:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:治理、部署與榮光:生命政治作為政治理論
作者:蕭育和
作者(外文):Yu-He Hsiao
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:陳思賢
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:生命政治政治理論治理部署榮光biopoliticspolitical theorygovernmentdispositifglory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
由傅柯對「生命權力」的經典闡述開始,現代政治之所以如鄂蘭所說,越來越以生命為政治場域的主要參照,緣由是其漸漸捨棄了「以力量對抗力量」,在各種浮誇儀式中作用,以生殺大權為終極手段的主權權力模式。取而代之的生命權力模式,著重的是:權力在不同局部機制之間的流通而具有的生產性效應;從局部機制到全面性策略之間的具體化過程;以及整體權力部署中各種權力技術之間的流通與轉化。以傅柯這三個高度理論性的系譜學方法為引,論文重構了傅柯的戰爭論述:作為社會組織原則的戰爭、在論述上各種戰爭型態之間的相互解碼,以及最後,從戰爭到治理的轉進。從方法論的提示到理論環節的釐清,在現實的對應是一個契約論思想家嘗試以主權與法律緊緊捆綁住,在18世紀稱之為治安,往後可以概括表述稱為「治理」的新政治空間,在這個空間中有雜多的治理對象,「人口」是其總稱;沒有一個單一的原則,只能泛稱為「治理性」;「安全部署」則是為了確保各種不同治理機制不致於相互衝突與消耗,這三個理論工具,所說明的是在自由主義治理取代國家理性的過程,新的治理對象、新的治理原則與新的政治理據的出現。在傅柯極富實驗性質,探索生命政治論題的過程中,物理性的身體逐漸退場,或者,它在生命與死亡得以實現互兌的部署網絡中,重新以不同元素的樣貌重新登場,「新自由主義」在這個意義上才可以稱之為「生命政治的誕生」。 這也回應了Esposito質疑以截然二分的生命與死亡效應來區分生命政治與主權,是否在概念上足夠精確的提問。但真正尖銳的提問,必然得到迴響,即便不是以可預期的形式。在傅柯成熟的生命政治論述中沒有特殊地位的「絕對死亡」,也就是暴力,在奈格理藉由推進傅柯,而闡述的帝國與雜眾相抗政治格局,以純粹的技術手段與毫無意義的殺戮重新登場。這個以不再需要肉身相搏卻能製造更有效率殺戮的戰爭,對應的是同樣是傅柯從來沒有系統性(或者說從來沒有)構思過的政治可能:雜眾作為一個集體性,具有顛覆潛能的政治主體。後現代的無產階級將在新的資本主義階段中,由於資本更需要以連結性關係來進行對社會的吸納,變得更壯大。
新的社會形態既孕育出更健壯的抵抗力量,也是失落政治傳統重新復興的現實契機:一種不依據既有建制而自由生成連結的制憲力量論述傳統。在此,主權的問題在新一輪的生命政治戰場中重新登場。Esposito與阿岡本著力將主權對個體的個別化效應,而不只僅僅是其揮霍但無效的權力使用,視為其特有的生命政治法理,而對阿岡本來說,可以視為對Esposito的回應,此一個別化效應並不在於其具體的生命形式,裸命更深刻的意涵在於它是在人形化機制中,通過例外性關係實現特定生命形式的過渡時的雙生。無窮盡的人形化部署貫穿社會的方方面面,可以說是當代資本主義社會的重要特徵,當代生命政治的核心論題是例外性關係向政治體內部的滲透與常態化,這是阿岡本對傅柯的增補:不是另一種有別於主權權力的權力流通方式,而是主權生命政治邏輯的分子化。以主權的禁令結構作為權威與權力之間的接合,對阿岡本來說,基本上也是西方政治「王國與治理」雙元機制的得以運作的邏輯。藉由安濟神學的概念範疇,阿岡本一方面重新處理了治理作為主權自我設置邏輯之延伸的論題;另一方面也在引入榮光此一概念的同時,指出了貫穿其論著的線索:政治是對一種例外性關係的設置,以為對空白的擄獲。在當前這個一切倫理與政治使命都不再有意義的末人政治時代,去除神學意象的榮光部署有了新的樣貌:各種傳播媒體對空洞言說的生產。暴力並沒有就此絕跡,其當代理據恐怕不一定是帝國生命權力的最終手段,而是,在榮光與治理的無以分別中,在每一個可能的環節中,從榮光的部署,從無意義的輿論言說中,都有可能翻轉出暴力,論文的研究,就以這場阿岡本與奈格理的「巨人之戰」,暫時畫下句點。
This dissertation begins with Michael Foucault’s classic explanation of “biopower”. For Foucault, the reason why life asserted itself as the ultimate point of reference in the modern age is that the operations of power increasingly abandon the mode of sovereignty whose rationality consists in “power against power”, performed in spectacular rituals with the right to take life as ultimate reference. Instead, the mode of biopower maintains itself by the productive effects of powers circulated in different partial mechanisms, the processes of materialization from partial mechanisms to global strategy and the economy and transfer between power technologies within the whole dispositif. According to the three highly theoretical methods of genealogy, the dissertation reconstructs the discourse of war in Foucault: war as the principle of social organization, the mutual deciphering among patterns of war in discrete discourses, and lastly, the displacement from war to government.
From the threads of genealogy to the clarification of discourses of war, the correspondence in empirical reality is a new political domain to which Jean-Jacques Rousseau attempted to bind by sovereign and law. In this new political domain which was named “the police” in 18th and later Foucault referred to as “the government”. In this new domain, there are multiple objects for government, which could be generalized as “population”, there is no single principle for effective government, only the general term “governmentality”, and "dispositif of security" in this new domain avoids the conflicts and depletion between governmental mechanisms.
In the replacement of raison d'etat with the liberal creeds in rationality of government, there emerged new objects as population, new principles as governmentality and new political rationality as security. In Foucault’s highly experimental exploration of the implication of biopolitics, the physical bodies gradually recede, or, in the networks of dispositif, which perfectly achieve the exchange of life and death, they could come on the biopolitical scene in new forms, that is why “neoliberalism as the birth of biopolitics”. This dissertation responds to Esposito’s interrogation of Foucault if the distinction between sovereign and biopower with discrete effects of death and life would be conceptually inaccurate.
However, in the elaboration of biopolitical antagonism between Empire and Multitude proposed by Antonio Negri, violence as absolute death, which has no place in Foucault’s mature explanation of biopower, reappears in pure technical means and meaningless killing. Wars in contemporary world are wagered without physical conflicts produce more effective massacre, whose counterpart is Multitude as collective, subversive and potential political subject. Negri envisaged a political alternative Foucault would never conceive: In the new stage of capitalism, postmodern proletariat continue to expand for capital more desperately need absorb the social with connective relations. New mode of capitalist society could breeds stronger power to resist the dominance of biopower, for Negri, that is the opportunity for rejuvenation of a lost constituent power tradition in western political thought, the constitution of multitude as free becoming and connection no longer needs the foundation of sovereignty.
Roberto Esposito and Giorgio Agamben assert the individualizing effect of sovereignty, for them the specific biopolitical axiom of sovereignty is not only wasteful expenditure. For Agamben, the consequence of the individualizing effect of sovereignty is not any concrete form of life, “bare life ” as anthropological machine accomplishes the passage from zoe to bios by the imposition of exceptional relation. The infinite anthropological machines has traversed all aspects of contemporary capitalist society, Agamben argued the central thesis of biopower is the permeation and normalization of exception into the body politics, which is the supplement of Foucault for Agamben. The ban structure of sovereignty as the articulation of authority and power is essentially the rationale of bipolar machine as “Kingdom and Government” in western political thought. With the categories of economical theology, Agamben on the one hand continued the thesis of biopolitical government as the extension of the exceptional relation of sovereignty, on the other hand, by introducing the concept of glory, he indicated the thread throughout all his biopolitical writings: biopolitics is the disposition of exceptional relation to catch the empty space.
In this “last man” age, for all ethical and political tasks are no longer substantial, the dispositif of glory divesting of theological implication would get new image: the production of empty speech by various media. But violence doesn’t vanish at all, whose rationality will not the ultimate mean of Empire as Negri argued, rather, for Agamben, in the indistinction of glory and government, in every moment, all seemingly innocent opinions, measures and speeches could reverse into the most violent consequences. This dissertation concludes with the Gigantomachy between Agamben and Negri.
