:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多國籍企業所有權型態、技術能力與經營績效關係之研究-以在台之英美日子公司為例
作者:施靜慧
作者(外文):Ching-Hui Shih
校院名稱:中國文化大學
系所名稱:國際企業管理研究所
指導教授:林彩梅
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:多國籍企業所有權型態技術能力經營績效multi-national enterprisesownership structuretechnological capabilitiesbusiness performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:56
近年來各國的多國籍企業蓬勃發展,期望藉由海外投資,增加企業的經營績效,本研究旨在探討多國籍企業所有權型態、技術能力與經營績效之關係,目的:1.外來投資究應採取何種所有權型態,能獲致較佳之經營績效2.台灣近年來高科技產業得天獨厚所擁有優越之技術能力,能否繼續為外商創造較高之經營績效3.外來投資持有股權越高,是否技術移轉越多,擁有之技術能力越強,經營績效也越佳4.英美日多國籍企業對所有權型態、技術能力與經營績效是否具干擾關係。本研究結果發現:1.外來投資採取不同所有權型態,與經營績效呈顯著差異,持有股權越高,無論在資金調度或策略之運用上,可以彈性運用,不易受到地主國干預,所以會有一較佳之經營績效2.技術能力對經營績效具顯著效果,當外來投資擁有之技術能力越高,造成企業製程或產品之創新,因而提昇企業之競爭優勢,進而影響企業之經營績效3.所有權型態與技術能力對經營績效具有交互影響效果,當外來投資持有股權越高,技術移轉越多,導致擁有之技術能力越強,促使獲利能力或銷售狀況提升,經營績效也越佳4.在台之英美日多國籍企業,對地主國所有權型態、技術能力與經營績效產生干擾效果。
Multi-national enterprise has been expanding in recent years. The aim is to enhance the performance of the business through overseas investments. This study takes on this unresolved issue by studying the effects of different types of ownership structure as well as technological capabilities on business performance.
The purpose of this study is to understand: 1. What types of ownership structure lead to better business performance? 2. Can Taiwan’s high-tech industries’ technological capabilities continue to create better business performance? 3. Does the business per-formance correspond proportionally to higher technological capabilities as a result of higher percentage of foreign ownership? 4. Do multi-national enterprises from America, Great Britain, and Japan cause interference on the ownership structure, technological capabilities, and business performance?
Statistical analysis shows that 1. Each multi-national enterprise adopts a different type of ownership structure, which does show a significant difference on performance. As the percentage of ownership goes higher, business performs better, on account of more flexible capital transfer and business strategies. 2. The higher the technological advantage, the better the performance. Foreign investment’s higher technological capa-bilities brings in new manufacturing process or new products, which enhance the com-petitive edge and, thus, better business performance. 3. The different types of ownership structure have an interference effect on the technological capabilities and business per-formance. When a foreign company holds a higher percentage of ownership, it tends to transfer more technologies to upgrade the company’s technological capabilities and, as a result, promotes better sales and earning. 4. Those British, American, and Japanese multi-national enterprises have an interference effect on indigenous ownership structure, technological capabilities and business performance.
參 考 文 獻
一、中文部份
李文瑞,曹為忠,詹雪蘭,陳旭銘(1998),中小企業進入大陸市場股權模式決策與經營績效之研究,產業金融,(114),19-34。
余明助,秦兆瑋(2003),我國多國籍企業國際行銷策略、政治風險、進入模式與經營績效關係之研究,高雄應用科技大學學報,(32),505-532。new window
林明杰(1992),技術能力與技術引進績效相關之研究,國立政治大學國際企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。new window
林彩梅(1995),多國籍企業技術移轉與我國產業國際水平分工,第五屆多國籍企業國際學術研討會論文集,台北:中國文化大學。new window
林彩梅(2003),多國籍企業論(五版),台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
孫梅瑞,陳龍麒(2002),台灣地區上市公司從事購併活動對經營績效影響之研究,中山管理評論,10(1),155-184。new window
經濟部投資審查委員會編製(2007),僑外投資事業營運狀況調查及對我國經濟發展貢獻分析報告,台北:編製者發行。
鄭伶如(2005),技術競爭力、創新資本與績效關聯性之研究-以台灣資訊電子業為例,國立台北大學企業管理學系未出版之博士論文。new window
蔡裕源(1994),技術移轉類型、管理機制與移轉績效關係之研究,國立政治大學國際企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。new window
劉峰旭(2004),台灣廠商大陸市場進入模式及經營績效之研究-交易成本理論、制度理論與行為決策理論之整合分析,銘傳大學國際企業學系未出版之碩士論文。
賴士葆,林明杰(1993),影響技術引進績效的因素,管理評論,12。new window
二、英文部份
Agarwal, S. & Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-28.
