:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中科學探究教學之教師實務知識研究
作者:張錫勳
作者(外文):Chang, Hsi-Hsun
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:課程與教學研究所
指導教授:甄曉蘭
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2020
主題關鍵詞:科學探究教學探究教學教師實務知識國中科學教師scientific inquiry teachinginquiry teachingteacher’s practical knowledgejunior high school science teacher
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究旨在探討國中科學教師實施探究教學所展現的實務知識內涵與認知結構、影響因素與形成機制。並依據研究結果,對於科學師資培育以及教師專業成長提出建議。
本研究以兩位國中科學教師進行個案研究,藉由課堂觀察、深度訪談、文件分析等方法,分析詮釋的重點在了解兩位個案教師的共通性與差異性。研究結論如下:
一、國中科學探究教學之教師實務知識的內涵,涵括教師對科學、教學、學習,和學生等相關部分所融合的知識與信念。這些知識彼此交織運作,並透過教師信
念的篩選和增強,使得教師在課堂教學中以自我知識的內涵進行理解轉化與調整而成為教師個人的PCK。
二、國中科學探究教學之教師實務知識的結構,係以科學探究意象指引,形成課堂教學實務原則與實務規則,環環相扣。在教學意象的指引下,不斷地透過教師信念與教學省思的交互作用,而後運作於實際教學中,形塑自己的科學探究教學風貌。
三、國中科學探究教學之教師實務知識的影響因素,係由教師個人因素與當前教學環境因素交織而成。其中成長背景與求學經驗和面對教育改革的態度是影響個案教師科學探究教學實務知識發展的重要因素。
四、國中科學探究教學之教師實務知識的形成機制,主要包含教師個人的默會致知,以及教師社群的知識轉化傳遞螺旋等不斷的教師自我學習歷程。
最後,本研究依據結論,針對科學教師實施探究教學、科學教師專業發展以及未來研究等方面,提出相關建議。科學教師實施探究教學方面,建議運用小組學習引導學生從事探究活動,循序漸進培養學生的科學探究能力。科學教師專業發展方面,職前培育課程建議加強貫穿實務的課程以提升教學實務能力,以及加強跨領域的課程以發展素養導向教學能力;教師在職進修建議引導教師經由默會致知理論化個人實務知識以提升中小學教師的專業性,以及經由教師社群的知識轉化傳遞螺旋創新中小學教師專業知識。未來相關研究方面,建議增加課堂觀察時間、加強探索個案教師的PCK面向之間的互動情形,以及與其他層面實務知識的關聯、研究對象可擴及小學,高中或新手教師。
The main aim of this study was to investigate two junior high school science teachers’ practical knowledge who were involved in the scientific inquiry teaching context. The focus of this study was to illustrate the component of science teachers’ practical knowledge, the structure of practical knowledge, the factors affecting practical knowledge and formation mechanism of practical knowledge .
A qualitative case study approach was conducted to elicit data needed.Through classroom observations, in-depth interviews and document analysis, data were collected and analysed, research findings were listed as follows:
1.The practical knowledge of the case teachers are formed by the teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about science, teaching, learning, and students.These aspects of teachers’ knowledge are intertwined through the filters and amplifiers of teachers’ beliefs, and shaped by self-knowledge, then be transformed into teachers' personal PCK.
2.The structure of the practical knowledge of the case teachers are guided by their images of scientific inquiry teaching, which formed the practical principles and rules of their teaching practices, informed by ongoing interaction through teachers’ beliefs and instructional reflection, then gradually shape their own science inquiry teaching style.
3.The influence factors of the practical knowledge of the case teachers are emerged by the interweaving of teacher’s personal factors and current milieu of teaching teaching factors. Among them, the growth background, learning experiences and attitude towards education reform are important factors that influence the development of the cases scientific inquiry teaching practical knowledge.
4.The mechanism of the practical knowledge of the case teachers that formed mainly includes the teacher's tacit knowing (learning from experienced teachers, enriching their professional knowledge, learning by doing experience, participating in public lesson syudy, etc.) and the knowledge spiral of the teacher community (through the interaction and application of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, to form a growing knowledge transformation and innovation).
Finally, based on the findings , suggestions for the science teachers to the implement of scientific inquiry teaching, teachers’ professional development and future research. For science teachers to implement scientific inquiry teaching, it is recommended to construct group learning activities, to engage gradually cultivate students' scientific inquiry ability. In terms of teachers’ professional development, pre-service teachers’ education courses emphasize actual practices to improve teaching practical ability, interdisciplinary courses to develop competency-based teaching ability; for enhance the professionalism of primary and secondary school teachers through tacit knowing of personal practical theory, innovate the professional knowledge of primary and secondary school teachers through the knowledge spiral of the teacher community. Future research , including increasing classroom observation time, strengthening the interaction between PCK aspects of exploring the cases, as well as relevance to other levels of practical knowledge, and specific suggestions for research objects that can be extended to elementary, high school, or novice teachers.
壹、中文部分

王文科(1994)。質的教育研究法。臺北:師大書苑。
王錦珍(1994)。國中實習教師社會化之俗民誌研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育系,臺北市。
王靜如(2001)。小學教師科學本質概念及教學之研究。科學教育學刊,9(2),197-217。
王靜如(2003)。科學本質的理論、教學知識與課程設計。論文發表於行政院國家科學委員會舉辦之「自然與生活科技學習領域課程研討會」,臺北市。
王玉麟(2004)。研究倫理與相關議題。教育研究月刊,56,82-88。
王美芬(2006)。自然與生活科技領域的探究教學策略。教育研究月刊,152,45-55。
王為國(2007)。從實務社群談課程發展與教師專業發展。課程研究,2(2),41-63。
王晶瑩(2011)。國際理科教育中科學探究理念的發展路徑。載於香港教育學院亞太科學教育論壇,12(1),文章9。取自
https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v12_issue1/cindex.htm
王雅玄(2012)。透視官方知識之生成:高中「生活科技」教科書政治脈絡分析。教育研究集刊,58(2),109-145。
王鑫(2014)。美國的科學教育計畫與編課本的考量。科學發展,504,66-70。
王金國(2016)。對教育「理論」與「實務」的省思。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(1),92-96。
王金國(2018)。重視學科內容知識與教材分析的能力。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(1),217-222。
