中文部分
方世杰(1998)，國內廠商參與科技專案研發動機之研究，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，
第4 卷第3 期，159-184。
方彥永(2003)，知識經濟體系下政府協助產業創新之研究－以業界開發產業技術
計畫為例，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
王健全(2001)，臺灣科技資源之規劃與運用。經濟前瞻，3 月號，72-76。
朱斌妤(2005)，鼓勵中小企業開發新技術推動計畫(SBIR)成效追蹤作業委外評估
研究計畫報告，財團法人工業技術研究院。
朱斌妤(2006)，科技政策與專案評估：選擇偏誤、動機、作為、創新與績效整合
評估模型。2006 年國科會計畫申請書。
江雪嬌(2001)，我國鼓勵中小企業技術創新策略之研究，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，
第7 卷第2 期，169-184。
呂淑媛(1998)，經濟部所屬事業協助中小企業推動研究發展計畫，工業簡訊，第
28 卷第7 期，57-65。
宋大崙（2006）。臺灣國家型科技計畫評量制度探討。國立臺灣大學會計學研究
所EMBA 碩士學位論文，未出版，台北。
李仁芳(1996)，產研合作創新與合作管理機制之探討，第五屆產業管理研討會。
周妍劭（2004）。專家為主，指標為輔：科技專案績效考評作業運作模式。臺灣
經濟研究月刊，第27 卷第1 期，27-33。
周霞麗（2002）。我國現有研究機構之績效考評機制。臺灣經濟研究月刊，第25卷第11 期，52-61。
林月珠(2002)，資料包絡分析法應用於電子、資訊領域科專計畫的效率評估，國
立交通大學工業工程與管理學程碩士論文。
林治廷(2000)，科技研究發展專案的連續多期效率評估，國立交通大學工業工程
與管理所碩士論文。
林欣吾（2002a），一般科專計畫績效評估指標。臺灣經濟研究月刊，第25 卷第11 期，62-71。
林欣吾（2002b），業界科專之績效評估機制。臺灣經濟研究月刊，第25 卷第11期，72-77。
承立平(1998)，我國科技產業發展政策之做法與檢討”，經濟情勢與評論季刊，
第三卷第三期，1-37。
祁明輝(1999)，專利於產品研發所扮演之角色，智慧財產權，第5 期，39-45 頁。姜貞吟(2002)，創新前瞻技術規劃之策略與績效考評機制。臺灣經濟研究月刊，第25 卷11 期，78-87。
柯惠友(2002)，政府研發補助經費對公司研發活動之影響效果──以經濟部所屬115
事業協助中小企業推動研究發展計畫為例，國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩
士論文。
柯惠友(2002)，政府研發補助經費對公司研發活動之影響效果─以經濟部所屬事業協助中小企業推動研究發展計畫為例，國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士
論文。
夏文龍(1998)，專利對產業界的價值，智慧財產權管理，第16 期，20-21 頁。
莊弘旻(2002)，公共部門與民間部門研究發展經費之關聯性分析，國立台灣科技
大學企業管理系碩士論文。
陳正昌、程炳林(1998)，SPSS、SAS、BMDP 統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用（第
二版）。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。
陳正福(2001)，研發活動之資源基礎分析－以主導性新產品開發計畫廠商為例，
國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
陳嘉萍(2002)，政府研發獎助與中小企業研發創新關係之研究－以新竹科學園區
廠商為例，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
曾政傑(2005)，研發聯盟的動機和組織能力對新產品開發績效的影響，國立成功大學企業管
理研究所碩士論文。
黃仟文、李鳳梧、朱斌妤(2003)，評估政府資助中小企業創新之效果－以「鼓勵
中小企業開發新技術推動計畫」為例，2003 科技政策與國家競爭力研討會，
台北：台灣大學。(卓越計畫 甲-91H-FA08-1-4)
黃志男(1997)，資料包絡分析法在科技專案執行效率評估的應用－以能源科技研發專案為例，國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
經濟部技術處(2002)，業界開發產業技術計畫成果摘要彙編，經濟部：台北市。
經濟部技術處(2005)，2005 科技專案執行年報
http://doit.moea.gov.tw/news/forlog_openfile.asp?id=4&award=pub&s=2&tourl
=../news_manager/pubpost/4f3.pdf
經濟部技術處全球資訊網。http://doit.moea.gov.tw/03know/product.asp
經濟部技術處科專計畫統計總覽。http://tierwebs.tier.org.tw/itis/itis12.asp
經濟部技術處業界開發產業技術計畫網站
http://innovation1.tdp.org.tw/group/application/tdp_itdp/index.php
董鍾明(2001)，研發效率評估之資料包絡分析法實證研究－以主導性新產品開發計畫為例，國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
劉代洋、許百華(1998)，我國中小企業研究發展需求與政府角色之研究－以科技
專案計畫為例，第三屆中小企業發展學術研討會。
謝龍發(1993)，我國廠商參與政府主導共同研究發展聯盟的動機、類型和管理機制的相關研究，政治大學企管所博士論文。
簡禛富、王國明、王文志、陳建宏、曾繁斌、賴威齊、席時昶、洪綾君（2001），
科技發展計畫績效評估指標與評估機制之研究。行政院國家科學委員會委託
之專題研究成果報告，未出版。
116
蘇雲一(1998)，資料包絡分析法與比例分析法運用於科技專案效率評估之研究，
國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M.(1996). Assessing the
work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 54-84.
Antonelli, C. (1989). A failure-inducement model of research and development
expenditure. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 159-180.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, 609-625.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Audretsch, D. B., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2002). Public/private technology
partherships: Evaluating SBIR-supported research. Research Policy, 31(1),
145-158.
Bell, M., &. Pavitt, K. (1995). The Development of Technological Capabilities.
InHaque, I. U. (Ed.), Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness (pp.
69-101). Washington: The World Bank,
Bingham, T. H. (2001). Estimating Economic Benefits from ATP Funding of New
Medical Technologies. In Wessner, C. W. (Ed.), The Advanced Technology
Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
Borys, B., & Jemison, D.B., (1989). Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances:
theoretical issues in organizational combinations. The Academy of Management
Review, 14(2), 234-249.
Branstetter, L., & Sakakibara, M., (1998). Japanese research consortia: a
microeconometric analysis of industrial policy. Journal of Industrial Economics,
46(2), 207-233.
Brod, A., & Shivakumar, R. (1997). R&D cooperation and the joint exploitation of
R&D. Canadian Journal of Economics, 30, 673-684.
Brown, M. (1994). Introduction to Innovation - Managing ideas into action. Henley
Management Centre/Price Waterhouse.
Browning, D. C., Beyer, J. M. & Shetletr, J. C. (1995). Building cooperation in
competitive industry: SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry. Academy of
Management Journal, 38(1), 131-151.
Busom, I. (1999). An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies. Working
Paper No. B99-05, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Capaldo, G., Iandoli, L., Raffa M., et al. (2003). The evaluation of innovation
capabilities in small software firms: A methodological approach. Small Business
Economics, 21(4) 343-354.
Carmichael, J. (1981). The effects of mission-oriented public R&D spending on
117
private industry. Journal of Finance, 36, 617-627.
Carpon, H., & van Pottelsberghe dela Potterie, B. (1997). Public support to R&D
Programmes: an integrated assessment scheme. In Policy Evaluation in
Innovation and Technology: Towards Best Practices (pp. 35-47). Paris:
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Caves, E., Crookel, H., & Killing, P. J. (1983). The Imperfect Market for Technology
Licenses. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 45, 249-67.
Chacke, G. K. (1988). Technology Management-Application to Corporate Markets
and Military Missions. NY: Praeger.
Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin''s Q. Finance
Management, 23(3), 70–4.
Clark, J., & Guy, K. (1998). Innovation and Competitiveness: A Review. Technology
Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(4), 363-395.
Combs, K., (1993). The role of information sharing in cooperative research and
development. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 11, 535-551.
Committee on Capitalizing on Science, Technology, and Innovation. (2004). An
Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project
Methodology. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Czinkota, M. R., Ronkainen, I. A., & Moffett, M. H. (2002). International Business
(6th ed). South-Western,
David, P. A., Toole A. A., & Hall, B. H. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or
substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research
Policy, 29(4/5), 497-529.
Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of
Marketing, 58(4), 37-52.
De Bondt, R., Slaets, P., Cassiman, B., (1992). The degree of spillovers and the
number of rivals for maximum effective R&D. International Journal of
Industrial Organization, 10, 35-54.
Dowling, G. R. (1994). Corporate Reputations: Strategies for Developing the
Corporate Brand. Kogan Page.
Dutta, S. & Weiss, A.M. (1997).The relationship between a firm''s level of
technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements.
Management Science, 43(3), 343-356.
Eshima, Y. (2003). Impact of policy on innovation SMEs in Japan. Journal of Small
Business Management, 41(1), 85-93.
Folster, S. (1995). Do subsidies to cooperative R&D actually stimulate R&D
investment and cooperation, Research Policy, 24, 403-417.
Fombrun, C. & Rindova, V. (2000). The road to transparency: Reputation
118
management at Royal Dutch/Shell. In M. Schultz & M. J. Hatch, (Eds.), The
Expressive Organization. Oxford University Press.
Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation, (3rd ed.).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fryxell, G. & Wang, J. (1994). The fortune corporate "reputation" index: Reputation
for what? Journal of Management, 20(1), 1-14.
Geisler, E., & Rubenstein, A. (1989). University- Industry Relations: A Review of
Major Issues. In A. Link & G. Tassey (Eds), Cooperative Research &
Development. Kluwa Academic Publishers.
Georghiou, L. (1999). Meta-Evaluation: Evaluation of evaluations. In European
Commission & Austrian Advisory Board for Universities (Eds), Science and the
Academic System in Transition: An International Expert Meeting on Evaluation
(pp. 195-202). Budapest: Akade''miai Kiado''.
Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1996). Strategic motives for international alliance
formation. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 301-332.
Griliches, Z., & Regev, H. (1998). An econometric evaluation of high-tech policy in
Israel. Paper presented at ATP-conference in Washington, DC, June 1998.
Guellec D. & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003). The Impact of Public R&D
Expenditure on Business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies,
12(3), 225-243.
Hagedoorn, J., & Narula, R., (1996). Choosing organizational modes of strategic
technology partnering: International sectoral differences. Journal of
International Business Studies, 27, pp.265-284.
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. L., & Vonortas N. (2000). Research partnerships. Research
Policy, 29, 567-586.
Hamberg, D. (1966). Essays on the Economics of Research and Development. New
York: Random House.
Higgins, R. S., & Link, A. N. (1981) Federal support of technological growth in
industry: some evidence of crowding out. IEEE Transactions on Engineering
Management, EM-28, 86-88.
Holemans, B., & Sleuwaegen, L. (1988). Innovation expenditures and the role of
government in Belgium. Research Policy, 17, 375-379.
Howe, J. D., & McFetridge, D. G. (1976). The determinants of R&D expenditures.
Canadian Journal of Economics, 9, 57-71.
Hsu, Y. G., Tzeng, G. H., & Shyu, J.Z. (2003). Fuzzy multiple criteria selection of
government-sponsored frontier technology. R&D projects. R&D Management,
33(5), 539-550
Irwin, D., & Klenow, P. (1996). High-tech R&D subsidies - estimating the effects of
119
SEMATECH. Journal of International Economics, 40, 323-344.
Itami, H. R. (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard
University Press.
Jaffe, A. B. (2002). Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public
Research-Support Programmes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 22-34
Johne, A. (1998). Using mark vision to steer innovation. Technovation, 19, 203-207.
Kamien, M. I., Muller, E., & Zang, I. (1992). Research joint ventures and R&D cartels.
American Economic Review, 82, 1293-1306.
Katsoulacos, Y., & Ulph, D. (1997). Technology policy: a selective review with
emphasis on European policy and the role of RJVs. In: J. A. Poyago-Theotoky
(Eds.), Competition, Cooperation, Research and Development: The Economics of
Research Joint Ventures (pp. 13–38). Macmillan, London.
Katz, M. L. (1986). An analysis of cooperative research and development. Rand
Journal of Economics, 17, 527-543.
Kauko, K., (1996). Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies: A Sceptical Note on the
Empirical Evidence. Research Policy, 25, 321-323.
Kealy, T. (1996). The Economic Law of Scientific Research. New York: St Martin’s
Press.
Kleet, T. J., & Moen, J. (1998). R&D Investment responses to R&D subsidies: a
theoretical analysis and econometric evidence. (presentation to the NBER
Summer Institute, July)
Kleinknecht, A., van Montfort, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice
between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11,
109-121.
Klette, T. & Moen, J. (1998) R&D Investment Responses to R&D Subsidies: A
Theoretical Analysis and a Microeconometric Study. paper presented at the
NBER Summer Institute.
Lahdalma, R. & Salminen, P. (2001). SMAA-2: Stochasitc multicriteria acceptability
analysis for group decision making. Operations Research, 49(3), 444-455.
Lerner, J. & Kegler, C. (2000). Evaluating the Small Business Innovation Research
Program: A Literature Review. In C. W. Wessner (Eds.), The Small Business
Innovation Research Program: An Assessment of the Department of Defense Fast
Track Initiative (pp. 307-324), Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the
SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3), 285-318.
Levy, D. M., & Terleckyj, N. E. (1983). Effects of government R&D on private R&D
investment and productivity: a macroeconomic analysis. Bell Journal of
Economics, 14, 551-561.
120
Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (1991). Why are government and private R&D
complements? Applied Economics, 23, 1673-1681.
Leyden, D. P., Link, A. N., & Bozeman, B. (1989). The effects of governmental
financing on firms’ R&D activities, a theoretical and empirical investigation.
Technovation, 9, 561-575.
Lichtenberg, F. R. (1984). The relationship between federal contract R&D and
company R&D. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 74, 73-78.
Lichtenberg, F. R. (1987). The effect of government funding on private industrial
research and development: a re-assessment. The Journal of Industrial Economics,
36, 97-104.
Lichtenberg, F. R. (1988). The private R&D investment response to federal design and
technical competitions. American Economic Review, 78, 550-559.
Lichtenberg, F. R., (1987). The effect of government funding on private industrial
research and development: a re-assessment. The Journal of Industrial Economics,
36, 97-104.
Lichtenberg, F. R., (1988). The private R&D investment response to federal design
and technical competitions. American Economic Review, 78, 550-559.
Lin, B-W. & Chen, J.-S. (2005). Corporate technology portfolios and R&D
performance measures: A study of technology intensive firms. R&D
Management, 35(2), 157-170.
Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981), Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization.
Journal of Business, 54(1): 1-32.
Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin’s Q ratio and industrial organization.
Journal of Business, 54, 1-32.
Marquish, D. G. (1982). The Anatomy of Successful Innovation. Winthrop Publishers,
Cambridge.
Martin, S. 1994. Private and social incentives to form R&D joint ventures. Review of
Industrial Organization, 9, 157–171.
Meade, L. M. & Presley, A. (2002). R&D Project Selection Using the Analytic
Network Process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 59-66.
Mogee, M. E., & Schacht W. H. (1980). Industrial innovation: major issues system.
Issue Brief No.1 B80005.
Mole, V., & Elliot, D. (1987). Enterprising innovation: An alternative approach.
Frances Pinter, London.
Mowery, D. S., Oxley, J. E. & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and
interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77-91.
Nauwelaers, C. & Wintjes, R. (2002) Innovating SMEs and Regions: The Need for
Policy Intelligence and Interactive Policies. Technology Analysis & Strategic
121
Management, 14(2), 201-215.
Odagiri, H., Nakamura, Y., & Shibuya, M. (1997). Research consortia as a vehicle for
basic research: The case of a fifth generation computer project in Japan.
Research Policy, 24, 403-417.
OECD (1999a). University Research in Transition. Paris.
OECD (1999b). University Research in Transition: Countries notes. Paris.
Parkhe, A. (1991) International portfolio analysis: A new model. Management
International Review, 31(4), 365-380.
Pereira, Z. L. & Aspinwall, E. (1997). Total quality management versus business
process re-engineering. Journal of Total Quality Management, 8(1), 33-42.
Peters, T., & R. Waterman (1982). In search of excellence. Harper and Row, New
York, N.Y.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. NY: Free Press.
Porter, M. E., & Fuller, R. (1986). Competition on Global Industries. MA: Harvard
Business Press
Reinganum, J. F. (1989). The timing of innovation: research, development, and
diffusion. In R. L. Schmalensee & Willig, R.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial
Organization (pp. 849-908). North-Holland, New York.
Robert, P.W. & Greenwood, R. (1997). Integrating transaction cost and institutional
theories: Toward a constrained-efficiency framework for understanding
organizational design adoption. Academy of Management Review, 22(2),
346-373.
Robertson, T. S. & Gatignon, H. (1998). Technology development mode: A
transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 515-531.
Rossi, P. H. (Eds.). (1982). Standards for evaluation practice. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic
approach (7th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial Innovation and Public Policy:
Preparing for the 1980s and 1990s. London: Frances Pinter.
Ruegg, R. (1999). Assessment of the ATP. In C. W. Wessner (Eds.), Advanced
Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 71-80). Washington,
D.C.: National Academy Press.
Sakakibara, M. (1997). Evaluation government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan:
Who benefits and how. Research Policy, 26(4/5), 447-473.
Sakakibara, M., (1997). Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research
and development: An empirical examination of motives, Strategic Management
Journal, 18, 143-164.
122
Salmenkaita, J. P., & Salo, A. (2002). Rationales for Government Intervention in the
Commercialization of New Technologies. Technology Analysis & Strategic
Management, 14(2), 183-200.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961) The Theory of Economic Development, London: Oxford
University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1975) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, N.Y: Harper & Row,
Publishers.
Scott, J. T. (1984). Firm versus industry variability in R&D intensity. In Griliches, Z.
(Ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Shrieves, R. E. (1978). Market structure and innovation: a new perspective. The
Journal of Industrial Economics, 26, 329-347.
Simpson, R. D., & Vonortas, N. S. (1994). Cournot equilibrium with imperfectly
appropriable R&D. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(1), 79-92.
Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., et al. (2005). Marketing and technology resource
complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental
contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 259-276.
Sorensen, A., Kongsted, H. C., & Marcusson, M. (2003). R&D, Public Innovation
Policy, and Productivity: The Case of Danish Manufacturing. Economics of
Innovation and New Technology, 12(2), 163-178.
Spence, M. (1984). Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance.
Econometrica, 52, 101-121.
Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring
the Relationship Between Organizational Determinant of Innovation, Types of
Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance. Omega, International
Journal of Management Science, 24(6), 631-647.
Suzumura, K. (1992). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in an oligopoly with
spillovers. American Economic Review, 82, 1307-1320.
Tassey, G. (1999). R&D Policy Models and Data Needs. Retrieved June 24, 2003,
from http://www.nist.gov/director/planning/dataneeds.pdf
Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and Innovation. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 5, 1-20.
Tidd, J. & Trewhella, M. J. (1997). Organizational and technological antecedents of
knowledge acquisition and learning. R&D Management, 27(4), 359-375.
Toivanen, O., & P. Niininen (1998). Investment, R&D, subsidies and credit
constraints. Working Paper, Dep. of Economics, MIT and Helsinki School of
Economics.
123
Tripsas, M., Schrader, S., & Sobrero, M., (1995). Discouraging opportunistic behavior
in collaborative R&D: A new role for government. Research Policy, 24, 367-389.
Tushman, M. & Nadler, D. (1986). Organising for innovation. California
Management Review, 28(3), 74-92.
Van der Panne, G., van Beers, C. P. & Kleinknecht, A. (2003) Success and failure of
innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management,
7(3), 309-338.
Vonortas, N. S. (1994). Inter-firm cooperation with imperfectly appropriable research.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 413-435.
Wallsten, S. J. (1999). Do government-industry R&D programs increase private
R&D?: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program.
Department of Economics. Working Paper, Stanford University.
Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private
R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. RAND
Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82-100.
Wessner, C. W., (2001). The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing outcomes.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Wooldridge, J. (2003). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & and Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations.
New York: John Wiley and Sons.