Anderson, E. & Gatignon, H. (1986). Mode of foreign entry: A trans-action cost analysis and proposition. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
Anderson, E. (1990). Two firms, one frontier:On assessing joint venture performance. Sloan Management Review, (Winter), 19-30.
Balajis, S. C. & Perlmutter, H. (1986). Strategic planning for a global business. Columbia Journal of Word Business, (Summer), 3-10.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources & sustained competitive advan-tage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Beamish, P. (1985). The characteristics of joint ventures in de-veloped and developing countries. Columbia Journal of World Business, (Fall), 13-19.
Bleekehdr, J. & Ernst, D. (1991). The way to win in cross-board alliance. Harvard Business Review, 67(6), 127-135.
Brewer, H. L. (1981). Investor benefits from corporate international diversification. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, (March), 113-121.
Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost in-fluences on entry mode choice. Journal of International Busi-ness Studies, 33(2), 203-221.
Brouthers, K. D & Brouthers, L. E. (2000). Acquisition or greenfield start-up? Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences. Strategic Management Journal , 21(1), 89-97.
Brouthers, L. E., Brouthers, K. D. & Werner, S. (1999). Is Dunning's eclectic framework descriptive or normative? Journal of Inter-national Business Studies, 30(4), 831-844.
Brouthers, L. E., Brouthers, K. D & Wernert, S. (2000). Perceived en-vironmental uncertainty, entry mode choice and satisfaction with economic performance. British Journal of Management, 11, 189-195.
Brouthers, K. D., & Nakos, G. (2004). SME entry mode choice and performance: A transaction cost perspective, Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 28(3), 229-247.
Brown, R. (1992). Managing the s curves of innovation. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(1), 61-72.
Buckly, P. J. & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational en-terprise. New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers, Inc.
Buckly ,P. J. & Casson, M. (1985). The economic theory of the multi-national enterprise. London: Macmillan.
Chanaron, J. J. & Perrin, J. (1987). The transfer of research, develop-ment and design to developing countries. Futures, 503-512.
Chen, S. F. S. & Hennart, J. F. (2002). Japanese investors choice of joint ventures versus wholly-owned subsidiaries in the US: The role of market barriers and firm capabilities. Journal of Interna-tional Business Studies, 33(1), 1-18.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica. 4, 386-405.
Collins, J. M. (1990). A market performance comparison of U.S. firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 2, 271-287.
Contractor, F. J. (1990). Ownership patterns of U.S. joint ventures abroad and the liberalization of foreign government regulations in the 1980s: evidence from the benchmark surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 55-73.
Elizabeth, S. C. & Winson, B. L. (1989). Conglomerates in 1980s a performance appraisal. Financial Management, 18(1), 45-53.
Fama, E. F. & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and con-trol? Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 301-325.
Feenstra, R. C. (1998). Integration of trade and disintegration of pro-duction in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspec-tive, 12(4), 31-50.
Gallon, M. R., Stillman, H. M. & Coat, D. (1995). Putting core com-petency thinking to practice. Technology Management, (May-June), 20-28.
Gatignon, H. & Anderson, E. (1988). The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4(Fall), 305-336.
Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S. & Olsen, D. M. (2000). Product and in-ternational diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 51-80.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R. & Palich L. (1997). Cultural Diversity and the Performance Multinational Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 309-335.
Grant, R. M. (1987). Multinational and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(3), 79-89.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive ad-vantage: implications for strategy Formulation. California Man-agement Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P. & Thomas, H. (1988). Diversity, diversi-fication and profitability among British manufacturing compa-nies,1972-1984. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 771-801.
Hall, G. R., & Johnson, R. E. (1970). Transfer of U.S. aerospace tech-nology to Japan, in the technology factor in international trade. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Columbia University Press, 305-358.
Han, K. C. & Lee, S. H. (1998). Multi-nationality and firm per-formance. Multinational Business Review, 6, 63-70.
Hennart, J. F. (1988). A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 361-374.
Hill, C. L., Hwang, P. & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of internal entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 117-128.
Hill, C. W. L. & Jones, G. R. (2004). Strategic management: An Inte-grated approach(6th ed.). Houghton Mifflin Com.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. & Hoskisson, R. E. (1997). Strategic man-agement: Competitiveness and globalization. New York: West Public Co.
Hsu, C. C. & Boggs, D. J. (2003). Internationalization and per-formance: Traditional measures and their decomposition. The Multinational Business Review, 11(3) 23-49.
Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. MIT press.
Jacobs, M. (1991). Short-term America: The causes and cures of our business myopia. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Mana-gerial behavior, agency cost and capital structure? Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Jung, Y. (1991). Multi-nationality and profitability. Journal of Busi-ness Research, 23, 179-187.