王美芬、熊召弟(1995):國民小學自然科教材教法。臺北市:心理。
王靜如、張靜儀(2001)。教師科學本質觀、教學信念與教學實務之研究。屏東師院學報,14,859-898。
王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。
王文科、王智弘(2017)。教育研究法(17版)。臺北市:五南。
王國華、段曉林、張惠博(1998)。國中學生對科學教師學科教學之知覺。科學教育學刊,6(4),363-381。
王靜如、周金燕、蔡瑞芬(2006)。科學本質與科學探究。屏東教大科學教育,23,3-17。 
毛松霖、張菊秀(1997)。探究式教學法與講述式教學法對於國中學生地球科學-氣象單元學習成效之比較。科學教育學刊,5(4),461- 497。
田耐青(2015)。教師以分組合作學習翻轉課堂教學。載於教育部(主編),分組合作學習百寶箱(頁27-42)。臺北市:教育部。
卯靜儒(2015a)。構繪一位歷史教師的教學轉化。課程與教學季刊,18(4),57-83。
卯靜儒(2015b)。解開學習共同體實踐歷程中 教師專業發展的密碼。中等教育,66(1),6-15。
朱幼倩(2009)。國中生學習遺傳學困難的探究-以工作記憶角度切入。載於中華民國科學教育學會舉辦之「中華民國第25屆科學教育學術研討會」論文彙編(頁433-439),臺北市。
池叔樺(2001)。國小低年級教師綜合活動課程的實務知識之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院課程與教學研究所,臺北市。 
阮凱利(2002)。理論與實踐的辯證---國小教師實踐知識之敘說性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院課程與教學研究所,臺北市。 
何秋萱(2005)。Flash融入五階段概念改變教學策略對國中生遺傳概念改變的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學生物學系,彰化市。
李源順(2005)。學生教師運用知識庫學習數學教學:理論與實務的連結。科學教育學刊,13(1),53-70。
李麗君(2005)。師資培育在改變師資生教學信念之意義及其困難與挑戰。教育資料與研究,62,134-143。
李哲迪(2009)。臺灣國中學生在TIMSS 及PISA 的科學學習成果表現及其啟示。研習資訊,26(2),73-88。
李利(2012)。職前教師實踐性知識發展研究(未出版之博士論文)。蘇州大學,江蘇省。
李涵鈺(2015)。再思教與學—日本學習共同體見學有感。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(4),122-127。
李松濤(2006)。科學教師教學決策機制之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所,高雄市。
李松濤(2018)。科學文本與科學閱讀。讀+科學科學閱讀教學36問,12-22。
李源順、林福來(2000)。數學教師的專業成長:教學多元化。師大學報:科學教育類,45(1),1-25。
李逢堅、濮世緯(2014)。國中生學習者角色認同之研究:以臺北市昇學國中為例。教育科學期刊,13(1),1-24。
李美華等(譯)(1998)。Earl Babbie(1996)著。社會科學研究方法(The practiceof social research,8th ed.)。臺北:時英。
李田英、曹博盛、左台益、謝豐瑞、黃福坤、陸健榮、…羅珮華(2008)。中學科學教師之教育學程修習狀況與成效。科學教育月刊,311,2-16。
汪文聖(2001)。現象學方法與理論之反思:一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理學,12,49-76。
余安邦(1999)。九年一貫課程真的是以孩子為中心嗎?教育資料文摘,43(4),74-79。
余民寧(1999)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。臺北市:商鼎。
吳芝儀(2000)。建構論及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法 (頁167-198)。高雄市:麗文。
吳木崑(2009)。杜威經驗哲學對課程與教學之啟示。臺北市立教育大學學報,40(1),35-54。
吳瑞聰(2009)。國小五年級學童科學學習態度與性別角色態度之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學自然科學系,臺北市。 
吳靖國(2010)。質性研究:從理解「人」開始。銘傳教育電子期刊,2,20-34。
吳清山(2017)。素養導向教師教育:理念、挑戰與實踐。學校行政雙月刊,112,14-27。
吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(2008)。M. Q. Patton著。質的評鑑與研究(QualitativeEvaluaion and Research Method)。臺北市:桂冠。
吳心楷、辛靜婷(2011)。數位學習研究中質性資料的管理與分析:以 NVivo軟體的使用為例。載於宋曜廷(主編),數位學習研究方法(頁163-208)。臺北市:高等教育。
佘曉清(1999)。生物教師的教學信念、教學、與師生互動─個案研究。科學教育學刊 ,7(1),35-47 。
沈冠名、彭紫羚(2011)。從教師科學本質觀、教學實務及課室學習環境探討探究教學實施之困境。屏東教大科學教育,34,17-29。
邱美虹(2000)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。
邱憶惠(1999)。個案研究:質化取向。國立高雄師範大學教育系教育研究,7,113-127。
邱憶惠(2002)。國小級任教師知識之個案研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄市。
邱憶惠(2003)。學習取向的教師知識。教育科學期刊,3(1),98-113。
邱珍琬(2003)。一位教師的成長。屏東師院學報,18,193-232。
邱榮章 (2006)。探究教學活動對國中學生「自然與生活科技」科影響之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所,彰化市。
邱懿歆(2013)。國中生化學表徵形成與轉換能力之研究—以『酸、鹼、鹽』單元為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學科學應用與推廣學系,臺中市。
邱憶惠、高忠增(2003)。教師知識之個案研究:以兩位國小級任教師為例。臺中師院學報,17(2),91-112。
邱美虹、周金城(2005)。美國百年科學教育的發展。教育資料與研究雙月刊,64,19-40。 
林秀蓁(1995)。一位國中理化教師實驗室之教學與經營(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所,高雄市。
林天祐(1996)。認識研究倫理。教育資料與研究,12,57-63。
林俊宏(1996)。國中生物實習教師學科教學知識之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所,彰化市。 
林生傳(1993)。實習教師的困擾問題與輔導研究。教育學刊,10,33-103。
林生傳(2003)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。
林樹聲(1999)。科學素養的省思。科學教育月刊,222,16-23。
林進材(1997)。教師教學思考—理論、研究與應用。高雄:復文。
林進材(1999)。教學研究與發展。臺北:五南。
林進材(2000)。有效教學原理—理論與策略。臺北:五南。
林新發(2001)。跨世紀台灣小學教育改革動向:背景、理念與評析。國立台北師範學院學報,14,75-108。
林逢祺(2002)。教材選擇的知識判準。教育研究集刊,48(1),1-33。
林珊如(2002)。知識管理與教育效能:圖書館應有的認識與角色。臺北市立圖書館館訊,19(4),14-23。
林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學主編,質的教育研究方法(頁239-262)。嘉義縣:國立中正大學。
林佩璇(2002a)。教學知識之研究:從研究典範的轉移到整合理解。課程與教學,5(3),17-33。
林佩璇(2002b)。行動研究的知識宣稱:教師實踐知識。國立臺北師範學院學報,15,189-210。
林佩璇(2002c)。學校本位課程評鑑的知識基礎—教師實踐知識。教育研究集刊,48(3),183-210。
林本炫(2007)。不同質性研究方法的資料分析比較。載於周平、楊弘任(主編),質性研究方法的眾聲喧嘩(頁127-150)。嘉義市:南華大學教育社會所。
林柏妤(2011)。臺灣地區國中生學習動機、學習策略、科學態度對學校認同程度與
科學成就的結構方程模式驗證之分析研究:以TIMSS 2007為例(未出版之碩士論文)。臺東大學教育學系教學科技研究所,臺東市。 
林靜雯(2015)。由資深教師與師資生之比較探討科學教師內容知識與教學內容知識之培力。T&D飛訊,208,1-21。
林陳湧、徐毓慧(2002)。國一學生對血糖恆定性的先前概念。科學教育學刊,10(4),373-387。
林美英、趙振瑛(2003)。教室知識管理:以知識螺旋理論增加知識的吸收能量。教學科技與媒體,66,18-35。
林正介、陳祖裕(2010)。社會及行為科學研究相關之基本倫理議題。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(1),19-25。
林樹聲、靳知勤(2012)。國小教師實踐社會性科學議題教學之教師知識成長與比較科學教育學刊,20(1),41-68。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊,3(2),122-136。
林新發、王秀玲、鄧珮秀(2007)。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展望。教育研究與發展期刊,3(1),51- 79。
林淑梤、張惠博、段曉林(2008)。科學實習教師個人實務理論實踐之探究。師大學報:科學教育類,53(2),1-30。
林陳涌、鄭榮輝、張永達(2009)。融入科學史教學對高中學生的 科學本質觀、對
科學的態度 以及學習成就的影響。科學教育學刊,17(2),93-109。
林勇吉、秦爾聰、段曉林(2014)。數學探究之意義初探與教學設計實例。臺灣數學教師,35(2),1-18。
林孟郁、鍾武龍、張月霞(2015)。實踐社群中的知識螺旋:高職教師在開發科學實驗課程的知識轉化。教育實踐與研究,28(2),117-148。
周珮儀(2002)。國小教師解讀教科書的方式。國立台北師範學院學報,15,115-138。
周淑卿(2002a)。誰在乎課程理論?-課程改革中的理論與實務問題。國立臺北師範學院學報,15,1-16。
周淑卿(2002b)。教師與學生在課程發展歷程中的處境─系統論與概念重建論的觀點。教育研究集刊,48(1),133-151。
周淑卿(2004a)。課程發展與教師專業。臺北市:高等教育。
周淑卿(2004b)。教師的課程知識內涵及其對師資教育的意義。課程與教學季刊,7(3),129-142。
周淑卿(2006)。反思實踐者應有的學習經驗。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編)新世紀師資培育的圖像(頁175-192)。臺北市:心理。
周健、霍秉坤(2012)。教學內容知識的定義和內涵。香港教師中心學報,11,145-163。
卓益安、金鈐、邱顯義(2015)。以教學反思探究一位高中資深數學教師教學用數學知識的內涵與適應。課程與教學季刊,18(4),29-56。
郁振華(2001)。波蘭尼的默會認識論。自然辯證法研究,17(8),5-10。
郁振華(2007)。身體的認識論地位—論波蘭尼默會認識論的身體性維度。復旦學報(社會科學版),6,72-80。
郁振華(2012)。人類知識的默會維度。北京:北京大學出版社,.
郁振華、劉靜芳(2005)。論人類知識的默會維度。載於中國邏輯學會舉辦之「第三次金岳霖學術思想研討會」論文集(頁46-50),北京市。
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。
胡德民(2001)。梅洛龐蒂《知覺現象學》中的「視域」(horizon)概念(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學哲學研究所,高雄市。 
胡郁珮(2016)。取徑於SECI知識轉換模式實踐美感教育之初探-以視覺藝術教學為例。臺南大學教育研究學報,50(2),47~72。
胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁141-157)。臺北市:巨流。
姜美玲(2008)。教師實踐性知識研究(未出版之博士論文)。華東師範大學,上海市。
洪文東(1996)。典範式思考與敘述式思考在科學文章閱讀中之關聯性(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所,臺北市。
洪文瓊(1997)。小學國語文「教材分析」深層探究。國教之聲,31(1),1-15。
洪文東(2000)。師院生典範式思考與敘述式思考之取向方式與表徵特性。屏東師院學報,13,251-280。
洪文東(2006)。以創造性問題解決教學活動設計提升學生解決問題能力。科學教育研究與發展,43,26-42。
洪文東(2007)。探究式化學單元教學活動設計與評估:以「水溶液的性質」為例。美和技術學院學報,26(1),15-42。
洪若烈(2003)。國小教師之教科書使用方式及其影響因素之探討。國教學報,15,175-192。
洪振方(1998)。在科學教學的另類選擇:融入科學史教學。屏師科學教育月刊,7,2-10。
洪振方(2003)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報,15,641-662。
洪振方(2016)。化學探究教學。臺灣化學教育,13。取自
https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/a7GtPM
洪振方、謝甫宜(2010)。科學學習成效理論模式的驗證與分析。教育與心理研究,33(3),47-76。
洪志成、洪慧真(2012)。精進教學實務之自我研究:教師PBL教學經驗的學習。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,39,75-106。
柯佳利(2009)。國小教師之生物演化概念(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學科學教育研究所,臺北市。
柯華葳(2013)。為什麼改變。親子天下雜誌。取自
http://www.parenting.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5051345&page=3
段曉林(1995)。學科教學知識對未來科教師資培育上的啟示。載於國立臺中教育大學舉辦之「第一屆數理教學及師資培育學術研討會」論文彙編(頁118-143)。臺中市:臺中教育大學。
段曉林(1996)。職前教師學科教學知識發展之研究(Ι)。行政院國家科學委員會研究成果報告(NSC 84-2513-S-018-003)。彰化市:彰化師大科學教育研究所。
段曉林、靳知勤(2000)。提昇國中理化學習動機之行動研究。行政院國家科學委員會研究成果報告(NSC 89-2511-S-018-030)。彰化市:彰化師大科學教育研究所。
施偉隆(2009)。從現象學的觀點對質性研究的省思。新竹教育大學人文社會學報,2(1),127-152。
施宜煌、賴郁璿(2010)。「教師即陌生人」隱喻對教師教學的啟示。當代教育研究季刊,18(1),111-145。
范信賢、黃茂在(2003)。課程改革中教師關心什麼?—教師敘說的探究。國教學報,15,149-174。
高強華(1996)。師資培育問題研究。臺北:師大書苑。
高敬文(1999)。質化研究的另類思考。載於國立中正大學教育研究所(主編),教育學研究方法(頁15-19)。高雄市:麗文。
高敬文(2002)。 質化研究方法論。臺北:師大書苑。
高淑清(2000)。現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於國立中正大學教育研究所(主編),質的研究方法(頁93-134)。高雄市:麗文。
高淑清(2002)。教育研究(二)質性教育研究。載於楊國賜(主編),新世紀的教育學概論:科技整合導向(頁517-575)。臺北市:學富。
高寶玉(2018)。香港自主學習的探索:融合東西方理念的嘗試。課程研究,13 (1),29-53。
韋寧均(2005)。新竹縣國中學生有關生物演化概念的世界觀傾向之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所,嘉義市。
韋冬餘(2015)。論施瓦布科學探究教學的基本內涵。全球教育展望,4,28-35。
郭玉霞(1997)。教師的實務知識:一個國民小學初任教師的個案研究。高雄:復文。
郭生玉(2001)。心理與教育研究法。臺中:精華。
郭重吉(2018)。從實務理論初探教學實務模型的發展與應用。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,11(3),31-59 。
郭人仲、徐順益、王國華(1995)。國中生物概念的類比學習之研究。科學教育,6,51-68。
陳姍姍(1993)。國三學生酸鹼概念之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學化學研究所,臺北市。
陳美玉(1996)。教師專業實踐理論與應用。臺北市:師大書苑。
陳美玉(2003)。從實踐知識論觀點看師資生的專業學習與發展。教育資料集刊,28,77-107。
陳美玉(2004)。合作發展經驗教師專業實踐理論之研究。師大學報,49(1),123-138。
陳美玉(2006)。從內隱知識的觀點論教師學習與專業發展。課程與教學季刊,9(3),1-13。
陳伯璋(2001)。學校本位課程發展與行動研究。載於中華民國課程與教學學會(主編)行動研究與課程教學革新(頁33-48)。臺北市:揚智。
陳國泰(2000)。國小初任教師實際知識發展之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄市。
陳國泰(2006)。國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師實務知識的發展之個案研究。國立臺北教育大學學報,19(2),31-64。
陳國泰(2011)。反省取向的「二階段集中實習課程」對國小師資生實務知識發展的影響。教育實踐與研究, 24(1),25-66。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。
陳向明(2003)。實踐性知識:教師專業發展的知識基礎。北京大學教育評論,1(1),104-112。
陳向明(2011)。搭建實踐與理論之橋:教師實踐性知識研究。北京市:教育科學。
陳均伊(2006)。以合作專業成長模式協助二位科學教師實施探究教學之個案研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所,彰化市。
陳琇姿(2006)。合作學習對國一學生學習動機與學習成就之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所,彰化市。 
陳建榮(2006)。電影融入教學於國小生命教育課程教學模式之設計與應用(未出版之碩士論文)。私立淡江大學,新北市。
陳桂香(2007)。實施探究教學對國二學生科學學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所,彰化市。 
陳美如(2006)。教師的課程理解探究。國立臺北教育大學學報,19(2),55-82。
陳美華(2007)。身體活動、自我概念和自尊關係之文獻回顧。臺灣運動心理學報,11,17-39。
陳均伊(2010)。教師專業成長之個案研究:一位國中自然教師探究教學觀點的轉變。教育科學研究期刊,55(2),233-264 。
陳仲翰(2011)。教師專業倫理發展在師資培育過程上之意義。教育資料與研究雙月刊,103,69-90。
陳竹亭(2015)。課程發展是教改背水一戰的契機—揪團做課程設計發展。載於張昭鼎研討會「十二年國教科學課程的深耕與活化」(頁112-135)。臺北市:中央研究院。
陳琦媛(2017)。問題本位學習法(PBL)於師資職前教育課程運用之初探。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(10),70-77。
陳世文(2018a)。跨越科學與文學的文本閱讀。科學研習,57,4-9。
陳世文(2018b)。「閱讀」科學教科書。讀+科學科學閱讀教學36問,23-35。
陳美玲、王淑琴(2004)。小而美的開放性探究實驗:一個可融入國中浮力單元課室教學的活動。行政院國家科學委員會科教處研究計畫(NSC 92-2522-S-018-002)。彰化市:彰化市:國立彰化師範大學。
陳毓凱、洪振方(2007)。兩種探究取向教學模式之分析與比較。科學教育月刊,305,4-19。
陳均伊、張惠博(2008)。一位化學老師實施探究教學的歷程與省思之個案研究:以「火山爆發」教學活動為例。師大學報,53(2),91-123。
陳鏗任、蔡曉楓(2012)。以科學探究精神開展通識教育:Schwab在芝加哥大學的超越與實踐。教育研究集刊,58(2),71-108。
陳靜靜、鍾啟泉(譯)(2016)。佐藤學著(2010)。教師花傳書:專家型教師的成長。上海市:華東師範大學出版社。
陳佳香、陳世欽、蘇偉成(2005)。隱性知識初探。水試專訊,10,36-39。
陳慧蓉、林宜如、邱美虹(2005)。2000-2004年SSCI中科學教育期刊內容分析。教育資料與研究雙月刊,64,119-138。
孫志麟(2001)。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係—實徵取向的分析。國立台北師範學院學報,14,109-140。
孫志麟(2003)。教師專業成長的另類途徑:知識管理的觀點。國立臺北師院學院學報,16(1), 229-252。
徐雅萍(2005)。教師的個人理論解讀-基於默會知識的理解。教育發展研究,20,73-77。
徐偉民(2013)。國小教師數學教科書使用之初探。科學教育學刊,21(1),25-48。
陸靜塵、李子建(2011)。學校情境中的教師實踐知識—敍事探究和民族志研究方法的視角。香港教師中心學報,10,51-60。
教育部(2002)。媒體素養教育政策白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2003a)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要–自然與生活科技領域。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2003b)。科學教育白皮書。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱。臺北市:作者。 
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:作者。 
教育部(2017)。 教育部辦理十二年國教課綱:教師公開授課與教學精進研習手冊。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2018a)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校
–自然科學領域。臺北市:作者。 
教育部(2018b)。中華民國教師專業素養指引─師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育
課程基準。臺北市:作者。
教育部、國家教育研究院(2012)。國小高年級自然與生活科技領域科學閱讀資源集。
臺北市:作者。
許美華(2004)。教師知識對學生學習之影響。研習資訊,21(3),84-95。
許澤民(譯)(2004)。Michael Polanyi著(1958)。個人知識:邁向後批判哲學(Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy)。臺北市:商周。
許良榮、王瓏真(2003)。中小學生對物質「燃燒」的迷思概念之研究。科學教育研究與發展專刊,1-17。
許良榮、蔣盈姿(2005)。以POE策略探究中小學生對物質「可燃性」的另有概念。科學教育研究與發展季刊,38,17-30。
許孟琪、蔡明昌(2009)。國小教師教育信念及其生命態度關係之探討。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,41(1),91-110。
張鈿富(1992)。教育專業問題與展望。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),教育專業(頁 349-365)。臺北市:師大書苑。
張芬芬(1984)。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意願之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所,臺北市。
張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
張惠博(1993)。邁向科學探究的實驗教學。教師天地,62,12-20。
張靜儀(1995)。自然科探究教學法。屏師科學教育,1,36-45。
張春興(1994)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張春興(2007)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐(重修二版)。臺北市:東華。
張國恩(2002)。從學習科技的發展看資訊融入教學的內涵。北縣教育,41,16-25。
張佩瑛、蔣治邦(2000)。課堂內師生問答互動之研究:國小數學課問答互動中教師教學信念與教學處理的關係。教育與心理研究,23(上),99-122。
張容君、周進洋(2001):發展二段式紙筆測驗探討國中學生「燃燒」概念。載於中華民國科學教育學會舉辦之「中華民國第十六屆科學教育學術研討會」論文彙
編(頁283-308)。臺北市:中華民國科學教育學會。
張瀚中、陳均伊(2010)。融入閱讀策略於科學探究教學中新住民子女的閱讀策略表現。科學教育研究與發展季刊,58,33-64。
張世忠、蔡孟芳、陳鶴元(2012)。國中科學教師的學科教學知識與科學教學導向之探討。科學教育學刊,20(5),413-433。
張育誠、吳鴻昌、李清潭(2015)。意義、脈絡、反身性:質性研究的科學性與正當性。商略學報,7(2),71-88。
張新仁、王金國、田耐青、汪履維、林美惠、黃永和(2014)。學生分組合作學習經驗問卷的編製與信效度。載於教育部(主編),分組合作學習百寶箱(頁11-12)。
臺北市:教育部。
國家教育研究院(2015)。十二年國民基本教育自然科學領域課程綱要-草案。新北市:作者。
康軒文教事業(2019)。國中自然與生活科技課本(一下)。新北市:康軒。
彭淮棟(譯)(1985)。Michael Polanyi著。博藍尼講演集:人之研究‧科學、信仰與社會‧默會致知。臺北市:聯經。
湯仁燕(2005)。Paulo Freire批判解放導向的課程觀點及其啟示。課程與教學季刊,8(4),57-76。
符碧真(2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育:國立臺灣大學「探究式—素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),59-87。
符碧真、黃源河(2016)。實地學習:銜接師資培育理論與實務的藥方?教育科學研究期刊,61(2),57-84。
黃政傑(1996)。質的教育研究:方法與實例。臺北市:漢文。
黃瑞琴﹙1999﹚。質的教育研究方法﹙二版﹚。臺北市:心理出版社。
黃光雄主譯(2001)。R. C. Bogdan & S. K. Biklen著。質性教育研究入門:理論與方法(Qualitative research for education:An introduction to theory and methods, 3rd
ed.)。嘉義市:濤石。
黃德祥(2002)。青少年發展與輔導。臺北市:五南。
黃騰(2005)。從「角色」到「自我」:論教師改變的歷史困境與可能。教育研究集刊,51(4),89-116。
黃儒傑(2008)。教師教學思考的負荷、社會支持及其教學表現:以臺中縣市幼稚園為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報,40(1),85-106。
黃冠閔(2009)。觸覺中的身體主體性 - 梅洛龐蒂與昂希。臺大文史哲學報,71,147-183。
黃源河(2010)。熔合斷裂:搭起師資培育理論與實務鴻溝的橋樑。當代教育研究季刊,18(4),1-40。
黃龍欽(2015)。高中英文典範教師實務知識探究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中市。 
黃俊儒(2016)。從科普閱讀談科學素養。科學研習月刊,55(11),52-56。
黃源河、符碧真(2010)。芬蘭師資培育:研究為基礎的派典與課程實踐。教育研究集刊,56(3),105-137。
黃茂在、陳文典(2011)。科學閱讀的想法與實例探討。教育研究月刊,210,85-97。
黃郁倫、鐘啟泉譯(2012)。學習的革命-從教室出發的教育改革。佐藤學著。臺北市:親子天下。
黃茂在、吳敏而(2016)。探索十二年國教自然科學教科書的設計原則:以「熱傳播」單元為例。教科書研究,9(2),69-100。
黃平屯、郭重吉、張惠博(2016)。理化教師學科教學知識的探討-以酸鹼中和為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(1),83-114。
黃台珠、鄭世暖、林明輝、蘇懿生、張學文、趙大衛(1994)。國中生物遺傳教學的
改進研究。高雄師大學報,5,113-135。
莊雪芳、鄭湧涇(2003)。國中學生對生物學的態度與學習環境之研究。科學教育學
刊,11(2),171-194。
單文經(2015)。杜威教材通論評析。教科書研究,8(1),63-108。
童鈺能(2011)。探究國一學生對生物課程的學習興趣、學習動機與學業成就間之關
連(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所,臺北市。
傅秉康(2013)。波蘭尼的默會認識理論對教學理論的貢獻。取自
http://commons.ln.edu.hk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1415&context=mcsln
曾崇賢、段曉林、靳知勤(2011)。探究教學的專業成長歷程─以十位國中科學教師的觀點為例。科學教育學刊,19(2),143-168。
曾千純、段曉林、溫媺純、秦爾聰、王國華(2012)。研究「探究師資培育計畫」對中學科學/數學教師探究教學效能的影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊,64,27-58。
楊深坑(1998)。理論詮釋與實踐:教育學方法論論文集(甲輯)。臺北市:師大書苑。
楊深坑(1999)。知識形式與比較教育。臺北市:揚智。
楊蘭映(2007)。國小教師教學中默會知識發展之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。南華大學教育社會學研究所,嘉義縣。
楊森陸(2007)。科學教師經由對學生學習困難的覺知以以改進教學之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學科學應用與推廣學系,臺中市。
楊宏琪(2013)。獨學不如共學:學習共同體對同儕審查的啟示。臺灣教育評論月刊,2(9),24-26。
楊子江、王美音(譯)(2000)。Nonaka,I. & Takeuchi,H.著。創新求勝:智價企業論(The knowledge creation: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of
innovation)。臺北市:遠流。
楊坤原、張賴妙理(2005)。問題本位學習的理論基礎與教學歷程。中原學報,33(2),215-235。
楊秀停、王國華(2007)。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊,15(4),439-459。
楊雲龍、徐慶宏(2007)。社會學習領域教師轉化教科書之研究。國立新竹教育大學教育學報,24(2),1-26。
楊薇、郭玉英(2008)。PCK對美國科學教師教育的影響及啟示。當代教師教育,1(3),6-10。
楊俊鴻、蔡清田(2010)。課程研究的下一個世代。課程研究,5(2),163-174。
葉天喜(2004)。落實綜合活動課程本質之個案研究-以一所國民小學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所,臺中市。
葉文傑(2006)。從哲學詮釋學的實踐智慧觀點論「懂得如何操作」與「自我理解」的教育經驗本質。教育與社會研究,11,1-22。
葉俐君(2009)。影片引導教學對國小資優生利社會行為和情緒表現之成效(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
鄒川雄(2008)。經典詮釋與默會身心狀態:一個「本土化」經典詮釋學的初步嘗試。載於真理大學舉辦之「宗教經典詮釋方法與應用學術研討會」(頁53-82),新北市:真理大學。
賀靜(2014)。關於質性研究中倫理問題的思考。才智,14,298-301。
靳知勤(2007)。科學教育應如何提升學生科學素養。科學教育學刊,15(6),627-646。
賈利軍、薛艷、徐韶(2008)。緘默知訊視角下就業能力開發。南京師大學報(社會科學版),4,113-120。
詹棟樑(2005)。教師的專業倫理與專業精神。教育研究月刊,132,11-17。
詹耀宗、邱鴻麟(2004)。以多元觀點探討中學生氧化還原迷思概念。高雄師大學報,17,337-358。
甄曉蘭(2001)。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學, 4(1),1-20。
甄曉蘭(2003)。教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊,49(1),63-94。
甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務:解構與重建。臺北市:高等教育。
鄭湧涇(1982)。皮亞傑認知發展與生物科學習的關係。科學教育月刊,51,23-27。
鄭湧涇(1987)。生物教育的新理念。科學教育月刊,206,84-88。
鄭豐順(1997):國中學生燃燒概念之診斷與探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學化學研究所,臺北市。
鄭明長(2005)。教師實務知識與專業成長。教育科學期刊,5(2):126-137。
鄭瑞洲、洪振方、黃台珠(2011)。情境興趣:制式與非正式課程科學學習的交會點。科學教育月刊,340,2-10。

鄭嘉惠、楊芳瑩、連筱萍、洪逸文(2019)。科學課室教學之教師提問模式分析:以
地球科學課室為例。科學教育學刊,27(3),167-184。
潘慧玲(1999a)。教育研究在教育決策中的定位與展望。理論與政策,12(2),1-15。
潘慧玲(計畫主持人)(1999b)。國中教師的知識探究(II):理論與實踐的辯證。國科會專案報告(NSC 87-2413-H-003-005)。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學。
潘淑滿(2006)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北:心理。
潘菁瑩(2010)。國中自然與生活科技教科書中科學史內容分析之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學數理教育研究所,新竹市。
歐用生(1989)。教學方法的新趨勢(上)。教與愛,24,7-9。
歐用生(1995)。質的研究。臺北:師大書苑。
歐用生(2000)。新學校的建立-九年一貫的展望。學校行政,7,3-7。
歐用生(2003)。誰能不在乎課程理論?教師課程理論的覺醒。教育資料集刊,28,373–387。
歐用生(2008)。教師是陌生人:「看見」不一樣的教師。國民教育,48(4),15-22。
歐用生(2012)。教師的課程理論化:從詩性智慧到A/r/t。香港中文大學教育學報,40(1-2),15-30。
歐陽鍾仁(1987)。科學教學的過程。臺北市:幼獅。
趙志成(2007)。有效教學策略的應用。取自
https://www.hkier.cuhk.edu.hk/document/OP/SOP43.pdf
熊召弟(1996)。建構者觀的自然科教學。科學教育研究與發展,3,3-11。
蔡敏玲(2001)。尋找教室團體互動的節奏與變奏:教育質性研究歷程的展現。臺北市:桂冠。
蔡坤鴻(譯)(1989)。Popper, K. R.著。臆測與駁斥─科學知識的成長(Conjecturesand refutations:The growth of scientific knowledge)。臺北市:幼獅文化。
蔡銘修、楊雅清(2016)。運用影片輔助教學對國中學生理化課程學習感受之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(10),102-106。
蔡執仲、段曉林(2005)。探究式實驗教學對國二學生理化學習動機之影響。科學教育學刊,13(3),289-315。
蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤(2007)。巢狀探究教學模式對國二學生理化學習動機影響之探討。科學教育學刊,2007,15(2),119-144。
劉湘瑤(2016)。科學探究的教學與評量。科學研習,55(2),5-11。
劉宏文、張惠博(2001)。高中學生進行開放式探究活動之個案研究 − 問題的形成與解決。科學教育學刊,9(2),169-196。 
劉佩雲、沈羿成(2013)。案例討論與教學實作促進教學後設認知改變之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,6(2),21-44 。
賴秀芬(2003)。國中英語專家教師實務知識之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義縣。 
賴光真(2017)。課程實施觀點新論。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(11),35-40。
翰林出版社(2019)。國中自然與生活科技課本(二下)。臺北市:翰林。
盧姍姍、畢華林(2015)。從科學探究到科學實踐:科學教育的觀念轉變。教育科學研究,1,65-70。
盧秀琴、徐于婷(2016)。國小師資生在自然領域的專業成長─以探究式教學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,9(1),115-142 。
鍾聖校(2003)。質性研究資料處理的舊曲及新調:巢狀方格分析。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(1),273-296。
鍾榮進(2014)。學科教學知識之呈現:以一位國小社會領域教師為例。新竹教育大學教育學報,31(1),1-46。
謝立倫(2005)。探討日常用語對科學名詞的運用之干擾現象:以國中生的理化學習為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學物理學系,臺北市。
簡紅珠(1992a)。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探討。高雄市:復文。
簡紅珠(1992b)。教學研究的趨勢。載於黃光雄主編,教學原理(增訂七版)(頁423-449)。臺北市:師大書苑。
簡紅珠(1996)。國小專家與新手教師的班級管理實作與決定之研究。教育研究資訊,4(4),36-48。
簡紅珠(1998)。教師教學決定、內涵、思考歷程與影響因素-兼談如何改進教學決定技能。課程與教學季刊,1(4),43-56。
簡紅珠(2002)。教師知識的不同詮釋與研究方法。課程與教學季刊,5(3),1-16。
簡紅珠(2007)。證據本位與教學研究。課程與教學季刊,10(2),53-64。
簡頌沛、吳心楷(2010)。探討教學歷程中信念、知識與實務的相互 影響:一位高中實習教師的個案研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊,56,75-104。
藍治平、簡秀玲、張永達(2002)。教學表徵多樣化的理論與應用:以國中生物「遺傳」的概念為例。科學教育月刊,248,41-54。
顏靜筠(2015)。國小教師身分認同之敘事探究:不同師資培育背景教師的經驗故事(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系,臺北市。
蘇宏仁(1996):科教課程模式--科學、技學、社會(STS)之探討研究。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育,190,2-12。
蘇懿生、黃台珠(1998)。對科學的態度:一個有待研究的問題。科學教育月刊,215,2-13。
鐘啟泉(譯)(2003)。課程與教師。佐藤學原著(2003)。教育科學出版社。
鐘建坪(2010)。引導式建模探究教學架構初探。科學教育月刊,328,2-18。
饒見維(1994)。知識場論:認知、思考與較育的統合理論。臺北市:五南。
饒見維(2001)。九年一貫課程與教師專業角色的省思。教師天地,113,7-13。
顧炳宏、陳瓊森、溫媺純(2011)。從學生的表現與觀點探討引導發現式教學作為發展探究教學之折衷方案角色的成效─以密度概念為例。科學教育學刊,19(3),257-282。

貳、英文部分

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R.,Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R.,
Hofstein,A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H.(2004). Inquiry in science education:
International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397-419.
Abd Rahman, F., & Scaife, J. A. (2006). Assessing preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge using a ‘bricolage’ approach. The International Journal of
Learning, 12(10), 81-92.
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G.
Lederman (Eds.),Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Abell, S.K. (2008). Twenty years later: does pedagogical content knowledge remain a
useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1405-1416.
Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing against culture. In R.G. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing
anthropology: Working in the present(pp.466-478). Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of
American Research Press.
Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and
developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Person, & R.
Barr (eds.), Handbook of Reading Research(PP.285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Smallgroup discussion in physics: Peer Interaction
modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science, 33, 1009-1114.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Science for all Americans:
A project 2061 report on scientific literacy goals in science, mathematics, and
technology. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science
literacy. New York,NY: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.

Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an orga nizing theme for science curricula. In S. K.
Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp.
807-830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. A. (1993). Education still under siege. Westport,CT: Bergin
& Garvey.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and
learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple
perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-104). London,UK: Ablex
Publishing.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Barrett,T. (2005). Understanding problem -based learning. Retrieved from
http://www.aishe.org/readings/ 2005-2/chapter2.pdf
Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Deway to Standards. Journal of
Science Teacher Education, 17, 265-278.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief
overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3-11.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. H. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to
medical education. New York,NY: Spring.
Bateson, G. (1983). Steps to An Ecology of Mind. Chicago,IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Beattie, M. (1995). New prospects for teacher education: Narrative ways of knowing
teaching and teacher learning. Educational Research, 37(1), 53-71.
Ben-David, A., & Zohar, A. (2009). Contribution of meta-strategic knowledge to
Scientific inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12),
1657-1682.
Ben-Peretz, M. (1984). Curriculum theory and practice in teacher education programs.
In L. G. Katz & J. D. Raths (Eds.), Advances in Teacher Education, 1, 9-27.
Ben-Peretz, M. (1995). Learning from Experiences:Memory and the Teacher’s Account
of Teaching; Albany, NY: Basic Books.
Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (1996). Assessing teachers’ practical knowledge. Studies in
Educational Evaluation, 22 (3), 275-286.

Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Education Research, 35, 463-482.
Berry, D. C. (1987). The Problem of Implicit Knowledge. Expert Systems, 4(3), 144-150.
Beswick, K. (2007). Teachers’ beliefs that matter in secondary mathematics classrooms.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65, 95-120.
Bloom, B.S., Engelahar, M. D., Frust, E.J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D.R.(1956).
Taxonomy of Educational Objective,Handbook1:Cognitive Domain. New York:David
McKay.
Branch, J. L., & Oberg, D. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to Implementing
inquiry-based learning. Edmonton, Conada: Alberta Learning.
Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their
relationships to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53-62.
Brown, C. A., & Cooney, T. J. (1982). Research on teacher education: A philosophical
orientation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15(4), 13-18.
Buchmann, M. (1983). Argument and conversation as discourse models of language use.
(Occasional Paper No. 68). East Lansing,MI: Michigan State University, Institute for
Research on Teaching.
Bybee, R.W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds.),
Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American
Association for the Advancement of Science.
Bybee, R.W., & Landes, N.M. (1988). The biological science curriculum study (BSCS).
Science and Children, 25(8), 36-37.
Calderhead, J. (1988) . The development of knowledge structure in learning to teach.In J.
Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ Professional Learning (pp. 51-64). London, UK:Falmer.
Calderhead, J., & Gates, P. (1993). Conceptual reflection in teacher development.
London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.),
Handbook of research on Teacher Education(pp291-310).New York,NY: Macmillan.
Carter, K., & Doyle, W. (1989). Classroom as a resource for the graduate preparation of
teachers. In A. E. Woolfolk (Ed.), Research perspectives on the graduate
preparation of teachers (pp. 51-68). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.


Carrington, S., Deppeler, J., & Moss, J. (2010). Cultivating teachers' beliefs, knowledge
and skills for leading change in schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,
35(1), 1-13.
Chang, W. Y. (2010). Taiwanese elementary students' motivation and attitudes Toward
learning English in English Village Program in Kaohsiung County (Doctoral
dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI
No.3437606)
Chase, C., & Gibson, H. L. (2002). Longitudinal impact of inquiry-based science
program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science.Science Education,
86(5), 693-705.
Chi, M. T. H.(2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some
misconceptions are robust. The journal of the Learning Science, 14(2), 161-199.
Ching, C. P. (2014). Linking theory to practice: A case-based approach in teacher
Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 280-288.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1425
Chin, C, & Chia, L. (2004). Implementing project work in Biology through
problem-based learning. Journal of Biology Education, 38(2), 69-75.
Choo, C. W. (2000). Working With Knowledge: How Information Professionals Help
Organizations Manage What They Know. Library Management, 21, 8/9,395-403.
CIRES (2010). Education Outreach Program. Retrieved from
http://cires.colorado.edu/education/outreach/rescipe/collection/inquirystandards.
html
Clandinin, D. J. (1983). A conceptualization of images as a component of teachers
personal practical knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of
Toronto.
Clandinin, D, J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teacher's classroom
images. Curriculum Inquiry,15(4),361-385.
Clandinin, D. J.(1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images on action. New York , NY:
Falmer.
Clandinin, D. J.(1992). Narrative and story in teacher education. In T. Russell & H.
Munby (Eds.) Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection,124-137.
London,UK: Falmer.

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson
(Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York ,
NY:Macmillan.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M.(1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge
landscapes.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.),
Handbook ofresearch on teaching (2nd ed., pp.255-296). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional
growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing:
An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4),
263-272.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. ( 1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and
knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of Knowledge and Practice:
Teacher Learning in Communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
Connelly, F.M. (1972). The functions of curriculum development. Interchange, 3(2-3),
161 -177. 
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives
of experience. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry.
Educational Researcher. 19(5), 2-14.
Connelly, F. M. ,Clandinin, D. J. & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers' personal knowledge on
the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7),
665-674.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of
Chicago Press.
Collins, H. & Pinch, T. (1994). The germs of dissent: Louis Pasteur and the origins of
life. In The Golem: what everyone should know about science. Cambridge:
Cambridge university press.
Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In Zimmerman, B. J., &
Schunk, D. K. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and Academic Achievement:
Theoretical perspectives (pp. 191-287). Mahwah, NJ: Elbaum.
Cornett, J. W., Yeotis, C., & Terwilliger, L. (1990). Teacher personal practical theories
and their influence upon teacher curricular and instructional actions: A case study of
a secondary science teacher. Science Education, 74, 517-529.
Cotton, K. (1988). Classroom questioning. School improvement research series, 3.
Retrieved from https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/resources/classroom-questioning-508.pdf
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry as inquiry in the rough and
tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 613-642.
David Hales (2010).An Introduction to Triangulation. UNAIDS Monitoring and
Evaluation Fundamentals series.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote
teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice.
New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. In L. Hickman (Ed.), The Collected Works of John
Dewey, 1882-1953( Electronic Edition, pp.177-356). Charlottesville, VA: Intelex
Corp.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to
the educative process. In L. Hickman (Ed.), The Collected Works of John Dewey,
1882-1953 ( Electronic Edition, pp.107-352). Charlottesville, VA: Intelex Corp.
Dick, W. (1997). Better Instructional design theory: process improvement or
reengineering? Educational Technology, 37(5), pp.47-50.
Dochy, F., Moerkerke, G., & Marten, R. (1996). Integrating assessment, learning and
instruction: Assessment of domain-specific and domain-transcending prior
knowledge and program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22, 309-339.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and Management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),
Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 205-234). New York,
NY:Macmillan.
Duffee. L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher
practical knowledge. Science Education, 76(5), 493-506.
Dyer,W. G. Jr.,&Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate
better theory: A rejoinder to eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review,16(3),
613-619.
Edgar, D. E., & Blod R. L. (1969). Professional socialization and teacher autonomy.
Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching.
Eick, C. J. & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher?
The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice.
Science Education, 86, 401-416.
Eisner, E. W. (1985). The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. London, UK:
The Falmer Press.
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of
school programs. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1996). Cognition and curriculum: Reconsidered(2nd ed.). London, UK:
Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press. 
Elbaz, F. (1981). The teacher’s practical knowledge: Report of a case study. Curriculum
Inquiry, 11(1), 43-71.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher Thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York, NY:
Nichols.
Erickson, H. L., Lanning, L. A., & French, R. (2017). Concept-based curriculum and
instruction for the thinking classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Ernst-Slavit, G., & Pratt, K. L. (2017). Teacher questions: Learning the discourse science
in a linguistically diverse elementary classroom. Linguistics and Education, 40,
1-10.doi:10.1016/j.linged.2017.05.005
Featherstone, H. (1992). Learning from the first years of classroom teaching: The journey
in, the journey out. Teachers College Record, 95, 93-112.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Floden, R. (1986). The cultures of teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.).
Handbook of research on teaching, (PP.505-526). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Fernandez, C. ( 2014). Knowledge base for teaching and pedagogical content Knowledge
(PCK): Some useful models and implications for teachers’ training. Problems of
education in the 21st century, 60, 79-100.

Flick, L. B. & Lederman, N. G. (2002). The value of teaching reading in the context of
science and mathematics. School Science and Mathemtics, 102 (3), 106-107.
Flick, L. B. & Lederman, N. G. (2004). Scientific inquiry and nature of science:
Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Ford, M. J., & Wargo B. M. (2007). Routines, roles, and responsibilities for aligning
scientific and classroom practices. Science Education, 91, 133-157.
Freire, P. (1970, 2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed.. New York, NY: Continuum..
Fullan, M. (1993). Innovation, reform, and restructuring strategies. In G. Cawelti (Ed.),
Challenges and achievements of American education. ASCD 1993 Yearbook.
Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Fullan, M. (1998). The meaning of educational change: a quarter of a century of learning.
In A. Hargreaves, A.Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International
Handbook of Educational Change, Part I (pp.214-228). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific
inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 452-467.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1982). Reason in the age of science. Trans. by F. G. Lawrence.
Cambridge,MA.: MIT Press.
Gage, N. L.(Ed.).(1963). Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Geiger, G. R. (1964). John Dewey in perspective: A reassessment. New York, NY:
McGrawhill.
Gengarelly, L. M., & Abrams, E. D. (2009). Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and
the secondary science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology,
18, 74-84.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Carlson J. (2013). The PCK summit consensus model and
definition of pedagogical content knowledge.In Reports from the Pedagogical
Content Knowledge (PCK) Summit, ESERA Conference.
Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science
Program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education,
86, 693-705.
Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning.
New York, NY: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H. (1994). Teachers, public life, and curriculum reform. Peabody Journal of
Education, 69(3), 35-47.
Glen, S., & Willie, K. (2000). Problem-based learning in nursing-a new model for a new
context. Hampshire, England: Macmillan.
Goodlad, J.J. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York,
NY: McGraw-Hill.
Grant, G. E.(1991). Ways of constructing classroom meaning:two stories about
and seeing. Journal Curriculum Studies, 23(5), 397-408.
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American
Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as stranger: Educational philosophy for the modern age.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Compary, Inc.
Greene, M. (1974). Cognition, consciousness, and curriculum. In W. Pinar (Ed.),
Heightened consciousness, cultural revolution, and curriculum theory (pp.
69-84).Berkeley, CA: MeCutchan.
Grossman, P. L. (1988). A study of contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge
for secondary English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Stanford University, CA.
Grossman, p. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher
education. New York, NY: Teachers college press.
Grossman, P. L. (1995). Teachers' knowledge. In L. Anderson (ED.), International
encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education . Cambridge, UK: Pergamon.
Grossman, P. L., & Richert, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A
reexamination of the influence of teacher education. Teaching and teacher education,
4(1), 53-62.
Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject
matter knowledge for teaching. In M.C. Reynolds(Ed.), Knowledge base for the
beginning teacher (pp.23-36). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Grouws, D. A., & Koehler, M. S. (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their
effects. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching
and learning (pp.115-126). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis? London,UK: The Falmer Press.
Gunstone, R. F. (1999). Content knowledge, reflection, and their intertwining: A response
to the paper set. Science Education, 83(3), 393-396.
Gunstone, R. F., & Mitchell, I. J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J.
J.Mintzes,J. H. Wandersee & J. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding:
A human constructivist view (pp. 133-163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and Practice. ( J. Viertel, Trans.) Boston, MA: Beacon
Press.
Hansen, L. M. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the
Science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.
Hargreaves, D. H. (2000). The production, mediation and use of professional knowledge
among teachers and doctors: a comparative analysis. In Center for Educational
Research and Innovation (Ed.).Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris,
France: OECD.
Hattie,J.(2012).Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York,
NY: Routledge.
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition:
Classroom-based factors that support and inhabit high-level mathematical thinking
and reasoning. Journal Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524-549.
Helmes, J., & Stokes, L. (2013). A meeting of minds around Pedagogical Content
Knowledge: designing an international PCK summit for professional, community,
and field development. Retrieve from
http://www.inverness-research.org/reports/2013-05_Rpt-PCK-Summit-Eval-final_03-2013.pdf
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations.
Educational Psychology Review, 13, 191-209.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., &Stigler, J. W.(2002). A Knowledge Base for the Teaching
Profession: What Would It Look Like and How Can We Get One? Educational
Researcher, 31 (5), 3-15.
Hinrichsen, J., & Jarrett, D. (1999). Science inquiry for the classroom: A literature
review. Portland,OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?
Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. doi:10.1023/
B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science
Review,70(256), 33-40.
Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues
relating of integration in science and science education.International Journal of
Science Education,14(5), 541-562.
Hofer, B. K. (2006). Motivation in the college classroom. In W. J. McKeachie, & M.
Svinicki (Eds.), McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and Theory for
college and university teachers (12th ed.)(pp. 140-150). Boston,MA : Houghton
Mifflin.
Huang, Y. P. (2014). University instructors’ use of English as a medium of instruction in
Taiwan:Functions of contextual beliefs. Hwa Kang English Journal, 20, 27-66.
doi:10.3966/221880882014122001002
Hurd, P. D. (1997). Inventing science education foe the new millennium. New York and
London: Teacher College, Columbia University.
Jackson, P.W.(1986). The practice of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Jarrett, D.(1997).Inquiry strategies for science and mathematics learning. Portland,
OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Jan H. van Driel, Douwe Beijaard, Nico Verloop (2001). Professional development
andreform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional
development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 668-690.
Jesus, S. N., & Paixao, M. P. (1996). The “Reality Schock” of the beginning teachers.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 402277).
Johnson, M. (1969). The Translation of Curriculum into Instruction. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, 1(2), 115-131.
Johnson D. W., & Johnson R.T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative,
competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. First edition,
1975.
Jones, K. A., & Jones, J. L. (2008). Making cooperative learning work in the college
classroom: An application of the “five pillars” of cooperative learning to
post-secondary instruction. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 8(2), 61–76.
Retrieved from http://uncw.edu/cte/ET/ articles/Vol8_2/Jones.pdf

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational
Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
Kanari, Z.,& Millar, R.(2004). Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret
data in science investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 748-769.
Kass, A., Burke, R., Blevis, E., & Williamson, M. (1993,1994). Constructing learning
environments for complex social skills. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4),
387-427.
Kearney, M., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. G. (2001). Student and teacher
perceptions of the use of multimedia supported Predict-Observe-Explain tasks to
probe understanding. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 589-615.
Keller.J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),
Instructional design theories and models : An overview of their current status.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance : the ARCS
Model Approach. Boston, MA : Springer.
Keys, C.W., & Bryan, L.A. (2001) Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers:
Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 38, (6),
631-645.
Keys, C. W. & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in
context: a case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher
Education, 10, 315-333.
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of
teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational
Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368. doi:10.2307/1163313
Koskinen, K.U., Pihlanto, Pekka & Vanharanta,H.(2003). Tacit knowledge
acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of
Project Management, 21, 281-290.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M. & Berger, C. F. (1998).Teaching Science in Elementary
and Middle School Classrooms. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (2000). Instructional, curricular,
and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms. In J. Minstrell & E.
H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp.
283315). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of
Science Press.
Kyle, W. C. (1980). The distinction between inquiry and scientific inquiry and why
high school students should be cognizant of the distinction. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 17, 123-130.
Lavonen, J., Jauhiainen, J. Koponen, T. I., & Kurki-Suonio, K. (2004). Effect of a
long-term in-service training program on teachers’ beliefs about the role of
experiments in physics education. International Journal of Science Education,
26, 309-328.
Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
Lee, O., &; Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in
middle school science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal,
30(3), 585-610.
Lee, O., &; Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science
classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585-610.
Lepper, M.R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues.
Ame. Psychol, 40(1), 1-18.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lisa M. -H.(2002). Defining Inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science
teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-821-6_2.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content
knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science
Education, 30(10), 1301-1320.
Loughran, J., & Hamilton, M. L. (2016). Developing an understanding of teacher
education (pp. 3-22). In J. Loughran & M. Hamilton(Eds.) International
handbook of teacher education. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-
981-10-0366-0_1
Lumsden, L. S. (1994). Student Motivation To Learn. ERIC Digest, Number 92.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED370-200)
Lunetta, V. N., & Tamir, P. (1981). An analysis of laboratory activities: Project
physics and PSSC. School Science & Mathematics, 81, 230-236.
McDonald, L. (2009). Teacher change:A dynamic interactive approach. International
Journal of Learning, 16(10), 623-636.
Magnusson, S. J., Borko, H., Krajcik, J., & Layman, J. (1992). The relationship
Between teacher content and pedagogical content knowledge and students'
Content knowledge of heat energy and temperature. Paper presented at the annual
Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
Magnusson, S. J., & Palincsar, A. S. (1995). Learning environments as a site of
science education reform. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 1-8.
Marks, U. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge : From a mathematical case to a
modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education , 41(3), 3-11.
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of
learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum
development.
Mattheis, F. E., & Nakayama, G. (1988). Effects of a laboratory-centered inquiry
program on laboratory skills, science process skills, and understanding in
middle grades students. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED307148)
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching the role of history and philosophy of
science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R. et
al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in middle grades: Assessment of learning in
urban systemic reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063-1080.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of
Science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Mauffette, Y., Kandlibinder, P., and Soucisse, A. (2004) The problem in problem-based
learning is the problems: But do they motivate students? in M. Savin-Baden and
K.Wilkie, Challenging rsearch into problem-based learning(pp.11-25).
Buckingham, LD: SRHE/OpenUniversity Press.
McNamara, D.(1991). Subject Knowledge and Its Application: Problems and Possibilities
for Teacher Educators. Journal of Education for Teaching, 17 (2),113-28.
Merriam, S. B.(1998).Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995) In-depth Interviewing (2nd
ed.).South Melbourne, TA: Longman.
Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by
states. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
Osbom, M. D. (1998). Teacher as knower and leamer: Reflections on situated knowledge
in science teaching. Journal 01 Research in Science Teaching, 35, 427-439.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of
the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9),
1049-1079.
Palincsar, A. S., & Magnusson, S.J. (2001). The interplay of firsthand and text-based
investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and
reasoning. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty five
years of progress (pp.151-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pappas, M. J. (2000). Managing the inquiry learning environment. School Library Media
Activities Monthly, 16(7), 27-30.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy
construct. Review of Educational Research, 62 (3), 307-332.
Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of
pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology
classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941.
Park, S., & Oliver, S. J. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical
content knowledge (PCK): Pedagogical content knowledge as a conceptual tool
to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3),
261-284. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6.
Pigge, F. L., & Marso, R. N. (1997). A seven year longitudinal multi-factor assessment of
teaching concerns development through preparation and early years of teaching.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 225-235.
Pines, A. L. (1985). Toward a taxonomy of conceptual relations and the implications for
the evaluation of cognitive structure. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines(Ed.), Cognitive
structure and conceptual change (pp.101-105). Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.
London,UK:Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Polanyi, M. (1969). Sense-giving and sense-reading. In M. Grene (Ed.), Knowing and
being: Essays(pp.22-35).Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula
(Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 102-119). New York,
NY: Macmillan.
Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classroom: Social processes in
smallgroup discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 33 (8), 839-858.
Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teachers’
science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637.
Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching?A review of the literature.
Review of Educational Research,62(1), 1-35.
Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary
science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal
of Science Education, 26(1), 3-24.
Roth, W.-M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment:
Interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 33(7),709-736.
Rutherford, F. J. (2001). Fostering the history of science in American science education.
Science & Education, 10, 569-580.
Sanders, D., & McCutcheon, G. (1986). The development of practical theories of
teaching. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2, 50-67.
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their
influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and
theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 40, 369-392.
Savin-Baden, M. (2004). Understanding the impact of assessment on students in
problem-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,
41(2), 223-233.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.
New York,NY: Basic books. 
Schön, D. A.(1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for
teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schwab, J. J. (1959). The impossible role of the teacher in progressive education. The
School Review, 67(2), 139-159.
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F.
Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. In A. Bellack & H.
M. Kliebard (Eds) (1977), Curriculum and evaluation.Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. 
Schwab, J. J. (1971). The practical: Arts of eclectic. The School Review,79(4),493-542.
Schwab, J. J. (1973). The Practical: Translation into Curriculum. The School Review, 81,
501-522.
Schwab, J. J.(1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In J. J. Schwab,
Science, curriculum, liberal education—Selected Essays. Chicago, IL: The
University of Chicago.
Schwab, J. J., & Brandwein, P. F. (1962).The teaching of science: The teaching of
science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). ”It’s the nature of the BEAST”: the influence
of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205-236.
Shulman, L. (l986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching. In M.
Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York,
NY: Macmillan.
Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
Educa-tional Researcher, 15(7), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987a). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.
Harvard Educational Review, 57,1-22.
Shulman, L. S. (1987b). Learning to teach. American Association of Higher Education
Bullein, 5-9.
Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case
methods in teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hacking, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in
Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2),
219-228.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: sage.
Settlage, J. (2007). Moving past a belief in inquiry as a pedagogy: Implications for teacher
knowledge. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the
classroom: Realities and opportunities (pp. 204-215). Charlotte, NC: Information
Age.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London,
UK: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd..
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stuart, C., & Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Preservice teachers’ experiences,
beliefs and classroom practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(2), 113-121.
Tamir,P.(1988).Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 99-110.
Tamir, P., Stavy, R., & Ratner, N. (1998). Teaching science by inquiry: assessment and
learning.Journal of Biological Education, 33(1),27-32.
Thiessen,D.(2000).A skillful start to a teaching career: A matter of developing Impactful
behaviors,reflective practices, or professional knowledge?International Journal of
Education Research, 33(5),515-537.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: in pursuit of better questions
and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1989). Barriers to higher-level cognitive learning in high
school science. Science Education, 72(6), 659-682.
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all
learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Towle, M. (1982). Learning how to be a student when you have a learning disability.
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(2), 7-13.
Trowbridge, L. W. & Bybee, R. W. (1990). Becoming a secondary school science
teacher (5th ed.). New York, NY: Merrill.
Trumbull, D. J. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned.
Science Education,89, 879-900.
Tschannen-Morana, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive
construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
UNESCO( 1966). Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers.
Retrieved from http://en.unesco.org/
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W.(1998). Developing science teachers’
Pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35(6),
673-695.
van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and
reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on
pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26-28.
van Manen, Max. (1982). Phenomenological pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 12(3),
283-299. 
Van Manen, Max. (1984). Practicing phenomenological writing. Phenomenology and
Pedagogy, 2(1), 36-39.
van Manen, Max.(1997). Research lived experience: Human service for an action
sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Ontario, Canada: Althouse Press.
Verloop, N., van Driel, J., & Meijer, P.(2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge
base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research,35(5), 441-461.
Wallace, C. S., & Kang, N. H. (2004). An Investigation of Experience Science Teachers’
Beliefs About Inquiry: An Examination of Competing Belief Sets. Journal of
research in science teaching, 41(9), 936-960.
Webb, K. M. (1995). Not even close: Teacher evaluation and teachers' personal practical
knowledge. Journal of Educational Thought,29(3), 205-226.
Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms
as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Wheatley, G.H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning.
Science Education, 75 (1), 9-21.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Prediction-observation-explanation. In R. White &
R. F. Gunstone, Probing Understanding ( pp. 44-64). London, UK: The Falmer
Press.
Wilson, B. G. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning
environment. Educational Technology, 35(5), 25-30.
Wilson, S. M., Schulman, L. S., &Richer, A. E. (1987). 150 different ways of 
knowing:Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.),
Exploring teacher thinking (pp.104-124). London, UK: Cassell.
Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2011). Mass Media Research: an Introduction (9th
ed.). New York, NY: Wadsworth.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can
investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom
practice? Science Education, 87, 112-143.
Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of inquiry: How preservice teachers reproduce
the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching,41,481-512.
Wong, W.L.P.; Radcliffe, D.F. (2000). The tacit nature of design knowledge. Technology
Analysis & Strategic Management ,12(4), 493-512.
Wortham, S. (2004). From good student to outcast: The emergence of a classroom
identity. Ethos, 32(2), 164-187.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE