|
壹、中文部分
王瑞壎（2003）。學校知識管理指標建構與實證分析之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
吳采蓉、楊淑晴（2009）。影響國小教師資訊融入教學創新行為結構模式之建構暨結構模式性別恆等性之檢定。教育心理學報， 40（3），385－418。
吳清山（1992）。學校效能研究。臺北市：五南。
吳清山（2002）。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。臺灣教育，614，2-8。
吳清山（2005）。學校創新經營方案之建構。中等教育，56，4-26。
吳清山（2018）。教育4.0。教育研究，288，14-30。
吳清基（2018）。迎接未來教育4.0的挑戰與因應。載於中國教育學會（主編），邁向教育4.0：智慧學校的想像與建構（頁III-V）。臺北市：學富。
李豪朕（2011）。國民小學校長分佈式領導、學校知識創新與ICT運用關係之研究（未出版碩士論文），國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
沈中偉（2004）。科技與學習：理論與實務。臺北市：心理。
林生傳（1999a）。九年一貫課程與教學創新。九年一貫課程研討會論文集-邁向課程新紀元，中華民國教材研究發展學會。
林生傳（1999b）。新世紀教學創新的一種思索－融“一”用“多”的教學。「迎向千禧年新世紀中小學課程改革與創新教學學術研討會」綜合論壇，國立高雄師範大學。
林彥宏（2009）。科技領導對學校行政管理創新之影響──以台北市國民中學為例。學校行政，64，98-125。
林新發（2018）。提高教師專業素養促進教育實驗創新。臺灣教育評論月刊，7（1），128-134。
洪詠善（2011）。跨／移界：理解教師教學創新的個案研究。教育研究月刊，204，95-109。
范熾文、張阿靈（2013）。桃園縣國民小學教師知識管理與教學創新關係之研究。教育經營與管理研究集刊，9，31~59。
桃園縣政府（2010）。ICT教育願景。取自http://www.tyc.edu.tw/files/enc/ict/ep1.html#sect1
秦夢群、張奕華（2006）。校長科技領導層面與實施現況之研究。教育與心理研究，29（1），1-27。
張奕華（2003）。美國中小學校長領導的新趨勢：科技領導。教育研究月刊，114，83-95。
張奕華（2006）。校長科技領導、教師科技素養與教學效能關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會（94-2413-H-004-024），未出版。
張奕華（2007）。學校科技領導與管理：理論及實務。臺北市：高等教育。
張奕華（2010）。校長科技領導─模式、指標與應用。臺北市：洪葉文化。
張奕華、吳怡佳（2008）。校長科技領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4（1），171-193。
張奕華、吳怡佳（2011）。科技領導、知識管理與學校效能結構關係之驗證。教育行政與評鑑學刊，11，1-28。
張奕華、吳權威（2017）。智慧教育之教師專業發展：理念與案例。臺北市：網奕資訊。
張奕華、張敏章（2010）。台北縣國民小學校長科技領導對學校效能影響之研究。學校行政，66，30-50。
張奕華、許正妹（2009）。校長科技領導對教師資訊科技素養影響路徑之研究：以都會型國民小學為例。初等教育學刊，33，1-32。
張奕華、蔡瑞倫（2010）。國民中學校長科技領導與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政，65，33-53。
張奕華、蕭霖、許正妹（2007）。學校科技領導向度與指標發展之研究。教育政策論壇，10（1），161-187。
陳以禮（譯）（2013）。哈佛教育學院的一門青年創新課(原作者：Tony Wagner)。臺北市：時報出版。
陳威助（2007）。臺灣地區資訊教育與數位落差問題探討。資訊社會研究，13，193-228。
曾志朗（2001）。教師的專業成長與新使命：別觀望別猶豫全心投入做個有使命的教改人。主計月刊，551，6-13。
黃美惠、林素卿、顏士喬、閻億龍（2013年5月）。國中英語教師教學反省與教學創新關係之研究。「2013 教育高階論壇學術研討會：數位時代之教育議題與發展」發表之論文，國立臺南大學。
葉連祺（2003）。科技領導。教育研究月刊，112，151-152。
詹志禹（2012）。找到心流就能學而不倦。親子天下，37，86-88。
詹志禹（2017）。實驗創新與十二年國民基本教育。課程與教學季刊，20(4)，1-24。
臺北市政府教育局（2011）。臺北市97至101學年度國民小學校務追蹤評鑑實施計畫。2011年11月18日，http://www.edunet.taipei.gov.tw/DO/DownloadController.Attach.asp?xpath=public/Attachment/11118181508.pdf
蒲逸悧（2011）。臺北市國民中學體育教師教學信念、教學創新與教學效能之相關。臺灣運動教育學報，6(1)，15-28。
蔡俊傑、劉威德、羅鴻仁（2012）。職業學校教導型組織文化與教師創新教學關係之探討。教師專業研究期刊，4，53-80。
蕭文智（2013）。應用結構方程模式探討學校ICT運用與學生學習表現之關係。學校行政，88，99-119。
謝傳崇（2013a）。十二年國教的挑戰：找回學術樂觀。教育人力與專業發展，30（3），25-33。
謝傳崇（2013b）。學生學術樂觀：正向力量讓他再站起來。師友月刊，553，50-54。
謝傳崇、李孟雪（2017）。國民小學校長翻轉領導、教師專業學習社群與教師教學創新關係之研究。教育政策論壇，20(2)，151-184
謝傳崇、劉美鈴、翁暄睿（2016）。國小學生知覺教師正向領導對學習表現影響之研究: 以教師資通訊科技運用為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，11（3），83-108。
謝傳崇、蔡毓芬、翁暄睿（2018）。國民小學教師正向領導對學生學術樂觀影響之研究—以資通訊科技運用為中介變項。教育行政論壇，10（2），79-96。
謝傳崇、蕭文智（2013）。國民小學校長科技領導與學生學習表現關係之研究: 以學校 ICT 運用為中介變項。教育理論與實踐學刊，27，291-324。
謝傳崇、蕭文智、官柳延（2016）。國民小學校長科技領導、教師教學創新與學生樂學態度關係之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，12(1)，71-104。
謝傳崇、謝宜君（2016）。國民小學教師正向領導對學生幸福感影響之研究：以學生學術樂觀為中介變項。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，9（3），29-56。
貳、外文部分
Adams, C. M. (2013). Collective student trust A social resource for urban elementary students. Retrieve from http://eaq.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/06/18/
0013161X13488596.full.pdf+html
Adams, C. M., & Forsyth, P. B. (2009). Conceptualizing and validating a measure of student trust. InW. Hoy and M. DiPaola (Eds.). Improving sSchools: Studies in Leadership and Culture. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., & FooI, F. S. (2008). School leadership and information technology communication. The Turkish On-Line Journal of Educational Technology, 7 (4), 82-91.
Alig-Mielcarek, J., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Instructional leadership. Educational leadership and reform, 29-54.
Anderman, L. H. (2003). Academic and social perceptions as predictors of change in middle school students' sense of school belonging. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(1), 5-22.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49-82.
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
Aten, B. M. (1996). An analysis of the nature of educational technology leadership in California’s SB 1274 restructuring schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of San Francisco, California.
Bailey, G. D. (1997). What technology leaders need to know: The essential top 10 concepts for technology integration in the 21st century. Learning & Leading with Technology, 25(1), 57-62.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American psychologist, 44(9), 1175.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4, 71-81. New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
Bauscher, R., & Poe, E. M. (2018). Educational facilities: Planning, modernization, and management (5th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Beard, K. S., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers: Confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education,26(5), 1136-1144.
Berk, L. E. (2000). Child development (5th ed.). Boston, USA: Allyn and Bacon Publications.
Brooks-Young, S. (2006). Critical technology issues for school leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Chang, I. (2002). Assessing principals’ leadership in implementing educational technology policies: An application of structural education modeling.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia.
Chang, I. H. (2011). A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 491-515.
Chang, I. H. (2012). The effect of principals' technological leadership on teachers' Technological Literacy and Teaching Effectiveness in Taiwanese Elementary Schools. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 328-340.
Creighton, T. (2003). The principal as technology leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Ertmer, P. A. (2002). Online professional development: Building administrators’ capacity for technology leadership. Retrieved November 26, 2011, from http://www2.edci.purdue.edu/ertmer/main_conf.htm
European Schoolnet (2009). Evaluation Framework For the Use of ICT in Education. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.xplora.org/ww/en/pub/
peerlearning/inspection/tools/evaluation_framework.htm
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.
Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for thetwenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124-142.
Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of educational administration, 41(2), 124-142.
Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools Can't improve without It. 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York: Teachers College Press.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of educational psychology,95(1), 148.
Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683-702.
Goldstein, L. S. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the co-construction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 647-673.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95-110.
Hanford, E. (2012). The problem with Lecturing. http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/
features/tomorrows-college/lectures/problem-with-lecturing.html.
Hoy, W. (2012). School characteristics that make a difference for the achievement of all students: A 40-year odyssey. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 76-97.
Hoy, W. K., & Sabo, D. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184-208.
Hoy, W. K., Hannum, J., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). Organizational Climate and Student Achievement: A Parsimonious and Longitudinal View. Journal of School Leadership, 8(4), 336-59.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly,26(3), 260-279.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American educational research journal, 43(3), 425-446.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools, healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Newbury Park, CA:: Sage Publications.
Hoy, W.K. & Hannum, J.W. (1997), Middle school climate: an empirical assessment of organizational health, and student achievement, Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3),290-311.
Hoy, W.K. & Sabo, D.J. (1998), Quality middle schools: Open and Healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press,
Hoy,W.K. & Feldman, J. (1987), Organizational health: The concept and its measure , Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(4), 30-37.
Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2018). Academic culture: a promising mediator of school leaders’ influence on student learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 350-363.
Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Edition ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Lee, J. S. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330-340.
Lunde, J. P., & Wilhite, M. S. (1996). Innovative teaching and teaching improvement. To Improve the Academy, 15, 155-167.
Ma, X. (2003). Sense of belonging to school: Can schools make a difference?. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 340-349.
Mishoe, J. N. (2012). Academic optimism and academic success: An explanatory case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3553622)
Ngidi, D. P. (2012). Academic optimism: an individual teacher belief. Educational Studies, 38(2), 139-150.
Nie, Y., Tan, G. H., Liau, A. K., Lau, S., & Chua, B. L. (2013). The roles of teacher efficacy in instructional innovation: its predictive relations to constructivist and didactic instruction. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 67-77.
ODLQC (2011). Open & distance learning quality council. Retrieve December. 30, 2011, from http://www.odlqc.org.uk/
QUALC (2011). Quality assurance network for adult learning centres. Retrieve December. 30, 2011, from http://www.efquel.org/qualc/
Riegel, L. A. (2012). Efficacy and academic emphasis: A leadership factor in elementary School Principals, and its Relationship to Hope, Resilience, Optimism, and View of Intelligence (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University).
Schmeltzer, T. (2001). Training administrators to be technology leaders.TECHNOLOGY AND LEARNING-DAYTON-, 21(11), 16-22.
Schultz, L. E. (2000). Qualities of an exceptional leader. Human Systems Management, 19(2), 93-103.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommcndations. Psychological Method, 7(4), 422-445.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Bankole, R. A., Mitchell, R. M., & Moore,Dennis M.,,Jr. (2013). Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 150-175.
UNIQUe (2011). European University Quality in eLearning. Retrieve December. 30, 2011, from http://www.qualityfoundation.org/unique-certification/
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning: A validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 443-463.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751-796.
Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294-318.
Wehlage, G. G. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc:Philadelphia, PA.
Wu, H. C. (2012). Collective responsibility, academic optimism, and student achievement in Taiwan elementary schools. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Wu, J. H., Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2013). Enabling school structure, collective responsibility, and a culture of academic optimism: Toward a robust model of school performance in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 176-193.
Zhao, X,, Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truthsabout mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
|