英文參考文獻(按字首英文字母順序排列)
一、專書
01. Allan Rosas, With a Little Help from My Friends: International Case-Law as A Source of Reference for the EU Courts, in THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY: YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE 203 (2005).
02. Andre Nollkaemper, The Netherlands, in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT 326 (David Sloss ed., 2009).
03. Andreas L. Paulus, Germany, in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT 209 (David Sloss ed., 2009).
04. ANDREAS. F. LOWENFELD, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW (2nd ed. 2008).
05. ANDREW D. MITCHELL, LEGAL PRINCIPLES IN WTO DISPUTES (2008).
06. Anthony Aust, United Kingdom, in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT 476 (David Sloss ed., 2009).
07. ANTHONY AUST, MODERN TREATY LAW AND PRACTICE (2000).
08. Antonis Antoniadis, The European Union and WTO law: A Nexus of Reactive, Coactive, and Proactive Approaches, in WORLD TRADE REVIEW 45 (L. Alan Winters eds., 2007).
09. AUGUST REINISCH, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS BEFORE NATIONAL COURTS (2000).
10. BARRY E CARTER & PHILLIP R TRIMBLE, INTERNATIONAL LAW-SELECTED DOCUMENTS (1991).
11. BIN CHEN, GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF LAW: AS APPLIED BY INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS (1987).
12. Birgit Schoiswohl, The ECJ’s Atlanta Judgment: Establishing a Principle of Non-Liability? , in THE BANANA DISPUTE: AN ECONOMIC AND LEGAL ANALYSIS 309 (F. Breuss, S. Griller & E. Vranes eds., 2003).
13. CHRISTOPH C SCHREUER, DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS BEFORE DOMESTIC COURTS (1981).
14. CHRISTOPH SCHREUER ,COMMENTARY TO THE ICSID CONVENTION (2001).
15. CLARE OVEY AND ROBIN WHITE, EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (3rd ed. 2002).
16. DAVID PALMETER & PETROS C. MAVROIDIS,DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION — PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE (2nd ed. 2004).
17. David Palmeter & Stanimir Alexandrov, Inducing Compliance' in WTO Settlement, in THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW : ESSAYS IN HONOR OF ROBERT E. HUDEC, 646.(Daniel L. M. Kennedy & James D. Southwick eds., 2002.).
18. David Sloss, United States, in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT 504 (2009).
19. David Sloss, Treaty Enforcement in Domestic Courts: A comparative Analysis, in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT 1 (2009).
20. De la Rochere, France, in UNITED KINGDOM NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF COMPARATIVE LAW, THE EFFECT OF TREATIES IN DOMESTIC LAW (Francis G. Jacobs & Shelley Roberts eds., 1987).
21. ERICH VRANES, TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT-FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, WTO LAW, AND LEGAL THEORY (2009).
22. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Proliferation and Fragmentation of Dispute Settlement in International Trade: WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures and Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms, in INTER-GOVERNMENTAL TRADE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: MULTILATERAL AND REGIONAL APPROACHES 417 (Julio Lacarte & Jaime Granados eds.,2004).
23. Evert A. Alkema, Fundamental Human Rights and the Legal Order of the Netherlands, in INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE NETHERLANDS Vol. Ⅲ 652 (Jonkheer H. Van Panhuys ed.,1980)
24. Georges Abi-Saab, The WTO Dispute Settlement and General International Law,in KEY ISSUES IN WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT-THE FIRST TEN YEARS 7 (Rufus Yerxa & Bruce Wilson eds.,2005).
25. GIULIANA ZICCARDI CAPALDO, THE PILLARS OF GLOBAL LAW (2008).
26. GREGORY SHAFFER, DEFENDING INTERESTS: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN WTO LITIGATION (2003).
27. Gunther Teubner, Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society, in GLOBAL LAW WITHOUT A STATE 3 (Gunther Teubner ed., 1997).
28. Hans Kelsen, Principles of International Law(1952).
29. Geert A. Zonnekeyn, Enforceability of WTO Law for Individuals: Rien ne va plus? , in DIRECT EFFECT OF WTO LAW 177 (Geert A. Zonnekeyn ed., 2008).
30. George Abi-Aaab, The Appellate Body and Treaty Interpretation, in THE WTO AT TEN-THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM 453 (Giorgio Sacerdoti, Alan Yanovich & Jan Bohanes eds., 2006).
31. Henry G. Schermers ＆ Denis F. Waelbroeck, Judicial Protection in the European Communities (6th ed. 2001)
32. IAN BROWNLIE, PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (6th ed. 2003).
33. IAN SINCLAIR, THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATY (2nd ed.1984).
34. ISABELLE VAN DAMME, TREATY INTERPRETATION BY THE WTO APPELLATE BODY (2009).
35. J. F. O’Connor, Good Faith in International Law (1991).
36. J.J. Fawcett, General Report, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 1 (1995).
37. Jacques H. J. Bourgeois, The European Court of Justice and the WTO: Problems and Challenges, in THE EU, THE WTO, THE NAFTA: TOWARDS A COMMON LAW OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE? 71 (Joseph H. H. Weiler ed., 2000).
38. JAN PAULSSON, DENIAL OF JUSTICE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW (2005).
39. JANN K. KLEFFNER, COMPLEMENTARITY IN THE ROME STATUTE AND NATIONAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTIONS (2008).
40. JOHN H. JACKSON, SOVEREIGNTY, THE WTO AND CHANGING FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW（2006）.
41. JOHN H. JACKSON, WILLIAM J. DAVEY & ALAN O. SYKES, LEGAL PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS (4th ed. 2002).
42. JOOST PAUWELYN, CONFLICT OF NORMS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW: HOW WTO LAW RELATES TO OTHER RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (2003).
43. Joost Pauwelyn, Remedies in the WTO: First Set the Goal, then Fix the Instruments to Get There, in WTO LAW AND PROCESS 185 (Mads Andenas & Federico Ortino eds., 2005).
44. Jörg Müller & Thomas Cottier, Estoppel, in ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW Vol. Ⅱ (Rudolf Bernhardt ed., 2003).
45. Kurt Siehr, Switzerland, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 382( J.J. Fawcett ed.,1995).
46. Lambertus Erades, Interactions between International and Municipal Law, in A COMPARATIVE CASE LAW STUDY 17 ( Malgosia Fitzmaurice & Cees Flintermen eds., 1993).
47. Louis F. Del Duca & George A. Zaphiriou, United States of America, in DECLINING JURISDICTION IN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 401 (J.J. Fawcett ed., 1995).
48. MALCOLM N. SHAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW (5th ed. 2003).
49. MARTIN DIXON, INTERNATIONAL LAW (6th ed. 2007).
50. MITSUO MATSUSHITA, THOMAS J. SCHOENBAUM & PETROS C. MAVROIDIS, THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION, LAW, PRACTICE, AND POLICY (2003).
51. MITSUO MATSUSHITA, THOMAS J. SCHOENBAUM, & PETROS C. MAVROIDIS, THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION LAW, PRACTICE, AND POLICY (2nd ed., 2006).
52. NORIO KUMURO , THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM: COVERAGE AND PROCEDURES OF THE WTO UNDERSTANDING （1995）.
53. OLE SPIERMANN, INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT IN THE PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE-THE RISE OF THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIARY (2005).
54. PETER J. FITZGERALD, SALMOND ON JURISPRUDENCE (12th ed. 1996).
55. Philippe Ruttley & Marc Weisberger, The WTO Agreement in European Community Law: Status, Effect and Enforcement, in THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: LEGAL, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL ANALYSIS 1461 （Patrick F.J.Macrory, Arthur E.Appleton & Michael G. Plummer eds., 2005）.
56. RONALD M. HERRUP, THE 2005 HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS(2008).
57. Sean D. Murphy, Does the International Law Obligate States to Open Their National Courts to Persons for the Invocation of Treaty Norms That Protect or Benefit Persons,in THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN TREATY ENFORCEMENT 61 (David Sloss ed., 2009).
58. SIMON A.B. SCHROPP, TRADE POLICY FLEXIBILITY AND ENFORCEMENT IN THE WTO –REFORM AGENDA TOWARDS AN EFFICIENT “BREACH” CONTRACT, DOCTORIAL DISSERTATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. GALLEN (2008).
59. SHARIF BHUIYAN, NATIONAL LAW IN WTO LAW-EFFECTIVENESS AND GOOD GOVERNANCE IN THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM (2007).
60. Steve Charnovitz, Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions, in POLITICAL ECONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF ROBERT E. HUDEC 602 (Daniel L. M. Kennedy & James D. Southwick eds., 2002.).
61. Thomas J. Schoenbaum & Douglas S. Arnold, Judicial Review of International Trade Law Decisions: A Comparative Analysis, in NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW ( Meinhard Hilf & Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann eds.,1993).
62. Thomas Cottier, DSU Reform: Resolving Underlying Balance-of –Power Issues, in THE WTO AT TEN-THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM 259 ( Giorgio Sacerdoti, Alan Yanovich, & Jan Bohanes ed., 2006).
63. TREVOR C. HARTLEY, THE FOUNDATIONS OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LAW (4th ed. 1998)
64. ROSEN SHABTAI, DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF TREATIES 1945-1986 (1989).
65. WILLIAM R. SLOMANSON, FUNDAMENTAL PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL LAW (5th ed. 2007).
66. WTO SECRETARIAT, A HANDBOOK ON THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM (2005).
67. YUVAL SHANY, REGULATING JURISDITIONAL RELATION BETWEEN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS (2007).
68. YUVAL SHANY, THE COMPETING JURISDICTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS (2003).
二、期刊論文
01. Alberto Alemanno, Recent Development: Judicial Enforcement of the WTO Hormones Ruling Within the European Community: Toward EC Liability for the Non-Implementation of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions? , 45 HARV.INT'L L.J. 547 (2004).
02. André Nollkaemper, Constitutionalization and the Unity of the Law of International Responsibility, 16(2) IND.J. GLOBAL LEGAL STUD. 535 (2009)
03. Andrea K Bjorklund, Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims, 45 VA.J.INT’L L. 809 (2005).
04. Andrew D. Mitchell, The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Disputes, 10 J.INT'L ECON. 795 (2007).
05. Ann-Marie Slaughter, A Global Community of Courts, 44 HARV.INT’L L.J.191 (2003).
06. Antonio Cassese, Remarks on Scelle’s Theory of “Role Splitting” (Dedoublement Functionel) in International Law, 1(1) EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 210 (1990).
07. Arwel Davies, Connecting or Compartmentalizing the WTO and United States Legal Systems- The Role of the Charming Betsy Canon, 10 J. INT’L ECON. L. 117 (2007).
08. August Reinisch, The Use and Limits of Res Judicata and Lis Pendens as Procedural Tool to Avoid Conflicting of Dispute Settlement Outcomes, 3 LAW & PRAC. INT’L CTS. & TRIBUNALS 37 (2004).
09. Basheer Shamnad and Reddy Prashant, “Ducking” TRIPS in India: A Saga Involving Novartis and the Legality of Section 3(d), 20(2) NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA REVIEW 131 (2008).
10. Carlos M. Vazquez & John H. Jackson, Symposium Issue on WTO Dispute Settlement Compliance: Some Reflections on Compliance with WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions, 33 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 555 (2002).
11. Carlos M. Vázquez, Treaties as Law of the Land: The Supremacy Clause and the Judicial Enforcement of Treaties, 122 HAVR. L. REV. 599 (2008).
12. Chad P. Bown, The Economics of Trade Disputes, The GATT Article XXIII, and the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding, 14(3) ECONOMICS AND POLITICS 283 (2002).
13. Colter Paulson, Compliance with Final Judgments of International Court of Justice since 1987, 98 AM. J. INT'L L. 434 (2004).
14. David Gantz, Dispute Settlement under the NAFTA and the WTO: Choice of Forum Opportunities and Risks for the NAFTA Parties, 14 AM. U. INT'L L. REV.1025 (1999).
15. Debra P. Steger, The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization, 98 AM. SOC'Y INT'L L. PROC. 142 (2004).
16. Elizabeth C. Seastrum, Chevron Deference and the Charming Betsy: Is There a Place for the Schooner in the Standard of Review of Commerce Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Determinations? , 13(2) FED. CIR. B. J. 229 (2003-2004).
17. Erin N. Palmer, The World Trade Organization Slips Up: A Critique of the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Understanding Through the European Union Banana Dispute, 69 TENN. L. REV. 443(2002).
18. Ernest A Young, Institutional Settlement in a Globalization Judicial System, 54 DUKE L.J. 1143 (2005).
19. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Administration of Justice in the World Trade Organization: Did the WTO Appellate Body Commit “Grave Injustice”? , 8 LAW & PRAC. INT’L CTS. & TRIBUNALS 329 (2009).
20. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Do Judges Meet Their Constitutional Obligation to Settle Disputes in Conformity with Principles of Justice and International Law?, 1(2) EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES 1 ( 2007).
21. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Justice as Conflict Resolution: Proliferation, Fragmentation, and Decentralization of Dispute Settlement in International Trade, 27 U. PA. J. INT’L ECON. L. 273 (2006).
22. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Multilevel Judicial Governance of International Trade Requires A Common Conception of Rule of Law and Justice, 10(3) J.INT’L ECON. L. 529 (2007).
23. Francesco Francioni, International Law as A Common Language for National Courts, 36 TEX. INT’L L.J.587 (2001).
24. Francis Snyder, The Gatekeepers: The European Courts and WTO Law, 40 COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW 313 (2003).
25. Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse? , 23(3) ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL 357 (2007).
26. Gabrielle Marceau, Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdiction-The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Teaties, 35(6) JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 1081 (2001).
27. Geert A. Zonnekeyn, EC Liability For Non-Implementation Of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions -- Are the Dice Cast? , 7 J.INT’L ECON. L. 483 (2004).
28. Georges Abi-Saab, Fragmentation or Unification: Some Concluding Remarks, 31 NYU J.INT’L L. 919 (1999).
29. Gerard Hafner, Pros and Cons Ensuing from the Fragmentation of International Law, 25 MICH.J.INT’L L. 849 (2004).
30. Geert A. Zonnekeyn, The Latest On Indirect Effect Of WTO Law in the EC Legal Order the Nakajima Case Law Misjudged? , 4(3) J. INT’L ECON. L. 597 (2001).
31. Hannah L Buxbaum, Transnational Regulatory Litigation, 46 VA.J.INT’L L. 251 (2005).
32. Harold H. Koh, Transnational Legal Process, 75 NEB. L. REV. 181 (1994).
33. Harvard Law Review, Developments in the Law: Res Judicata, 65 HARV. L. REV. 818(1952).
34. Helmut Schermers, Some Recent Cases Delaying the Direct Effect of International Treaties in Dutch Law, 10 MICH. J. INT’L L. 266 (1989)
35. International Association of Independent Tanker Owners and Others, The Requirement of Direct Effect in the Judicial Review EU Law against International Law (CASE C-308/06), 15 COLUM. J. EUR. L. 143 (2008).
36. Jackson F. Morrill, A Need for Compliance: The Shrimp Turtle Case and the Conflict between the WTO and the United States Court of International Trade, 8 TUL. J. INT’L & COMP. L.413 (2000).
37. James Bacchus, Table Talk: Around the Table of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, 35 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 1021 (2002).
38. James Cameron & Kevin R. Gray, Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, 50 INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 248 (2001).
39. Jane A. Restani & Ira Bloom, Interpreting International Trade Statutes: Is the Charming Betsy Sinking? , 24 FORDHAM INT’L L.J. 1533 (2001).
40. Jenney S Martinez, Towards an International Judicial System, 56 STAN. L. REV. 429 (2003).
41. Jide Nzelibe, The Credibility Imperative: The Political Dynamics of Retaliation in the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Resolution Mechanism, 6(1) THEORETICAL INQUIRIES IN LAW 215 (2005).
42. John H Jackson, WTO Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National governments, 90 Am. J. Int'l L.193 (1996).
43. John H. Jackson , The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding - Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation, 91(1) AM. J. INT'L L. 60 (1997).
44. John H. Jackson, International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”? , 98(1) AM. J. INT'L L. 109 (2004)
45. John H. Jackson, Process and Procedure in WTO Dispute Settlement: Comment: Process and Procedure in WTO Dispute Settlement, 42 CORNELL INT'L L.J. 233 (2009).