Kefalas, A. G. (1992). The global corporation. National Forum, 72(4), 26-30.
Kim,W. C. & Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multi-nationals mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 29-53.
Kogut, B. (1985). Designing global strategies: Profiting from operational flexibility. Sloan Management Review, 26, 27-38.
Kogut, B. & Singh, H. (1988).The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, (Fall), 411-432.
Kumar, M. S. (1984). Growth, acquisition and investment: An analysis of the growth of industrial firms and their overseas activities. Cambride, U. K.: Cambride University Press.
Lacity, M. C. & Hirschheim, R. (1993). The information systems out-sourcing bandwagon. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 73-86.
Lee, J., Bae, Z. T. & Choi, D. K. (1988). Technology development process: A Model for a developing countries with a global per-spective. Rand D Management, 18(3), 235-250.
Long, C. & Vickers-Koch, M. (1995). Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage. Organization Dynamics, 24(1), 7-22.
Luo, Y. (1997). Performance implications of international strategy. Group & Organization Management, 22(1), 87-116.
Luo, Y. (1999). The structure-performance relationship in a transi-tional economic: An empirical study of multinational alliance in China. Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 15-31.
Makino, S. & Beamish, P. W. (1998). Performance and survival of joint ventures with non conventional ownership structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 797-818.
Mathur I., Singh, M. & Gleason K. C. (2004). Multinational diversifi-cation and corporate performance: Evidence from European firms. European Financial Management, 10(3), 439-464.
Michel, A. & Shaked, I. (1986). Multinational corporations vs. domes-tic corporations: Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 89-100.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management owner-ship ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-316.
Morck, R. & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multi-nationality. Journal of Business, 64(20), 165-187.
Nakos, G., & Brouthers K. D. (2002). Entry mode choice of SMES in central and eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Prac-tice, (Fall), 47-63.
Nitsch, D., Beamish, P. W. & Makino, S. (1996). Entry mode and per-formance of Japanese FDI in western Europe. Management In-ternational Review, 36, 27.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pan, Y. (1996). Influences on foreign equity ownership level in joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), 1-26.
Pan, Y., Li, S. & Tse, D. K. (1999). The impact of order and mode of market entry on profitability and market share. Journal of In-ternational Business Studies, 30, 81-104.
Pan, Y. & Tse, D. K. (2000). The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535-554.
Pitt, M. & Clarke, K. (1999). Competing on competence: A knowl-edge perspective on the management of strategic innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(3), 301-316.
Ramanujam, V. & Venkartraman, N. (1987). Planning and perform-ance: A new look at an old question. Business Horizons, 30(3), 19-25.
Rasheed, H. S. (2005). Foreign entry mode and performance: The moderating effects of environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(1), 41-54.
Rivera, J. M. (1991). Prediction performance of earnings forecasts: The case of U. S. multinationals, Journal of International Busi-ness Studies, 22(2), 265-288.
Robock, S. H. & Simmond, K. (1983). International business and multinational enterprises(3rd ed.), Homewood: Richard D. Ir-win, Inc., 460-461.
Root, F. R. (1987). Entry strategies for international markets. Mas-sachusetts: Lexington.
Rosenberg, N. & Frischtak, C. (1985). International technology: Con-cepts, measures and comparisons. New York: .Pager.
Shapiro, A. C. (1999). Multinational financial management(6th ed.), 686-691.
Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 44-68.
Stopford, J. M. & Wells, L. T. (1972). Managing the multinational en-terprise. Basic Books Inc., 100-167.
Technology Atlas Team (1987). Components of technology for re-sources transformation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 32, 19-35.
Teece, D. J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The Eco-nomic Journal, 87(June), 242-261.
VenKatraman, N. & Vasuderom, R. (1987). Planning and performance: a new look at an old question. Business Horizons, 30(3), 19-25.
Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, 190-207.
Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of U.S. enterprises. New York: Basic Book, 52.
Walsh, S. & Linton, D. (2002). The measurement of technical compe-tences. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 63-86.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
Williamson, O. E. (1979).Transaction cost economics: The govern-ment of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(3), 233-261.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York:Free Press.
Wong, J. K. (1995). Technology transfer in Thailand: Descriptive vali-dation of a technology transfer model. International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 788-796.
Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W. & Makino, S. (1994). Ownership- based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 253-273.
Wortzel, R. (1979). New life style determinants of women’s food and shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43, 28-29.
Zhao, H. & Luo, Y. (2002). Product diversification, ownership struc-ture, and subsidiary performance in China’s dynamic market. Management International Review, 42(1), 27-48.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE