本研究目的旨在運用資料包絡分析法求取單位間相對效率之特性，尋求我國與亞洲各國於北京、廣島、曼谷、釜山與杜哈亞洲運動會參賽效率，特別是中華奧林匹克委員會自1990年重返北京亞運競技舞台至2006年杜哈亞運期間歷屆參賽生產力消長情形。本研究運用時間序列縱斷面比較整體國家競技表現，得知我國整合產出相對排名呈現逐年衰退現象，北京亞運排名第9位；廣島與曼谷亞運皆排名第11位；釜山亞運排名第17位；杜哈亞運排名第16位。橫斷面分析求得我國參考學習國家包括南韓、卡達與哈薩克；規模報酬分析呈現我國於五屆亞運賽事皆屬於不夠理想的規模報酬遞減，故朝向減少投入（提升效率）或增加產出（提升效能），為達成提升我國參賽績效的兩大方向。我國自1990年重返亞運競技舞台以來，歷屆跨期生產力變動情形起伏不定，分別為廣島亞運(0.999)漸入佳境，曼谷亞運(0.144)創造有史以來最佳成績，釜山亞運(0.528)與杜哈亞運(0.612)則呈現急速衰退現象，值得政府、國家體育領導階層以及體育從業人員持續關注。另，本研究實證分析亦發現歷屆亞運主辦國包括日本、泰國、南韓總生產力指數表現優異，可謂落實「主場優勢」達到提升國家競技運動表現之目的，提供欲迅速提升競技運動表現國家一個重要參考方向。

This study applied the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a relatively efficient measurement for obtaining the results of the nations participating in the last five Asian Games. The focus was on the productivity changes of Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee since its return from Beijing 1990 to Doha 2006. We used the time series analysis to compare Chinese Taipei’s decreasing ranking which were the 9th in Beijing, the 11th in Hiroshima and Bangkok, the 17th in Busan, and the 16th in Doha. The cross section analysis found out not only Chinese Taipei's benchmarking in Korea, Qatar and Kazakhstan, but the decrease in scale in the five competitions. Thus the increasing efficiency and effectiveness were two major thoughts for the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee. Since Chinese Taipei's return to the Asian Games in 1990, it has assumed unstable productivity changes: Hiroshima 0.999; Bangkok 1.444; Busan 0.528; and Doha 0.612. It performed up-and-up in Hiroshima, the best in Bangkok, but rapidly at low ebb in Busan and Doha. The Chinese Taipei government, sports manpower ought to pay attention to it. In the bargain, the empirical analyses figured out that the hosted nations such as Japan, Thailand, and Korea created an extraordinary total productivity factor. The "home team advantages" promoted the entire nation's competitive capabilities and provided an important consultational direction for the rising competitive nations.