Agamben, Giorgio.1993. The Coming Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, Giorgio.1995. Idea of Prose. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1999a. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. New York : Zone Books.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1999b.”The messiah and the sovereign: The problem of law in Walter Benjamin,” in Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, ed., Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford California: Stanford University Press, pp.160-174.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1999c.”On potentiality,” in Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, ed., Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford California: Stanford University Press, pp.177-84.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. Means without Ends: Notes on Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2007a. Profanations. New York: Zone Books.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2007b. “The work of man,” in in Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life, ed., Matthew Calarco and Steven DeCaroli, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.1-10.
Agamben, Giorgio.2009. What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2011a. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2011b. Nudities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2011c. The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2015a. The Use of Bodies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2015b. Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2015c. “On the limits of violence,” in Towards the Critique of Violence: Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben, ed., Brendan Moran and Carlo Salzani. London : Bloomsbury Academic, pp.231-38.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2016. “A jurist confronting himself,” in The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt, ed., Jens Meierhenrich and Oliver Simons. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.457-470.
Alliez, Éric and Maurizio Lazzarato. 2018. Wars and Capital. New York: Semiotext(e).
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, Hannah. 1993. Between Past and Future. New York: Viking Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, Hannah. 2007. “We refugees,” in The Jewish Writings, ed., Jerome Kohn and Ron H. Feldman. New York: Schocken Books, pp.264-74.
Behrent, Michael C. 2009. “A seventies thing: On the limits of Foucault's neoliberalism course for understanding the present,” in A Foucault for the 21st Century: Governmentality, Biopolitics and Discipline in the New Millennium, ed., Sam Binkley and Jorge Capetillo. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub., pp.16-29.
Benjamin, Walter. 1996a. “Critique of power,” in Selected Writings I, ed., Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary SmithCambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, pp.236-52.
Benjamin, Walter. 1996b. “Goethe's Elective Affinities,” in Selected Writings I, ed., Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary SmithCambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, pp.297-360.
Benjamin, Walter. 2007. Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
Bidet, Jacques. 2016. Foucault with Marx. London: Zed Books.
Bigo, Didier. 2006. “Globalized (in)security: The Field and the Ban-opticon,” in Translation, Biopolitics, Colonial Difference, ed., Naoki Sakai and Jon Solomon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp.5-49.
Binkley, Sam. 2014. Happiness as Enterprise: An Essay on Neoliberal Life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Blanchot, Maurice. 1993. The Infinite Conversation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Brown, Wendy. 2005. “Neoliberalism and the end of liberal democracy,” in Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp.37-59.
Brown, Wendy. 2008. ”Sovereignty and the return of the repressed,” in The New Pluralism: William Connolly and the Contemporary Global Condition, ed., David Campbell and Morton Schoolman. Durham: Duke University Press, pp.250-272.
Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Bröckling, Ulrich. 2011. “Human economy, human capital : a critique of biopolitical economy,” in Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, ed., Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann and Thomas Lemke. New York : Routledge, pp.247-268.
Bröckling, Ulrich. 2016. The Entrepreneurial Self. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso.
Campbell, Timothy and Adam Sitze (ed.). 2013. Biopolitics: A Reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
Campesi, Giuseppe. 2017. A Genealogy of Public Security: The Theory and History of Modern Police Powers. New York: Routledge.
Casarino, Cesare and Antonio Negri. 2008. In Praise of the Common. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chamayou, Grégoire. 2012. Manhunts: A Philosophical History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chandler, David and Julian Reid. 2016. The Neoliberal Subject: Resilience, Adaptation and Vulnerability. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Cleaver, Harry. 1992. “The inversion of class perspective in Marxian Theory: From Valorization to Self-valorization,” in Open Marxism: v. 2. Theory and Practice, ed., Werner Bonefeld, Richard Gunn, and Kosmas Psychopedis. London: Pluto Press, pp.106-144.
Crary, Jonathan. 2013. 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. New York: Verso.
De la Durantaye, Leland. 2009. Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Dean, Mitchell. 2017. “Diagrams, dispositifs and the signature of power in the study of the international,” in International Political Sociology: Transversal Lines, ed., Tugba Basaran, Didier Bigo, Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet and R.B.J Walkerpp. New York : Routledge, pp.83-105
Dean, Mitchell and Kaspar Villadsen. 2016. State Phobia and Civil Society: The Political Legacy of Michel Foucault. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1995a. “Control and becoming: Interview with Negri,” in Negotiations, 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.169-176.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1995b. “Postscript on control societies,” in Negotiations, 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.177-182.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1996. ”Intellectuals and power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze,” in Foucault live : (interviews, 1961-1984), ed., Sylvère Lotringer. New York: Semiotext(e), 74-82.
