◎丁萬鳴（2005/06/27）觀點麥克風。李鴻源：丟錢治水，不如建水鳥保護區，聯合報，A10版，綜合
◎工商時報（2005/03/16）《大社論》經建計畫要著重持續可行，工商時報，焦點新聞，02版
◎工商時報（2005/05/14）《社論》排拒乃至忽略大陸，提振景氣效果有限，工商時報，焦點新聞，02版
◎工商時報（2005/05/23）《社論》不及格的提振景氣措施，工商時報，焦點新聞，02版
◎工商時報（2005/06/16）特別預算，免了！工商時報，焦點新聞，02版
◎工商時報（2005/07/20）《社論》依法行政完成「水患治理特別條例」立法，工商時報，焦點新聞，02版
◎文祖湘（2005/08/09）沒有青山，哪來綠水？自由電子報，自由廣場
◎水患治理監督聯盟（2009）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」各縣市民間參與團體名單
◎王志弘（2009）多重的辯證：列斐伏爾空間生產概念三元組演繹與引申，地理學報，55：1-24
◎王志偉（2008）防洪對保護財產之經濟評估，國立中興大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文
◎王怡文（2007）本土社會信任理論模型的建構：環境決策過程中的社會信任分析，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文
◎王佳煌（2005）都市社會學，初版，臺北：三民
◎王皓平（2006）地方利害關係者治理模式之研究：以臺北市大理街社區運動為例，國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文
◎內政部（2006）中華民國臺閩地區人口統計
◎中時晚報（2005/06/21）《社評》要治水，不要口水，中時晚報，焦點話題，02版
◎中時晚報（2005/07/19）《社評》平安度過之後，中時晚報，焦點話題，02版
◎中時晚報（2005/09/07）《社評》荒謬與荒唐，中時晚報，焦點話題，02版
◎中國時報（2005/06/19）《社論》別把治水問題也扯成藍綠對抗吧！中國時報，焦點新聞，A2版
◎中國時報（2005/06/21）治水，預算無著落；遷村，八字沒一撇，中國時報，焦點新聞，A6版
◎中國時報（2005/07/26a）《新聞分析》人為疏失釀災，應該檢討，中國時報，南市新聞，C5版
◎中國時報（2005/07/26b）《社論》在野黨何妨拿出真本事來審八年八百億特別預算，中國時報，焦點新聞，A2版
◎中國時報（2005/09/11）《社論》有會要錢的狠勁，也該有能花錢的本事，中國時報，焦點新聞，A2版
◎丘昌泰（1994）探索石化工業環境糾紛的迷思：政策利害關係者角度的觀察，法商學報，29：105-175
◎朱元發（1990）韋伯思想概論，臺灣初版，臺北：遠流
◎江原勝幸（2005）震災避難期の災害弱者支援に関する考察研究，研究紀要 19‐W号，静岡県立大学短期大学部
◎李永展、何紀芳（1996）臺北地方生活圈都市服務設施之鄰避效果，都市與計劃，23（1）：95-116
◎李宏育（2002）農地與農村公益機能之評價——以臺中彰化地區為例，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文
◎李武忠（2005/06/19）災難循環，臺灣人不生氣？聯合報，A15版，民意論壇
◎李根政（2005/08/22）治水切忌亂投醫，自由電子報，自由廣場
◎李翰林（2008）民間聯盟參與1,410億治水預算審查——政治機會結構的觀點，臺灣民主季刊，5（4）：87-128
◎何明修（2000）民主轉型過程中的國家與民間社會：以台灣的環境運動為例（1986-1998），國立臺灣大學社會學研究所博士論文
◎呂郁女（2010）新聞價值與新聞報導之演進，新聞原理與編輯，銘傳大學新聞學系編，臺北：銘傳大學新聞系，19-47
◎杜慶承（2005）中央政權輪替對地方派系的影響——彰化縣個案研究，選舉研究，12（1）：117-145
◎余範英、李鴻源、於幼華、林聖芬、馬以工、夏鑄九、溫清光、歐晉德、歐陽嶠暉（2005/06/23）治水，不要只是口水，中國時報，國土規劃專題，A12版
◎汪靜明（2005/06/23）河溪生態系統，不容破壞，中國時報，國土規劃專題，A12版
◎林火旺（2004）倫理學，二版，臺北：五南
◎林河名（2005/07/30）藍委不滿：800億治水，書面報告僅1600字，1字5000萬，聯合報，A4版，要聞
◎林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花（2005）質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析，身心障礙研究，3（2）：122-136
◎林倖妃（2008/04/26）蘇花高環評退回，交新政府決定，中國時報，政治新聞，A5版
◎林淑英（2008）千呼萬喚始出來——話說「水患治理監督聯盟」，「水患治理監督聯盟」網頁，http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/458
◎周仲島（2005/07/22）強化豪雨預報能力，中國時報，時論廣場，A15版
◎周桂田（2002）在地化風險之實踐與理論缺口──遲滯型高科技風險社會，臺灣社會研究季刊，45：89-129
◎周桂田（2007）新興風險治理典範之芻議，政治與社會哲學評論，22：179-233
◎周新富（2007）教育硏究法，臺北：五南
◎長坂俊成、池田三郎（2008）災害リスクガバナンス研究の戦略と方法，第20回研究発表会『災害リスクのガバナンス』：研究論文，17（3）：13-23
◎吳定（2003）公共政策辭典，二版，臺北：五南
◎吳宗憲（2008）臺灣民主轉型與金權政治，臺灣民主季刊，5（3）：177-184
◎吳建華、謝發昱、黃俊峰、陳銘凱（2004）個案研究，教育研究的取徑：概念與應用，潘慧玲主編，臺北：高等教育，199-236
◎吳焜裕（1999/09/09）勿讓環境決策程序流於形式化，民眾日報，http://taup.yam.org.tw/
comm/comm9912/t012.htm
◎吳憲雄（2005/06/14）大水淹透透，為什麼？中國時報，時論廣場，A15版
◎柳中明（2005/06/17）超大豪雨，隨時會破紀錄，聯合報，A15版，民意論壇
◎胡正榮（2004）新聞理論教程，北京：中國廣播電視出版社
◎胡幼慧（1996）多元方法：三角交叉檢視法，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，胡幼慧主編，臺北：巨流，271-285
◎胡湘婷（2005）農業地役權中非市場價值之評價——以宜蘭縣為例，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文
◎范振和（2010/11/09）《冷眼集》從人道出發的路，恐難擋，聯合晚報，A2版，話題
◎洪素卿（2005/06/25）防洪，雲嘉南養殖區擬縮減，自由電子報，生活新聞
◎苑舉正（2001）典範社會學的限制，孔恩：評論集，朱元鴻、傅大為主編，臺北：巨流，163-197
◎秦立林（2007）土石流災害下行動弱勢族群疏散避難決策行為之研究，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文
◎徐世大（1967）水資源經濟研究叢刊之三：防洪計劃的經濟研究，經濟部水資源統一規劃委員會
◎畢恆達（2025）教授為什麼沒告訴我——論文寫作的枕邊書，臺北：學富文化
◎殷莞之（2001）流動的希望／災難？基隆河防洪整治的政治經濟學分析，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文
◎陳文福（2005/06/15）八百億治水的虛與實，中國時報，時論廣場，A15版
◎陳李綢（2000）個案研究，臺北：心理
◎陳至中、許俊偉（2010/11/10）環團：環評史最黑暗的一天，環評大會拍板，蘇花改蓋定了（2-1）中國時報，焦點新聞，A4版
◎陳青紜（2007）從社區防災觀點談災害弱勢族群避難支援體系建構之研究，長榮大學土地管理與開發研究所碩士論文
◎陳東旭（2001/08/10）水泥牆景觀差入夜熱氣襲人，百福社區堤防里民敬而遠之，聯合報，18版，基隆市新聞
◎陳道（2005/09/24）治水八百億，南投當人頭？聯合報，A15版，民意論壇
◎陳萬紘（2007）應用Mitchell利害關係人理論建構一個考量多元顧客需求之改良式QFD技術，育達商業技術學院企業管理所碩士論文
◎陳夢琨（2007）河川治理與地方永續發展之研究——以基隆河瑞芳段員山子分洪工程為例，國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系在職專班碩士論文
◎陳麗娟（2006）法學槪論，臺北：五南
◎黃金益（2000）國內服務弱勢族群公益性電台的價值與生存問題之探討，世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文
◎黃冠華（2008）颱風土石流受災地區行動弱勢族群疏散避難行為模式之研究：以水里、尖石地區為例，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文
◎黃雅詩、李順德（2005/06/15）治水經費在野批評。謝長廷：臺北人不懂淹水苦，聯合報，A6版，話題
◎郭俊銘（1991）發言紀錄，水的關懷：河川環境與水源保護研討會論文集，蕭新煌等著，臺北：時報文化，102
◎郭昱瑩（2005）菁英規劃vs.參與規劃，人事月刊，41（1）：6-15
◎郭昱瑩（2007）成本效益分析，臺北：華泰
◎許雲霄（2006）公共選擇理論，北京：北京大學出版社
◎張家瑋（2005/07/23）面子比人命重要？自由電子報，自由廣場
◎張健常（2005/06/26）整治河川，還是換個地方淹？聯合報，A15版，民意論壇
◎葉重新（2001）教育研究法，臺北：心理
◎曾懿晴（2010/11/10）討論6小時，史上最快速通過的重大環評案，蘇花改環評，有條件過關，聯合報，A1版，要聞
◎曾懿晴、熊迺群（2010/11/10）蘇花難題，初審閉門會，綠黨批傅沒迴避，聯合報，A6版，話題
◎楊宗灝（2003/06/14）違建蓋在行水區，要拆！中國時報，北縣新聞，C2版
◎經濟部水利處（2000a）基隆河整體治理計畫規劃工作：防洪水庫硏究檢討專題報告
◎經濟部水利處（2000b）基隆河整體治理計畫規劃工作：非工程防洪檢討——易淹水區土地使用規劃研討專題報告
◎經濟部水利處（2000c）基隆河整體治理計畫規劃工作：員山子分洪規劃檢討（初步評估）專題報告
◎經濟部水利處（2000d）基隆河整體治理計畫規劃總報告
◎經濟部水利署（2002a）基隆河員山子分洪計畫環境影響評估報告 v.1
◎經濟部水利署（2002b）基隆河員山子分洪計畫環境影響評估報告 v.2
◎經濟部水利署（2002c）基隆河員山子分洪計畫環境影響評估報告 v.3
◎經濟部水利署（2007）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」第1階段實施計畫執行情形及績效報告（備查本）
◎經濟部水利署（2008a）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」嘉義縣管事業海堤好美里海堤規劃報告
◎經濟部水利署（2008b）基隆河整體治理計畫（前期計畫）結案報告
◎經濟部水利署（2009）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」嘉義縣管事業海堤東石海埔地海堤規劃報告
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2006a）河川治理及環境營造規劃參考手冊
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2006b）區域排水整治及環境營造規劃參考手冊
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2007）防洪工程經濟效益評估之檢討修正（1/3）
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2008a）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」臺南縣龜子港排水系統環境營造規劃
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2008b）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」嘉義縣朴子溪支流排水系統環境營造規劃
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2008c）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」臺中縣旱溝排水系統環境營造規劃
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2008d）防洪工程經濟效益評估之檢討修正（2/3）
◎經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所（2009）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」桃園縣管河川南崁溪水系治理規劃報告（總報告）
◎經濟部水利署第七河川局（2009）「易淹水地區水患治理計畫」屏東縣管區域排水土庫地區排水系統規劃報告
◎翟慎宏（2007）以Mitchell利害關係人確認與顯著性理論建構公共政策之分析模式，育達商業技術學院企業管理所碩士論文
◎蔡良文（2006）人事行政學：論現行考銓制度，臺北：五南
◎蔡育軒、陳怡君、王業立（2007）社區發展協會、選舉動員與地方政治，東吳政治學報，25（4）：93-135
◎劉華美、周桂田（2006）邁向一個開放性風險評估的可能──以生物多樣性議題之基因工程為檢討，臺灣科技法律與政策論叢，2（4）：73-104
◎鄭思蘋（2003）都會區颱洪災害損失之分析與評估，國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系暨研究所博士論文
◎賴兩陽（2010）地方政治人物對推動社區工作的影響性分析：桃園縣觀音鄉社區工作者的觀點，社會政策與社會工作學刊，14（1）：39-79
◎蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪（2002）環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用，臺北：俊傑
◎蕭景楷（2003）防洪措施之間接效益初步評估（2/2），中興大學應用經濟學系
◎蕭新煌（1995）民間環保團體、地方政府與河川保護——本次研討會的緣由與主旨，全民參與搶救河川（上）：河川保護、地方自治與民眾參與研討會，柯三吉、蕭新煌等著，臺北：時報文化，1-18
◎蕭新煌（1999）當前環評制度面臨的信任差距的問題：從地方環保抗爭事件談起，勞工之友雜誌，580：6-12
◎薛孟杰（2010/11/10）蘇花改環評，有條件過關，總經費465億，預計105年12月完工，工商時報，地方要聞，A23版
◎謝麗美（2005/09/08）防洪，先請地方催收稅款，自由電子報，自由廣場
◎羅以倫（2004）基隆河水災損失減輕措施之成本效益分析，國立臺北大學資源管理研究所碩士論文
◎羅紹麟、童秋霞（2000）自然資源經營之利害關係者分析：以林務局主管人員之意見為例，林業研究，22（4）：45-57
◎Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) (2005) Integrated Flood Risk Management in Asia 2: A Primer, Bangkok: ADPC, http://www.adpc.net/maininforesource/udrm/
floodprimer.pdf
◎Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K. & Sonnenfeld, A. J. (1999) Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 507-525
◎Angeles, P. A. (1992) HarperCollins Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed.), New York: Har-perCollins
段德智、尹大貽、金常政譯（2004）哲學辭典，二版，臺北：貓頭鷹
◎Argenti, J. (1993) Your Organization: What is it for? New York: McGraw Hill
◎Argenti, J. (1997) Stakeholders: The case against, Long Range Planning, 30(3): 442-445
◎Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216-224
◎Balmer, J. M., Fukukawa, K. & Gray, E. R. (2007) The nature and management of ethical corporate identity: A commentary on corporate identity, corporate social responsibility and ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 76: 7-15
◎Banerjee, S. B. (2000) Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders, and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine, Organization & Envi-ronment, 13(1): 3-38
◎Beck, U. (2000) Risk society revisited: Theory, politics and research programmes, The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory eds. Adam, B., Beck, U. & van Loon, Joost., London: Sage, 211-239
◎Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Doubleday
◎Berry, J. M. (1997) The Interest Group Society (3rd ed.), New York: Longman
◎Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. & Wisner, B. (1994) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters (1st ed.), London: Routledge
◎Box, R. C. (1998) Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century, London: Sage
◎Brody, H. (1992) Philosophic approaches, Doing Qualitative Research eds. Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L., Newbury Park, CA: Sage
◎Brouwer, R. & van Ek, R. (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact as-sessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands, Ecological Economics, 50: 1-21
◎Browder, G. & Ortolano, L. (2000) The evolution of an international water resources management regime in the Mekong River Basin, Natural Resources Journal, 40(3): 499-531
◎Bryson, J. M. & Bromily, P. (1993) Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 319-337
◎Bryson, J., Cunningham, G. & Lokkesmoe, J. (2002) What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American men project of Hennepin County, Minnesota, Public Administration Review, 62: 568-584
◎Buchholz, R. A. & Rosenthal, S. B. (2005) Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory, Journal of Business Ethics, 58: 137-148
◎Buysse, K. & Verbeke, A. (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder man-agement perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 24: 453-470
◎Campbell, S. (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the con-tradictions of sustainable development, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3): 296-312, http://www.cnr.uidaho.edu/css386/Readings/Campbell_Greencities.pdf
◎Carson, T. L. (2003) Does the stakeholder theory constitute a new kind of theory of social responsibility? Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(2): 171-176
◎Cavuta, G., Environmental goods valuation: The total economic value, http://www.openstarts.
units.it/dspace/bitstream/10077/860/1/e7cavuta.pdf
◎Chakraborty, J., Tobin, G. A. & Montz, B. E. (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spa-tial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards, Natural Hazards Review, 6(1): 23-33
◎Child, J. W. & Marcoux, A. M. (1999) Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder theory in the original position, Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2): 207-223
◎Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92-117
◎Commonwealth of Australia (2001) Economic Costs of Natural Disasters in Australia, Bu-reau of Transport Economics Report 103, http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications/99/Files/
r103_lores.pdf
◎Conrad, J. (1980) Society, Technology and Risk Assessment, New York: Academic
◎Cragg, W. (2002) Business ethics and stakeholder theory, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 113-142
◎Creswell, J. W. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Ap-proaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
崔延強譯（2007）研究設計與寫作指導：定性、定量與混合研究的路徑，重慶：重慶大學出版社
◎Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Re-search, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
謝志偉、王慧玉譯（2010）混合方法研究導論，臺北：心理
◎Dahl, R. A. (1957) The concept of power, Behavioral Science, 2: 201-215
◎Dahl, R. A. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven: Yale University Press
◎Day, P. & Klein, R. (1989) Interpreting the unexpected: The case of AIDS policy making in Britain, Journal of Public Policy, 9(3): 337-353
◎De Marchi, B. & Ravetz, J. R. (1999) Risk management and governance: A post-normal science approach, Futures, 31: 743-757
◎Delaney, D. & Leitner, H. (1997) The political construction of scale, Political Geography, 16(2): 93-97
◎Dietz, T., Stern, P. C. & Rycroft, R. W. (1989) Definitions of conflict and the legitimization of resources: The case of environmental risk, Sociological Forum, 4: 47-69
◎Donaldson, T. (1999) Making stakeholder theory whole, Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 237-241
◎Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications, Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65-91
◎Dowding, K. M. (1996) Power, Buckingham: Open University Press
◎Driscoll, K. & Starik, M. (2004) The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment, Journal of Business Ethics, 49: 55-73
◎Dunn, W. N. (2004) Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (3rd ed.), New Jersey: Prentice Hall
◎Dunn, W. N. (2008) Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction (4th ed.), New Jersey: Prentice Hall
◎Eesley, C. & Lenox, M. J. (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action, Strategic Management Journal, 27: 765-781
◎Ekenberg, L., Brouwers, L., Danielson, M., Hansson, K., Johannson, J., Riabacke, A. & Vári, A. (2003) Flood Risk Management Policy in the Upper Tisza Basin: A System Ana-lytical Approach. Simulation and Analysis of Three Flood Management Strategies, IIASA Interim Report IR-03-003, http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/IR-03-003.pdf
◎Elms, H. E., Berman, S. & Wicks, A. C. (2002) Ethics and incentives: An evaluation and development of stakeholder theory in the health care industry, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(4): 413-432
◎Enarson, E. & Morrow, B. H. (1998) Why gender? Why women? An introduction to women and disaster, The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women’s Eyes eds. Enarson, E. & Morrow, B. H., London: Praeger, 1-8
◎Ermolieva, T., Ermoliev, Y., Fischer, G. & Galambos, I. (2003) The role of financial in-struments in integrated catastrophic flood management, Multinational Finance Journal, 7(3&4): 207-230, http://mfs.rutgers.edu/MFJ/Articles-pdf/V07N34p5.pdf
◎Ermolieva, T., Ermoliev, Y., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Vari, A. & Amendola, A. (2002) Design of Flood-Loss Sharing Programs in the Upper Tisza Region, Hungary: A Dynamic Mul-ti-Agent Adaptive Monte Carlo Approach, IIASA-DPRI 2002 Proceedings, http://www.
iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMS/dpri2002/Papers/ermol.pdf
◎Etzioni, A. (1964) Modern organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
◎Evans, P. B. (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
◎Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, London: Duke University Press
◎Flax, L. K., Jackson, R. W. & Stein, D. N. (2002) Community vulnerability assessment tool methodology, Natural Hazards Review, 3(4): 163-176
◎Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): 219-245
◎Freeman, R. E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, MA: Pit-man
◎Freeman, R. E. (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions, Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 409-421
◎French, J. R. P. & Raven, B. (1959) The bases of social power, Studies in Social Power ed. Cartwright, D., Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
◎Friedman, A. L. & Miles, S. (2002) Developing stakeholder theory, Journal of Management Studies, 39(1): 1-21
◎Friedman, A. L. & Miles, S. (2006) Stakeholders: Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press
◎Friedrichs, R. (1970) A Sociology of Sociology, London: Collier MacMillan
◎Frooman, J. (1999) Stakeholder influence strategies, Academy of Management Journal, 24(2): 191-205
◎Froud, J., Haslam, C., Suckdev, J., Shaoul, J. & Williams, K. (1996) Stakeholder economy? From utility privatisation to New Labour, Capital and Class, 60, Autumn, 119-134
◎Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1992) Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science, Social Theories of Risk eds. Krimsky, S. & Golding, D., London: Praeger, 251-274
◎Gamble, G. & Kelly, G. (1996) Stakeholder capitalism and one nation socialism, Renewal, 4(1): 23-32
◎Ganderton, P. T., Benefit-cost analysis of disaster mitigation: A review, http://gandini.unm.
edu/research/Papers/BCA_MitFIN.pdf
◎Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press
◎Giddens, A. (1985) A contemporary critique of historical materialism, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
◎Gioia, D. A. (1999) Practicability, paradigms and problems in stakeholder theory, Academy of Management Journal, 24(2): 228-232
◎Golet, G. H., Roberts, M. D., Larsen, E. W., Luster, R. A., Unger, R., Werner, G. & White, G. G. (2006) Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: A case study of the Sacramento River project, California, Environmental Management, 37(6): 862-879
◎Greene, W. H. (2003) Econometric Analysis (5th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
◎Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. J. & Whatmore, S. (2009) The Dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed.), Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
◎Grimble, R. & Chan, M. K. (1995) Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries, Natural Resources Forum, 19(2): 113-124
◎Grimble, R., Chan, M. K., Aglionby, J. & Quan, J. (1995) Trees and Trade-offs: A Stake-holder Approach to Natural Resource Management, Gatekeeper Series no. 52, Interna-tional Institute for Environment and Development
◎Haigh, N. & Griffiths, A. (2009) The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: The case of climate change, Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(6): 347-359
◎Handy, C. (1976) Understanding Organizations, London: Penguin Books
◎Handy, C. (1993) What is a company for? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1(1): 14-17
◎Hanley, N., Colombo, S., Kriström, B. & Watson, F. (2009) Accounting for negative, zero and positive willingness to pay for landscape change in a national park, Journal of Agri-cultural Economics, 60(1): 1-16
◎Hardcastle, D. & Powers, P. (2004) Community Practice: Theories and Skills for Social Workers, New York: Oxford University Press
◎Hasnas, J. (1998) The normative theories of business ethics: A guide for the perplexed, Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1): 19-42
◎Hay, C. (1996) A state of disarray? Huttonomics, New Labour and the contemporary British impasse, Renewal, 4(3): 40-50
◎Hayes, B. D. (2004) Interdisciplinary planning of nonstructural flood hazard mitigation, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130(1): 15-25
◎Heath, J. & Norman, W. (2004) Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management, Journal of Business Ethics, 53: 247-265
◎Hemmati, M. (2002) Multi-Stakeholder Process for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict, London: Earthscan
◎Henriques, I. & Sadorsky, P. (1999) The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 87-99
◎Heugens, P. & van Oosterhout, H. (2002) The confines of stakeholder management: Evi-dence from the Dutch manufacturing sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 40: 387-403
◎Hilhorst, D. (2004) Complexity and diversity: Unlocking social domains of disaster re-sponse, Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People eds. Bankoff, G., Frerks, G. & Hilhorst, D., London: Earthscan, 52-66
◎Hilhorst, D. & Bankoff, G. (2004) Introduction: Mapping vulnerability, Mapping Vulnera-bility: Disasters, Development and People eds. Bankoff, G., Frerks, G. & Hilhorst, D., London: Earthscan, 1-9
◎Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2003) Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Sub-systems (2nd ed.), Toronto: Oxford University Press
龐詩等譯（2006）公共政策研究：政策循環與政策子系統，北京：生活‧讀書‧新知三聯書店
◎Hromadka II, T. V. & Yen, C. C. (1995) Using a cost-to-benefit index (CBI) to set priorities for a city master plan drainage system, Environmental Software, 10(1): 1-9
◎Hsu, Kan-Lin (2002) The Rise and Fall of the Taiwanese Development State, 1949-1999, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University
◎Humber, J. M. (2002) Beyond stockholders and stakeholders: A plea for corporate moral authority, Journal of Business Ethics, 36: 207-221
◎Hutton, W. (1995) The State We Are In, London: Random House
◎IUCN/WCPA (1998) Economic Values of Protected Areas: Guideline for Protected Area Managers, Cambridge, UK: IUCN, http://www.unpei.org/PDF/policyandprogrammes/
Economic-values-Protected-areas.pdf
◎Jacobs, M. (1997) The environment as stakeholder, Business Strategy Review, 8(2): 25-28
◎Jary, D. & Jary, J. (2005) HarperCollins Dictionary of Sociology (2nd ed.), New York: HarperCollins
周業謙、周光淦譯（2005）社會學辭典，二版，臺北：貓頭鷹
◎Jasanoff, S. (1993) Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis, Risk Analysis, 13(2): 123-129
◎Jasanoff, S. (1998) The political science of risk perception, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 59: 91-99
◎Jasanoff, S. (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society, States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order ed. Jasanoff, S., London: Routledge, 31-54
◎Jensen, M. C. (2002) Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 235-256
◎Jones, T. M., Felps, W. & Bigley, G. A. (2007) Ethical theory and stakeholder related deci-sions: The role of stakeholder culture, Academy of Management Journal, 32(1): 137-155
◎Junker, B., Buchecker, M. & Müller-Böker, U. (2006) Objectives of public participation: Which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations? Water Resources Research, 43: W10438
◎Kaler, J. (2006) Evaluating stakeholder theory, Journal of Business Ethics, 69: 249-268
◎Keenoy, T. (1999) HRM as a hologram; a polemic, Journal of Management Studies, 36(1): 1-23
◎Kline, W. (2006) Business ethics from the internal point of view, Journal of Business Ethics, 64: 57-67
◎Knox, S. & Gruar, C. (2007) The application of stakeholder theory to relationship market-ing strategy development in a non-profit organization, Journal of Business Ethics, 75: 115-135
◎Kochan, T. A. & Rubenstein, S. A. (2000) Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership, Organization Science, 11(4): 367-386
◎Kymlicka, W. (2001) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2nd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press
劉莘譯（2003）當代政治哲學導論，臺北：聯經
◎Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥譯（1994）科學革命的結構，二版，臺北：遠流
◎Kutrilla, J. V. (1967) Conservation reconsidered, American Economic Review, 57(4): 777-786
◎Kutrilla, J. V. & Fisher, A. C. (1985) The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future
◎Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K. & Litz, R. A. (2008) Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us, Journal of Management, 34(6): 1152-1189
◎Leach, R. & Smith, P. (2001) Local Governance in Britain, New York: Palgrace
◎Lebel, L., Garden, P. & Imamura, C. (2005) The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong Region, Ecology and Society, 10(2): 18
◎Lewis, C. W. (1991) The Ethics Challenge in Public Service: A Problem-Solving Guide, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
◎Linerooth-Bayer, J., Vári, A. & Brouwers, L. (2003) Flood Risk Management in the Upper Tisza Region: A Model-Based Stakeholder Approach, Draft Report IIASA RMS Program, Laxenburg, Austria
◎Lodahl, J. B. & Gordon, G. (1972) The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments, American Sociological Review, 37: 57-72
◎Lonsdale, K. G., Downing, T. E., Nicholls, R. J., Parker, D., Vafeidis, A. T., Dawson, R. & Hall, J. (2008) Plausible responses to the threat of rapid sea-level rise in the Thames Estuary, Climatic Change, 91(1-2): 145-169
◎Lowi, T. (1972) Four systems of policy, politics, and choice, Public Administration Review, 33: 298-310
◎Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillan
◎Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. P. (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiative by business, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268-305
◎Mautner, T. (2005) The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed.), New York: Penguin
◎McDaniels, T. L., Gregory, R. S. & Fields, D. (1999) Democratizing risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions, Risk Analysis, 19(3): 497-510
◎McEntire, D. A., Fuller, C., Johnston, C. W. & Weber, R. (2002) A comparison of disaster paradigms: The search for a holistic policy guide, Public Administration Review, 62(3): 267-281
◎McLennan, G. (1984) Capitalist state or democratic polity, The Idea of the Modern State eds. McLennan, G., Held, D. & Hall, S., Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University Press
◎McNutt, P. A. (2002) The Economics of Public Choice, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
梁海音譯（2008）公共選擇經濟學，長春：長春出版社
◎Mertens, D. M. (2003) Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective, Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research eds. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 135-164
◎Mileti, D., Drabek, T. & Haas, E. (1975) Human Systems in Extreme Environments, Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado
◎Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E. & Alexander, L. (1995) In-depth Interviewing (2nd ed.), South Melbourne: Longman
◎Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. & Wood, D. J. (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identifi-cation and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts, Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886
◎Mitroff, I. (1983) Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
◎Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
◎Morrow, B. H. (1999) Identifying and mapping community vulnerability, Disasters, 23(1): 1-18
◎Naidoo, R. & Ricketts, T. H. (2006) Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation, PLoS Biol, 4(11): e360
◎Nchito, W. (2007) Flood risk in unplanned settlements in Lusaka, Environment and Urba-nization, 19(2): 539-551
◎O’Brien, M. (2000) Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk As-sessment, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
◎O’Doherty, R. (1996) Using contingent valuation to enhance public participation in local planning, Regional Studies, 30(7): 667-678
◎Ornstein, N. J. & Elder, S. (1978) Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Policymaking, Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press
潘文同譯（1981）利益集團、院外活動和政策制定，北京：世界知識出版社
◎Orts, E. W. & Strudler, A. (2002) The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2): 215-233
◎Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change, Water Resources Management, 21(1): 49-62
◎Pannell, S. (1999) Did the earth move for you? The social seismology of a natural disaster in Maluku, Eastern Indonesia, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 10(2): 129-143
◎Parent, M. M. & Deephouse, D. L. (2007) A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers, Journal of Business Ethics, 75: 1-23
◎Pearce, D., Atkinson, G. & Mourato, S. (2006) Cost-benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments, Paris: OECD
◎Pelling, M. & Dill, K. (2010) Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes, Progress in Human Geography, 34(1): 21-37
◎Perrini, F. (2006) SMEs and CSR theory: Evidence and implications from an Italian pers-pective, Journal of Business Ethics, 67: 305-316
◎Peterson, G. L. & Sorg, C. F. (1987) Toward the Measurement of Total Economic Value, Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
◎Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in Organizations, Marshfield, MA: Pitman
◎Phillips, R. A., Freeman, R. E. & Wicks, A. C. (2003) What stakeholder theory is not, Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4): 479-502
◎Plender, J. (1997) A Stake in the Future: The Stakeholding Solution, London: Nicholas Brearley
◎Post, J. E., Preston, L. E. & Sachs, S. (2002) Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
◎Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
李少軍、杜麗燕、張虹譯（2003）正義論，臺北：桂冠
◎Read, M. & Marsh, D. (2002) Combining qualitative and quantitative methods, Theory and Methods in Political Science eds. Marsh, D. & Stoker, G., Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave
何景榮譯（2007）量化與質性研究法的結合，政治學方法論與途徑，臺北：韋伯
◎Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H. & Stringer, L. C. (2009) Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management, Journal of Environmental Manage-ment, 90: 1933-1949
◎Renard, Y. (2004) Guidelines for Stakeholder Identification and Analysis: A Manual for Caribbean Natural Resource Managers and Planners, published by the Caribbean Natural Resources Institute in collaboration with The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, http://www.canari.org/Guidelines5.pdf
◎Renn, O. (2006) Participatory processes for natural resource management, Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management eds. Stoll-Kleemann, S. & Welp, M., New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 3-15
◎Rhenman, E. (1964) Foeretagsdemokrati och Foeretagsorganisation, Stockholm: Thule
◎Ritzer, G. (1980) Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science (revised ed.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon
◎Rosa, E. A. (1998) Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk, Journal of Risk Re-search, 1: 15-44
◎Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation, Science, Technology, & Human values, 25(1): 3-29
◎Schwartz, M. S. (2006) God as a managerial stakeholder? Journal of Business Ethics, 66: 291-306
◎Shiferaw, B., Freeman, H. A. & Navrud, S. (2005) Valuation methods and approaches for assessing natural resource management impacts, Natural Resource Management in Agriculture: Methods for Assessing Economic and Environmental Impacts eds. Shiferaw, B., Freeman, H. A. & Swinton, S. M., Cambridge, MA: CABI, 19-51
◎Sismondo, S. (2004) An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, Oxford, UK: Blackwell
國立編譯館主譯、林宗德譯（2007）科學與技術研究導論，臺北：群學
◎Stake, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
◎Starik, M. (1995) Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature, Journal of Business Ethics, 14: 207-217
◎Sternberg, E. (1997) The defects of stakeholder theory, Corporate Governance: An Inter-national Review, 5: 3-10
◎Stoney, C. & Winstanley, D. (2001) Stakeholding: Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the conceptual terrain, Journal of Management Studies, 38(5): 603-626
◎Suchman, M. C. (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20: 571-610
◎Sugden, R. (2005) Integrating Cost-Benefit Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis of Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Projects, Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Ero-sion Risk Management R&D Programme, R&D Project Record FD2018/PR2, http://randd.
defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=FD2018_5184_PR.pdf
◎Sundaram, A. K. & Inkpen, A. C. (2004) The corporate objective revisited, Organization Science, 15(3): 350-363
◎Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003) The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs, Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research eds. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 671-701
◎The World Bank (2008) Climate Resilient Cities: A Primer on Reducing Vulnerabilities to Climate Change Impacts and Strengthening Disaster Risk Management in East Asian Cities, Washington, DC: The World Bank, http://www.worldbank.org/eap/climatecities
◎Tierney, K., Bevc, C. & Kuligowski, E. (2006) Metaphors matter: Disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604: 57-81
◎Tobin, J. (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables, Econometrica, 26(1): 24-36
◎Trevino, L. K. & Weaver, G. R. (1999) The stakeholder research tradition: Converging theorists-not convergent theory, Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 222-227
◎Tuchman, B. (1984) The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam, New York: Knopf
◎United Nations Environment Programme (1999) Conceptual Framework and Planning for Integrated Coastal Area and River Basin Management, Priority Actions Programme
◎Vari, A., Linnerooth-Bayer, J. & Ferencz, Z. (2003) Stakeholder views on flood risk man-agement in Hungary’s Upper Tisza Basin, Risk Analysis, 23(3): 585-600
◎van Beek, E. (2004) Consensus building in IWRM in the Netherlands, presentation material at International Conference on Integrated Water Resources Management, Tokyo
◎van der Werff, P. E. (2004) Stakeholder responses to future flood management ideas in the Rhine River Basin: Nature or neighbour in Hell’s Angle, Regional Environmental Change, 4: 145-158
◎Warner, J. & Oré, M. T. (2006) El Niño platforms: Participatory disaster response in Peru, Disasters, 30(1): 102-117
◎Warner, J., Waalewijn, P. & Hilhorst, D. (2002) Public participation in disaster-prone wa-tersheds. Time for multi-stakeholder platforms? Paper for the Water and Climate Dialo-gue, Disaster Studies, No. 6, Wageningen University, http://www.disasterstudies.wur.nl/NR/
rdonlyres/E08690FD-1923-4358-B3B4-FBA2F7734B91/25010/no6mspindisaster.pdf
◎Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, translated by Hen-derson, A. M. & Parsons, T., edited with an introduction by Parsons, T., New York: Free Press
◎Weyer, M. V. (1996) Ideal world, Management Today, September, 35-8
◎Wilmott, H. (1995) What has been happening in organization theory and does it matter? Personnel Review, 24(8): 33-53
◎Winn, M. I. (2001) Building stakeholder theory with a decision modeling methodology, Business & Society, 40(2): 133-166
◎Wisner, B. (2001) Risk and the neoliberal state: Why post-Mitch lessons didn’t reduce El Salvador’s earthquake losses, Disasters, 25(3): 251-268
◎Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. & Davis, I. (2004) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters (2nd ed.), London: Routledge
◎Witter, J. V., van Stokkom, H. T. C. & Hendriksen, G. (2006) From river management to river basin management: A water manager’s perspective, Hydrobiologia, 565: 317-325
◎Wood, D. (1991) Corporate social performance revisited, Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718
◎World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2006) Social Aspects and Stakeholder In-volvement in Integrated Flood Management, Associated Programme on Flood Manage-ment, WMO-No. 1008, http://www.adpc.net/v2007/Resource/downloads/socialaspect13oct_2.
pdf
◎Wynne, B. (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide, Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a new Ecology eds. Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. & Wynne, B., London: Sage, 45-83
◎Wynne, B. (2002) Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology: Reflex-ivity inside out? Current Sociology, 50(30): 459-477
◎Yin, R. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
◎Yodmani, S. (2001) Disaster risk management and vulnerability reduction: Protecting the poor, paper presented at The Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty, organized by the Asian Development Bank