臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：風險意向模式：於客觀測驗中定量與測量學生對知識確定之風險接受
作者：席德恩
作者(外文)：Brady Michael Jack
校院名稱：國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱：科學教育研究所
指導教授：劉嘉茹
邱鴻麟
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2011
主題關鍵詞：評量；信心；測驗；風險接受；科學教育；assessment；confidence；measurement；risk taking；science education
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
如同純科學研究者致力於建立更敏感的測量工具以補捉自然世界的潛在現象般，本研究者亦致力於建立一個更敏感的測量工具以補捉學生心中對知識確定之風險接受的潛在現象。藉由控制受試者為他/她對某一問題答案的信心去配分，研究者可以確認此工具以不複雜方式而得到特別的效果，包含受試者對其所認為的知識正確性之確定。
本研究提出一個叫做「風險意向」的模式，它可以測量受試者對知識確定的感覺，並將其數位化成界於０與１的量尺。利用這個單一的數字，研究者可以估計受試者對特定知識中正確性感覺之風險接受機率的程度。將此正確性的感覺數位化後（後文稱為風險意向分數[RIS]），可以提供研究者一個客觀且可管理的方式，來追蹤受試者在測驗中相關知識的風險接受。從6 個測驗所獲得的結果發現，RIS 比傳統沒有配分的測驗可以更敏感來區別男、女性受試者對知識的確定。
風險意向模式(RIM)包含三個部份：(1) 信心配分；(2) 受限的情境；(3) 風險意向方程式。此三個部份可以讓外在觀察者察覺受試者對知識確定之風險接受的內心狀態。
為了測試RIM 在評估受試者對知識確定之風險接受的內心狀態，研究者協同5
位8 年級中學老師，對147 位學生實施為期14 週且歷經6 個客觀測驗的實驗。本研究結果顯示RIM 比傳統沒有配分的測驗可以更敏感來區別男、女性受試者對知識的確定。最後，本研究的限制、意涵及對未來的建議也一併做討論。
Just as investigators in the pure sciences continue to endeavor to create instruments of greater sensitivity to capture the hidden phenomena of the natural world, this investigator endeavored to create an assessment method of greater sensitivity to capture the hidden phenomena of risk taking toward knowledge certainty in the mind of the student. By controlling the way a respondent weighs his or her confidence toward an answer selection, this investigator
was able to identify its exclusive effects on how the respondent reflected upon felt feelings of certainty toward rightness he or she had toward his or her knowledge, uncomplicated by answer selection error or omission.
This study presents a model entitled Risk Inclination that uses a respondent’s analog feelings of knowledge certainty toward his or her test answer responses and digitizes them into a single 1st factorial moment of probability on a scale between 0 and 1. It is by this single number that researchers can approximate the weight or degree of risk taking probability that a respondent has toward feelings of rightness of a specific area of knowledge being tested. Digitizing these feelings of rightness into a single number (hereafter called a Risk Inclination Score [RIS])provides researchers with an objective and manageable way to isolate and track the nature of risk taking among respondents toward a number of associated areas of knowledge being tested. Results collected from six tests demonstrate that RIS is more sensitive to differences of certainty toward knowledge between genders than measures of confidence weighting or non-confidence weighting (i.e., viewing an answer response as only being correct or incorrect).
The Risk Inclination Model (RIM) is composed of three components: (1) confidence weighting, (2) restricted context, and (3) risk inclination formula. It is by way of these three components that an outside observer is connected with a respondent’s inner state of risk taking
toward knowledge certainty.
To test the effectiveness of RIM in assessing a respondent’s inner state of risk taking toward knowledge certainty, this investigator worked with five 8th grade middle school teachers to implement its use on six objective tests given to their students (n=147) over a period of 14 weeks. Results collected during this investigation demonstrated that RIM was more sensitive to
differences of certainty toward knowledge between genders than separate measures of confidence weighting or non-confidence weighting (i.e., viewing an answer response as only being correct or incorrect). Limitations of the study, implications of the research, and suggestions for future research are also discussed.
Ahlgren, A. (1969). Reliability, Predictive Validity, and Personality Bias of Confidence-weighted Scores. Paper presented at the AERA and NCME.
Anagnostelis, B. (1998). Resource Discovery: Identifying, Evaluating and Integrating Digital Networked Resources within the Learning Process. Health Informatics Journal, 4(1), 39-50.

Atkins, W. J., Leder, G. C., O'Halloran, P. J., Pollard, G. H., & Taylor, P. (1991). Measuring Risk Taking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(3), 297-308.

Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-Confidence and Personal Motivation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 871-915.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Fornell, C. (1982). Theoretical Concepts, Measurements, and Meaning. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis (2 ed., pp. 5-23): Praeger.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Worth Publishers.

Barlow, P. (Ed.) (1814) A New Mathematical and Philosophical Dictionary: Comprising an Explanation of the Terms and Principles of Pure and Mixed Mathematics. London: Whittingham and Rowland.

Bem, D. J. (1972). The Self-Preception Postulates. Self-Preception Theory (Vol. 6, pp. 2-7). New York: Academic Press.

Brewer, C. A. (2004). Near Real-Time Assessments of Student Learning and Understanding in Biology Courses. BioScience, 54(11), 1034-1039.

Burgess, R. G. (1986). Introduction. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Key Variables in Social Investigation (pp. 1-11). London: Routledge & Kengan Paul.

Charles, G. M. (2009). Taking the Test. Get ot the Top of the Class: How to Succeed in High School (pp. 129-148). New York: Gracie Mansion Publishing.

Chun, H., & Keles, S. (2009). Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping with Multivariate Sparse Partial Least Squares Regression. Genetics, 182(1), 79-90.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Congress, U. S. (2009). Encouraging the Participation of Female Students in STEM Fields: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Research and Science Education, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, Serial No. 111-45, 111 CONG.

Cooke, W. E. (1906). Weighting Forecasts. Monthly Weather Review, 34, 274-275.

Coxeter, H. S. M., & Greitzer, S. L. (1967). Quadrangles: Varignon's Theorem. Geometry Revisited (Vol. 19, pp. 51-55). Washington, D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America.

Cramer, R. D. (1993). Partial Least Squares (PLS): Its Strengths and Limitations. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, 1(1), 269-278.

Duncan, R. M. (1995). Piaget and Vygotsky revisited: Dialogue or assimilation? Developmental Review, 15, 458-472.

Ebel, R. L. (1965). Confidence Weighting and Test Reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2(1), 49-57.

Echternacht, G. J. (1972). The use of confidence testing in objective tests. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 217-236.

Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103-127.

Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., & Potgieter, M. (2005). Undergraduate Students' Performance and Confidence in Procedural and Conceptual Mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 701-712.

Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (2008). Using Holland's Theory to Study Patterns of College Student Success: Impact of Major Fields on Students. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher Edcuation: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. XXIII, pp. 329-380). New York: Springer.

Feng, S.-L., & Tuan, H.-L. (2005). Using ARCS Model to Promote 11th Graders' Motivation and Achievement in Learning about Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 463-484.

Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic Self-efficacy and Academic Self-concept: Reconsidering Structural Relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 499-505.

Fischer, I., & Budescu, D. V. (2005). When do those who know more also know more about how much they know? The Development of Confidence and Performance in Categorical Decision Tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(1), 39-53.

Garber, J., & Dodge, K. A. (1991). The Development of emotion regulation and dysregulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gardner-Medwin, A. R. (1996). Teaching The Science Process Skills. National Science Education Standards, 75-102. Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=4962

Gardner-Medwin, A. R. (1998). Updating with Confidence: Do your students know what they don't know? Health Informatics Journal, 4(39-50).

Gardner-Medwin, A. R. (2006). Confidence-Based Marking - Towards Deeper Learning and Better Exams. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group Ltd.

Gardner-Medwin, A. R., & Curtin, N. A. (2007, May 29-31). Certainty-based Marking (CBM) for Reflective Learning and Proper Knowledge Assessment. Paper presented at the REAP International Online Confidence 2007: on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility, University of Glasgow.

Gardner-Medwin, A. R., & Gahan, M. (2003, July). Formative and Summative Confidence-Based Assessment. Paper presented at the Proc. 7th International Computer-Aided Assessment Conference, Loughborough, UK.