Deleuze, Gilles. 2016. “Desire and pleasure,” in in Between Deleuze and Foucault, ed., Nicolae Morar, Thomas Nail and Daniel W. Smith. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.223-231.
Didier, Bigo. 2008. “Security: A field left fallow,” in Foucault on Politics, Security and War, ed., Michael Dillon and Andrew W. Neal. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.93-114.
Dillon, Michael and Julian Reid. 2009. The Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live. New York: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 2009. The Beast and the Sovereign, vol.1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2008. Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2010. Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2011. Immunitas: The Protection and Negations of Life. Cambridge, U.K. ; Malden, Mass.: Polity Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2013. Terms of the Political: Community, Immunity, Biopolitics. New York: Fordham University Press.
Esposito, Roberto. 2017. “Politics in the present,” in Sovereignty in Ruins: A Politics of Crisis, ed., George Edmondson and Klaus Mladek. Durham: Duke University Press, pp.100-124.
Foucault, Michael. 1980a. History of Sexuality, Vol.1. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michael. 1980b. ”Two lectures,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, ed., Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books, pp.78-108.
Foucault, Michael. 1980c. ”The history of sexuality,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, ed., Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books, pp.183-193.
Foucault, Michael. 1980d. ”The confession of the flesh,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977, ed., Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books, pp.194-228.
Foucault, Michael. 1984. “Politics and ethics: An Interview,” in The Foucault Reader, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books, pp.373-80.
Foucault Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, Michael. 1996a. ”The eye of power,” in Foucault live : (interviews, 1961-1984), ed., Sylvère Lotringer. New York: Semiotext(e), 226-240.
Foucault Michel. 1996b. “Clarifications on the question of power,” in Foucault Live : (interviews, 1961-1984), ed., Sylvère Lotringer. New York: Semiotext(e), pp.255-263.
Foucault Michel. 1997a. “Sex, power, and the politics of identity,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.1 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp.163-174.
Foucault Michel. 1997b. “The ethics of the concern for the self as a practice of freedom,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.1 Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp.281-302.
Foucault Michel. 1998. “Nietzsche, genealogy and history,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.2 Aesthetics, method, and epistemology, ed., James D. Faubion. New York: New Press, pp.269-293.
Foucault Michel. 2000a. “Truth and juridical forms,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp.1-89.
Foucault Michel. 2000b. “The politics of health in the eighteenth century,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp. 90-105.
Foucault, Michael. 2000c. “Truth and power,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., James D. Faubion. New York: New Press, pp.111-133.
Foucault, Michael. 2000d. “Interview with Foucault,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., James D. Faubion. New York: New Press, pp.239-297.
Foucault Michel. 2000e. “’Omnes et singulatim’: Toward a critique of political reason,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp. 298-325.
Foucault, Michael. 2000f. “The Subject and power,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., James D. Faubion. New York: New Press, pp.326-48.
Foucault Michel. 2000g. “Space, knowledge and power,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp.349-364.
Foucault, Michael. 2000h. “The risks of security,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., James D. Faubion. New York: New Press, pp.365-381.
Foucault Michel. 2000i. “The political technology of individuals,” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp.403-417.
Foucault Michel. 2000j. “Useless to revolt?” in The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984: Vol.3 Power, ed., Paul Rabinow. New York: New Press, pp.449-453.
Foucault, Michel. 2003a. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London : Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 2003b. Society must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault Michel. 2005a. “Tehran: Faith against the Shah,” in Foucault and the Iranian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.198-202.
Foucault Michel. 2005b. “What are the Iranians dreaming about?” in Foucault and the Iranian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.203-208.
Foucault Michel. 2005c. “A revolt with bare hands,” in Foucault and the Iranian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.216-219.
Foucault Michel. 2005d. “The mythical leader of the Iranian revolt,” in Foucault and the Iranian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.220-222.
Foucault Michel. 2005e. “Iran: The Spirit of a world without spirit,” in Foucault and the Iranian Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.250-259.
Foucault, Michel. 2006a. History of Madness. New York: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 2006b. Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973-74. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, Michel. 2007a. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault Michel. 2007b. “What is critique?” in The Politics of Truth, ed., Sylvère Lotringer. Los Angles, CA: Semiotext(e), pp.41-82.
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, Michel. 2014. On the Government of the Living: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1979-80. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, Michel. 2015. The Punitive Society: Lectures at the Collège de France 1972-1973. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Frankenberg, Günter. 2014. Political Technology and the Erosion of the Rule of Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Galli, Carlo. 2010. Political Spaces and Global War. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gehring, Petra. 2017. “The inverted eye. panopticon and panopticism, revisited, ” Foucault Studies 23: 46-62.
Green, Jeffrey E.. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gros, Frédéric. 2014. “The forth age of security,” in The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism, ed., Vanessa Lemm and Miguel Vatter. New York: Fordham University Press, pp.17-28.
Gros, Frédéric. 2016. “Is there a biopolitical subject? Foucault and the birth of biopolitics,” in Biopower: Foucault and Beyond, ed., Vernon W. Cisney and Nicolae Morar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp.259-73.
Gros, Frédéric. 2017. “On liberalism: limits, the market and the subject,” in Foucault and the Modern International: Silences and Legacies for the Study of World Politics, ed., Philippe Bonditti, Didier Bigo and Frederic Gros. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.191-201.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The Burnout Society. Stanfor: Stanford University Press.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. London: Verso.
Hardt, Michael. 1998. ”The withering of civil society,” in Deleuze And Guattari: New Mappings in Politics, Philosophy, and Culture, ed., Eleanor Kaufman and Kevin Jon Heller. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp.23-39.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2012. Declaration. [S.l.] : Argo-Navis.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2017. Assembly. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. von 2007. The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1996. Leviathan, ed., Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. On the Citizen, ed., Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffman, Marcelo. 2014. Foucault and Power: The Influence of Political Engagement on Theories of Power. New York: Bloomsbury.
Kalyvas, Andreas. 2005. “The sovereign weaver: Beyond the camp,” in Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer, ed., Andrew Norris. Durham: Duke University Press, pp.107-134.
Kishik, David. 2012. The Power of Life: Agamben and the Coming Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Laclau, Ernest. 2004. “Can immanence explain social struggles?” in Empire’s New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri, ed., Paul A. Passavant and Jodi Dean, New York: Routledge, pp.21-30.
Laclau, Ernest. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.
Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2002. “From biopower to biopolitics, ” Pli (13): 99-113.
Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2006. “Immaterial labor,” in Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, ed., Paolo Virno and Michael Hardt. Minneapolis:Minnesota University Press, pp.133-147.
Lemke, Thomas. 2011a. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
Lemke, Thomas. 2011b. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Publishers.
Lemke, Thomas. 2014. “The risks of security: liberalism, biopolitics, and fear,” in The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism, ed., Vanessa Lemm and Miguel Vatter. New York: Fordham University Press, pp.59-74.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 2004. Unforeseen History. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Lorey, Isabell. 2015. State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious. New York: Verso.
Mbembe, Achille. 2008. “Necropolitics,” in Foucault in an Age of Terror: Essays on Biopolitics and the Defence of Society, ed., Stephen Morton and Stephen Bygrave. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.152-182.
Mills, Catherine. 2005. “Linguistic survival and ethicality: Biopolitics, Subjectification and Testimony in Remnants of Auschwitz,” in Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer, ed., Andrew Norris. Durham: Duke University Press, pp.198-221.
Mills, Catherine. 2008. The Philosophy of Agamben. Ithaca: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Mills, Catherine. 2018. Biopolitics. New York: Routledge.
McNeill, William. 2006. The Time of Life: Heidegger and ēthos. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Münkler, Herfried. 2005. The New Wars. Cambridge: Polity.
Nail, Thomas. 2016. ”Biopower and control,” in Between Deleuze and Foucault, ed., Nicolae Morar, Thomas Nail and Daniel W. Smith. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.247-263.
Negri, Antonio. 2004a. Subversive Spinoza: (un)Contemporary Variations. New York: Manchester University Press.
Negri, Antonio. 2004b. Negri on Negri. New York: Routledge.
