臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：新媒體與科學傳播：「低碳生活部落格」的內容與產製研究
書刊名：傳播與社會學刊
作者：李美華 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Meihua
出版日期：2015
卷期：32
頁次：頁59-90
主題關鍵詞：低碳生活部落格；全球暖化；氣候變遷；科學傳播；媒介框架；Low Carbon Living weblog；Global warming；Climate change；Science communication；Media frames
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:215
  • 點閱點閱:116
本研究採用內容分析法與深度訪談法，分析曾獲台灣2008年全球華文部落格大獎，以及年度最佳公益暨文教組織部落格首獎的網路新媒體「低碳生活部落格」所再現的全球暖化與氣候變遷主題、方向、消息來源、超連結、回應文、按讚次數等類目；並探討其組織運作。本研究呼應過去文獻，肯定「低碳生活部落格」對於全球暖化與氣候變遷此一科普議題的建構與傳播扮演重要角色；「低碳生活部落格」在組織運作、消息來源、與閱聽人互動等面向發揮網路新媒體的「常駐性」、「易於蒐尋」、「更新速度快」、「超連結」、「延伸閱讀」、「標籤雲」等特色與功能。推特（Twitter）及臉書（Facebook）是「低碳生活部落格」寫手們最常使用，也最依賴的網路社群媒體。未來研究可以從跨文化比較的角度，分析世界各國網路新媒體對於全球暖化及氣候變遷的議題再現，亦可從使用者端的角度分析，進一步探討網路科普傳播的趨勢及現象。
For a long time, the mainstream media have ignored science communication and failed to adequately cover scientific knowledge and information. Taking the coverage of global warming and climate change news in the Taiwanese mainstream media as an example, not only is the amount of reportage scarce, but the fact is that most coverage is adopted from western wire services, which makes the science news appear to be biased and lacking in local perspectives. However, in the internet era, many observers have asserted that the traditional, mainstream mass media have lost their position of privilege and have become less influential than the new media with respect to science communication. In the current study, content analysis was applied to examine the characteristics of the posts for the renowned science blog, Low Carbon Living weblog, including types, tones, sources, media frames, reader comments, and hyperlinks. In-depth interviews were conducted of the administrators and post writers to assess the blog’s operation and management. The results indicated that Twitter and Facebook are the two major social media used by the blog’s writers. The results also indicated that the blog exhibits various characteristics of new media including interactivity, hypertext, and the keyword cloud, and has provided more in-depth perspectives about global warming and climate change than the traditional mass media. Suggestions for future research are provided and discussed.
期刊論文
1.楊意菁、徐美苓(20101200)。風險社會概念下的風險溝通與網路傳播：以全球暖化議題為例。中華傳播學刊，18，151-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Walejko, G.、Ksiazek, T.(2010)。Blogging from the niches: The sourcing practices of science bloggers。Journalism Studies，11(3)，412-427。  new window
3.Chyi, H. I.、McCombs M.(2004)。Media Salience and the Process of Framing：Coverage of the Columbine School Shooting。Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly，81(1)，22-35。  new window
4.江靜之(20140700)。電視全球暖化新聞之多媒材分析初探：以TVBS【搶救地球】特別報導為例。新聞學研究，120，47-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Foust, C. R.、Murphy, William O'Shannon(2009)。Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse。Environmental Communication，3(2)，151-167。  new window
6.陳憶寧(20110100)。「我」即是來源：癌症部落客的書寫研究。新聞學研究，106，99-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Carpenter, S.(2010)。A study of content diversity in online citizen journalism and online newspaper articles。New Media & Society，12(7)，1064-1084。  new window
8.Brown, T.、Budd, L.、Bell, M.、Rendell, H.(2011)。The local impact of global climate change: Reporting on landscape transformation and threatened identity in the English regional newspaper press。Public Understanding of Science，20(5)，658-673。  new window
9.李美華(20130400)。科學新聞之再現與馴化--當全球暖化遇上在地產製。臺大新聞論壇，12，3-33。  延伸查詢new window
10.Anderson, A.(2009)。Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new researchagenda。Sociology Compass，3(2)，166-182。  new window
11.Antilla, L.(2005)。Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science ofclimate change。Global Environmental Change Part A，15(4)，338-352。  new window
12.Bichara, S. L.(2006)。Building blogs: A multi-dimensional analysis of thedistribution of frames on the 2004 presidential candidate web sites。Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly，83(2)，329-345。  new window
13.Asayama, S.、Ishii, A.(2014)。Reconstruction of the boundary between climate science and politics: The IPCC in the Japanese mass media, 1988-2007。Public Understanding of Science，23(2)，189-203。  new window
14.Buys, L.、Aird, R.、van Megen, K.、Miller, E.、Sommerfeld, J.(2014)。Perceptionsof climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia。Public Understanding of Science，23(2)，170-188。  new window
15.Dirikx, A.、Gelders, D.(2010)。To frame is to explain: A deductive frame-analysis of Dutch and French climate change coverage during the annual UN conferences of the parties。Public Understanding of Science，19(6)，732-742。  new window
16.Grundmann, R.、Krishnamurthy, R.(2010)。The discourse of climate change:A corpus-based approach。Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines，4(2)，125-146。  new window
17.Kahlor, L.、Rosenthal, S.(2009)。If we seek, do we learn? Predicting knowledgeof global warming。Science Communication，30(3)，380-414。  new window
18.Jaspal, R.、Nerlich, B.(2014)。When climate science became climate politics:British media representations of climate change in 1988。Public Understanding of Science，23(2)，122-141。  new window
19.Kouper, I.(2010)。Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices,challenges, and opportunities。Journal of Science Communication，9(1)，1-10。  new window
20.Segev, E.、Baram-Tsabari, A.(2012)。Seeking science information online: Datamining Google to better understand the roles of the media and the education system。Public Understanding of Science，21(7)，813-829。  new window
21.Schafer, M. S.、Schlichting, I.(2014)。Media representations of climate change:A meta-analysis of the research field。Environmental Communication，8(2)，142-160。  new window
22.Papacharissi, Z.(2004)。Democracy on-line: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of on‐line political discussion groups。New Media & Society，6(2)，259-284。  new window
23.Olausson, U.、Berglez, P.(2014)。Editorial。Environmental Communication，8(2)，139-141。  new window
24.Takahashi, B.(2011)。Framing and sources: A study of mass media coverage of climate change in Peru during the V ALCUE。Public Understanding of Science，20(4)，543-557。  new window
25.Takahashi, B.、Meisner, M.(2013)。Climate change in Peruvian newspapers: The role of foreign voices in a context of vulnerability。Public Understanding of Science，22(4)，427-442。  new window
26.Stamm, K. R.、Clark, F.、Eblacas, P. R.(2000)。Mass communication and publicunder standing of environmental problems: The case of global warming。Public Understanding of Science，9(3)，219-237。  new window
27.Shema, H.、Bar-Ilan, J.、Thelwall, M.(2012)。Research blogs and the discussionof scholarly information。PLOS ONE，7(5)，e35869。  new window
28.Vraga, E. K.、Edgerly, S.、Wang, M. B.、Shah, D. V.(2011)。Who taught me that? Repurposed news, blog structure, and source identification。Journal of Communication，61(5)，795-815。  new window
29.Vainio, A.、Paloniemi, R.(2013)。Does belief matter in climate change action?。Public Understanding of Science，22(4)，382-395。  new window
30.Chen, Y. N.(2010)。Examining the presentation of self in popular blogs: A cultural perspective。Chinese Journal of Communication，3(1)，28-41。  new window
31.Eveland, W. P.、Dunwoody, S.、William. P.(2001)。User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the Web versus print。Communication Research，28(1)，48-78。  new window
32.Kerbel, Matthew R.、Bloom, Joel David(2005)。Blog for America and civic involvement。Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics，10(4)，3-27。  new window
33.Kent, M. L.(2008)。Critical Analysis of Blogging in Public Relations。Public Relations Review，34(1)，32-40。  new window
34.Olausson, U.(2009)。Global warming-global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty。Public Understanding of Science，18(4)，421-436。  new window
35.Trammell, K. D.、Tarkowski, A.、Hofmokl, J.、Sapp, A. M.(2006)。Republic of blog: Examining polish bloggers through content analysis。Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication，11(3)，702-722。  new window
36.Trammell, K. D.、Keshelashvili, A.(2005)。Examining the new influencers: A self-presentation study of a-list blogs。Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly，82(4)，968-982。  new window
37.翁秀琪、施伯燁、孫式文、方念萱、李嘉維(20091000)。從使用者出發的網路資源準社會互動研究：理論建構與使用者經驗研究。新聞學研究，101，1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Braun, Virginia、Clarke, Victoria(2006)。Using thematic analysis in psychology。Qualitative Research in Psychology，3(2)，77-101。  new window
會議論文
1.徐美苓(2014)。新興環境議題的媒體建構：以替代能源的新聞報導為例。中華傳播學會2014 年學術研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Levinson, P.(2009)。New New Media。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Kerlinger, F. N.(1986)。Foundation of behavioral research。Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
3.Wimmer, R. D.、Dominick, J. R.(2014)。Mass media research: An introduction。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth。  new window
4.Crigler, Ann N.(1996)。The Psychology of Political Communication。Ann Arbor, MI：University of Michigan Press。  new window
5.Lindlof, T. R.、Taylor, B. C.(2002)。Qualitative communication research method。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
6.羅文輝(19910000)。精確新聞報導。臺北：正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.臧國仁(19990000)。新聞媒體與消息來源：媒介框架與真實建構之論述。臺北：三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Krippendorff, Klaus H.(1980)。Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology。Sage。  new window
其他
1.Horrigan, J.(20061120)。The internet as a source for news and information about science，http://www.pewinternet.org/2006/11/20/the-internet-as-a-resource-for-news-and-information-about-science/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Herring, S. C.(2010)。Web content analysis: Expanding the paradigm。The International Handbook of Internet Research。New York, NY：Springer。  new window
2.Barnes, S. B.(2008)。Understanding social media from the media ecological perspective。Mediated Interpersonal Communication。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：700（臺灣：689，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67157800
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上