Gott, R., Duggan, S., & Roberts, R. (2009). Concepts of Evidence. Retrieved from http://www.dur.ac.uk/richard.gott/Evidence/cofev.htm

Halpern, D. F., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J. R., & Wentzel, K. (2007). Encouraging girls in math and science-Institute of Education Sciences. Washington: National Center for Education Research.

Harper, D. (Ed.) (2001) Online Etymology Dictionary.

Hartl, D. L., & Jones, E. W. (2009). Genetics: Analysis of Genes and Genomes (7 ed.). London: Jones and Barlett Publishers.

Hastedt, D., & Sibberns, H. (2005). Differences between Multiple Choice Items and Constructed Response Items in the IEA TIMSS Surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 145-161.

Hays, J. N. (2003). Continuity and Change: Magic, Religion, Medicine, and Science, 500-1700 The Burdens of Disease: Epidemics and Human Response in Western History (3 ed., pp. 78-105). Piscataway, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Henmon, V. A. C. (1911). The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. Psychological Review, 18, 186-201.

Hollingworth, H. L. (1913). Experimental Studies in Judgment Archives of Psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 1-119). LA, CA: The Library of The University of California Los Angeles.

Hong, Z.-R., Veach, P. M., & Lawrenz, F. (2003). An Investigation of the Gender Sterotyped Thinking of Taiwanese Secondary Boys and Girls. Sex Roles, 48(11/12), 495-504.

Jack, B. M., Hung, K. M., Liu, C. J., & Chiu, H. L. (2009, April 13-17). Utilitarian Model of Confidence Testing for Knowledge-based Societies. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA.

Jack, B. M., Liu, C. J., & Chiu, H. L. (2007). Taiwan Elementary Teachers' Views of Science Teaching Self-efficacy and Outcome Expectations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 19-35.

Jack, B. M., Liu, C. J., Chiu, H. L., & Shymansky, J. A. (2009a, April 13-17). Confidence Testing for Knowledge-based Global Communities. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA.

Jack, B. M., Liu, C. J., Chiu, H. L., & Shymansky, J. A. (2009b, April 17-21). Confidence Wagering during Mathematics and Science Testing. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, CA.

Jack, B. M., Liu, C. J., Chiu, H. L., & Tsai, C. W. (2011). Measuring the Confidence of 8th Grade Taiwanese Students' Knowledge of Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, online.

Jacobs, S. S. (1968). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Selected Aspects of Personality and Confidence-weighting Behaviors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland. University Microfilms. College Park, Maryland.

Johnston, M. F., Hays, R. D., & Hui, K.-K. (2009). Evidence-based Effect Size Estimation: An Illustration Using the Case of Acupuncture for Cancer-related Fatigue. BWC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 9(1), 1-9.

Joreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. O. A. (1983). Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality Structure Prediction (Contributions to Economic Analysis. Kidlington, Oxfordshire: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2005). Ecological and Person-Oriented Aspects of Metacognitive Processes in Test-Taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(3), 321-341.

Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161-173.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A. (1997). Discriminant and Predictive Validity of Academic Self-concept, Academic Self-efficacy, and Mathematics-specific Self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(3), 307-315.

Luebkeman, C., & Peting, D. (1996). Principle of Moments. Retrieved from http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~struct/courseware/461/461_lectures/461_lecture10/461_lecture10.html

Lundeberg, M., Fox, P. W., & Puncochaf, J. (1994). Highly Confident but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.

Lundeberg, M., & Mohan, L. (2009). Context Matters: Gender and Cross-Culture Differences in Confidence. In D. J.

Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 222-239). New York: Routledge.

Mangan, B. (2001). Sensation's Ghost: The Non-Sensory "Fringe" of Consciousness. Psyche, 7(18).

Martin, D. J. (1976). The effects of a confidence weighting technique on learning and confidence. Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report (pp. 118-141). Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

Morres, T. T., & Chang, J. C.-J. (2009). Self-efficacy, Overconfidence, and the Negative Effect on Subsequent Performance: A Field Study. Information & Management, 46(2), 69-76.

Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (2007). High School Biology Students' Knowledge and Certainty about Diffusion and Osmosis Concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 107(3), 94-101.

Oliver, M. (1998). Innovation in the Evaluation of Learning Technology. London: University of North London.

Onafowora, L. L. (2005). Teacher Efficacy Issues in the Practice of Novice Teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 28(4), 34-43.

Pajares, F. (2000). Frank Pajares on Nuturing Academic Confidence. Emory Report, 52(21). Retrieved from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/NurturingAcademicConfidence.html

Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2006). Self-efficacy Beliefs and Motivation in Writing Development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 158-170). New York: Guilford Press.

Pastorino, E., & Doyle-Portillo, S. (2009). Social Psychology: How Do We Understand and Interact with Others. What is Psychology? (pp. 446-495). Belemont, CA.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Perullo, D. (2005). Roadmap to the AIMS High School Mathematics. New York: Random House Inc.

Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget's theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (4 ed., Vol. 1). New York City, New York: Wiley.

Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Krsnik, R., & Beilfuss, M. L. (2006). Exploring Alternative Conceptions from Newtonian Dynamics and Simple DC Circuits: Links between Item Difficulty and Item Confidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 150-171.

Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1991). The Nature of Science Science for All Americans (pp. 1-14). New York: Oxford University Press.

Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2003). Measuring Confidence in Academic Study: A Summary Report. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology and Psychopedagogy, 1(1), 1-17. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10369/275

Scholz, U., Dona, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is General Self-efficacy a Universal Construct? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242-251.

Schraw, G. (1997). The Effect of Generalized Metacognitive Knowledge on Test Performance and Confidence Judgments. Journal of Experimental Education, 65(2), 135-146.

Schwarzer, R., Boehmer, S., Lusczynska, A., Mohaned, N. E., & Knoll, N. (2005). Dispositional Self-efficacy as a Personal Resource Factor in Coping After Surgery. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 807-818.

Shantz, U., & Hartup, W. W. (1995). Conflict in child and adolescent development New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sharma, D. P. (2010). Varignon's Theorem (Principle of Moments). Engineering Mechanics (pp. 8-9). New Delhi, India: Dorling Kindersley.

Skjong, R. (Producer). (2005, February 25, 2010). Etymology of Risk: Classical Greek Origin.

Slakter, M. J. (1967). Risk Taking on Objective Examinations. American Educational Research Journal, 4(1), 31-43.

Soderquist, H. O. (1936). A New Method of Weighting Scores in a True-false Test. Journal of Educational Research, 30, 290-292.

Springer, R. (2006). Using Effect Size in NSSE Survey Reporting. Research & Practice in Assessment, 1(1), 1-7.

Swineford, F. (1938). The Measurement of a Personality Trait. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 295-300.

Tarnas, R. (1991). The Philosophical Revolution The Passion of the Western Mind (pp. 272-297). New York: Harmony Books.

Thorndike, E. L. (1912). The Measurement of Educational Products. The School Review: A Journal of Secondary Education, 20(5), 289-299.

Trow, W. C. (1923). The psychology of confidence - an experimental inquiry. Archives of Psychology, 67, 1-47.

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.

Wikipedia. (2009). Risk Retrieved July 13, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk

Wiley, L. N., & Trimble, O. C. (1936). The Ordinary Objective Test as a Possible Criterion of Certain Personality Traits. School and Society, XLIII, 446-448.

Yen, Y.-C., Ho, R.-G., & Chen, L.-J. (2006). A Polytomous Computerized-Adaptive Testing that Rewards Partial Knowledge. In R. Mizoguchi, P. Dillenbourg & Z. Zhu (Eds.), Learning by Effective Utilization of Technologies: (pp. 629-636). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.

Yen, Y.-C., Ho, R.-G., Chen, L.-J., Chou, K.-Y., & Chen, Y.-L. (2010). Development and Evaluation of a Confidence-Weighting Computerized Adaptive Testing. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 163-176.

Ziller, R. C. (1957). A Measure of the Gambling Response-Set in Objective Tests. Psychometrika, 22(289-292).

Zoller, U., Fastow, M., Lubezky, A., & Tsaparlis, G.(1999). Students' Self-Assessment in Chemistry Examinations Requiring Higher- and Lower-Order Cognitive Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 112-113.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：439（臺灣：426，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2432875 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68235750
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上