Negri, Antonio. 2006. “Constituent Republic,” in Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, ed., Paolo Virno and Michael Hardt. Minneapolis:Minnesota University Press, pp.213-222.
Negri, Antonio. 2007a. “Logic and theory of inquiry: Militant praxis as subject and episteme,” in Constituent Imagination: Militant Investigations, Collective Theorization, ed., Stevphen Shukaitis and David Graeber. Oakland, CA : AK Press, pp.62-72.
Negri, Antonio. 2007b. “The discreet taste of the dialectic,” in Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life, ed., Matthew Calarco and Steven DeCaroli, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.109-25.
Negri, Antonio. 2008a. Reflections on Empire. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Negri, Antonio. 2008b. Empire and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Negri, Antonio. 2009. Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Negri, Antonio. 2010. “Sovereignty bet. Government, exception and governance,” in Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept, ed., Hent Kalmo and Quentin Skinner. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.205-221.
Negri, Antonio. 2012. Declaration. [S.l.]: Argo-Navis.
Negri, Antonio. 2013. Spinoza for Our Time: Politics and Postmodernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Negri, Antonio. 2016a. “When and how I read Foucault,” in Between Deleuze and Foucault, ed., Nicolae Morar, Thomas Nail and Daniel W. Smith. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.72-83.
Negri, Antonio. 2016b. “At the origins of biopolitics,” in Biopower: Foucault and Beyond, ed., Vernon W. Cisney and Nicolae Morar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp.48-64.
Negri, Antonio. 2017. Marx and Foucault: Essays. Volume 1. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Neocleous, Mark. 2000. The Fabrication of Social Order: A Critical Theory of Police Power. Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
Neocleous, Mark. 2006. “Theoretical foundations of the ‘new police science’, ” in The New Police Science: The Police Power in Domestic and International governance, ed., Markus D. Dubber and Mariana. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.17-41.
Noys, Benjamin. 2010. The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Nyquist, Mary. 2013. Arbitrary Rule: Slavery, Tyranny, and the Power of Life and Death. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Oakeshott, Michael. 1991. “The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind,” in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, pp.pp.488-541.
Oakeshott, Michael. 1993. Morality and Politics in Modern Europe: the Harvard Lectures. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ojakangas, Mika. 2004. “Impossible dialogue on bio-power: Agamben and Foucault,” Foucault Studies 2: 5-28.
Oksala, Johanna. 2012. Foucault, Politics, and Violence. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Paras, Eric. 2006. Foucault 2.0: Beyond Power and Knowledge. New York: Other Press.
Passavant, Paul. A. 2003. “Introduction: Postmodern Republicanism,” in Empire’s New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri, ed., Paul A. Passavant and Jodi Dean, New York: Routledge, pp.1-20.
Peterson, Erik. 2011. “The book of angels: Their place and meaning in the liturgy,” in Theological Tractates, ed., Michael J. Hollerich. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.106-142.
Pitts, Frederick H. 2017. Critiquing Capitalism Today: New Ways to Read Marx. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rabinow, Paul and Nikolas Rose. 2016. “Biopower today,” in Biopower: Foucault and Beyond, ed., Vernon W. Cisney and Nicolae Morar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp.297-325.
Rasche, William. 2007. “From sovereign ban to banning sovereignty,” in Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life, ed., Matthew Calarco and Steven DeCaroli. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.92-108.
Read, Jason. 1999. “The antagonistic ground of constitutive power: An essay on the thought of Antonio Negri,” Rethinking Marxism 11 (2) : 1-17.
Read, Jason. 2001. “The hidden abode of biopolitical production: Empire and the ontology of production,” Rethinking Marxism 13 (3/4) : 24-30.
Read, Jason. 2009. “A genealogy of homo-economicus: Foucault, neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity” in A Foucault for the 21st Century : Governmentality, Biopolitics and Discipline in the New Millennium, ed. Sam Binkley and Jorge Capetillo, Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Pub., pp.2-15.
Rehmann, Jan. 2016. “The unfulfilled promises of the late Foucault and Foucauldian 'Governmentality-Studies',” in Foucault and Neoliberalism, ed., Daniel Zamora and Michael C. Behrent. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press, pp.134-58.
