:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:邏輯思考能力評量工具的編製
書刊名:師大學報
作者:黃寶鈿
出版日期:1988
卷期:33
頁次:頁485-505
主題關鍵詞:工具化學成就思考能力測驗評量編製學習邏輯
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
本測驗之編製目的在設計一套評量學生的邏輯思考能力的測試工具(乙卷),並與前一期國科會專題研究計畫所設計之甲卷配合,以建立一套複本測試工具。本測驗之適用範圍為形式操作期之學生。本工具包括比例、控制變因、機率、相關及組合等五種推理能力,每部分包括兩種相同內容的題目。本測驗之折半信度為0.47 - 0.87,庫李信度為0.47 - 0.86,Cronbach信度係數在0.47 - 0.86間。本測驗經由項目分析結果顯示其具有相當的鑑別作用與適當的難度分佈。構念效度為0.31 - 0.82,與化學成就測驗之相關為0..20至0.55,與魏氏智商之相關為0.26至0.47,以上結果皆達到統計上之顯著水準。
The purpose of this study was to develope an instrument of logical thinking, FORM B, as an alternative for of FORM a, which was used in the formal research project sponsored by National Science Council. The test consists ten items designed to measure five modes of formal reasoning: controlling variables, proportional reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, an correlational reasoning. By item analusis, it indicated that the test consisted a reasonable difficulty and a discrimination poper. Analysis of data from 2195 students from grade 7 through college inicated high test realiability (p<.01). The split-haf realiability is 0.47=0.87; the Cronbach coeffocoemt os 0.47-0.86 Rvidemce of croterion-related alidity was obtained from a study with the chemistry achievement test, adn the correlation coefficient is between 0.20 to 0.55. The construct validiy is 0.31-0.82. The correlation coefficient is 0.26-0.47 with IQ test. All the above data provided the high test validity(p<0.1).
期刊論文
1.簡茂發(19740600)。試題分析的方法。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,16,左1-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chiappetta, E. L.(1976)。A review of Piagetian studies relevant to science instruction at the secondary and college level。Science Education,60(2),253-261。  new window
3.黃寶鈿(19790500)。大一學生的理科學習成就與邏輯推理能力的關係之研究。國立政治大學學報,39,49-68。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kohlberg, L.、Gilligan, C.(1971)。The adolescent as a philosopher: the discovery of the self in a postconventional world。Daedalus,100(4),1051-1085。  new window
會議論文
1.Higgings-Trenk, A.、Gaite, A. J. H.(1971)。Elusiveness of formal operational thought。79th Annual Convention of the American Pschological Association,201-202。  new window
學位論文
1.Juraschek, W. A.(1974)。The performance of prospective teachers on certain Piaqetian tasks(博士論文)。The University of Texas at Austin。  new window
圖書
1.Fan, Chung-teh(1952)。Item analysis table。Princeton, N. J.:Educational Testing Service。  new window
2.Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.(1975)。The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children。New York:Norton。  new window
3.Inhelder, B.、Piaget, J.(1958)。The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
單篇論文
1.Lawson, A. E.,Blake, A. J. D.(1974)。Concrete and formal thinking abilities in high school biology students as measured by the separate instruments,Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California at Berkeley。  new window
其他
1.Lawson, A. E.(1974)。Relationship of concrete and formal operational science subject matter and the developmental level of the learner,Chicago。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE