|
一、中文文獻 1.王肇蘭、許義忠、徐偉初(2008)。台灣地區地方政府效率暨生產力之評估。應用經濟論叢,(84),71-120。 2.王肇蘭、許義忠、賴如庭(2014)。臺灣地區地方稅捐稽徵機關稽徵效率暨生產力之分析。會計審計論叢,4(1),99-136。 3.李豔玲(1997)。稅捐稽徵機關績效評估之研究。高雄市:國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士學位論文。 4.吳仂(2013)。地方政府支出效率之研究。臺北市:臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士學位論文,1-62。 5.吳亭瑩(2006)。影響地方財產稅收因素之探討。臺北市:國立政治大學財政研究所碩士學位論文,1-80。 6.吳濟華、劉春初、馮永猷(2010)。台灣地方政府公共支出效率衡量之實證研究。行政暨政策學報,(50), 33-80。 7.林恭正、陳信嘉(2008)。地方政府資本支出對財產稅收入影響之實證分析。財稅研究,40(2),66-82。 8.邱荃瑩(2005)。我國地方稅捐稽徵機關績效評估之研究-以資料包絡分析法。桃園市:元智大學會計學系碩士學位論文,1-86。 9.胡議文(2010)。我國地方稅捐稽徵機關稽徵績效之研究-三階段資料包絡分析法之應用。臺北市:國立政治大學碩士論文。 10.陳醇(2015)。縣市改制前後之地方政府績效評估。新北市:臺北大學財政學系碩士學位論文,1-155。 11.陳曉瑩(2002)。台灣地區以土地稅作為地方主要財源之研究。臺南市:成功大學都市計劃學系碩士學位論文,1-102。 12.張瑞真(2003)。從公共選擇觀點探討土地稅稅基之評定。臺北市:國立政治大學地政研究所博士學位論文,1-94。 二、英文文獻 1.Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. (2008). Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1946-1979. 2.Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative science quarterly, 27(3), 459-489. 3.Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425-451. 4.Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Vela-Bargues, J. M. (2002). Efficiency and Quality in Local Government Management: The case of Spanish local authorities (Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona). 5.Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. 6.Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge university press. 7.Cao, X., & Yang, F. (2011). Measuring the performance of Internet companies using a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Enterprise Information Systems, 5(2), 207-217. 8.Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9, 181-185. 9.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Li, S. (1989). Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 23(6), 325-344. 10.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. 11.Chen, K., & Zhu, J. (2017). Second order cone programming approach to two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(1), 231-238. 12.Chen, Y., Cook, W.D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1170-1176. 13.Chiumia, A., & Simwaka, K. (2012). Tax policy developments, donor inflows and economic growth in Malawi. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 4(4), 159-172. 14.Chu, J., Wu, J., Zhu, Q., An, Q., & Xiong, B. (2019). Analysis of China’s regional eco-efficiency: A DEA two-stage network approach with equitable efficiency decomposition. Computational economics, 54(4), 1263-1285. 15.Cook, W. D., Liang, L., Zhu, J. (2010). Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega, 38(6), 423-430. 16.Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1-4. 17.Da Cruz, N. F., & Marques, R. C. (2014). Revisiting the determinants of local government performance. Omega, 44, 91-103. 18.De Borger, B., Kerstens, K., Moesen, W., & Vanneste, J. (1994). Explaining differences in productive efficiency:An application to Belgian municipalities. Public Choice, 80(3-4), 339-358. 19.Du, J., Liang, L., Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2011). A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(2), 390-397. 20.Eeckaut, P., Tulkens, H., & Jamar, M. A. (1993). Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency–Techniques and Applications, 300-334. 21.Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35-49. 22.Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290. 23.Fogarty, J., & Mugera, A. (2013). Local government efficiency: evidence from Western Australia. Australian Economic Review, 46(3), 300-311. 24.Ghobadian, A., & Ashworth, J. (1994). Performance Measurement in Local Government-Concept and Practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(5), 35-51. 25.Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237-250. 26.Guo, C., Shureshjani, R. A., Foroughi, A. A., & Zhu, J. (2017). Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3), 896-906. 27.Guo, Y., Fu, Y., Chui, E. W. T., & Xue, M. (2017). Equity, efficiency and effectiveness: an evaluation study of the urban minimum livelihood guarantee scheme in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 10(2), 143-157. 28.Hu, X., & Liu, C. (2016). Profitability performance assessment in the Australian construction industry: a global relational two-stage DEA method. Construction Management and Economics, 34(3), 147-159. 29.Hu, X., & Liu, C. (2018). Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and overall performance in the Chinese construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(6), 780-797. 30.Huang, S. H., Yu, M. M., Hwang, M. S., Wei, Y. S., & Chen, M. H. (2017). Efficiency of Tax Collection and Tax Management in Taiwan's Local Tax Offices. Pacific Economic Review, 22(4), 620-648. 31.Hunter, W. J., & Nelson, M. A. (1996). An IRS production function. National Tax Journal, 49(1), 105-115. 32.Javaid, M. F. (2017). Expenditure efficiency and fiscal size: An empirical evidence from developing Asian countries. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 55(1), 247-269. 33.Johnston, J. M., Marlowe, J., Matkin, D. S., & Hayes, M. (2011). The impact of local school property tax reductions on city and county revenue decisions: A natural experiment in Kansas. Public Finance and Management, 11(2), 180. 34.Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European journal of operational research, 192(3), 949-962. 35.Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European journal of operational research, 185(1), 418-429. 36.Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2011). Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(3), 515-519. 37.Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2014). Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 512-521. 38.Kapelko, M., Lansink, A. O., & Stefanou, S. E. (2015). Analyzing the impact of investment spikes on dynamic productivity growth. Omega, 54, 116-124. 39.Karkazis, J., & Thanassoulis, E. (1998). Assessing the effectiveness of regional development policies in Northern Greece using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 32(2), 123-137. 40.Kistik, V., & Koçak, H. (2016). Data Envelopment Analysis on Performance Measurement of Municipals. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(23), 24-34. 41.Kloot, L., & Martin, J. (2000). Strategic performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government. Management accounting research, 11(2), 231-251. 42.Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55(7), 643-653. 43.Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Lu, W. M. (2016). Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58, 33-45. 44.Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. (2013a). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3-15. 45.Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. (2013b). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893-902. 46.Lobo, M. S., Vandenberghe, L., Boyd, S., & Lebret, H. (1998). Applications of second-order cone programming. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 284(1–3), 193-228. 47.Loikkanen, H. A., & Susiluoto, I. (2005). Cost Efficiency of Finnish Municipalities in Basic Service Provision 1994-2002. Urban Public Economics Review, (4), 39-63. 48.Lu, W. M., & Hung, S. W. (2011). Exploring the operating efficiency of Technology Development Programs by an intellectual capital perspective—A case study of Taiwan. Technovation, 31(8), 374-383. 49.Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., Hung, S. W., & Lu, E. T. (2012). The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: Production and marketing efficiency perspectives. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(2), 529-544. 50.Makrydemetres, A., Zervopoulos, P. D., & Pravita, M. E. (2016). Reform of public administration in Greece; evaluating structural reform of central government departments in Greece: application of the DEA methodology (No. 97). Hellenic Observatory, LSE. 51.Malanga, F. (1986). The relationship between IRS enforcement and tax yield. National Tax Journal, 39(3), 333-337. 52.Marto, B. I., Hakim, A., Wijaya, A. F., & Pratiwi, R. N. (2015). The Performance of Revenue Office in the Perspective of New Public Management-(Study on Performance of Local Tax Management in Makassar, Indonesia). International Journal of Applied, 5(1), 57-62. 53.Mavi, R. K., Saen, R. F., & Goh, M. (2019). Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: A big data approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 553-562. 54.Mohammad, N., & Noordin, N. (2016). Data envelopment analysis model for measuring efficiency of zakat collection and distribution. e-Academia Journal, 5(2), 210-218. 55.Morais, P., & Camanho, A. S. (2011). Evaluation of performance of European cities with the aim to promote quality of life improvements. Omega, 39(4), 398-409. 56.Nold Hughes, P. A., & Edwards, M. E. (2000). Leviathan vs. Lilliputian: a data envelopment analysis of government efficiency. Journal of Regional Science, 40(4), 649-669. 57.Palmer, A. J. (1993). Performance measurement in local government. Public Money & Management, 13(4), 31–36. 58.Perpiña, I. N., Coll, M. T. B., Petrović, M., & Ausina, E. T. (2017). Which estimator to measure local governments’ cost efficiency? Evidence from Spanish municipalities. In XXIV Encuentro de Economía Pública (p. 24). Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. 59.Savić, G., Dragojlović, A., Vujošević, M., Arsić, M., & Martić, M. (2015). Impact of the efficiency of the tax administration on tax evasion. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 28(1), 1138-1148. 60.Sexton, T. R., & Lewis, H. F. (2003). Two-stage DEA: An application to major league baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2-3), 227-249. 61.Shao, L., Yu, X., & Feng, C. (2019). Evaluating the eco-efficiency of China's industrial sectors: A two-stage network data envelopment analysis. Journal of environmental management, 247, 551-560. 62.Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48. 63.Siyuan, L., Chonghuai, N., & Xilong, Y. (2017). Study on Efficiency of Government Fiscal Policy in Process of Enterprise Innovation‒Based on A Perspective of Two-stage Innovation. Science and Technology Management Research, 2017(14), 6. 64.Stine, W. F. (2003). The effect of personal property tax repeal on Pennsylvania's real estate tax growth and stability. National Tax Journal, 56(1), 45-60. 65.Tavana, M., Mirzagoltabar, H., Mirhedayatian, S. M., Saen, R. F., & Azadi, M. (2013). A new network epsilon-based DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(2), 501-513. 66.Thirtle, C., Shankar, B., Chitkara, P., Chatterjee, S., & Mohanty, M. S. (2000). Size does matter: technical and scale efficiency in Indian state tax jurisdictions. Review of Development Economics, 4(3), 340–352. 67.Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA:a slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243-252. 68.Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA–A third pole of technical efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1554-1563. 69.Walsh, K. (2012). Understanding taxpayer behaviour–new opportunities for tax administration. The Economic and Social Review, 43(3, Autumn), 451-475. 70.Wang, Q., Hang, Y., Sun, L., & Zhao, Z. (2016). Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 254-261. 71.Wanke, P. F. (2013). Physical infrastructure and shipment consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian ports: A two-stage network-DEA approach. Transport Policy, 29, 145-153. 72.Wanke, P., & Barros, C. (2014). Two-stage DEA: An application to major Brazilian banks. Expert systems with applications, 41(5), 2337-2344. 73.Worthington, A. C. (2000). Cost efficiency in Australian local government:a comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometrical approaches. Financial Accountability & Management, 16(3), 201-223. 74.Worthington, A., & Dollery, B. (2000). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in local government. Local Government Studies, 26(2), 23-52. 75.Yadava, A. K., & Neog, Y. (2019). Public Sector Performance and Efficiency Assessment of Indian States. Global Business Review, 1-19. 76.Yin, P., Chu, J., Wu, J., Ding, J., Yang, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). A DEA-based two-stage network approach for hotel performance analysis: An internal cooperation perspective. Omega, 93, 102035.
|