Brown, J. (1997). Computers in language testing: Present research and some future directions. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 44-59.
Liu, P., & Lei, L. (2005). A review of missing data treatment methods. An International Journal: Intelligent Information Management Systems and Technologies, 1(3), 412-419.
Lord, F. (1974). Estimation of latent ability and item parameters when there are omitted responses. Psychometrika, 39(2), 247-264.
Lord, F. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lord, F. (1983). Unbiased estimators of ability parameters, of their variance, and of their parallel-forms reliability. Psychometrika, 48(2), 233-245.
Lord, F. (1986). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian parameter estimation in item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 157-162.
Ludlow, L. H., & O'leary, M. (1999). Scoring Omitted and Not-Reached Items: Practical Data Analysis Implications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(4), 615-630.
McBride, J. R., Wetzel, C. D., & Hetter, R. D. (1997). Preliminary psychometric research for CAT-ASVAB: Selecting an adaptive testing strategy. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From 60
inquiry to operation(pp. 83–95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Mills, C., & Steffen, M. (2000). The GRE computer adaptive test: Operational issues. Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice, 75-99.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
Mislevy, R., & Wu, P. (1988). Inferring Examinee Ability When Some Item Responses Are Missing. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.
Mislevy, R. J., & Wu, P. (1996). Missing responses and IRT ability estimation: Omits, choice, time limits, and adaptive testing.Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.
Owen, R. (1975). A Bayesian sequential procedure for quantaresponse in the context of adaptive mental testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 351-356.
Papanastasiou, E. C., & Reckase, M. (2007). A "rearrangement procedure" for scoring adaptive tests with review options. International Journal of Testing, 7(4), 387–407.
Segall, D. O. (1988). A procedure for scoring incomplete adaptive tests in high stakes testing. Unpublished manuscript. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.61
Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E. (1999). Development of the CAT-ASVAB. In F. Drasgow & J. B. Olson-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in Computerized Assessment (pp. 35-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slater, S., & Schaeffer, G. (1996). Computing Scores for Incomplete GRE General Computer Adaptive Tests. Paper presented at the the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education.
Tuikkala, J., Elo, L., Nevalainen, O. S., &Aittolallio, T. (2006). Improving missing value estimation in microarray data with gene ontology. Bioinformatics, 22, 566–572.
Warm, T. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54(3), 427-450.
Yi, O., Widiatmo, H., Hanson, B. A., Ban, J.-C., & Harris, D. J. (2001, April). Impact of Scoring Options for Not Reached Items in CAT. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle WA.
Zhang, C., Qin, Y., Zhu, X., Zhung, S., & Zhang, J. (2006). Clustering-based missing value imputation for data preprocessing. Paper presented at the Industrial Informatics, 2006 IEEE International Conference on n: Proceedings of the 4th International IEEE Conference on Industrial Informatics, INDIN'06:1081-1086. (oral paper)62
Yen Y.C., R.G.Ho, W.W.Liao., L.J.Chen.(2011). Reducing the Impact of Inappropriate Items on Reviewable Computerized Adaptive Testing. An International Journal: Educational Technology & Society, 15 (2) , 213-243.