壹、中文部分
Adamson, J.（2010）。〈回家吃飯:在全球氣候變遷時代下重新想像地方〉，《生態臺灣》，57-67。
Mason, J.（1979）。〈氣候變遷的數值模式研究著〉，《氣象學報》，25(4): 35-38。
于治中（1998）。〈阿爾杜塞與意識形態的物質性〉，《臺灣社會研究》，(31): 97-113。
王大維（2010）。《成年前期男性氣概建構之論述分析》，國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系所博士論文。
王怡絹（2009）。〈國內大學科學資訊需求及尋求行為之初探〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
王瑞庚(2011)。《台灣 WiMAX 技術發展政策之科技治理研究-漠視科學爭議與風險治理的科技決策模式》，台大國家發展所博士論文。
王肇偉（2011）〈歐盟、美國及中國在哥本哈根氣候變遷會議之策略研究〉，《歐洲國際評論》，147-178。
余碧平譯（2005）。《主體詮釋學》，上海人民出版社。（原書Foucault, M. [2001]. L'hermeneutique du sujet: Cours au college de France(1981-1982). Hautes etudes.）
吳宜昭、陳永明、朱容練（2010）。〈台灣氣候變遷趨勢〉，《國研科技》，25: 40-46。
吳明進（1992）。〈台灣的氣候變化-氣溫和降水〉，《大氣科學》，20(4)，295-318。
呂立翔（2009）。〈重建科技社會中科學新聞的產製圖像－以中時、聯合、自由三報為例〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
李丁讚（2010）。〈重回土地：災難社會的重建〉，《台灣社會研究》，78: 273-326。
李丁讚、林文源（2003）。〈社會力的轉化: 台灣環保抗爭的組織技術〉，《臺灣社會研究》，52: 57-119。
李秀珠（2008a）。《解構科學傳播：從地球暖化議題探討科學新聞的產製，訊息設計，媒體再現，及公眾認知（促進公眾對於科技的理解及參與）》，國科會研究計畫。
李秀珠（2008b）。《科技新聞之訊息設計：從地球暖化議題探討閱聽人如何理解科技新聞（促進公眾對於科技的理解及參與）》，國科會研究計畫。
李河清（2004a）。〈知識社群與全球氣候談判〉，《問題與研究》，43(6): 73-102。
李河清（2004b）。〈氣候變遷整合評估模式：從IPCC到Taiwan-IPCC〉，《環境保護》，27(1): 136-155。
李長潔（2008）。〈傅科論述分析方法在台灣的使用〉，《文明探索叢刊》，(67): 73-107。
李青蓉（2009）。〈探討科學教科書中圖像來源和取得、編制之研究：以高中生物學為例〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
李美華（2010）。〈台灣主流媒體之科學新聞產製：全球暖化新聞的消息來源研究〉，選自《科學傳播論文集2》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業村生計劃統籌中心。
杜文苓（2011）。〈環境風險與科技政治：檢視中科四期環評爭議〉，東吳政治學報，29(2): 57-110。
沈錦惠（2009）。《電子語藝與公共溝通》，天空數位圖書。
周昌忠譯（1997）。《生食與熟食》，中國人民大學。（原書Levi-Strauss, C. [1972]. Le cru et le cuit. Plon.）
周桂田（2005）。〈知識、科學與不確定性—專家與科技系統的「無知」如何建構風險〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，13: 131-180。
林子倫（2008）。〈氣候變遷政策之論述分析〉，《公共行政學報》，28: 153-175。
林明聖（2009）。〈以科學家與傳播者的雙重角色談科學傳播的團隊溝通〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
林義晃（2003）。〈報紙環境新聞分析及其對中部地區民眾環境認知、態度及行為之影響研究〉，台中師院環境教育所碩士論文。
林遠澤（2005）。〈責任倫理學的責任問題── 科技時代的應用倫理學基礎研究〉， 《台灣哲學研究》，5: 297-343。
林遠澤（2012）。〈克己復禮為仁── 論儒家實踐理性類型學的後習俗責任倫理學重構〉，《清華學報》，42(3): 401-442。
林豐瑞、謝孟紋（2011）。〈農民因應氣候變遷的基礎資源、對氣候變遷問題的認知與因應行為對調適策略與因應方法之影響以台東縣稻作農民為例〉，《台灣農學會報》，12(4): 314-334。
邱羽立、蔡今中（2009）。〈促進學習者對創新科技知識之理解：以國科會科技新聞培訓班為例〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
柯舜智（2009）。〈颱風訊息傳播的科學與非科學論述〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
胡紹凱、唐大崙（2010）。〈以錯誤科學報導為鑑的傳播機制討論〉，選自《科學傳播論文集2》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業村生計劃統籌中心。
倪炎元（2006）。〈進入傅柯系譜學分析的兩種策略〉，《新聞學研究》，87: 183-188。
倪炎元（2006）。《再現的政治》，台北：韋伯文化。
倪炎元（2012）。〈批判論述分析的定位爭議及其應用問題：以Norman Fairclough分析途徑為例的探討〉，《新聞學研究》，110: 1-42。
孫立平（2001）。〈『過程-事件分析』與對當代中國農村社會生活的洞察〉，載於：邊燕杰, 涂肇慶&蘇耀昌（編），《華人社會的調查研究：方法與發現》，頁273-296，香港：牛津大學出版社。
孫維三（2006）。〈觀察媒體的觀察: 尼克拉斯‧ 魯曼的《 大眾媒體的實在》〉，《新聞學研究》，89: 181-187。
徐美苓、楊意菁（2011）。〈台灣全球暖化風險溝通的常民認知〉，《傳播與社會》，15：71-104。
烏鈺涵（2009）。〈從科學到科學節目呈現：電視科普節目製作過程之個案研究〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
秦琍琍（2006）。〈建構／解構－現代主義、後現代主義、與組織傳播研究的再思〉，《傳播研究的傳承與創新》，台北：世新大學。
秦琍琍（2011）。《重．返實踐：組織傳播理論與研究》，台北：威仕曼。
秦琍琍、李長潔 (2012)。〈從科學傳播的角度看科學社群的策略溝通〉，「第五屆公關與廣告國際學術論壇」，台北，世新大學。
高宣揚（1999）。《後現代論》，台北：五南。
張小虹（2002）。〈看. 不見九二一: 災難, 創傷與視覺消費〉，《 中外文學》，356: 83-131。
張之傑.（2012）。〈台灣早期科普刊物《 科學教育》考察〉，《中華科技史學會學刊》，17: 57-63。
張嘉玲、陳明義（2009）。〈綠色產業發展趨勢〉，《科學與工程技術期刊》，1: 11-17。
張榮譯（2008)。《技術、醫學與倫理學︰責任原理的實踐》，上海譯文出版社。（原書Jonas, H. [1987]. Technik, medizin und ethik: zur praxis des prinzips verantwortung . Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.）
張慧嫻（2005）。《階段社區林業計畫的建構與想像--2002~2004年》，國立台灣大學森林境資源學研究所碩士論文。
戚啟勳（1983）。〈氣候變遷及其可能影響之探討〉，《氣象學報》，29(2): 1-19。
莫季雍（2007）。〈從傳播到科學傳播〉，選自《科學傳播源流》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
許世雨（2012）。〈建構非營利組織與企業合作關係之研究〉，《第三部門學刊》，3: 39-80。
許晃雄（2001）。〈台灣環境變遷與全球氣候變遷衝擊之評析-氣候（III）〉，九十年度國科會永續發展研究計畫報告。
郭貴春（2006）。〈語境研究綱領與科學哲學發展〉，《中國社會科學》，5: 28-32。
陳世榮（2007）。〈探究環境治理中的知識溝通：台灣氣候變遷研究的網絡分析〉，《公共行政學報》，25: 1-30。
陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》，台北：五南。
陳昭銘、汪鳳如（2000）。〈台灣地區長期暖化現象與太平洋海溫變化之關係〉，《大氣科學》，28(3): 221-240。
陳瑞麟（2003）。〈風險生活、科技規範與風險生死學--反省科技帶來的死亡風險〉，《東吳學報》，8: 125-161。
陳嘉彌、陳淑芳（2009）。〈偏遠地區Σ（sum）科學遊戲與科技傳佈〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
陳憶寧（2011）。〈當科學家與記者相遇：探討兩種專業對於科學新聞的看法差異〉，《中華傳播學刊》，19: 147-187。
陳靜茹、蔡美瑛（2009）。〈全球暖化與京都議定書議題框架之研究—以2001-2007 年紐約時報新聞為例〉，《新聞學研究》，100: 153-195。
游美惠（2000）。〈內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉，《調查研究》，8: 5-40。
馮鋼 編（2008）。《社會學基礎文獻選讀》，浙江大學出版。
黃俊儒、簡妙如（2010）。〈資訊時代中的公民素養- 論科學傳播素養之內涵及建立〉，《新聞學研究》，105: 127-166。
黃朝恩（1998）。〈環境新聞的報導內容及其時空特性－以台灣地區(民國75至84年)為例〉，《地理研究報告》，29: 1-31。
黃新生、李名揚（2007）。〈面對平面媒體〉，選自《科學傳播源流》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
黃瑞祺、黃之棟（2008）。〈科學與社會的交叉點：以全球暖化為例〉，《科學教育月刊》，306: 18-26。
黃鈴媚、沈錦惠、曹開明（2014）。〈網路傳播社會中的「電子符號行動者」：從台灣國光石化案重構閱聽人之主體性〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，27: 101–148。
黃榮村（1994）。〈全球氣候變遷的不確定性與社會因應〉，《環保科技通訊》，6(5): 1-6。
楊文金（2009）。〈從百年來牛頓運動定律的論述科學談漢語〉，《科學傳播論文集1》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
楊意菁、徐美苓（2010）。〈風險社會概念下的風險溝通與網路傳播: 以全球暖化議題為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，18: 151-191。
葉啟政（2013）。《象徵交換與正負情愫交融: 一項後現代現象的透析》，台北：遠流。
葉蓉樺（2010）。〈21世紀的科學類博物館傳播甚麼樣的科學風貌：由千禧年歐洲新設科學館的內容設計談起〉，選自《科學傳播論文集2》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業村生計劃統籌中心。
詹志禹（2002）。〈科學發現與知識成長：我們能從科學哲學當中學到什麼〉，《應用心理研究》，15: 105-127。
熊傳慧（1984）。〈報紙報導環境問題的內容分析(1960-1982)〉，政治大學新聞所碩士論文。
趙雅麗（2007）。〈說科學故事的不二法門〉，選自《科學傳播源流》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
趙寧（1992）。〈新聞媒介之環保教育概念分析〉，師大書苑。
劉小楓、陳少明（2005）。《盧梭的蘇格拉底主義》，北京：華夏出版社。
劉紹臣、陳正平、許乾忠（2007）。〈台灣地區之氣候變遷〉，《研究成果報導》，71-75。
諸葛俊、許如婷、朱旭中（2010）。〈電視媒介生態環保新聞製播環境的檢討與批判—建構環境科學傳播的起點〉，選自《科學傳播論文集2》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業村生計劃統籌中心。
魯真、華建、王俊權、林琳（2010）。〈大眾科學素養與科學傳播之研究〉，選自《科學傳播論文集2》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業村生計劃統籌中心。
蕭崑杉、張春炎（2010）。〈氣候變遷風險的媒體建構與論述競技〉，台灣社會學年會。
謝君蔚、徐美苓（2010）。〈基因改造食品的新聞框架分析〉，選自《科學傳播論文集2》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業村生計劃統籌中心。
謝瀛春（2004）。〈從科學傳播看台灣科普困境〉，北京大學科學傳播研討會論文。
魏國棟（2003）。〈氣候變遷與因應經濟政策工具：文獻回顧〉，《經濟研究》，39(1): 27-69。
關尚仁（1992）。〈節目策略研究初探〉，《廣播與電視》，1: 15-33。
關尚仁（2005）。〈科學教育節目製播及科學教育機構參訪計畫〉，國科會研究計畫。（未出版）
關尚仁（2007）。〈廣播電視篇〉，選自《科學傳播源流》，台北：台灣科普傳播事業催生計畫統籌與協調中心。
蘇美麗（2005）。〈從後現代主義論質化研究〉。國民教育研究學報，14: 57-78。
顧洋（2008）。〈全球暖化的因應〉，科學發展，421: 6-11。

貳、英文部分
Abercrombie, N. (1996). Television and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Agassi, Joseph (1975).Science in flux. Springer Netherlands.
Alba-Luez, L. (2009). The perspectives of discourse analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Alvesson, M. & Karreman, D. (2000). Taking the Linguistic Turn in Organizational Resarch.The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(2), pp. 136-158.
Alvesson, Mats and Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology, London: Sage.
Apel, Karl-Otto (1976). Transformation der philosophie: Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft. Suhrkamp Publishing.
Atkinson JM. & Heritage J. (Eds.)(1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Azar, Christian. (2009). Solving: the climate challenge. Albert Bonnier.
Backstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), pp. 24-41.
Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the social sciences: towards pragmatism. Polity.
Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambiguty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Barbara, A. and Van Loon, J. （2000）. Introduction, in The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory(pp. 1-46), New Delhi.
Barry, J. (1994). The limits of the shallow and the deep: Green politics, philosophy, and praxis. Environmental Politics, 3(3), pp. 369-394.
Barthes, R. ( 1972). Mythologies. London: Paladin.
Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to on ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, eution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
Bauman, Z. (2013). 44 letters from the liquid modern world. John Wiley & Sons.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Culture as praxis. London : Sage.
Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragment: essays in postmoder morality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and its discontents, Oxford: Blackwell.
Beck, U. (1992). Rick society: toward a new modernity. London: Sage.
Beck, U. (1998). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Toward a theory of reflexive modernization, In U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash(eds), Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.
Beck, U. (1989). From industrial society to the rich society: questions of survival, social structure and ecological enlightenment, Theory, Culture & Society, . 9, pp. 97‐123.
Beck, U. , Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernisation: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bell, D. (1976). The coming of the post-industrial society. In The Educational Forum, 40(4), pp. 574-579. Taylor & Francis Group.
Bell, W. (2003). Foundations of futures studies: history, purposes, and knowledge. Transaction Publishers.
Bell, W. (2011). Foundations of futures studies: human science for a New Era: Values, Objectivity, and the Good Society. Transaction Publishers.
Benjamin, W. (1968).The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, Illuminations, New York : Harcourt Books.
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1990). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, Anchor Books.
Bergson, H. (1911). Creative eution, Routledge Press.
Bernal, J. D. 1967. The social function of science. Cambridge: MIT.
Bird, A. (2004). Kuhn, naturalism, and the positivist legacy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 35(2), pp. 337-356.
Bisel, Ryan S. (2009).On a Growing Dualism in Organizational Discourse Research. Management Communication Quarterly. 22(4), pp. 614-638.
Bitzer. L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. In Philosophy and rhetoric. 1(1), pp. 1-14.
Bloch, M. (2005). Where did anthropology go?: or the need for human nature. In Maurice Bloch(ed.). Essays on cultural transmission(pp.1-20). Berg Publishers, Oxford, UK,
Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research, London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste, Routledge Press.
Boykoff, Maxwell T. (2008). The cultural politics of climate change discourse in UK taboids. Political Geography, 27, pp. 549-569.
Brink, Patrick ten, Augustin Berghofer, Christoph Schlaack, Pavan Sukhdev, Alexandra Vakrou, Stephen White, & Heidi Wittmer. (2009). TEEB for national and international policy-makers-summary: responding to the value of nature: The Economic of ecosystems and Biodiversity.
Brundtland Commission, & Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, L. R. (2008). Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to save cilization: W. W. Norton.
Bryant, C. (2001). The anatomy of a science circus: the eution of a graduate program in sience communication, in Science Communication in theory and practice(pp. 237-255). Kluwer Academic.
Burke, E. (1757/1990). A philosophy enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful .New York: Oxford University Press.
Burke, E. (1998). A philosophical enquiry into the sublime and beautiful. Penguin UK.
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley :University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1984). Permanence and change, 2nd, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burns, T. W. , OConnor D. J. & Storklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a counterparty definition, in Public Understand. Sci. 12(2003), pp. 183–202.
Carrada, G. (2006). Communicating science: A scientists survival kit. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Carey, J. W. (2008). Communication as culture, revised edition: Essays on media and society. Routledge.
Carey, James W. (1989).Communication as culture. London: Routledge.
Carvalho, A. & Peterson, T. R. (2009). Discursive Constructions of Climate Change: Practices of Encoding and Decoding. Environmental Communication, 3(2), pp. 131-133.
Cassirer, E. (1947).Myth and language. New York, Harper & Brothers.
Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture. John Wiley & Sons.
Chia, R., & MacKay, B. (2007). Post-processual Challenges for the Emerging Strategy-as-practice Perspective: Discovering Strategy in the Logic of Practice. Human Relations, 60(1), pp. 217–42.
Chia, R. (2000). Discourse analysis as organizational analysis. Organization, 7(3), pp. 513-518.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton university press.
Comte, A. (1988). Introduction to positive philosophy. Hackett Publishing.
Cooren F. and Taylor, J. R. (1997). Organization as an Effect of Mediation: Redefining the Link Between Organization and Communication, in Communication Theory, 7(3), pp. 219-260.
Cornford, F. M. (Ed.). (2000). Platos cosmology: the timaeus of Plato (. 4). Psychology Press.
Cox R. (2006). Environmental communication and The Public Sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), pp. 522-537.
Curry, J. A., & Webster, P. J. (2011). Climate science and the uncertainty monster. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92(12), pp. 1667-1682.
de Monthoux,P. G. (2000). The art management of aesthetic organization , in The aesthetics of organization, London: Sage. pp. 35-60.
Debord, G. (1967). The society of the spectacle. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deetz, S. (1986).Metaphors and the Discursive Production and Reproduction of Organization, in Organizational Communication: Emerging Perspectives, L. Thayer (ed.). Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
Deetz, S. (1996).Crossroad describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 9, pp. 190-207.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari (1988). F. A Thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia, University of Minnesota: Athlone Press.
Deleuze, G. (1987). Proust et les signes. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.
Deleuze, Gilles. (1978), The logic of sense, New York: Columbia University Press.
Denney, David. (2005). Risk and society. London: Sage.
Denzin, N. (1983). Interpretive interactionism. In G. Morgan (eds.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social research(pp. 126-46). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGEhandbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Dewey, J. (2004). Democracy and education. Courier Dover Publications.
Douglas, Mary (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge press.
Douglas, Mary (1992). risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change. Communication in Science as culture, 16(2), pp. 129–150.
Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1938). The rules of sociological method. Reprinted in. Martin & McIntyre.
Eckersley R. 2001. Postmodern science: The decline or liberation of science? In Stocklmayer S, Gore M, Bryant C (Eds). Science Communication in Theory and Practice(pp. 83-94). Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Edel, A. (1980). Exploring fact and value. Transaction Publishers.
Einsiedel, E. F., and B. Thorne. 1999. Public responses to uncertainty. In Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new controversial science, edited by S. M. Friedmen, S. Dunwoody, and C. L. Rogers, 43-58.mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eisenberg, E. & Goodall, H. (1997). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. New York: St Martins Press.
Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology?. Columbia University Press.
Elliott, A. (1996). Subject to ourselves: Social theory, Ppsychoanalysis and post modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Landon: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2005). Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case of Critical Realism. Organization Studies, 26, pp. 915.
Fairhurst, G. T. and Putnam, L. (2004). Organization as Discursive Constructions. Communication Theory, 14 (1), pp. 5-26.
Farace, R. V. , Monge, P. & Russell, H. M.(1977). Communicating and organizing, Random House.
Farrell, (1999). T. B. (1999). Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory, in Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader. Guilford Press. pp. 140-152.
Ferre, F. (1976). Shaping the future: resources for the Post-Modern World, New. York: Harper and Row.
Fine, G. (1992). Aristotles Criticisms of Plato. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, pp.13-41.
Fischhoff, B. (2009). Public competence in science. People and Science, 1(2), 27.
Fischhoff, B. (2011). Communicating the risks of terrorism (and anything else). American Psychologist.
Fischhoff, B. & Kadvany, J. (2011). Risk: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. London : Methuen.
Flechtheim, O. K. (1945). Teaching the future. The Journal of higher education, pp. 460-465.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routlede.
Foucault, M. (1973). The Order of Things: An archaeology of the human science. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1981). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writing 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
Fox, N. J. (1999). Postmodern reflections on risk, hazards and life choices, in Risk and Sociocultural Theory(pp. 12-33), Cambridge University Press.
Frank, A. (2004). Falun Gong and the threat of history, M.-A. Tetreault, R.A. Denemark (Eds.), Gods, guns, and globalization: Religious radicalism and international political economy(pp. 241–243), Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age.Futures, 25(7), pp. 739-755.
FuntowIcz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Uncertainty, complexity and post‐normal science. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 13(12), pp. 1881-1885.
Gadarmer, H. (2004). Truth and method. 2nd rev. edition. Trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.
Gardner, G.T. & Stern, P.C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Garnaut, R., H. Stephen, J. Frank, & Sheehan P. (2008). Emissions in the Platinum Age: the implications of rapid development for climate-change mitigation, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(2), pp. 377-401.
Gee, J. P. (2005). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, Routledge Press.
Geertz, C. (1983). From the Natives Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Knowledge. In Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology(pp. 55–70). New York: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic books.
Gergan, K. & Gergan, M. (1988). Narrative and The Self As Relationship, Advances in experimental social Psychology, AcdemicPress.
Giddens, Anthony (1991). Modernity and self-Identity：Self and society in the late modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Giddens, Anthony (2009).The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge : Polity.
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Goldmann, L. (1976). The hidden God, Humanities Press.
Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. & Putnam, L. L. (2004).The sage handbook of organizational discourse. Landon: Sage.
Griffin, Davis. (1988). The enchantment of science. Pantheon.
Groffman, P. M. and et al. (2010).Restarting the conversation: challenges atthe interface between ecology and society, Front Ecol Environ, 8(6), pp. 284–291.
Groffman, P. M., Stylinski, C., Nisbet, M. C., Duarte, C. M., Jordan, R., Burgin, A., . & Coloso, J. (2010). Restarting the conversation: challenges at the interface between ecology and society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), pp. 284-291.
Gross, A. (1993). The roles of rhetoric in the pubic understanding of science, in Public understand, Sci 3, pp. 3-32.
Grossmann, I. and Morgan, M. G., (2011). Tropical cyclones, climate change, and scientific uncertainty: what do we know, what does it mean, and what should be done?, Climatic Change, 108( 3), pp. 543-579.
Gunderson, A.G., (1995). The environmental promise of democratic deliberation. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
Gurvitch, G. (1964). The spectrum of social time. Princeton university press.
Habermas, J. .(1988). Nachmetaphysisches denken. Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main.
Hall, S. (1993). Encoding, decoding. The cultural studies reader, 4, pp. 90-103.
Halpern, D. F. (2002). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Routledge.
Haraway, Donna (1991)Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature, New York: Routledges.
Haraway, D. (1996).Modest Witness, New York: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. Columbia University Press.
Harvey, L. D., & Kaufmann, R. K. (2002). Simultaneously constraining climate sensitivity and aerosol radiative forcing. Journal of Climate, 15(20), pp. 2837-2861.
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, legislation and liberty, .1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. T
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit. SUNY Press.
Heracleous, Loizos Th. (2004).Interpretivist Approaches to Organizational Discourse. In Handbook of Organizational Discourse. Landon: Sage.
Hjerpe, M., & Linner, B. O. (2009). Utopian and dystopian thought in climate change science and policy. Futures, 41(4), pp. 234-245.
Hopkinson, G. C., & Hogarth-Scott, S. (2001). “What happened was…” broadening the agenda for storied research. Journal of Marketing Management, 17, pp. 27-47.
Horton, A. (1999). A simple guide to successful foresight. foresight, 1(1), pp. 5-9.
Hsu, H.-H., and C.-T. Chen, (2002).Observed and projected climate change in Taiwan, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 79, pp. 87-104.
Hulse, D., Eilers, J., Freemark, K., Hummon, C., & White, D. (2000). Planning alternative future landscapes in Oregon: evaluating effects on water quality and biodiversity. Landscape Journal, 19(1-2), pp. 1-19.
Humphreys, P. (1990, January). Computer simulations. In PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association (pp. 497-506). Philosophy of Science Association.
Jasanoff, S. (1998). Coming of age in science and technology studies, in Science Communication, 20, pp. 91-98.
Jonas, H. (1979). Toward a philosophy of technology. Hastings Center Report,9(1), pp. 34-43.
Kadar, A., & Effken, J. (1994). Heideggerian meditations on an alternative ontology for ecological psychology: A response to Turveys (1992).proposal.Ecological Psychology, 6(4), pp. 297-341.
Kandall, G. & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucaults methods, London: Sage.
Kasa, I.W. (2011). Local Wisdom In Relation To Climate Change. J. ISSAAS, 17(1): pp.22-27.
Keenoy, T. & Oswick C.. (2003). Organizing textscapes. Organization Studies, 25(1), pp. 135–142 .
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Bibliothek der Universitat Konstanz.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1995). Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, & T. Pinch(Eds.), Handbook of Science and technology(p. 140-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kolb, D. (1988). The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After. University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific reutions. University of Chicago press.
Lash, 1994. Reflexivity and its doubles: structure, aesthetics, community. In Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social Order (pp. 110-73). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lash, S. (1993). Reflexive modernization: the aesthetic dimension. Theory, Culture & Society, 10, pp. 1-23.
Lash, S. 2000. Risk Culture, in The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory(pp. 62-47), New Delhi.
Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1994).Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.
Lash, S. and Wynne, B. (1992). Introduction. In Risk society: toward a new modernity(pp. 1-8). London: Sage.
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Leitch, S., & Palmer, I. (2010). Analysing texts in context: Current practices and new protocols for critical discourse analysis in organization studies.Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), pp. 1194-1212.
Lewenstein, B. V. (1992). Cold Fusion and hot history, in Osiris, 7, pp. 135-163.
Lewenstein, B. V. (1995). From Fax to Facts: communication in the Cold Fusion Saga, in Social Studies of Science, 25(3), pp. 403-436.
Lewenstein, B. V. (2005a). Introduction- Nanotechnology and the Public, in Science Communication, 27(2), pp. 169-174.
Lewenstein, B. V. (2005b). The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies, in Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), pp.659-667.
Linstead, Stephen(2001). The language of organization. SAGE.
Lovelock, J. (2007). The revenge of Gaia: Earths climate in crisis and the fate of humanity. Basic Books.
Lowe, T. Brown, K Dessai, S. Doria, M. Haynes, K. and K. Vincent (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 15 (4)., pp. 435–457
Lupton, Deborah (1999).Risk, Routledge.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G.Bennington & B. Massumi, trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J. F. (1994). Lessons on the analytic of the sublime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Malaska, P. & Virtanen, I. 2005. Theory of futuribles. Futura 2–3, pp. 10–28.
Malinowski, Bronislaw (1922).Argonauts of the western pacific. New York: Dutton.
Marx, Karl (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. New York: International Publishers.
Matson, F. (1964). The broken image. Routledge.
McCall, R. B. (1988). Science and the press: Like oil and water? American Psychologist, 43(2), pp. 87.
McGrew, A.(1992). A Global Society? , in S. Hall, D. Held and A. McGrew (eds), Modernity and its Futures(pp. 61-102). Cambrid: Polity Press.
Meisenbach, Rebecca J. (2008).Working With Tensions: Materiality, Discourse, and (Dis)empowerment in Occupational Identity Negotiation Among Higher Education Fund-Raisers,Communication Quarterly.. 22. pp. 258-287.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology, The Humanities Press.
Messner, Dirk, John Schellnhuber, Stefan Rahmstorf, & Daniel Klingenfeld. (2010). The budget approach: A framework for a global transformation toward a low-carbon economy. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2(3).
Monge, Peter and Marshall Scott Poole. (2008). The Eution of Organizational Communication, Journal of Communication, 58, pp. 679-692.
Moser, S. C. (2009). Good Morning America! The Explosive Awakening of the US to Adaptation. Charleston, SC: NOAA and Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission.
Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom J. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation, PNAS, 107 (51), pp. 22026-22031.
Muir, S. A., (1999). Toward an ecology of language,in Kenneth Burke and the 21st century. Bernard L. Brock (Ed.). SUNY Press.
Mumby, D. K. & Stohl. C. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Mangement Communication Quarterly, 10(1), pp.50-72.
Mumby, D. K. & Stohl. C. (2007). (Re)isciplining organizational communication studies. Mangement Communication Quarterly, 21, pp.268-280.
Nebeker, F. (1995). Calculating the weather: Meteorology in the 20th century. Academic Press.
Nisbet M. C. (2011).Re-Defining Science Communication: Emerging Best Practices that Empower the Public,from http://bigthink.com/age-of-engagement/re-defining-science-communication-emerging-best-practices-that-empower-the-public.
Nisbet M. C. & Dietram A. S. (2009).Whats next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions, American Journal of Botany, 96(10), pp. 1767-1778.
Nowotny, H., P. Scott, & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
ONeill S.J., Boykoff, M. Day, S. and S. Niemeyer, (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23, pp. 413–421.
Oels, A. (2005). Rendering climate change governable: from biopower to advanced liberal government?. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning,7(3), pp. 185-207.
OHagan, A, Grist, E. P. M., Crane, M., Sorokin, N., Sims, I. & Whitehouse, P. (2006). Bayesian and time-independent species sensitivity distributions for risk assessment of chemicals. Environmental Science and Technology 40, pp. 395-401.
OLeary, M., & Chia, R. (2007). Epistemes and structures of sensemaking in organizational life. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(4), pp. 392-406.
Parker, Ian. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology,US: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
Parry, Martin, Jason Lowe, & Clair Hanson (2009).Overshoot, adapt and recover. Nature, 458, pp. 1102-1103.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system, London: Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publication.
Pendergraft, C. A. (1998). Human dimensions of climate change: cultural theory and collective action. Climatic Change, pp. 643-666.
Petersen, A. C. (2000). Philosophy of climate science. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81(2), pp. 265-271.
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Potter J. & Wetherell M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: beyond altitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
Potter, J. (1996).Representing reality, London: Sage.
Prelli, L. J. (1989). A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Putnam, Linda L. and Cheney, (1985), Organizational Communication: Historical Development and Future Directions, Speech Communication in the 20th Century(pp. 130-156), edited by Thomas W. Benson, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
Putnam, L., Phillips, N. & Chapman, P. (1996), Metaphors of Communication and Organization, Handbook of Organization Studies(pp. 375-408), edited by Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia R. Hardy, and Walter R. Nord, London: Sage,.
Ralston, S. (2013). John McGowan, Pragmatist Politics. Philosophy in Review, 33(5), pp. 388-390.
Ranciere, J. (1995). La mesentente. Paris: Galilee.
Randall, D. and Wielicki, B.: 1997, Measurements, Models and Hypothesis in the Atmospheric Sciences. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. 78, pp. 399-406.
Ravetz, J. R. (2006). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3(4), pp. 275-284.
Redding, W. C. (1985). Stumbling toward identity: the emergence of organizational communication as a Field of Study, in Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions , pp. 15-54.
Reisinger, A. (2011). Interdisciplinarity: are we there yet?. Climatic change, 108(1), 23-30.
Renn, O. & Rohrmann, B. (2000). Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: a survey of empirical studies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ricoeur, P. (1997).Rhetoric-poetics-hermeneutics. In W. Jost & M. J. Hyde (eds.), Rhetoric and hermeneutics in our time: A reader(pp.60-72). New Haven, CV: Yale University Press.
Roochnik, D. (1990). The tragedy of reason: towards a platonic conception of logos. London: Sage.
Rouse, Joseph (1996).Engaging science: how to understand its practices Philosophically. Cornell University Press.
Ruane, Janet M. (2005). Essential of research methods, Blackwell Publishing.
Russill, C. (2004). Toward a pragmatist theory of communication. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Sadoway, D. (2012). From Associations To Info-Sociations: Civic Associations And ICT In Two Asian Cities. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(3).
Sainsbury, L. and Dexter, M. (2000). Science and the Public: A review of science communication and public attitudes to science in Britain. the OST Public Engagement.
Santag, Susan(1978). Illness as metaphor, New-York: Routledges.
Scott, A. (2002). Two Views of Risk, Consciousness and Community, in The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory, London: Sage.
Scott, R. L. (1999). On view rhetoric as epistemic, in Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader(pp. 113-139). Guilford Press.
Senge, P. (2008). The necessary reution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York：Doubleday Dell Publishing.
Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence: an exploration change in people, organization, and society. Bantam Dell Pub Group.
Senge, P.M. (1990). The fifth discipline：The art and practice of the learning organization.New York：Doubleday Dell Publishing.
Shellenberger, M., & Nordhaus, T. (2004). The death of environmentalism. Global warming politics in a post-environmental world, 28.
Shackley, S. (2001). The respectable politics of climate change: the epistemic communities and NGOs, International Affairs, 77(2), pp.329-345.
Shackley, S. and Wynne, B., 1996. Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority, Science, Technology & Human Values, . 21(3), pp. 275-302.
Shackley, S., Young, P., Parkinson, S., & Wynne, B. (1998). Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modelling: Are GCMs the best tools?. Climatic Change, 38(2), pp. 159-205.
Shapin, S. (1996). The scientific reution. University of Chicago Press.
Shaw, P. 2007. The sublime. Routledge: London.
Sheppard, S. R. (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(6), pp. 637-654.
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change, in Environment and Planning A.
Slaughter, R. (2004). Futures beyond dystopia: Creating social foresight. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Smythe, D. W. (1977). Communications: blindspot of western Marxism. University of California Press.
Sobol, J., Qentile, J. & Sunwolf(2004). Once Upon a Time: An Introduction to the Inaugural Issue. Storytelling, Self, Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Storytelling Studies. 1(1). pp. 1-7.
Sontag, S. (1966). Against interpretation: and other essays. Macmillan.
Spretnak, C. (1997). The resurgence of the real: body, nature, and place in a hypermodern world. PA: Addison-Wesley.
Strati, A. (2000). The aesthetic approach in organization studies, in The aesthetics of organization(pp. 13-34). London: Sage..
Talja, S. (1999). Analyzing qualitative interview data: The discourse analytic method, Library & Information Science Research, 21, pp. 459–477.
Taylor, Bryan C. (2005). Postmodern Theory. In Engaging Organizational communication Theory and Research(pp. 113-140), Steve May & Dennis K. Mumby(eds.). London: Sage.
Taylor, C. (1989).Sources of the self. Harvard University Press.
Thompson, A. (2006). Management under anarchy: the international politics of climate change. Climatic Change,78, pp. 7–29.
Toulmin S. (1985). The return to cosmology: postmodern science and the theology of nature. University of California Press.
Toulmin, S. E. (1961). Foresight and understanding: An enquiry into the aims of science.
Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002). On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change, in Organization Science, 13( 5), pp. 567-582.
Tsoukas, H. & Hatch, M. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The casefor a narrative approach to organizational complexity, Human Relations, 54(8), pp. 979–1013.
Urry, J. (2011). Climate change and society. Polity.
van der Sluijs, J. (2005). Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies. Water Science & Technology, 52(6), pp. 87-92.
van Dijck, J. (2003). After the Two Cultures : Toward a (Multi)cultural Practice of Science Communication, in Science Communication, pp. 25:177.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997).Discourse as interaction society. In T. A. Van Dijk(ed.), Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies . 1-A multidisciplinary introduction(pp. 1-38). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Walker W.E., Harremoes P., Rotmans J., van der Sluijs J.P., van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss M.P. (2003).Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model based decision support. Integr Assess 4:5–17 CrossRef.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of economic and social organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weigold, M. F. (2001). Communicating Science A Review of the Literature, Science Communication, 23(2), pp. 164-193.
Weingart, P. (1998). Science and the Media, Research Policy, 27, pp. 869-879.
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model. Communication Monographs , 59 , pp. 329-349.
Wynne, M. J., (1982). Phaeophyceae. In S. P. Parker (ed.), Synopsis and classification of living organisms(pp. 115–125). McGraw-Hill,New York.
Zehr, S. C. (2000). Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), pp. 85-103.