46. John H. Jackson, Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: A Policy Analysis, 86 AM. J. INT'L L.310 (1992).
47. John M. Ryan, Interplay of WTO and U.S. Domestic Judicial Review: When the Same U.S. Administrative Determinations Are Appealed Under the WTO Agreements and Under U.S. Law, Do the Respective Decisions and Available Remedies Coexist or Collide? , 17 TUL. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 353 (2008).
48. John O. McGinnis, The Appropriate Hierarchy of Global Multilateralism and Customary International Law: The Example of the WTO, 44 VA. J. INT’L. L. 229 (2003-2004).
49. Joost Pauwely, How to Win a World Trade Organization Dispute Base on Non-World Trade Organization Law? , 37 JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 997(2003).
50. Joost Pauwelyn, Going Global, Regional, or Both? Dispute Settlement in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and Overlaps with the WTO and Other Jurisdictions, 13 MINN.J. GLOBAL TRADE 231 (2004).
51. Joost Pauwelyn, The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization, 98 AM. SOC'Y INT'L L. PROC.135 (2004).
52. Joost Pauwelyn & Luiz Eduardo Salles, Forum Shopping before international tribunal:(real) concern, (im)possible solutions, 42 CORNELL INT’L L. J. 77（2009）
53. Judith Hippler Bello, The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More, 90 AM.J.INT’L L. 416 (1996).
54. Kevin C. Kennedy, Parallel Proceedings at the WTO and under NAFTA Chapter 19: Whither the Doctrine of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in DSU Reform? , 39 GEO. WASH. INT'L L. REV. 47 (2007).
55. Kevin P. Cummins, Trade Secrets: How the Charming Betsy Canon May Do More to Weaken US Environmental Laws Than the WTO's Trade Rules, 12 FORDHAM ENVTL. L. J. 141 (2000).
56. Laurel E. Miller, Forum Non-Conveniens and State Control of Foreign Plaintiff Access to U.S. Courts in International Tort Actions, 58 U. CHI. L. REV. 1369 (1991).
57. Lorand Bartels, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding, 35 JURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 499 (2001).
58. Marc Weisberger, The Application of Portugal v. Council: The Banana Cases, 12 DUCK J. COMP.& INT’L L. 153 (2002).
59. Marco Bronckers, From “Direct Effect” To” Muted Dialogue”-Recent Developments in the European Courts’ Case Law on the WTO and Beyond, 11(4) J. INT’L ECON. L. 885 (2008).
60. Mark L. Movsesian, Judging International Judgments, 48 VA. J. INT’L L. 65 (2007)
61. Mark L. Movsesian, Sovereignty, Compliance, and the World Trade Organization: Lessons from the History of Supreme Court Review , 20 MICH. J. INT'L L. 775 (1998-1999).
62. Matthew H. Adler, Congressional Involvement in Expropriation Cases: A Case Study of the "Fact finding" Process, 21 LAW & POL'Y INT'L BUS. 211 (1989).
63 .Michael Byers, Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, A New Age, 47 McGill L.J. 389 (2002).
64. Michael C. Dorf, Dynamic Incorporation of Foreign Law, 157 U. PA. L. REV. 103 (2008-2009).
65. Michael F. Williams, Charming Betsy, Chevron, and the World Trade Organization: Thoughts on the Interpretive Effect of International Trade Law, 32 LAW & POL’Y IN INT’L BUS. 677 (2001).
66. Nikolaos Lavranos, The Solange-Method as a Tool for Regulating Competing Jurisdictions Among International Courts and Tribunals, 30 LOY. L. A. INT'L & COMP. L. REV. 275（2008）.
67. Piet Eeckhout, Judicial Enforcement of WTO Law in the European Union–Some Further Reflections, 5 J. INT’L ECON. L. 91 (2002).
68. Raj Bhala, The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication, 9 FLA. ST. J. TRANSNAT'L L. & POL'Y 1 (1999).
69. Robert B Ahdieh, Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts, 79 N.Y.U. L. REV. 2029 (2004).
70. Robert B. Ahdieh, Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts, EMORY SCHOOL OF LAW EMORY LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP WORKING PAPER SERIES (Year 2005) 101 (2005).
71. Robin Miller, Effect of World Trade Organization (WTO) Decisions Upon United States, 17 A. L. R. 1 (2007).
72. Rossella Brevetti & Christopher S. Rugaber, Bush Ends Steel Safeguard Tariffs in Face of Threat by EU to Retaliate, INTERNATIONAL TRADE REPORTER Vol. 20, No. 49 (December 11, 2003).
73. Rutsel Silvestre J. Martha, World Trade Dispute and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule, 30 JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 107 (1996).
74. Simon N. Lester, WTO Panel and the Appellate Body Interpretations of the WTO Agreements in US Law, 35 Journal of World Trade 521 (2001).
75. Stefan Griller, Judicial Enforceability of WTO Law in the European Union Annotation to Case C-149/96, Portugal v. Council, 3 J. INT’L ECON. L. 441 (2000).
76. Steve Charnovitz, Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions, 95(4) Am. J. Int'l L. 792 (2001)
77. Steve Charnovitz, Triangulating the World Trade Organization, 96(1) AM. J. INT'L L. 28 (2002)
78. Susan Esserman and Robert Howse, The WTO on Trial, 82 FOREIGN AFF.130 (2003).
79. Thomas Cottier, International Trade Law: the Impact of Justifiability and Separations of Powers in EC Law, 5 EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW 307 (2009).
80. Warren F. Schwartz & Alan O. Sykes, The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization, 31 J. LEGAL STUD. 179 (2002).
81. William Burke White, International Legal Pluralism, 25 MICH. J. INT'L L. 963 (2004).
82. Willam J. Davey & Andre Sapir, The Soft Drinks Case: The WTO and Regional Agreements, 8 WORLD TRADE REV. 5 (2009).
83. William S Dodge, National courts and International Arbitration: Exhaustion of Remedies and Res Judicata under Chapter Eleven of NAFTA, 23 HASTINGS INT’L COMP. L. REV. 357 (2000).
84. Yuka Fukunaga, Securing Compliance Through the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Implementation of DSB Recommendations, 9(2) J.INT’L ECON. L. 383 (2006).
85. Yu Minyou, WTO Disputes Settlement—China’s Performance and Proposals on Its Improvement, 4 (4) FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA 601 (2009).
86. Yuval Shany, Capacities and Inadequacies: A Look at the Two Separation Barrier Case, 38 ISR. L. REV. 230 (2005).
87. Yuval Shany, How Supreme is the Supreme Law of the Land? A Comparative Analysis of the Influence of International Human Rights Conventions upon the Interpretation of Constitutional Texts by Domestic Courts, 31 BROOKLYN J. INT’L. L. 341 (2006).
88. Zhu Lanye, U.S.-China WTO Roundtable: The Effects of the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel and Appellate Body Reports: Is the Dispute Settlement Body Resolving Specific Disputes Only or Making Precedent at the Same Time?, 17 TEMP. INT'L & COMP. L.J. 221 (2003)
三、其他資料
01. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Judging Judges: Do Judges Meet Their Constitutional Obligation to Settle Disputes in Conformity with “Principles of Justice and International Law”? (January 2008). EUI LAW Working Paper No. 2008/01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1093622.
02. Explanatory Report to Protocol No 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Amending the Control System of the Convention (CETS No 194), Available at http://convention.coe.int /Treaty/EN/Reports/Html/194.htm.
03. Jeanne J. Grimmett, WTO Decisions and Their Effect in U.S. Law, CRS Report for Congress RS22154 (Jan. 30, 2007) , Available at http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/81991.pdf.
04. Joost Pauwelyn, Choice of jurisdiction: WTO and Regional Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Challenges, Options and Opportunities" (Speech presented to the ICTSD/GIAN-RUIG dialogue on the "Mexico Soft Drinks Dispute: Implications for Regionalism and for Trade and Sustainable Development"), available at International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development
.
05. KD Raju, The Debacle of Novartis Patent Case in India: Strict Interpretation of Patentability Criteria under Article 27 of the TRIPs Agreement (November 2007), 2 (2007). Available at http://ssrn. com/abstract=1030963.
06. Kyung Kwak & Gabrielle Marceau, "Overlaps and Conflicts of Jurisdiction Between the WTO and RTAS" (Paper presented to Conference on Regional Trade Agreements World Trade Organization, 26 April 2002) , available at http://www.wto.org/ english/tratop_e/region_e/sem_ april02_e/marceau. pdf>.
07. Report of the ILC Study Group. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi and Draft Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group, Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 and Add.1 and Corr.1, 2 May 2006.
08. Report to the Trade Barriers Regulation Committee, Examination Procedure Concerning an Obstacle to Trade, within the Meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94, Consisting of Measures Adopted by the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu Affecting Patent Protection in Respect of Recordable Compact Discs( 30 January 2008).available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/ doclib/docs/2008/january/tradoc_137633.pdf.
09. Sheela Rai, Doctrine of Precedent in WTO (2007), available at http://www. esocialsciences.com/data/articles/Document1912007470. 4038965.doc.
10. Sheela Rai, Safeguard Measures under WTO, available at http://www. esocialsciences.com/data/articles/Document1882007540.2265894.
日文參考文獻（按作者姓氏筆畫排列）
一、專書
01. 山本草二，国際法，有斐閣，1994年新版。
02. 伊藤眞，民事訴訟法，有斐閣，2008年第3版3訂。
03. 松井茂記，日本国憲法，有斐閣，2007年3版。
04. 新堂幸司，訴訟物と爭點效（上），有斐閣，1988年。
05. 高橋宏志，重點講義民事訴訟法（上），有斐閣，2007年11月。
06. 清水章雄，ガット・ルールによる営業の自由及び財産権行使の自由の保障－西陣ネクタイ訴訟第1審判決をめぐって－国際摩擦とわが国の産業政策，小樽商科大学経済摩擦研究会，1987年。
07. 芦部信喜著，高橋和之補訂，憲法，岩波書店，2007年4版。
二、期刊論文
01. 平覚，わが国におけるガットの法的地位，神戸商科大学商大論集，第39巻第4号，1988年2月。
02. 松下満雄，西陣ネクタイ訴訟最高裁判決，ジュリスト，第956号，1990年6月。
三、其他資料
01. 末啓一郎，国際経済法の国内直接適用に関する諸問題－WTO諸協定の国内裁判規範性についての考察（2008），http://www.ics.hit-u.ac.jp/jp/phd/article_sue. pdf/，2010年1月6日。
02. 阿部克則，第7章わが国におけるWTO協定の直接適用可能性，地方公共団体における国際協定への対応のあり方に関する調査研究，平成12 年，http://nippon. zaidan.info/seikabutsu/2000/00097/，2009年12月11日。
中文參考文獻（按作者姓氏筆畫排列）
一、專書
01. JOHN H. JACKSON著，張乃根譯，THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM - LAW AND POLICY OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS，復旦大學，2001年。
02. 朱曉勤主編，發展中國家與WTO法律制度研究，北京大學，2006年。
03. 吳嘉生，國際法與國內法關係之研析，五南，1988年。
04. 李浩培，條約法概論，法律，1987年。
05. 沈克勤，國際法，台灣學生書局，1991年。
06. 邱宏達，國際法在我國國內法上的地位，憲政時代，第19卷第4期，1995年4月。
07. 林彩瑜，WTO「杜哈回合」反請消議題談判與台灣參與之立場建議，載於氏著WTO貿易救濟與爭端解決之法律問題，元照，2006年1月。
08. 姜皇池，國際公法導論，新學林，2008年2版。
09. 洪力生，戰後各國新憲法與國際法的關係，薩孟武先生六秩晉華誕紀念社會科學論文集，台大法學院，1957年。
10. 徐熙光，國際法與國際事務論叢，台灣商務，1993年。
11. 陳治世，國際法，台灣商務，1993年。
12. 陳隆修，2005年海牙法院選擇公約評析，五南，2009年。
13. 黃異，國際法在國內法領域中的效力，元照，2006年。
14. 黃政傑「GATT/WTO爭端解決體系下非違反協定行為之控訴之研究」，中原大學財經法律系碩士論文，2002年7月。
15. 趙堅集，論違反協定與非違反協定之控訴—以世界貿易組織之法制為中心，中正大學法律研究所碩士論文，2003年6月。
16. 萬鄂湘等，國際條約法，武漢大學，1998年。
17.雷蕾，價值判斷：理論與實際的平衡－論WTO法的國內適用問題，中國司法，2002年10月。
18. 羅昌發，GATT/WTO與我國貿易，永然文化，1996年。
19. 羅昌發，國際貿易法，元照，2010年。
20. 羅昌發，「美國貿易法中之三０一報復條款之研究」，載於羅昌發，美國救濟制度：國際經貿法研究（一），月旦，1994。
二、期刊論文
01. 何曜琛，WTO爭端解決裁決於國內法院的效力－兼評歐盟經驗對我國的借鏡，中華國際法與超國界法評論，第3卷第1期，2007年6月。
02. 呂太郎，所謂爭點效--簡評最高法院87年臺上字第1029號、88年臺上字第557號判決，法令月刊第51卷10期（2000年10月）。
03. 李貴英， WTO爭端解決報告於歐洲共同體法律體系內部之地位與效力：歐洲共同體法院與第一審法院所持立場，東吳法律學報第16卷第3期，2005年4月。
04. 林彩瑜，論WTO與區域貿易協定爭端解決機制之衝突與調和，國立台大學法學論叢，第40卷第1期，2011年3月。
05. 周緒華，我國WTO義務履行之國際法基礎－以米酒稅調降事件對美諮商為例，政大法學評論，第87期，2005年10月。
06. 許士宦，民事訴訟法修正後之訴訟標的理論-Theory of "Litigated Object" after the Amendment of the Code of Civil Procedure，國立台灣大學法學論叢34卷1期，2005年1月。
07. 張乃根、張家琦，略論WTO法與中國「一國四域」法律關係，政治與法律，第4期，2000年8月。
08. 陳文真，由智利—劍魚案論環保貿易措施所引發之爭端：管轄權衝突之探討，政大法學評論第86期， 2005年8月。
09. 陳隆修，父母責任、管轄規則與實體方法論相關議題評析，東海大學法學研究第25期（2006年12月）。
10. 陳純一，條約在海峽兩岸法律中的地位與適用，中國國際法與國際事務年報，第15期，2004年9月。
11. 陸樹槐，國際法與國內法之關係，法律評論，第26卷第10期，1960年10月。
12. 游啟忠，條約與協定美國國內法上之效力（九），法務通訊，第144期，1989年10月。
13. 游啟忠，條約與協定美國國內法上之效力（十），法務通訊，第1442期，1989年10月。
14. 黃異，從德國法制看國際法引入國內法領域的問題，臺灣海洋學報，第4卷第1期，2005年6月。
15. 黃澗秋，論WTO協定在國內法院的適用，社會科學，第9期，2001年9月。
16. 黃國昌，爭點效理論之細緻化--評最高法院96年臺上字第1782號判決，台灣法學雜誌108期，2008年7月。
17. 謝英士、林雅慧，未經任許外國法人智慧財產權之保護與「與貿易有關之智慧財產權協定」中最惠國待遇原則之適用－評台北地方法院九十五年度自字第一五六號暨台灣高等法院九十六年度上易字第一一七七號刑事判決，中華國際法與超國界法評論，第4卷第1期，2008年6月。
18. 馮震宇，從TRIPS規範看飛利浦特許實施案之爭議與影響，月旦法學雜誌第159號，2008年8月。
三、其他資料
1. 孔祥俊，WTO法律的國內適用，http://big5.china.com.cn/chinese/OP-c/88214.htm/，2010年1月7日。
2. 我國申請加入GATT ∕ WTO之歷史紀要，http://www.mofa.gov.tw/webapp/lp.asp?ctNode=1220&CtUnit=102&BaseDSD=7&mp=1/，2009年12月30日。
3. 李幸祥，試論我國實施WTO協議的幾個主要問題（2005年6月），http://www. wtolaw.gov.cn/，2009年12月30日。
4. 李廣民，國際法與國內法關係中日之比較，山東社會科學院，http://www.sdass.net.cn/sdass/webpublish/block.258.view.detail.newsdetail?key=844.
5.孫南申，從中國入世看WTO協議在中國法院的適用，http://www.lunwennet.com/ thesis/2003/7414.html/，2009年12月1日。