Hubel, V., & Lussow, D.（1994）。基本設計概論（張建成 譯）。台北︰六合。（原著出版於1984）
Lucci, R., & Orlandini, P.（1992）。產品設計模型（張悟非 譯）。台北︰六合。（原著出版於1990）
王竣星（2006）。設計構想發展階段中數位媒材之運用對設計思考行為之影響 （未出版的碩士論文）。大同大學工業設計學系，台北。
方婷妮（2006) 。不同入學背景學生學習態度及學習策略對專業科目學業成就之影響-以二年制工業設計系學生為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣科技大學設計研究所，台北。
田耐青（2003）。運用學習風格理論培養學生「了解自我與發展潛能」的能力。教師天地，126，12-17。
江明進（2012) 。電腦輔助繪圖應用於設計圖學教學方式與成效之研究（未出版之博士論文）。大同大學設計科學研究所，台北。
吳天方（1997）。我國師範大學工業教育學生學習風格之相關研究。教育研究資訊，5（5），114-132。
吳百薰（1998）。國小學生學習風格相關因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所，台中。
吳佩芬、嚴貞（2005）。國內大學院校電腦動畫相關科系人才培育探討。設計研究，5，1-8。
吳煥昌（2001）。高工機械製圖科學生空間能力與展開圖學習成就之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所，台北。
李宸頡（2006）。設計實務教學之問題研究－兼論數位化設計實務教學之潛力（未出版之碩士論文）。長庚大學工業設計學系，台北。
李書辰（2008）。工業設計教育課程規劃研究（未出版之碩士論文）。銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士論文，桃園。
李新富（2011）。臺灣大百科全書―數位設計。行政院文化部。取自http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=5068
李麗雪、徐慧民、謝明峰、林孟立（2006）。朝陽科技大學建築與景觀系不同入學背景學生基本設計學習成果之比較分析研究。朝陽設計學報，7，1-14。
周芯瑋（2014）。虛擬教材結合實體教具之虛實整合教學研究－以風光互補發電系統為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北教育大學數位科技設計學系，台北。
林生傳（1985）。國中學生學習式態之相關因素及其與學校教育態度、學業成就的關係。教育學刊，6，41-94。
林俊宏（2004）。投影幾何之電腦輔助教學設計與成效研究（未出版之碩士論文）。大同大學工業設計研究所，台北。
林祐毅（2015）。設計系學生學習風格與學習成效之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學工業設計系創新設計碩士班，台北。
林菁、鍾如雅、陳雅萍（2006）。網路教學中學生特質與修課動機和學習成效之研究。教育資料與圖書館學季刊，43（4），413-433。
林漢裕、李玉琇（2010）。空間短期記憶、空間工作記憶與空間能力對圖學表現的影響。設計學報，15（4），1-18。
侯幸雨（2010）。個人數位學習創意績效之研究。環球科技人文學刊，11，1-17。
洪秀燕、朱柏穎、吳志富、劉又榕（2015）。不同學習背景工業設計所研究生概念發展階段之能力差異。藝術教育研究，29，47-73。
洪明顯、游耿能、許永洲（2013）。互動式 3D 電腦輔助學習應用於正投影視圖教學。TANET2013臺灣網際網路研討會論文集（頁760-765），國立中興大學，台中。
洪凌威（2008）。學前非本科系工業設計碩士班學生所學與就職之關係（未出版碩士論文）。大同大學工業設計研究所，台北。
洪雅玲（2007）。台灣數位內容產業專業人才培訓問題探討：以遊戲、動畫產業為例。資訊社會研究，12，213-240。
洪寶蓮（2001）。影響大學生學業學習之因素探討。通識教育年刊，3，7-27。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學--三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
張智銘、游萬來（2012）。工業設計師應具備之能力：國內外文獻回顧。工業設計，126，20-25。
張瑋容（2013）。從專利申請看3D列印市場大勢。北美智權報 編輯部。
張萬子（2004）。圖學網路學習系統之發展。國立虎尾科技大學鼓勵性研究計畫成果報告。
教育部（2009）。職業學校群科課程綱要-設計群。頁226-231。取自
http://vs.tchcvs.tc.edu.tw/course99/設計群-職校群科課程綱要.pdf
梁榮進（2005）。產品模型之運用與評估研究－以旋轉成型為例（未出版的碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所，雲林。
莊煥銘、陳虹眞、沈家成（2007）。學習路徑、學習風格與數位學習績效之研究──以國中數學科為例。中華民國資訊管理學會與銘傳大學主辦之第十八屆國際資訊管理學術研討會。台北：銘傳大學。
許言、張文智、楊耿賢（2007）。新進設計師招募方式與工作表現對設計教育的意涵。國際藝術教育學刊，5（1），71-109。
許明潔（2000）。數位媒體企劃與設計。台北︰龍辰。
許峻誠、王韋堯（2009）。學習背景差異對簡化圖形之偏好研究。藝術教育研究，17，109-130。
郭重吉（1987）。英美等國晚近對學生學習風格之研究。資優教育季刊，22，2-8。
郭翠娟（2014）。產品模型製作研究（未出版的碩士論文）。國立成功大學工業設計研究所，台南。
陳文誌、游萬來（2004）。線上設計學習環境的發展架構研究：以工業設計課程為例。行政院 國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC 92-2520-S-182-002）。
陳志漢（2002）。不同入學背景學生專業科目學業成就與學習態度之研究-以國立雲林科技大學設計學院二技生為例（未出版的碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計研究所，雲林。
陳李綢（1992）。認知發展與輔導。台北︰心理。
陳冠臻（2009）。數位媒體設計教育之研究（未出版的碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系，雲林。
陳盈慈（2005）。工業設計系學生學習風格之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所，雲林。
陳淳迪、陳姿琪（2010）。由設計視覺溝通探討工業設計實務教學的實施，設計學報，15（3），69-86。
陳聖智、許明潔、張文山、梁朝棟（2012）。當數位媒體設計學生想像時：促動想像的因素探索與相關性研究。教學科技與媒體，99，2-18。
陸定邦、呂佳珍（2012）。以競合關係為導向的選才模式。設計學報，17（1），1-24。
曾文祈（2012）。遊艇空間配置視覺化溝通輔助系統（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學工業設計研究所，台南。
曾坤明、曾逸展（2008）。產品設計: 歷史與挑戰。台北：五南。
鈕文英（1994）。學習障礙學生的學習風格與教學。教育研究，37。
黃任邦（2014）。設計與非設計背景學生的溝通語彙差異之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。大同大學工業設計研究所，台北。。
黃明正、蔡登傳（2005）。從數位藝術潮流探討設計教育之整合，設計研究，5，26-33。
黃英修、謝宗哲、蔡岷洧（2010）。產品與視覺設計階段之想像力因子差異研究。2010台灣感性學會研討會論文，（頁301-306）。台灣：台中。
黃啟華（2007）。快速原形機之氣霧噴印製程設計（未出版之碩士論文）。成功大學機械工程學系碩士在職專班，台南。
黃馨誼、陳又菁（2013）。學習風格與教材呈現對學習成效與認知負荷影響之研究。第九屆知識社群國際研討會，（頁261-272）。台北：中國文化大學。
楊東華（2013）。Unity 3D 4.X 全方位遊戲設計基礎。台北：全華。
楊坤堂（1996）。學習風格教學。特教園丁，12（2），5-8。
楊曉林（2010）。關于數碼影視和動畫專業碩士研究生培養的思考。電影文學，2010（1），46-47。
經濟部工業局 （2003）。數位內容產業白皮書。數位內容產業推動服務網。取自http://www.dcipo.org.tw/content/publish/viewcontent.aspx?sn=52AD3040E65A48F7B9ACB7F28E68F740。
經濟部工業局（2015a）。數位內容產業發展補助計畫。數位內容產業推動服務網。取自http://dcp.itnet.org.tw/index.php
經濟部工業局（2015b）。2014 Taiwan數位內容產業年鑑。經濟部工業局。取自https://dcipoorgtw.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/2014industry.pdf
經濟部工業局（2016）。2016-2018數位內容產業人才需求調查摘要。經濟部工業局。取自http://itriexpress.blogspot.tw/2016/04/2016-2018_22.html
葉耀宗（2004）。產品模型製作在跨領域開發中角色之研究（未出版的碩士論文）。國立台北科技大學創新設計研究所，台北。
廖佩泠（2004）。工業設計系學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究（未出版的碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所，雲林。
廖運炫（2013）。3D列印技術。台大校友雙月刊，7，16-23。
趙世範、方榮爵（2003）。應用立體電腦動畫技術建置高職製圖課教教學網站研究。高雄師大學報，15，55-83。
蔣世寶、孫春望（2014）。學生學習背景與情境詞句對鏡位詮釋的影響。設計學報，19（3），41-62。
鄭海蓮、陳世玉。（2007）標準化空間能力測驗之建模與驗證。教育研究與發展期刊，3（4），181-216。
賴日騰（2012）。應用HappyCAD製圖系統對國中生工程圖學學習成效之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。 國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所,台北。
賴建都（2002）。台灣設計教育思潮與演進。台北：龍溪。
戴文雄（1998）。不同正增強回饋型式電腦輔助學習系統對不同認知型態與空間能力高工學生機械製圖學習成效之研究。行政院國科會委託專案研究報告（NSC86-2516-S-018-010-TG）。
魏義峰（2002）。3D--電腦輔助繪圖在工程圖學之應用。雄工學報，4，299-311。
簡慶郎（2001）。學習正投影對提昇高工學生空間能力之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
蘇靜宣（2007）。設計系學生學習風格與設計思考的關係（未出版之碩士論文）。大同大學工業設計研究所，台北。
Alexandra, G. W. (2007). The Bauhaus, 1919-1933. Heilbrunn timeline of art history. Retrieved from http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/bauh/hd_bauh.htm
Alkhasawneh, E. (2013). Using VARK to assess changes in learning preferences of nursing students at a public university in Jordan: Implications for teaching. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1546-1549.
Allison, M. T., & Duncan, M. C. (1988). Women, work, and flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 118-137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Baykan Z, & Naçar M. (2007). Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ, 31,158-60.
Becker, K., Kehoe, J., & Tennent, B. (2007). Impact of personalised learning styles on online delivery and assessment. CWIS, 24, 105-19.
Bilda, Z., & Demirkan, H. (2003). An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Design Studies, 24(1), 27-50.
Brusasc, P. L., Caneparo, L., Carrara, G., Fioravanti, A., Novembri, G., Zorgno, A. M. (2000). Computer supported design studio. Automation in Construction, 9(4), 393-408.
Chen, H. H., & You, M. L. (2006). Comparison of sketching activities with traditional and digital tools in graphic design. Journal of Design, 11(4), 113-135.
Chen, K. L., & Sidhu, M. S. (2015). Engineering students learning preferences in UNITEN: Comparative study and patterns of learning styles. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18 (3), 266-281.
Cheon, S. U., Kim, B. C., Mun, D., & Han, S. (2012). A procedural method to exchange editable 3D data from a free-hand 2D sketch modeling system into 3D mechanical CAD systems. Computer-Aided Design, 44(2), 123-131.
Chiang, S. B. & Sun, C. W. (2013). The effect of learning background and imagery cognitive development on visual perception. Educational Media International, 50(3), 206-224.
Chiu, Y. P., Shiau, Y.C., & Lai, S.C. (2013). Study on simulating building fire evacuation using Unity software. Disaster Advances,6(13),380-391.
Chu, P. Y., Hung, H. Y., Wu, C.F., & Liu, Y. T. (2015). Effects of various sketching tools on visual thinking in idea development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 1-16. First online: 14 December 2015, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10798-015-9349-5
Clark, R. E. (1998). The CANE model of motivation to learn and to work: A two-stage process of goal commitment and effort. In J. Lowyck (Ed.), Trend in corporate training (pp. 1-25). Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven Press.
Cross, N. (1999). Natural intelligence in design. Design Studies, 20(1), 25-39.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper/Collins.
D’Amore, A., James, S., & Mitchell, E.K. (2012). Learning styles of first-yearundergraduate nursing and midwifery students: A cross-sectional surveyutilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Nurse Educ Today, 32,506-15.
Danzer, M. (2011). Establishing a new digital/virtual product development process in design education. 2011 IDA congress education conference (pp. 22-27), 24 - 26 October 2011, TICC, Taipei.
Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Nowlin, B., & Lanouette, M. (2002). Do multimedia lesson structure and learning styles influence undergraduate writing performance? College Student Journal, 36(1), 20-32.
Demirbas, O.O. & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction 17, 345-359.
Dickinson, J. K., Yu, Z., Zeng, Y., & Antunes, H. (2005). Pen-tablet as a CAD interface alternative. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 21(4-5), 465-474.
Donelson, F. L. (1990). The development, testing, and use of a computer interface to evaluate an information processing in high students of high and low statial ability. Unpublished Master dissertation, Ohio State University, OH.
Drago, W.A., &Wagner, R.J. (2004). VARK preferred learning styles and online education. MRN, 27, 1-13.
Dune, R, & Dunn, K. (1994). Teaching young children through their individual learning style. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Eger, A.O., Lutters, D. & Houten, F.J.A.M. van (2004). Create the future': An environment for excellence in teaching future-oriented industrial design engineering. In 2nd international engineering and product design education conference, IEPDE (pp. 43-50), September 2-3, 2004, Delft, The Netherlands.
Felder. R.M. & Silverman. L.K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education, Engr. Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Fleming, N. D. (1995). I'm different; not dumb: Modes of presentation (V.A.R.K.) in the tertiary classroom. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). 18, 308-313.
Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch, New Zealand: Author.
Fleming, N. D. (2015, September). VARK: A guide to learning styles. Retrieved from http://vark-learn.com/home-mandarin/
Fleming, N. D., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree! Educational Developments, 7(4), 4-7.
Fleming, N., & Mills C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy. 11, 137-155.
Garger, S., & Guild, P. (1984). Learning styles: The crucial differences. Curriculum Review, 2, 9-12.
Gero, J. S. (2004). The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Design Studies, 25(4), 373-391.
Goel, A. K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., & Helms, M. (2012). Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative - Four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design. Computer-Aided Design, 44, 879-900.
Gradinscak, Z. (1998). A study on computer-based geometric modeling in engineering graphic. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(20-21), 1915-1922.
Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 36(4), 234-236.
Gross, M., & Do, E. (2004). The three Rs of drawing and design computation. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition’ 04 (pp. 613-632). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hanna, R., & Barber, T. (2001). An inquiry into computers in design: Attitudes before-attitudes after. Design Studies, 22(3), 255-281.
Hirst, T. (2008, April 10). Digital World - Interactive media and game design. [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from
Hofmeester, G.H., Kemp, J.A.M., & Blankendaal, A.C.M. (1996). Sensuality in product design: A structured approach. In Proceedings of CHI ’96, (13-18), April, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, ACM Press, 428-435.
Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1992). Manual of learning styles (3Ed.), London: P. Honey.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M.Y., Chen, W.C., Lee, C.C., Lin, P.H., & Chen, Y.L. (2013). Comparing the retention and flow experience in playing solitary and heart attack games of San Zi Jing: A perspective of dual process theory. Computers & Education, 69, 369-376.
Iwashita, N. & Sekiguchi, S. (2009). Effects of learner background on the development of writing skills in Japanese as a second language. Australian Review of Applied linguistics, 32(1), 1-20.
Jackson, S. A. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding of the flow experience in elite athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 76-90.
Jean, G. & Simard, D. (2013). Deductive versus inductive grammar instruction: Investigating possible relationships between gains, preferences and learning styles. System, 41(4), 1023-1042.
Jin, Y., & Benami, O. (2010). Creative patterns and stimulation in conceptual design. AI EDAM—Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 191-209.
Jin, Y., & Chusilp, P. (2006). Study of mental iteration in different design situations. Design Studies, 27(1), 25-55.
Karwowski, M., & Soszynski, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination? Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 163-171.
Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339-345.
Keengore, J., & Georgina, D. (2012). The digital course training workshop for online Learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 17(4), 365-379.
Klement, M. (2014). How do my Students Study? An Analysis of Students’ of Educational Disciplines Favorite Learning Styles According to VARK Classification. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 384-390.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (1999). Learning style inventory (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McBer and Company.
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472-477.
Kurtoglu, T., Swantner, A., & Campbell, M. I. (2010). Automating the conceptual design process: From black box to component selection. AIEDAM-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 49-62.
Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F. & Woltz, D. J. (1984). Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325-1345.
Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 1-11. oi:10.1016/j.sbspro. 2011.11.312.
Lee, C. H. M., Cheng, Y. W., Rai, S., & Depickere, A. (2005). What affect student cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system? Computers & Education, 45(1), 1-19.
Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. (2010). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait--multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323-339.
Lewis, W. P., & Bonollo, E. (2002). An analysis of professional skills in design: Implications for education and research. Design Studies, 23(4), 385-406.
Lohman, D.F. (1984). Statail ability: Individual differences in speed and level (Tech. Rep. No.9). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Aptitude Research Project, School of Education. (NTIS No.AD-A075973)
Lord, T. R. (1985). Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 395-405.
Lu, J., Yu, C. S., & Liu, C. (2002). Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information and Management, 40(4), 497-507.
Luh, D. B. & Chen, S. N. (2013). A Novel CAI System for Space Conceptualization Training in Perspective Sketching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 147-160.
Lujan, H.L., & DiCarlo, S.E. (2006). First-year medical students prefer multiple learningstyles. Adv Physiol Educ, 30, 13-6.
Ma, G. L., Li, Y., Li, W. Q., & Pan, P. Y. (2011). A process model and method of idea generation for conceptual design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225(4), 568-586.
Mankey, V. L. (2011). Using multimodal and multimedia tools in the psychiatric education of diverse learners: Examples from the Mental. Academic Psychiatry, 35(5), 335-339.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Gil, F. A., Contero, M. & Saorin, J. (2013). Dynamic three-dimensional illustrator for teaching descriptive geometry and training visualisation skills. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21(1), 8-25.
Massimini, F., & Carli, N. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.). Optimal experience: Psychological study of flow in conscious (pp.266-287). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McGown, A., Green, G., & Rodgers, P. (1998). Visible ideas: Information patterns of conceptual sketch activity. Design Studies, 19(4), 431-453.
McLean, G. (2010). Style Matters. Pharmaceutical Representative, 40 (6), 20-21.
McQuillan, J., & Conde, G. (1996). The conditions of flow in reading: two studies of optimal experience. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 17(2), 109-135.
Meehan-Andrews, T.A. (2009). Teaching mode efficiency and learning preferences of first year nursing students. Nurse Educ Today, 29, 24-32.
Mitchell, W., McCullough, M. (1995). Digital design media. NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Murphy, P. (1993). By natural design: An Exploratorium book. CA: Chronicle Books
Muzammila, A., Hafiz, M. A., & Murad, A. (2011). The Influence of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) in Chemistry on the Students Achievement at Higher Secondary Level. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 1(4), 426-435.
Naveiro, R. M., & De Souza Pereira, R. C. (2008). Design education in Brazil. Design Studies, 29(3), 304-312.
Othman, N., & Amiruddin, M, H. (2010). International conference on learner diversity. Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 652-660.
Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 745-771.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 103-122). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory research and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Merrill.
Prithishkumar, I.J., & Michael, S.A. (2014). Understanding your student: Using the VARK model. Education Forum, 60(2), 183-186.
Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies, 19(4), 389-430.
Reid, R. D., & Sanders, N. R. (2010). Operation management: An integrated approach (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rita, C. P. (2013). Computer assisted instruction (cai) programme for commerce stream students having different educational achievements level. Golden Research Thoughts, 3(1), 1-4.
Robi, R (2001). Animation industry barrels along. Computer Graphics World, 24(4), 22.
Samarakoon, L., Fernando, T., & Rodrigo, C. (2013). Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC medical education, 13, 42.
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., Catrambone, R., (2009). The impact of learning characteristics on information utilization strategies, cognitive load experienced, and performance in hypermedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 387-401.
Schön, D. A. & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135-156.
Scrimgeour, A. (2012). Understanding the nature of performance: The influence of learner background on school-age learner achievement in Chinese. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 312-338.
Scrivener, S. A. R., & Clark, S. M. (1993). How interaction with sketches aids creative design. In Proceedings of the International State-of-the-art Conference, Interacting with Images, National Gallery, London.
Shenoy, N., Shenoy, A. K., & Ratnakar, U. P. (2013). The perceptual preferences in learning among dental students in clinical subjects. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 7 (8), 1683-1685.
Snelgrove, S.R. (2004). Approaches to learning of student nurses. Nurse Educ Today,24, 605-14.
Sorby, S. A. (2007). Developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. 13(1), 1-11.
Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chai, C., Wang, C., & Huang, Q. (2014). Creative segment: A descriptive theory applied to computer-aided sketching. Design Studies, 35(1), 54-79.
Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chai, C., Wang, C., & Liu, Z. (2013). Impact of text on idea generation: An electroencephalography study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(4), 1047-1062.
Suwa, M., Purcell, T., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19(4), 455-483.
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
Tang, H. H., & Chu, H. R. (2005). The role of instructional communication in design studio, Proceedings of IDC’05, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan. (CD-ROM). (1-4 Nov 2005)
Tang, H. H., Lee, Y. Y., & Gero, J. S. (2011). Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function behaviour-structure coding scheme. Design Studies, 32(1), 1-29.
Tovey, M., Porter, S., & Newman, R. (2003). Sketching, concept development and automotive design. Design Studies, 24(2), 135-153.
Tseng, W. S. W., & Ball, L. J. (2011). How uncertainty helps sketch interpretation in a design task. In T. Toshiharu & N. Yukari (Eds.), Design creativity 2010 (pp. 257-264). London: Springer.
Tuckey, H., & Selvaratnam, M. (1993). Studies involving three-dimensional visualization skills in chemistry. Studies in Science Education, 21,99-121.
Van Beest, M. (2010). What is the multimedia design process? Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://www.ehow.com/about_6307785_multimedia-design-process_.html
Van Dijk, C. G. C. (1995). New insights in computer-aided conceptual design. Design Studies, 16(1), 62-80.
Van Elsas, P. A., & Vergeest, J. S. M. (1998). New functionality for computer-aided conceptual design: The displacement feature. Design Studies, 19(1), 81-102.
Vasquez, N. A., & Buehler, R. (2007). Seeing future success: Does imagery perspective influence achievement motivation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1392-1405.
Verstijnen, I. M., Van Leeuwen, C., Goldschmidt, G., Hamel, R., & Hennessey, J. M. (1998). Sketching and creative discovery. Design Studies, 19(4), 519-546.
Wölfel, C., & Merritt, T. (2013). Method card design dimensions: a survey of card-based design tools. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2013 (pp. 479-486). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Won, P. H. (2001). The comparison between visual thinking using computer and conventional media in the concept generation stages of design. Automation in Construction, 10(3), 319-325.
Wu, C. F., & Chiang, M. C. (2013). Effectiveness of applying 2D static depictions and 3D animations to orthographic. Computers & Education, 63, 28-42.
Yusuf, M. O., & Afolabi, A. O. (2010). Effects of computer assisted instruction (CAI) on secondary school students' performance in biology. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 62-69.
Zimring, C., & Craig, D. L. (2001). Defining design between domains: an argument for design research á la Carte. In C.M. Eastman, W.M. McCracken, W.C. Newsteete (Eds), Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education, (pp. 125-146).
Zorriassatine, F., Wykes, C., Parkin, R., Gindy, N. (2003). A survey of virtual prototyping techniques for mechanical product development. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineering, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217(4), 513-530.