Reid, Julian. 2008. “Life struggle: War, discipline and biopolitics in the thought of Michel Foucault,” in Foucault in an Age of Terror: Essays on Biopolitics and the Defence of Society, ed., Stephen Morton and Stephen Bygrave. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.14-42.
Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The Politics of Life itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1992. Discourse on the Origins of Inequality (second discourse) ; Polemics ; and, Political Economy, Collected Writings, Vol.3. Hanover: Published for Dartmouth College by University Press of New England.
Salzani, Carlo. 2015. “From Benjamin’s blossen Leben to Agamben’s Nuda Vita: A genealogy,” in Towards the Critique of Violence: Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben, ed., Brendan Moran and Carlo Salzani. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp.109-124.
Santner, Eric L. 2011. The Royal Remains: The People's Two Bodies and the Endgames of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schmitt, Carl. 2003. The Nomos of the Earth. New York: Telos Press.
Schmitt, Carl.2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schmitt, Carl.2008a. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schmitt, Carl. 2008b. Constitutional Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
Schmitt, Carl. 2011. “Forms of modern imperialism in international law,” in Spatiality, Sovereignty and Carl Schmitt, ed., Stephen Legg. New York: Routledge, pp.29-45.
Sinnerbrink, Robert. 2005. “From Machenschaft to biopolitics: A genealogical critique of biopower,” Critical Horizons 6(1): 239-265.
Sloterdij, Peter. 2013. In the World Interior of Capital: For a Philosophical Theory of Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Spinoza, Benedictus. 2002. Complete Works, trans., Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub.
Tellmann, Ute. 2011. “The economic beyond governmentality: The limits of conduct,” in Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, ed., Ulrich Bröckling, Susanne Krasmann and Thomas Lemke. New York : Routledge, pp.285-303.
Tilly, Charles. 2003. “A nebulous empire,” in Debating Empire, ed., Gopal Balakrishnan. New York: Verso, pp.26-28.
Toscano, Alberto. 2007. “Always already only now: Negri and the biopolitical,” in in The Philosophy of Antonio Negri, Vol.II: Revolution in Theory. ed., Timothy Murphy. London: Pluto Press, pp.109-128.
Tuck, Richard. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. New York: Oxford University Press.
Turchetto, Maria. 2007. “From ‘mass worker’ to ‘empire’: the disconcerting trajectory of Italian Operaismo,” in Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism, ed., Jacques Bidet and Stathis Kouvelakis. Chicag: Haymarket Books, pp.285-308.
Vardoulakis, Dimitris. 2013. “The end of stasis: Spinoza as a reader of Agamben,” in The Politics of Nothing: On Sovereignty, ed., Clare Monagle and Dimitris Vardoulakis. New York: Routledge, pp.51-62.
Vatter, Miguel. 2007. “Legality and resistance: Arendt and Negri on constituent power.” in The Philosophy of Antonio Negri, Vol.II: Revolution in Theory. ed., Timothy Murphy. London: Pluto Press, pp.52-83.
Vatter, Miguel. 2014. “Free markets and republican constitutions in Hayek and Foucault,” in The Republic of the Living: Biopolitics and the Critique of Civil Society. New York : Fordham University Press, pp.195-220.
Virno, Paolo. 2004. A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life. Cambridge: Semiotext (e).
Vine, David. 2015. Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases abroad harm America and the World. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Vitale, Alex S.. 2017. The End of Policing. New York: Verso.
Weber, Samuel. 2006. “Going along for the ride: Violence and gesture: Agamben reading Benjamin reading Kafka reading Cervantes,” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 81(1): 65-83.
Whyte, Jessica. 2013. Catastrophe and Redemption: The Political Thought of Giorgio Agamben. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wilson, Woodrow. 1981. “Address to the world’s salesmanship congress in Detroit,” in The Papers of Woodrow Wilson v.37, ed., Arthur S. Link. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p.387.
Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth. 2006. Why Arendt Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Zamora, Daniel. 2016. “Foucault, the excluded, and the neoliberal erosion of the state,” in Foucault and Neoliberalism, ed., Daniel Zamora and Michael C. Behrent. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press, pp.63-84.
Zartaloudis, Thanos. 2010. Giorgio Agamben: Power, Law and The Uses of Criticism. New York: Routledge.
Ziarek, Krzysztof. 2008. “After humanism: Agamben and Heidegger,” South Atlantic Quarterly 107 (1): 187-209.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE