:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:職能、團隊問題解決能力、電腦稽核活動與內部稽核績效之關聯性研究
作者:吳東憲 引用關係
作者(外文):Tung-Hsien Wu
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:會計與資訊科技研究所
指導教授:黃士銘
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:電腦輔助查核工具與技術電腦稽核活動職能團隊問題解決能力CAATTscomputer auditingcompetencyteam problem-solving ability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
內部稽核部門進行電腦稽核多數使用電腦輔助稽核軟體(CAATTs, Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques)協助。在一般的情況下,內部稽核人員擁有豐富的稽核知識與經驗,雖可讓電腦稽核作業擁有明確的稽核目標以面對E化環境作適當因應,但實務上卻不盡然可讓每項稽核作業均順利達成預定目標。雖然過去電腦稽核的研究探討許多不同的議題,但針對CAATTs所能產生的效益,卻鮮少有實證之探討。因此,本研究探討內部稽核人員的職能、團隊問題解決能力以及電腦稽核活動對稽核績效之影響。然而,因為CAATTs的導入仍在初步的階段,本研究以內部稽核人員所認知的團隊問題解決能力、電腦稽核活動以及稽核績效進行探討,以個人的認知了解變數之間的關聯性。
本研究以問卷調查的方式收集內部稽核人員資料,以PLS (Partial least squares regression)進行分析。實證結果發現,全樣本的分析中,團隊問題解決能力以及電腦稽核活動直接影響內部稽核績效,職能透過團隊問題解決能力以及電腦稽核活動的中介效果間接影響內部稽核績效。公司已導入CAATTs的樣本中,團隊問題解決能力以及電腦稽核活動直接影響內部稽核績效,職能透過團隊問題解決能力以及電腦稽核活動的中介效果間接影響內部稽核績效,。未導入CAATTs的樣本中,職能部份直接影響內部稽核績效以及透過電腦稽核活動的中介效果間接影響內部稽核績效,電腦稽核活動直接影響內部稽核績效。進一步,本研究發現知識透過其他職能、團隊問題解決能力以及電腦稽核活動間接影響內部稽核績效。因此,在導入CAATTs時,不僅需要內部稽核人員的職能,也仰賴團隊的合作與電腦稽核活動建置的完整性才能夠達成預期的目標。本研究之結果將有助於未來內部稽核部門使用CAATTs執行電腦稽核成效之參考。
The majority of internal audit departments use computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) for assistance when performing computer auditing. Internal auditors generally possess substantial auditing knowledge and experience. Although this can facilitate the establishment of clear objectives for computer auditing operations to respond appropriately to computerized environments, in practice, the intended targets may not necessarily be met during each auditing operation. Previous studies on computer auditing have investigated diverse topics. However, few have empirically examined the benefits of CAATTs. Therefore, this study addresses the influence that competency, team problem-solving ability, and computer auditing activity have on audit performance. Because the implementation of CAATTs remains at an early stage, this study examines internal auditors’ personal perception to understand the relationships between variables.
This study employed questionnaires to collect data from internal auditors and adopted the partial least squares regression method for analysis. The empirical results show team problem-solving ability and computer auditing activity directly influenced internal auditing performance and competency indirectly influenced internal auditing performance through the mediating effects of team problem-solving ability and computer auditing activity. For the sample of companies that had implemented CAATTs, computer auditing activity, and team problem-solving ability and computer auditing activity influenced internal auditing performance directly, and competency indirectly influenced internal auditing performance through the mediating effects of team problem-solving ability. For the sample of companies that had yet to implement CAATTs, competency exhibited a partial direct effect and a direct effect on internal auditing performance through the mediating effects of computer auditing activity, and computer auditing activity influenced internal auditing performance directly. The results of this study also indicated that knowledge indirectly influenced internal auditing performance through other competencies, team problem-solving ability, and computer auditing activity. Therefore, the implementation of CAATTs requires not only internal auditor competency, but also team cooperation and thoroughly established computer auditing activity to achieve the projected goals. The results of this study can enable internal audit departments to effectively perform computer auditing using CAATTs in the future.
Abu-Musa, A. A. (2008). Information technology and its implications for internal auditing: An empirical study of Saudi organizations. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(5), 438.
ACL (2006) "data analysis techniques: an acl workshop" ACL Services Ltd.
ACL (2011) The ACL Audit Analytic Capability Model: Navigating the journey from basic data analysis to continuous monitoring - A White Paper
Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Keskin, H., & Lynn, G. S. (2006). Transactive memory system in new product development teams. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 53(1), 95-111.
Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in new product development projects: a transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42(8), 1105-1120.
Alles, M. A., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2010). Principles and problems of audit automation as a precursor to continuous auditing. Working paper, Rutgers Accounting Research Center, Rutgers Business School.
Alles, M. G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2002). Feasibility and economics of continuous assurance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 125-138.
Alles, M. G., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2008). Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. Journal of Information Systems, 22(2), 195-214.
Bandura, A (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (1977), pp. 191–215
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
Bandura, A. (1998). Personal and collective efficacy in human adaptation and change. Advances in psychological science, 1, 51-71.
Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information systems research, 6(1), 3-23.
Bedard, J. C., Jackson, C., Ettredge, M. L., & Johnstone, K. M. (2003). The effect of training on auditors' acceptance of an electronic work system.International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(4), 227-250.
Bogan, M. B., & Kromrey, J. D. (1996). Measuring the environmental literacy of high school students. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 36(1).
Borthick, A. F. Designing continuous auditing for a highly automated procure-to-pay process. Journal of Information Systems.
Braun, R.L. & H.E. Davis. 2003. Computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: Analysis and perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal 18 (9), 725-731.
Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research.Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9-54.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management science, 42(4), 541-558.
Bushong, J. G., Talbott, J. C., & Cornell, D. W. (2008). Instructional case—activity-based costing incorporating both activity and product costing.Accounting Education: an international journal, 17(4), 385-403.
Capretz, L. F., & Ahmed, F. (2010). Why do we need personality diversity in software engineering?. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 35(2), 1-11.
Catano, V. M. (1998). Competencies: A review of the literature and bibliography. The Canadian human resources professional capabilities profile, The Canada Council of Human Resource Associations, Ottawa, Canada.
Chan, D. Y., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2011). Innovation and practice of continuous auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(2), 152-160.
Chen, I. J., & Popovich, K. (2003). Understanding customer relationship management (CRM): People, process and technology. Business Process Management Journal, 9(5), 672-688.
Chen, W., feng Liu, S., Smieliauskas, W. J., & Trippen, G. (2011). Influence factors analysis of online auditing performance assessment based on AHP and GIA. In Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 37-41). IEEE.
Chia Ming Sun, "The Adaptation and Routinization Processes of A Continuous Auditing System Implementation" (July 29, 2012). AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. Paper 21.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 295-336.
Chiou, H. J. (2011). When PLS Meets with SEM: Issues and Dialogues, αβγ Journal of Quantitative Research, 3(1), 20-53
Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., & Yoo, Y. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study. Mis Quarterly, 34(4), 855-870.
Claggett, J. L., & Goodhue, D. L. (2011, January). Have IS Researchers Lost Bandura's Self-Efficacy Concept? A Discussion of the Definition and Measurement of Computer Self-Efficacy. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Coderre, D., Verver, J. G., & Warren, J. D. (2006). Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 3 Continuous auditing: implications for assurance, monitoring, and risk assessment. Institute of Internal Auditors.
Coderre, David. Internal Audit: Efficiency Through Automation. Vol. 11. Wiley, 2009.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.
Cristina, B. A., & Cristina, P. (2009). Measuring And Assessment Of Internal Audit’S Effectiveness. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 3(1), 784-790.
Debreceny, R. S., Gray, G. L., Ng, J. J. J., Lee, K. S. P., & Yau, W. F. (2005). Embedded audit modules in enterprise resource planning systems: implementation and functionality. Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 7-27.
Debreceny, R., S. Lee, W. Neo, and J.S. Toh. (2005). Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector: Challenges and opportunities. Managerial Auditing Journal 20 (6), 605-619.
Diaz, M. C., & Loraas, T. (2010). Learning new uses of technology while on an audit engagement: Contextualizing general models to advance pragmatic understanding. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems,11(1), 61-77.
Dos Santos, B., & Sussman, L. (2000). Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox. International journal of information management, 20(6), 429-440.
Dowling, C. (2009). Appropriate audit support system use: The influence of auditor, audit team, and firm factors. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 771-810.
Downey, J. P., & McMurtrey, M. (2007). Introducing task-based general computer self-efficacy: An empirical comparison of three general self-efficacy instruments. Interacting with Computers, 19(3), 382-396.
Downey, J. P., & Zeltmann, S. (2009). The role of competence level in the self‐efficacy–skills relationship: an empirical examination of the skill acquisition process and its implications for information technology training. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(2), 96-110.
Driskell, J., Hogan, R., and Salas, E. (1987). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. Sage Publication, Newbury Park, CA, 91-112.
Dull, R. B., Tegarden, D. P., & Schleifer, L. L. (2006). ACTVE: a proposal for an automated continuous transaction verification environment. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 3(1), 81-96.
Eisner, S. (2010). Grave new world? Workplace skills for today’s college graduates. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 3(9).
Fong, P. S. (2003). Knowledge creation in multidisciplinary project teams: an empirical study of the processes and their dynamic interrelationships. International Journal of Project Management, 21(7), 479-486.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 382-388.
Free, C., & Radcliffe, V. (2009). Accountability in crisis: The sponsorship scandal and the office of the comptroller general in Canada. Journal of business ethics, 84(2), 189-208.
Gabriel, S. L., & Hirsch Jr, M. L. (1992). Critical thinking and communication skills: Integration and implementation issues. Journal of Accounting Education, 10(2), 243-270.
Gartner (2011). Hype Cycle for Governance, Risk and Compliance Technologies.
Gelinas Jr, U. J., Levy, E. S., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2001). Norwood Office Supplies, Inc.: A Teaching Case to Integrate Computer-Assisted uditing Techniques into the Auditing Course. Issues in Accounting Education, 16(4), 603-636.
Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 102-115.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 183-211.
Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C. E., & Rosen, B. (1987). Modeling vs. non modeling: The impact on self-efficacy and performance in computer training for managers.The International Business Schools Computer Users Group Proceedings, 122-6.
Goldberg, D. M. (2011). General Auditing for IT Auditors. ISACA Journal, 3, 36.
Gonzalez, G. C., Sharma, P. N., & Galletta, D. F. (2012). The antecedents of the use of continuous auditing in the internal auditing context. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.
Grutterink, H., Van der Vegt, G. S., Molleman, E., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). Reciprocal Expertise Affirmation and Shared Expertise Perceptions in Work Teams: Their Implications for Coordinated Action and Team Performance.Applied Psychology.
Hall, J. A. (2010). Information technology auditing and assurance. South-Western Pub.
Henderson, J. C., & Lee, S. (1992). Managing I/S design teams: a control theories perspective. Management Science, 38(6), 757-777.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological bulletin, 121(1), 43-64.
Houck, T. P. (2003). Why and how Audits Must Change: Practical Guidance to Improve Your Audits. Wiley.
Hsieh, J. J., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. Mis Quarterly, 32(1), 97-126.
Hsu, J. S., Chang, J. Y., Klein, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2011). Exploring the impact of team mental models on information utilization and project performance in system development. International Journal of Project Management, 29(1), 1-12.
Hsu, M. K., Wang, S. W., & Chiu, K. K. (2009). Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 412-420.
Huang, S. M., Hung, Y. C., & Tsao, H. H. (2008). Examining the determinants of computer-assisted audit techniques acceptance from internal auditors' viewpoints. International Journal of Services and Standards, 4(4), 377-392.
Huang, S. M., Ou, C. S., Chen, C. M., & Lin, B. (2006). An empirical study of relationship between IT investment and firm performance: A resource-based perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), 984-999.
Hunton, J. E., & Rose, J. M. (2010). 21st century auditing: Advancing decision support systems to achieve continuous auditing. Accounting Horizons, 24(2), 297-312.
Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) (2011), International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, The Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte Springs, FL.
Jackson, D. (2010). An international profile of industry-relevant competencies and skill gaps in modern graduates. The international journal of management education, 8(3), 29-58.
Janvrin, D., Bierstaker, J., & Lowe, D. J. (2008). An examination of audit information technology use and perceived importance. Accounting Horizons,22(1), 1-21.
Janvrin, D., Bierstaker, J., & Lowe, D. J. (2009). An investigation of factors influencing the use of computer-related audit procedures. Journal of Information Systems, 23(1), 97-118.
Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., Wu, S. P., & Liang, T. P. (2009). The relation of requirements uncertainty and stakeholder perception gaps to project management performance. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(5), 801-808.
Jin, B. H., Huang, C. J., Wu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. T. (2012). Inter-organizational cooperation in regional innovation systems: A catalyst of transactive memory systems. In Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET), 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12, 1700-1704.
Jo, H., Kim, S., & Won, D. (2011). Advanced Information Security Management Evaluation System. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems,5(6), 1192-1213.
Johnson, R. D., & Marakas, G. M. (2000). Research report: the role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 402-417.
Kearns, G. S. (2010). Measuring AIS Course Outcomes: The Relationship Between Knowledge/Skills and Interest/Enjoyment. AIS Educator Journal, 5(1), 47-69.
Keil, M., Rai, A., & Liu, S. (2012). How user risk and requirements risk moderate the effects of formal and informal control on the process performance of IT projects. European Journal of Information Systems.
Knapp, K. J., Denney, G. D., & Barner, M. E. (2011). Key issues in data center security: An investigation of government audit reports. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 533-541.
Kotb, A., Roberts, C., & Sian, S. (2012). E-business audit: Advisory jurisdiction or occupational invasion?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting.
KPMG 2010 Continuous auditing and monitoring: Are promised benefits now being released?
Kuhn Jr, J. R., & Sutton, S. G. (2010). Continuous auditing in ERP system environments: The current state and future directions. Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 91-112.
Kwahk, K. Y., & Ahn, H. (2010). Moderating effects of localization differences on ERP use: A socio-technical systems perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 186-198.
Lambrechts, A. J., Lourens, J. E. & Sparks D. E. (2011). Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 16: Data Analysis Technologies Institute of Internal Auditors.
LaPolice, C. C., Carter, G. W., & Johnson, J. W. (2008). Linking O* NET descriptors to occupational literacy requirements using job component validation. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 405-441.
Lawshe, C. E. 1975. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28:563-575.
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587.
Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management science,50(11), 1519-1533.
Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254-1265.
Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581-598.
Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.
Lin, B. T. (2005) Theory and Practice of Internal Audit, The Institute of Internal Auditors, ROC.
Lin, C., & Chen, L. C. (2009, June). Development of an Interdisciplinary Information Technology Auditing Program. In Proceedings of the 13th Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education, Seattle, WA.
Lin, T. C., Hsu, J. S. C., Cheng, K. T., & Wu, S. (2011). Understanding the role of behavioural integration in ISD teams: an extension of transactive memory systems concept. Information Systems Journal, 22(3), 211-234.
Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice, 115-135.
Liu, B., & Zang, Z. (2010). The mediating effects of team efficacy on the relationship between a transactive memory system and team performance.Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 38(7), 865-869.
Liu, J. Y. C., Chen, H. H. G., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2010). Task completion competency and project management performance: The influence of control and user contribution. International journal of project management, 28(3), 220-227.
Longstreet, P., Xiao, X., Sarker, S., & Sprott, D. (2011). Predicting Technology Related Performance: Where Self-Prophecy and Computer Self-Efficacy Meet. AMCIS 2011 Proceedings
Lu, Y., Xiang, C., Wang, B., & Wang, X. (2011). What affects information systems development team performance? An exploratory study from the perspective of combined socio-technical theory and coordination theory.Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 811-822.
Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). Maryland vs. Michigan: Another look at the relationship of expectancy and goal difficult to task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 419-440.
Masli, A., Peters, G. F., Richardson, V. J., & Sanchez, J. M. (2010). Examining the potential benefits of internal control monitoring technology. The Accounting Review, 85(3), 1001-1034.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for" intelligence.".American psychologist, 28(1), 1.-14
Michinov, E., Olivier-Chiron, E., Rusch, E., & Chiron, B. (2008). Influence of transactive memory on perceived performance, job satisfaction and identification in anaesthesia teams. British journal of anaesthesia, 100(3), 327-332.
Mitchell, S., & Switzer, C. S. (2009). GRC Capability Model" Red Book" 2.0. Open Compliance and Ethics Group, OCEG.
Mojab, F., Zaefarian, R., & Azizi, A. H. D. (2011). Applying Competency based Approach for Entrepreneurship education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 436-447.
Nevo, D., Benbasat, I., & Wand, Y. (2012). Understanding Technology Support for Organizational Transactive Memory: Requirements, Application, and Customization. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4), 69-98.
Ng, B. Y., Kankanhalli, A., & Xu, Y. (2009). Studying users' computer security behavior: A health belief perspective. Decision Support Systems, 46(4), 815.
O*NET Resource Center. www.onetcenter.org/
Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Developing learners (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Pangalos, G., & Katos, V. (2010). Information Assurance and Forensic Readiness. Next Generation Society. Technological and Legal Issues, 181-188.
Peltokorpi, V., & Manka, M. L. (2008). Antecedents and the performance outcome of transactive memory in daycare work groups. European Psychologist, 13(2), 103-113.
Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E. (2012). Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 21-42.
Prawitowati, T. (2011). Designing CBA model of performance appraisal system as a merit rating for higher education institution. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy| Ventura,14(1).
Racz, N., Weippl, E., & Seufert, A. (2010). A frame of reference for research of integrated governance, risk and compliance (GRC). In Communications and Multimedia Security (pp. 106-117). Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
Ratley, J. (2010). Report to the Nations: On occupational fraud and abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE)
Reinstein, A., & Bayou, M. E. (1997). Critical thinking in accounting education: processes, skills and applications. Managerial Auditing Journal, 12(7), 336-342.
Rezaee, Z., Sharbatoghlie, A., Elam, R., & McMickle, P. L. (2002). Continuous auditing: Building automated auditing capability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 147-163.
Rosson, M. B., Carroll, J. M., & Sinha, H. (2011). Orientation of Undergraduates Toward Careers in the Computer and Information Sciences: Gender, Self-Efficacy and Social Support. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 11(3), 14.
Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A. M. (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1922-1936.
Scarlata, A. N., Stone, D. N., Jones, K. T., & Chen, C. C. (2011). The O* NET: A Challenging, Useful Resource for Investigating Auditing and Accounting Work.Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 781-809.
Schneider, A. (2010). Assessment of internal auditing by audit committees.Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 14(2), 16-26
Seipel, M. M., Johnson, J. D., & Walton, E. (2011). Desired Characteristics for Msw Students and Social Work Employees: Cognitive Versus Personal Attributes. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 445-461.
Seong, J. Y., Amy, L., Park, W. W., Hong, D. S., & Shin, Y. (2012). Person-Group Fit: Diversity Antecedents, Proximal Outcomes, and Performance at the Group Level. Journal of Management.
Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2007). The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. Mis Quarterly, 31(2), 219-238.
Shin, S. Y., & Park, W. W. (2011). Moderating Effects of Group Cohesiveness in Competency-Performance Relationships: A Multi-Level Study. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 1-15.
Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923-939.
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Kraiger, K., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2009). Do familiar teammates request and accept more backup? Transactive memory in air traffic control. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51(2), 181-192.
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (1993). Competence at Work models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Subramanian, G. H., Klein, G., Jiang, J. J., & Chan, C. (2009). Balancing four factors in system development projects. Communications of the ACM, 52(10), 118-121.
Tallman, I., Leik, R. K., Gray, L. N., & Stafford, M. C. (1993). A theory of problem solving behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 157-177.
Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 723-740.
Teeter, R. A., Alles, M. G., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2010). The Remote Audit.Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 7(1), 73-88.
Thatcher, J. B., Zimmer, J. C., Gundlach, M. J., & McKnight, D. H. (2008). Internal and external dimensions of computer self-efficacy: An empirical examination. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 55(4), 628-644.
Townsend (2006). The real world on continuous auditing initiatives http://businessfinancemag.com

Turel, O., Yuan, Y., & Connelly, C. E. (2008). In justice we trust: Predicting user acceptance of e-customer services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 123-151.
Vasarhelyi, M. A., Alles, M., Kuenkaikaew, S., & Littley, J. (2012). The acceptance and adoption of continuous auditing by internal auditors: A micro analysis. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13, 267-281.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Wan, Z., Compeau, D., & Haggerty, N. (2012). The Effects of Self-Regulated Learning Processes on E-Learning Outcomes in Organizational Settings.Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(1), 307-340.
Wang, C. C., & Farn, C. K. (2012). Explore the Knowledge Integration in Knowledge Teams from a Transactive Memory Perspective. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 3739-3745). IEEE.
Wang, E. T., Ju, P. H., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2008). The effects of change control and management review on software flexibility and project performance.Information & management, 45(7), 438-443.
Wang, F., Zhang, H., Hou, H., Yang, L., Wang, H., & Ba, X. (2012). Fundamental data audit for medical insurance fund management information system. In Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), 2012 International Conference on(pp. 1191-1195). IEEE.
Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2011). Individual virtual competence and its influence on work outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 299-334.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of group behavior, 185- 208.
West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 293-321.
Wright, R. T., & Marett, K. (2010). The influence of experiential and dispositional factors in phishing: An empirical investigation of the deceived.Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 273-303.
Yang, J. R. (2013) Overview of the Semi-conductor Industry TWSE Monthly Review 612: 49-58
Yang, L. (2011). Study on the Improvement of the Internal Audit Work in IT Environment. In Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling (KAM), 2011 Fourth International Symposium on (pp. 233-236). IEEE.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Yuan, Y. C., Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2010). The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise retrieval: A multilevel network perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 700-714.
Zhang, L., Pawlicki, A. R., McQuilken, D., & Titera, W. R. (2012). The AICPA Assurance Services Executive Committee Emerging Assurance Technologies Task Force: The Audit Data Standards (ADS) Initiative. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 199-205.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE