參考文獻
一、中文部份
毛新勇(1999)。建構主義學習理論在教學中的應用。課程教材教法，9，19。
王千倖(2000)。案例教學法。洪志成等箸。教學原理。高雄：麗文文化。
王文科(2003)。課程與教學論。台北：五南。
王薌茹(1994)。概念圖在國中生物教學成效之研究。國立高雄師範大學
科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)，高雄。
王麗雲(1999)。個案教學法的理論與實務。課程與教學季刊，2(3)，117-134。
司徒達賢(1984)。管理與組織個案集。台北：國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
朱國雄(2007)。大學教育個案教學法要素分類與學生產品知識關係之研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文(未出版)，台北。
江武雄(1995)。建構主義的教學策略-以「科學教育專題研究」為例。建構與教學。第2期。(網路版)。
江淑卿(2001a)。概念構圖與圖示對兒童自然科學的知識結構與理解能力之影響。科學教育學刊，9(1)，35-54。
江淑卿(2001b)。經驗式和統計式概念構圖對兒童的知識結構與理解能力之影響。屏東師院學報，14，371-396。
江淑卿、郭生玉(1997)。不同學習過程的概念構圖策略對促進知識專家化與理解能力之效果研究。師大學報：教育類，45，1-15。
何克抗(1997)。建構主義的教學模式、教學方法與教學設計。北京師範大學學報，5(143)，74-81。
何治鈴(2002)。概念構圖與合作學習應用於綜合高中會計科目教學成效之研究。中原大學會計研究所碩士論文(未出版)，桃園。
余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習—概念構圖之研究。台北：商鼎文化。
吳青樺(2003)。案例教學法在教師專業成長網路學習社群之發展。淡江大學教育科技學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)，臺北。
李咏吟(1998)。認知教學-理論與策略。台北：心理出版社。
肖川(1998)。從建構主義學習觀論學生的主體發展。教育研究與實驗，4，1-5。
卓亦甄、王國華(2003)。網路案例教學法之發展初探－以輔導生物科實習教師為例。中華民國第十九屆科學教育學術研討會。
周文賢(2002)。多變量統計分析，台北：智勝文化事業有限公司。
周齊武、杜榮瑞、顏信輝(2001)。從會計專業科目之期中及期末考試題探索我國會計教育強調的學習層級(一)，會計研究月刊，186，126-132。
周齊武、杜榮瑞、顏信輝(2001)。從會計專業科目之期中及期末考試題探索我國會計教育強調的學習層級(二)，會計研究月刊，187，148-152。
林文真(2004)。圖形組織工具訓練方案對國小資優生問題解決思考歷程影響之相關研究。國立師範大學特殊教育學系特教教學碩士論文(未出版)，台北。
林佩璇(1992)。合作學習在高級職業學校的應用。技術及職業教育，24，21-23。
林芳穗、曹融、嚴貞(民87)。個案教學法在視覺傳達設計課程教學之研究。勤益學報，4，411-420。
林冠群(2001)。概念圖評量在數學課室學習中的應用與變異來源之初探。高雄師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)，高雄。
林純華(2007)。案例教學法實施之研究－以職前戲劇教育師資培育課程為例。國立台南大學戲劇創作與應用學系碩士論文，未出版，臺南。
林清山(1990)。教育心理學認知傾向。台北：遠流出版公司。
林碧珍(1990)。國小學生數學解題表現及其相關因素。國立臺灣師範大學數學研究所博士論文(未出版)，臺北。
邱垂昌(2006)。應用概念構圖學習策略於商業會計學之研究－合作學習抑或個別學習。高雄師大學報，21，87-104。
邱垂昌、官月緞(2003)。結構化知識圖形中概念構圖之運用-以高等會計學為例。教育與心理研究，26(2)，355-384。
邱垂昌、陳美紀、黃素琴、陳文義(1998)。應用結構化知識於會計學上之實證研究-概念圖之運用。教育研究資訊，6(6)，14-31。
邱垂昌、陳瑞斌（2000）。應用概念構圖於會計教學與評量之實證研究。政治大學學報，81，37-67。
邱垂昌、黃華山、謝佳惠(2004)。以超媒體輔助之概念圖建通教學教材之實證研究-以會計存貨教材為例。國立臺北師範學院學報，17(2)，57-84。
范瑞東(2005)。概念構圖教學策略對學習成效影響的後設分析 。國立新竹教育大學職業繼續教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)，新竹。
徐文華(1997)。The Use of Case Study Method in Business Management English Teaching at the Tertiary Level，文藻學報，11，61-74。
高薰芳(2000)。案例教學法在師資培育之應用與評鑑。發表於中華民國課程與教學學會舉辦：「第一屆課程與教學論壇」學術研討會，台北。
張民杰(2001)。案例教學法之研究及其試用—以教育行政課程試用為例。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文(未出版)，台北。
張秀鳳(2005)。國小五年級學童在概念構圖融入數學教學活動的解題表現之研究。國立台灣師範大學數理教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)，臺北。
張春興(2004)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
張春興、林清山(1991)。教育心理學。台北：東華。
張美玉(1998)。建構取向的科學教室內師生互動實例。科學教育學刊，6(2)，149-168。
張景媛(1994)。數學文字題錯誤概念分析及學生建構數學概念的研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報，27，175-200。
張靜嚳(1995)。何謂建構主義。建構與教學，第3期(網路版)。
郭生玉（1991）。心理與教育研究法（第十版）。台北：精華。
陳惠娟(2003)。國中綜合活動領域實施概念構圖教學之成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文(未出版)，臺北。
陳琦、張建偉(1998)。建構主義與教學革新。教育研究與實驗，3，46-50。
陳嘉成(1996)。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對小學生自然科學習之成效研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)，臺北。
陳嘉成(1998)。合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效研究。教育與心理研究。21，107-128。
陳憶芬(2004)。案例教學法及其在師資培育上之應用。中等教育，55(4)，130-141。
陳憶芬、張克章與吳壽山(2004)。案例教學法及學生回饋意見之分析研究。國立編譯館館刊，32(3)，44-55。
黃政傑(1992)。台灣省高級職業學校合作學習實驗研究。台北：台灣師範大學教育研究中心。
楊明祥(2004)。融入概念構題圖教學策略於國中光學單元之研究。國立彰化師範大學物理研究所碩士論文(未出版)，彰化。
詹志禹(1996)。認識與知識：建構論vs.接受觀。教育研究雙月刊，49，25-37。
劉俊庚(2002)。迷思概念與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析-以概念構圖和後設分析模式探討其意涵與影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)，臺北。
劉常勇(1998)。管理教育之個案教學。教育研究資訊，6(2)，101-114。
蔡宜君(2000)。案例教學法在中等學校師資培育之應用：教學案例的發展。淡江大學教育科技學系研究所碩士論文(未出版)，臺北。
謝佳惠、黃華山、邱垂昌(2003)。應用改良式概念圖建構會計存貨教材之可行性探討。屏中學報，11，201-208。

二、英文部分
Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC) (1990). Objective of education for accounting: Position statement number one. Issue in Accounting Education, 5, 307-312.
Adler, S. A. (1996). On case method and classroom management. Action in Teacher Education, 18(3), 33-43.
Akinoglu, Orhan and Yasar, Zeynep. (2007). The Effect of Note taking in Science Education through The Mind Mapping Technique on students’ attitudes, Academic achievement and concept Learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(3), 34-43.
Andrew, L. (1997). Diversity : Changing perspectives using case-based method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of College for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406344)
Argyris, C. (1980). Some limitations of the case method : Experience in a management development program. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 291-298.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bagley, C. & Hunter B. (1992). Restructuring, and Technology: Forgoing a new relationship. Educational Technology, 32(7), 22-27.
Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. B. (1994). Teaching and Case Method, 3rd edn (Cambridge. MA, Harvard Business School Press).
Bastable, S. B. (2003). Nurse as education: Principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
Benham, M. K. (1996). The practitioner-scholars’ view of school change: a case-based approach to teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(2), 119-135.
Bentley, G. W. (2001). Problem-based learning. In A. J. Lowenstein & Bradshaw(Eds.), Fuszard’s innovative teaching strategies in nursing (3rd ed. 83-106). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Billings, D. M. & Halstead, J. A. (Eds.). (1998). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faulty. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.
Birkmire, D. P. (1985). Text processing: The influence of text structure, Background knowledge, and purpose. Reading research Quarterly, 20, 314-326.
Bloom, B. S. (1981). Evaluation to improvement learning. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll Model – A 25 year retrospective and prospective view. Educatuonal Research, 18(1), 26-31.
Charistensen, C. R. & Hansen, A. J. (1987). Teaching and the case method. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
Chi, M. T. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Implications for learning and discovery in sciences. In R. Giere (Ed). Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp.129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive science, 5, 121-152.
Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J.F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 257-273.
Chiou, Chei-Chang. (2008). The Effect of Concept Mapping on Students; Learning Achievements and Interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375-387.
Diamantes, T. (1996). A case for cases: Using the case method in the preparation of administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors in educational Administration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399624).
Ertmer, P. A. & Russell, J. D. (1995). Using case studies to enhance: instructional design. Educational Technology, 35(4), 23-31.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (Fourth Edition). Orlando. FL: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Hansen, James D. (2006). Using Problem-Based Learning in Accounting, Journal of Education for Buseness, 81(4), 221-224.
Hasemann. L., & Mansfield. H. (1995). Concept mapping in research on mathematical knowledge development: Background, method, finding and conclusions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 45-72.
Hassler, Russel H. (1950). The Case Method of Teaching Accounting, Accounting Review, 25(2), 170-173.
Hill, Lilian H. (2005). Concept Mapping to Encourage Meaningful Student Learning. Adult Learning, 16(3/4), 7-13.
Hoffmann, Michael. G.. (2005). Logical Argument Mapping: A Method for Overcoming Cognitive Problems of Conflict Management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(4), 304-334.
Hsu, Li-Ling. (2004). Developing Concept Maps from Problem-based learning Scenario Discussions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(5), 510-518.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (l985). The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups.. In R. E. Slavin, et al (Eds.) Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp.103-124). New York: plenum Press.
Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T.(1990). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: International Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson R. T. (1991). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. New Jersey: Allyn and Bacon.
Kagan, S. (1985). Dimensions of cooperative classroom structures. In R. E. Slavin, et al (Eds.) Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn.(pp.67-96). New York: Plenum Press.
Kleinfeld, J.(1992b). Can cases carry pedagogical content knowledge? Yes, but we’re got signs of a “Matthew Effect.” (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344841).
Knirk, F. G. (1991). Case Materials: Research and Practice, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(1), 73-81.
Kokotovich, Vasilije. (2008). Problem Analysis and Thinking Tools: An Empirical Study of Non-Hierarchical Mind Mapping, Design Studies, 29(1), 49-69.
Kolkman, M. J. (2005). Mental model mapping as a new tool to analyze the use of information in decision-making in integrated water management, Physics and Chemistry of The Earth, 30(4/5), 317-332.
Kowalski, T. J. (1991). Case Study on Educational Administration. NY. Longman Publishing Group.
Kowalski, T.J.(1999). Using cases in a school administration doctoral seminar. In M.R. Sudzina(Ed.), Case application for teacher education : Cases of teaching and learning in the content area (pp.201-217). Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon.
Lang, C. (1987). The case method of teaching: Community college faulty are taking a “Harvard Method” and making it their own. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 286539)
Leauby, B. A. & Brazina P. (1998). Concept mapping: Potential uses in accounting Education. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(1), 123-138.
Levin, B. B. (1993). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63-79.
Lewis, A. B. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81. 521-531.
Lundeberg, M. a. (1987). Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading research Quarterly, 22, 407-432. :
Malone, J., & Dekkers, J. (1984). The concept map as an aid to instruction in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 84(3), 220-231.
Merseth, K. K. (1991). The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4). 243-249.
Merseth, K. K. (1994). Cases, case method, and the professional development of education. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 401272)
Motiwalla, L. & Tello, S. (2000). Distance learning on the internet: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4). 253-264.
Nagel, G. K. (1991). Case method: It’s potential for training administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 75(539), 37-43.
Nesbit ,John C., & Adesope, Olusola O. (2006).Learning With Concept and
Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Researc, 76(3). 413-448.
Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. D. (1984). Application of advances in learning theory and philosophy of science to the improvement of chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(7), 607-612.
Novak, J. D. (1991). Concept maps and vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Richardson, V.(1993). Use of cases in considering methods for motivation student. In H. Harrington & M. Thompson(Eds.), Student motivation and case study manual(pp.57-60).Boone, NC: Appalachian State University.
Rippin, A., Booth, C., Bowie, St., and Jordan, J. (2002). A Complex Case: using the case study method to explore uncertainty and ambiguity in undergraduate business education. Teaching in Higher Education, 7 (4), p429-441.
Roselle, A. (1996). The case study method: a learning tool for practicing librarians and information specialists, Library Review, 45(4), 30-38.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1985). Representation of knowledge. In A. M. Aitkenhear & J. M. Slack (Eds), Issues in cognitive modeling (15-62). Hillsdale, NU: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press.
Schon, D. A. (1983). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design
for teaching and learning in the profession. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Seaman, T. (1990). On the high road to achievement: Cooperation concept mapping. Virginia U.S. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED335140)
Shulman, J. H. (1992a). Tender feelings, hidden thoughts: Confronting bias, innocence, and racism through case discussions. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356208).
Shulman, L. (1996). Just in case : Reflections on learning from experience. In J. Colbert, K. Trimble, & P. Desberg (1996). The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp198-217). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Shulman, L. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman(Ed.), Case methods in teacher education(pp.155-174).New York: Teachers College Press.
Simon, Jon. (2007). Concept Mapping in a Financial Accounting Theory Course. Accounting Educatuon. 16(3). 273-308.
Spiro, R.J. et. al. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application : Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B.C. Britton(Ed.), Executive control processes(pp.177-199). Hillsdale, N J : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). The theory of successful intelligence.發表於中華民國國家科學委員會科學教育處主辦：「創造力、智力與思考」學術研討會，台北。
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science. (3rd Ed). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stoiber, K.C. (1991). The effect of technical and reflective preserves instruction on pedagogical reasoning and problem solving. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 131-139.
Stolovitch, H.D., & Keeps, E.J. (1991). Selecting and writing case studies for improving human performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 4(1), 43-54.
Tillman, B.A. (1992). A study of the case of case methods in preservice teacher education. UMI Dissertation Service. Ann Arbor, Michigan: A Bell & Howell Company.
Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37-54.
Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G. T., & Spilich, G. J. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Leaning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651-667.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes, Eds, & Trans. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, W. M., Cheung, C. F., Lee, W. B., Kwok, S. K. (2008). Self-associated concept mapping for representation, elicitation and inference of knowledge. Knowledge-Based systems, 21(1), 52-61.
Wassermann. S. (1994). Introduction to case method teaching: A guide to the galaxy. NY: Teaching College Columbia University.
Williams, M.M. (1996). Using the case method in a foundations of education course. In J. Colbert, K. Trimble, & P. Desberg (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case method (pp.187-196). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Wineberg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical text: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American educational Research Journal, 28, 395-455.