language of Leadership in Contemporary France. Vermont: Dartmouth.
Duhamel, O. 2000, October Vol. III. 1997: l''année de la dissolution. Le Debat , pp. 165-166.
Duhamel, Olivier and Jean-Luc Parodi . 1985. La Constitution de la Cinquième République. Presses de Sciences Po.
Duhamel, Olivier. 1993. Le Pouvoir politique en France. Paris: Seuil.
Durkheim, Emile. 1962. Socialism. New York: Collier-Macmillan.
Durkheim, Emile. 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan.
Durupty, M. 1988. Les Privatisations en France. Paris: Documentation Française.
Duverger, M. 1954. Political Parties. London: Methuen.
Duverger, M. 1986. Breviaire de la cohabitation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France .
Duverger, M. 1987. La cohabitation des français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Duverger, M. 1996. Le système politique français: Droit constitutionnel et Science politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Elderidge, N., S. Gould. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. T. J. Schopf, ed. Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper, & Co., San Francisco, CA, 82-115.
Elgie, R. 1998. “The Classification of Democratic Regime Types: Conceptual Ambiguity and Contestable Assumptions”, European Journal of Political Research, 33, 219-38.
Elgie, R. 1999. “The Politics of Semi-presidentialism”, in R. Elgie (ed.), Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-21.
Elgie, Robert and Sophia Moestrup. 2007 .Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe: A Comparative Study. Routeldge.
Elgie, Robert. 2004. “Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations”. Political Studies Review. Vol. 2, pp314-330.
Erikson, Erik H. 1963. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.
Etzioni, A. 1964. Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Forester, J. (Ed.).
Favoreu, Louis. 1988. La politique saisie par le droit: alternances, cobhation. Economica.
Feldman, M. S. 2003. “A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines.” Industrial and Corporate Change. 12: 727-752.
Feldman, S. Martha and Brian T. Pentland. 2003. “Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94-118.
Feldman, S. Martha and Brian T. Pentland. 2005a. “Issues in empirical field studies of organizational routines.” In M. Becker (ed.). Handbook of Organizational Routines. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, in press.
Feldman, S. Martha and Brian T. Pentland. 2005b. “Organizational routines as a unit of analysis”. Industrial and Corporate Change. (14) 5: 793-815.
Feldman, S. Martha. 1995. Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Feldman, S. Martha. 2000. “Organizational routines as a source of continuous change”. Organization Science. 11: 611-629.
Feldman, S. Martha. 2004. “Resources in emerging structures and process of change.” Organization Science. 15:295-309.
Fenno, Richar. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Little, Brown.
Fessler DMT, Pillsworth EG, Flamson TJ .2004. Angry men and disgusted women: an evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking. Org Beh Hum Dec Proc 95: 107-123.
Frèches, J. 1989. Voyage au centre du pouvoir. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Frémy, D. 1987. Quid des Présidents de la République...et des candidats. Paris: Robert Laffont.
Freud, Sigmund. 1969. An Outline of Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.
Freud, Sigmund. 1975. The Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.
Gaffney, J. a. 1997. French Presidentialism and the Election of 1995. Vermont: Ashgate.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology, Malden MA: Polity Press/Blackwell Publishing.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books
Gicquel, J. 1989. De la cohabitation. Pouvoirs , 69-79.
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretive Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Volume 1: Power, Property and the State. London: Macmillan.
Giroud, F. 1977. La comédie du pouvoir. Paris: Fayard.
Glaser, B. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence versus Forcing. Mill Valley
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1965. “Discovery of substantive theory: A basic strategy underlying qualitative research.” American Behavioral Scientist. 8: 5-12.
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday and Anchor Books.
Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Golden-Biddle, Karen and Karen Locke. 1993. “Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince”. Organization Science. (4) 3: 595-616.
Golsan, R. J. 2003. The Le Pen Moment. SubStance , 128-143.
Gouaud, C. 1996. La Cohabitation. Paris: Ellipses.
Gregory, R. L. 1970. The Intelligent Eye. New York: Mac Graw Hill.
Greilsammer, Ilan. “Cohabitation à la Française, Cohabitation à l’Israélienne” Revue Française de Science Politique 1989. 2 (1). P. 7-8
Greimas, A. 1987. On Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hardin, Russell. 1999. Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hasnas, John. 1995. “back to the Future: From Critical legal Studies Forward to legal Realism, or How Not to Miss the Point of the Indeterminacy Argument.” 45 Duke Law Journal 84.
Hatton, J. A. 1997. Science and its Ways of Knowing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Hegel. G.W.F. 1995. Reason in History. Translated by Robert Hartman. Prentice Hall.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Blackwell publishing.
Henry, P. 1950. L''histoire des préfets. nouvelles éditions latines.
Hopkins, Jasper. 1985. Nicholas of Cusa on learned Ignorance: A Translation and an Appraisal of De Docta Ignorantia. Arthur J. Banning Press
Huberman, Michael and Matthew B. Miles. 1994. “Data Management and Analysis Methods”, Chapter 27 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Denzin and Lincoln, Sage
Hummel, R. 1987. The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Hutchins, E. 1991. “Organizing work by adaptation”. Organization Science. 2: 14-39.
Innis, H. 1952. Changing Concepts of Time. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Iser, W. 1989. Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
James, William. 1981. Pragmatism, A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Popular Lectures on Philosophy. (1907) Hackett Publishing
James, William. 1996. Some Problems of Philosophy: A Beginning of an Introduction to Philosophy (1911), University of Nebraska Press.
Jospin, Lionel. 2002. Le Temps de répondre. Paris: Stock.
July, S. 2000, Jan.. L''adaptation française: entretien avec serge July. Le Debat , pp. 4-9.
Kaufman, H. 1977. Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Keeler, J. A. 1996. Chirac''s Challenge: Liberalization, Europeanization, and Malaise in France. New York: St. Martin''s Press.
Kelly, P. J. 1990. Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law. Oxford.
King, G., Koehane, R., & Verba,S.1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. 1986. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Kirk, Jerome and Marc L. Miller. 1986. Reliability and validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage.
Kirschke, Linda, 2007. “Semi-Presidentialism and the Perils of Power-Sharing in Neopatrimonial states”. Comparative Political Studies. (40) 11: 1372-1394.
Knight, Frank. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Kriz, Jürgen. 1988. Facts and Artefacts in Social Science: An epistemological and methodological analysis of empirical social science research techniques. Hamburg: McGraw-Hill Research.
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1986. “The powers of association.” In J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: 264-280. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France, trans. Alan Sheridan and John Law. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Le Gall, j. 2000. La troisième cohabitation: quelle pratique des institutions de la Cineuième République? Revue du Droit Public (1), 101-120.
Lecomte, C. 1986. Au secours! l''alternance est la. Paris: Messidor.
Legrand, C. a. 1998. Mitterrand. Paris: Jacques Legrand SA.
Levi-Strauss, C. 1963. Structural Anthropology. Translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books. Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Polity
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lewis-Beck, M. S. 1997. “Who’s the Chef? Economic Voting under a Dual Executive”, European Journal of Political Research, 31, 315-25.
Lin, Ann Chih. 1998. “Bridging Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Qualitative Methods”. Policy Studies Journal. (26)1: 162-180.
Lin, Jih-wen. “Change Without Revision: The Prospect of Taiwan’s Constitutional Convention” paper presented at American Political Science Association 2007 Annual conference, Sept. 1, 2007
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Linz, Juan J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism”, Journal of Democracy, (1) 1: 51-69
Lochak, D. 1997. Les hauts fonctionnaires et l''alternmance: quelle politisation? In L''administration française est-elle en crise? L''Harmattan.
Loewenstein G. 2000. Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Am Econ Rev 90: 426-432
Luhmann, N. 1971. Sinn als Grundbegriff der Soziologie. In: Habermas, J. & Luhmann, N (eds.): Theorie der Gesellschaft order Sozialtechnologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 25-100.
Lynch, M., E. Livingston, and Harold Garfinkel. 1983. “Temporal Order in Laboratory Work.” in Science Observed, edited by M. Mulkay and Karin Knorr-Cetina. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Maanen, Van John. 1988. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maines, David. R. 1987. “The Significance of Temporality for the Development of Sociological Theory” The Sociological Quarterly. 28 (3): 303-311
Malouines, M. E. 2001. Deux Hommes Pour Un Fauteuil. Paris: Librairie Artheme fayard.
Manicas, P. and Secord P. F. 1983. “Implications for Psychology of the new Philosophy of Science”. American Psychologist. 38: 399-413.
Mansfield, H. C. 1989. Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power. New York: The Free Press.
Manson, S. 2001. De l''an VIII à l''an 2000: le préfet est-il encore un "fonctionnaire politique"? (1). Revue du Droit Public (1), 201-219.
March, J. G. and H. A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
March, James G. and Johan P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
March, James. 1981. “Decisions in Organizations and Theories of Choice.” Pp. 205-244 in Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, edited by Andrew H. Van de Ven and William F. Joyce. New York: John Wiley, Wiley-Interscience.
March, James. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Free Press.
March, James. G. 1996. “Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action” Administrative Science Quarterly. 41 (2) pp. 278-287.
Marcus, G. E. and M. M. J. Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Marian, M. 2000. Les tressautements de la cohabitation et la remise en marche de la gauche. Esprit (12), 167-168.
Massot, Jean. “Réformer la Constitution pour eviter la Cohabitation? C’est nécessaire et possible”. La Cohabitation. Pouvoirs 91:129-137.
Massot, Jean. 1997. Alternance et cohabitation sous la Ve République. Paris: La Documentation Française.
Maus, D. 1988. Textes et documents relatifs à l''élection présidentielle des 24 avril et 8 mai 1988. Paris: La Documentation française.
McKeown, Timothy. 1999. “Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research.” International Organization (53) 1: 161-190.
Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Ritov I. 1999 Emotion-based choice. J Exp Psych: General. 128: 332-324
Merton, Robert. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action”. American Sociological Review. (1)6. 894-904
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Millar, John. 1812. An Historical View of English Government. London: printed for J. Mawman.
Mirman, R. 2004. Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory: Geometry, Language, Logic. Iuniverse.
Mitchell, J. Clyde. 1984. Case Studies. In Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct, edited by R. F. Ellen,. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press. 237-41
Mitterrand, F. 1975. La paille et le grain. Paris: Flammarion.
Mohr, Lawrence. 1982. Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Montesquieu. 1914. The Spirit of Law (translated by Thomas Nugent, revised by J. V. Prichard). London: G. Bell & Sons, Ltd.
Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Northcutt, W. 1992. Mitterrand: A Political Biography. New York: Holmes & Meier.
O’Neil, P. 1993. “Presidential Power in Post-Communist Europe: The Hungarian Case in Comparative Perspective”, Journal of Communist Studies, 9 (3), 177-201.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Orlikowski, W. 2000. “Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens of studying technology in organizations.” Science. 11: 404-428.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action Presidential Address, American Political Science Association. 1997” The American Political Science Review. 92 (1): 1-22
Parsons, Talcott. 1964. “Evolutionary universals in society”, American Sociological Review. Vol. 29
Parsons, Talcott. 1971. The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Pasquino, Gianfranco. 1997. “Semi-presidentialism: A Political Model at Work”. European Journal of Political Research. 31:128-37
Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Peirce, Charles. 1897. Logic of Relatives. The Monist, Vol. VII, 2: 161-217.
Pfister, T. 1986. Dans les Coulisses du Pouvoir. Paris: Albin Michel.
Pierre Avril. 1994. Les conventions de la constitution: Normes non ecrites du droit politique. Presses universitaires de France.
Piotet, Jean-Pierre, 1994. Edouard Balladur ou la Reputation a l''epreuve du pouvoir. Certitude
Pisani-Ferry, F. 1965. Le coup d''Etat manqué du 16 mai 1877. Paris: Laffont.
Poncelet, C.2002 “La Ve Republique aujourd''hui: un regime qui manque de contre-pouvoirs” Revue du Droit Public. 1 (1)
Popper, Karl, 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York, NY
Poulard, J. V. 1990 Summer. The Frech Double Executive and the Experience of Cohabitation. Political Science Quarterly , 105 (No. 2), pp. 243-267.
Punnet, R. M.1973. Front-bench Opposition. London
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
Raimond, Jean-Bernard. 1989. Le Quai d’Orsay à l’épreuve de la cohabitation. Paris: Flammarion.
Redeylet, M. 1981. L''alternance et les emplois à discétion du gouvernement. AEAp.
Ricoeur, P. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, J. B. Thompson (Ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rockman, Bert. A. 2000. “Theory and Inference in the Study of Bureaucracy: Micro-and Neoinstitutionalist Foundations of Choice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 11 (1): 3-27.
Rogers, R.A.P. 1905. “The Meaning of the Time-Direction”. Mind, (14) 53. pp. 58-73
Roper, S. D. 2002. “Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier-Presidential Regimes”, Comparative Politics, 34(3), 253-72.
Rosaldo, Renato. 1989. Culture & Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
Rosen. F. 1990. “The Origins of Liberal Utilitarianism: Jeremy Bentham and Liberty”. In R. Bellamy, ed., Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-century Political Thought and Practice, London. Pp. 5870.
Rossiter, Clinton. 1948. Constitutional Dictatorship: Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies. Princeton University Press
Roy, Albert Du. 2000. Domaine Réservé: Les coulisses de la diplomatie française. Paris: Seuil.
Sabherwal, Rajiv, Rudy Hirschheim, Time Goles. 2001. “The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model” Organization Science. 12 (2): 179-197.
Sandelowski, M. 1995. Aesthetics of Qualitative Research. Image, 27, 205-209.
Sartori, G. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. Second edition. London: Macmillan.
Sauer, Carl. 1969. Seeds, Spades, Hearths, and Herds: The Domestication of Animals and Foodstuffs. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Schrameck, O. 2001. Matignon Rive gauche. Paris: Seuil.
Schumpeter, J. [1936] 1991. The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Ed. R. Swedberg. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
Schutz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Translated by G. Walsh and F. Lehnert. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Scott, Richard. W. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage
Scott, W. Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations.. London: Sage Publication.
Seince, P. 1988. Presidentielles: de la monarchie temperee.
Sewell, William. H. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation” The American Journal of Sociology. 98 (1): 1-29.
Skach, Cindy.2005. Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic. Princeton University Press.
Skake, R. 1994. Case Studies. In: N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Smith, Dorothy. 1974. “The Social Construction of Documentary Reality,” in Sociological Inquiry, 44 (4): 257-268.
Smith, H. W. 1975. Strategies of Social Research: The Methodological Imagination. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Stepan, A. and Skach, C. 1993. “Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarism versus Presidentialism”, World Politics, 46 (1), 1-22
Stern, P. N. 1980. “Grounded Theory Methodology: Its uses and processes.” Image, 12. 20-23.
Stinchcombe, A. 1959. “Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: A comparative study,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 3: 168-187.
Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Taylor, C. 1993. “To follow a rule.” In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, and M. Postone (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives: 45-60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, W. I. 1966. On Social Organization and Social Personality (M. Janowitz, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tiersky, R. 2000. François Mitterrand: The Last French President. New York: St. Martin''s Press.
Tobin, J. 1997. Le péfet dans la décentralisation. L''Harmattan.
Tuppen, J. 1991. Chirac''s France, 1986-88. New York: St. Martin''s Press.
Tushnet, Mark. 1996. “Defending the Indeterminacy Thesis.” 16 Quinnipiac Law Review 339.
Van de Ven, M. S. Poole. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20 (3): 510-540.
Vedel, Georges. 1997. « Variations et cohabitations », Pouvoirs, 83
Vedel. Georges. 1958 Droit administratif. – Presses universitaires de France
Vezins, V. D. 1995. Balladur de a à z. Paris: Albin Michel.
Victor, Barbara. 1999. Le Matignon de Jospin. Paris: Flammarion.
Weaver, R.K. and Rockman, B.A. 1993. “Assessing the Effects of Institutions”, in R. K Weaver and B.A. Rockman (eds), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 1-41.
Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Trans. A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons. Oxford: Oxford university Press.
Weber, Max. 1956. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Talcott Parsons.Allen & Unwin
Weick, K. E. 2005. Organizing and failures of imagination. International Public Managemeent Journal, 8(3): 425-438.
Weick, K. E. 2006. Review of Shouldering Risks by Constance Perrin. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 766-769.
Weick, K. E., and K. Roberts. 1993. “Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on fight decks.” Administrative Science Quarterly. 38: 357-381.
Westbrook, John, “Cohabitation: from prehistory to post-elections”, The Tocqueville Review, 8, 1987, p. 325-340.
Wiesel, E. 1999. And the Sea Is Never Full: memoirs 1969-. New York: Knopf.
William, M. 2000. Science and Social Science. London: Routledge.
Wilson, T.P., and D. Zimmerman. 1979-80. “Ethnomethodology, Sociology, and Theory,” Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 7:52-88.
Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.
Wolcott, Harry F. 1994. Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Zapp, Christian and Eben Moglen. 1996. “Linguistic Indeterminacy and the Rule of law: On the Perils of Misunderstanding Wittgenstein,” 84 Georgetown Law Review 485.
Zarka, J.-C. 1992. Fonction présidentielle et problématique majorité présidentielle/majorité parlementaire sous la Ve Republique (1986-1992). Paris: LGDJ.
Zarka, J.-C. 1994. Le "domaine réservé" à l''épreuve de la seconde cohabitation. Revue politique et parlementaire , 1 (969), 40-44.
Zemmour, E. 1995. Balladur, immobile a grands pas. Paris: Bernard Grasset.
Zimmerman, D. 1970. “The practicalities of rule use.” In J. Douglas (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge: 221-238. Chicago: Aldine.
Zorgbibe, Charles. 1993. “Le rapport Vedel: un retour aux sources de la Ve République?” Revue politique et parlementaire, 963: 3-12.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE