:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:防制學生藥物濫用之成效評估
作者:吳智泰
作者(外文):WU,CHIH-TAI
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:犯罪防治研究所
指導教授:楊士隆
許華孚
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2021
主題關鍵詞:高中職防制學生藥物濫用質性研究RE-AIM成效評估high school vocationalprevention of drug abuse by studentsqualitative researchRE-AIMeffectiveness evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
摘 要
隨著新興毒品氾濫,防制學生藥物濫用工作所面臨的挑戰也不斷變化,但不論從家庭、學校或社區的層面所實施的防制學生藥物濫用方案,政府始終不斷嘗試及修正各種策略尋求最適合國情的做法,各單位全力推動藥物濫用防制工作之際,引起了本次研究的動機;本研究目的冀望透過某縣境內執行防制學生藥物濫用的相關單位,透過質性研究採深度訪談方式及結合部分量化調查資料,以RE-AIM模式進行歸類分析,以瞭解某縣防制學生藥物濫用執行工作之成效評估做成結論,並對校園學生藥物濫用防制作為提出具體可行之建議。
本研究採半結構式深度訪談方式,以立意取樣,對某縣各單位及高中職學校專家代表9位實施深度訪談,7位實施焦點座談,以RE-AIM模式,分別針對涵蓋面、效果面、參與面、執行面及持續面等五面向,將訪談資料結合部分統計量化綜整歸納分析,據以探討某縣執行教育部防制學生藥物濫用實施計畫的成效評估。
研究結果發現:涵蓋面,2018年至2020年期間藥物濫用個案,春暉專案小組大部分均能順利結案,中斷輔導的情形有減少的趨勢;特定人員列冊平均人數,國中、國及高中、高職,近3年比例均有微幅下降趨勢。反毒宣講成果,2018年參加宣講學生人次與當年度縣內國小至高中學生總人數比率約占1.09%,2019年則約佔0.15%,2020年約佔0.16%,發現近2年宣講成果比例大幅減少。效果面,以策略中,強化轉介追蹤機制、綿密防制通報網絡等兩項效果最佳,其中更以強化轉介追蹤機制獲得訪談代表一致認為效果成效最佳。參與面,以策略中,強化轉介追蹤機制,獲得訪談專家共識度最高一致認同執行效果最好。執行面,經訪談分析歸納,專家學者認同目前執行均能有效防制學生藥物濫用之現況,且執行成果與投入人力、資源成正比。持續面,就現今執行策略提出相關修正意見和配合少年事件處理法修正後即將實施的配合精進作法,提出相關建言。
由結果可知,某縣防制學生藥物濫用之成效,經綜合評估後是正向成比例式成長,但現行做法若能結合各單位意見加以修正,相信定能在現今人力不足狀況下,發揮事半功倍的效益,讓學生除課業之外還能從家庭或學校生活環境中以不同途徑多管道方式,從社團或志工活動中獲得肯定及自信心,並結合校園人力加強專業輔導效率,落實教育部防制學生藥物濫用工作,打造出單純無毒的學習環境達成友善校園的境界。
關鍵詞:高中職、防制學生藥物濫用、質性研究、RE-AIM、成效評估
Abstract
With the proliferation of emerging drugs, the challenges faced by the prevention of drug abuse among students are constantly changing. However, the government has always tried and modified various strategies to seek the best in the prevention of student drug abuse programs implemented at the family, school or community level. The method that suits the national conditions, when each unit is fully promoting drug abuse prevention and control work, aroused the motivation of this research; its purpose is to use in-depth interviews through qualitative research through relevant units that implement drug abuse prevention among students And combined with part of the quantitative survey data, the RE-AIM model is used to classify and analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of drug abuse prevention in a certain county, and to make specific and feasible recommendations for the prevention of drug abuse by students on campus.
This research adopts a semi-structured in-depth interview method, sampling intentionally, and conducts in-depth interviews with 9 expert representatives from various units and high school vocational schools in a certain county, and 7 focuses on discussion. The RE-AIM model is used to focus on the coverage and effect. , Participation, Implementation, and Continuing. The interview data is combined with some statistical and quantitative comprehensive analysis to discuss the effectiveness evaluation of a county’s implementation of the Ministry of Education’s implementation plan to prevent student drug abuse.
The results of the study found that: for the coverage, most of the drug abuse cases from 2018 to 2020, Chunhui task force were able to successfully close the case, and the number of interrupted counseling tends to decrease; the average number of specific personnel listed, middle school, national and high school, high school In the past three years, the proportions have shown a slight downward trend. Anti-drug propaganda results. The ratio of the number of students participating in the propaganda in 2018 to the total number of students from elementary schools to high schools in the county in that year accounted for about 1.09%, about 0.15% in 2019, and about 0.16% in 2020. It was found that the proportion of results in the past 2 years Significantly reduced. In terms of effect, among the strategies, the enhanced referral tracking mechanism and the dense prevention and notification network have the best results. Among them, the enhanced referral tracking mechanism has been agreed by interview representatives that the effect is the best. Participate in the strategy, strengthen the referral tracking mechanism, and obtain the highest consensus among interviewed experts and agree that the implementation effect is the best. On the implementation side, after interviews and analysis, experts and scholars agree that the current implementation can effectively prevent the current situation of student drug abuse, and the implementation results are proportional to the input of manpower and resources. Continue to face, put forward relevant amendments on the current implementation strategy, and provide relevant suggestions on the coordination and improvement practices that will be implemented after the amendment of the Juvenile Incident Treatment Law.
It can be seen from the results that the effectiveness of a county in preventing drug abuse among students has grown positively and proportionally after comprehensive evaluation. However, if the current practice can be revised in accordance with the opinions of various units, I believe it will be able to achieve twice the result with half the effort under the current manpower shortage. In addition to schoolwork, students can gain affirmation and self-confidence from clubs or volunteer activities in different ways and channels in addition to their homework or school life environment, and combine campus manpower to enhance the efficiency of professional guidance and implement the Ministry of Education’s prevention Prevent students from drug abuse work, create a pure and non-toxic learning environment to achieve a friendly campus.
Keywords: high school vocational, prevention of drug abuse by students, qualitative research, RE-AIM, effectiveness evaluation
壹、中文部分
王淑女(1995)。青少年的休閒活動與偏差行為。社區法展季刊,72,頁105-124。
吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。原書名Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.
李文政(譯)(2015)。社會科學研究法。資料蒐集與分析。原作者Shaun Best。心理出版社股份有限公司出版。
李安妮(1983)。大台北地區男性少年非行成因之分析-控制理論的一項實證研究。台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
李景美、黃惠玲、苗迺芳(2000)。青少年物質使用之社會學習及社會連結因素研究-以在學生為例 ,健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,2 0,頁17-34。
李景美、葉美玉(1999)。拒毒之鑰-青少年藥物濫用預防理論與原則。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,第十九期,頁43-51。
周愫嫻(1995)。社會階級、家庭結構與青少年偷竊行為的研究:一個美國社區的實證研究。社區發展季刊,27,頁152-171。
林正宏(1993)。城鄉少年偏差行為成因比較分析:Gottfredson and Hirschi 一般化犯罪理論之實證研究。中央警察大學警政研究所碩士論文。
林佳頤、范瑋益、徐建業(2008)。防制藥物濫用之情境互動多媒體學習成效探討。醫療資訊雜誌,第十七卷第四期,2008年12月,頁25-43。
林俊杰(2018)。第三、四級毒品犯罪查緝現況與策略之評估研究-以臺中市為例。國立中正大學犯罪防制研究所博士班博士論文。
邱銘謙(2016)。青少年藥物濫用認知在反毒教育需求之調查研究-以某縣國中學生為例,彰化師大教育學報,2016,第30輯,頁87-108。
侯崇文(1996)。巨視社會控制、微視社會控制與青少年犯罪。犯罪學期刊第二期。
侯崇文(2000)。青少年偏差行為-社會控制理論與社會學習理論的整合。犯罪學期刊第六期。
紐文英(2018)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(第2版),台北:雙葉書廊。
張伯宏(2007)。我國毒品戒治政策與成效之研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治學系博士班博士論文。
張景然(2001)。青少年犯罪學,台北:巨流。
張楓明(1998)。社會控制與青少年偏差行為-以雲嘉地區為例,南華大學教育社會學研究所碩士論文。
張德銳(1986)。台北市國民中學三年級學生次級文化與違規犯過行為之關係。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
教育部、法務部、外交部、行政院衛生署(2008)。97年反毒報告書。台北:法務部。
莊耀嘉(1996)。犯罪的心理成因:自我控制或社會控制。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,(2)。
許春金(1986)。青少年犯罪原因論。台北:中央警官學校。
許春金(1993)。青少年犯罪原因論-社會控制理論之中國研究。台北:五南。
許春金(1996)。閩南籍、客家籍、山地籍少年偏差行為之類型、盛行及成因之比較分析,八十五年度行政院國科會犯罪問題研究成果研討會論文集,頁181-214。
許春金(2000)。犯罪學。台北:三民。
許春金、孟維德(1997)。家庭、學校自我控制與偏差行為。中央警察大學學報,30,頁225-256。
陳伯璋(2000)。質性研究方法的理論基礎。中正大學教育研究所主編。質的研究方法。高雄:麗文文化公司。
陳志哲、廖容瑜、張萩琴、黃久美、郭鐘隆(2016)。應用理論建構以3D虛擬實境為特色之教育介入對高中職濫用愷他命學生的成效。數位學習科技期刊,第8卷第3期,7月,頁51-69。
曾淑萍(2000)。自我控制與少年竊盜行為:一般化犯罪理論之驗證。國立中正大學犯罪防制研究所碩士論文。
馮齡儀、藍郁青、李志恆(2017)。青少年藥物濫用之環境暴露因素及防制策略,青少年藥物濫用預防與輔導,台北:五南。
黃于真、林永豐(2017)。臺灣國民小學階段防制學生藥物濫用課程之探究與規劃。藥物濫用防制,第2卷第1期,頁29-46。
黃宏仁(2009),國民中學學生反毒知識現況及反毒教育需求研究-以嘉義市為例。國立中正大學碩士論文。
黃政吉(1992)。從社會學習增強理論探討少年犯罪之成因及預防之道,警學叢刊,22(3): 頁105 -115。
黃富源、周文勇、鄧煌發(2000)。少年暴力犯罪相關因素之研究-家庭結構、動力與社會學習觀點以論,台北:行政院青年輔導委員會。
黃富源、鄧煌發(1999a)。單親家庭結構與功能對青少年非行之影響-台北市之調查研究結果分析。警政學報第二十五期。桃園:中央警察大學。
黃靖婷(2015)。矯正機構收容人納入全民健康保險-以RE-AIM架構為基礎之政策評估。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文。
楊士隆、吳志揚、李宗憲(2010)。台灣藥物濫用防制政策之評析。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,第二卷第二期,頁1-20。
楊士隆、曾淑萍、李宗憲(2010)。青少年藥物濫用的防制,2008年青少年藥物濫用防治研討會論文集,頁1-15,國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
楊士隆、曾淑萍、戴伸峰、顧以謙、陳瑞旻(2017)。2016台灣校園學生非法藥物使用之盛行率調查研究-以新北市、台中市、高雄市為例。藥物濫用防制,第2卷第3期,頁1-12。
楊士隆、戴伸峰、曾淑萍、林子心、陳冠樺(2019)。國立中正大學防制藥物濫用教育中心成效評估。藥物濫用防制,第4卷第4期2019,頁69-88。
楊士隆等著(2016),刑事司法與犯罪學研究方法(P17-P44),台北:五南。
楊國樞(1978)。中學生的問題行為及其學校因素。青少年行為與輔導-社會學校道德教育與訓導工作的檢討。
董旭英(2000)。青少年偏差行為研究:檢驗一般化緊張理論的實證性。行政院國科粹專題研究計畫。
董旭英、黃儀娟(譯)(2000)。次級資料研究法。原作者David W. Steward。弘智文化事業有限公司出版。
潘淑滿(2006)。質性研究:理論與運用,第6版,台北:心理出版社。
蔡德輝、楊士隆(2000)。台灣地區少年強姦犯、非暴力犯及一般少年犯罪危險因子之比較研究,犯罪學期刊,5:頁1-31。
蔡德輝、楊士隆(2021)。少年犯罪-理論與實務,修訂新版,台北:五南。
蔡德輝、楊士隆(2019)。犯罪學,第8版,台北:五南圖書。
鄭瑞隆(2000)。暴力犯罪少年家庭特徵與家庭生活經驗,犯罪學期刊,5:頁49-78。
簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流圖書出版公司。
顏正芳、羅文君、孫檀榕(2004)。應用多媒體教材於青少年俱樂部濫用毒品反毒宣導之成效,醫學教育,第八卷第四期,頁46-55。
羅文君(2003)。高中職校反毒宣導成效之評估。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文。

貳、英文部分
Agnew,R(1987).,On testing structural strain theories.Journal of research in crime and delinquency,4,pp281-286.
Agnew,R(1992).,Foundation for a general theory of crime.Criminology,30,pp47-87.
Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J(1986).,Prediction of Goal-direction Behavior: Attitudes, Intensities, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of experimental Social Psychology,22.
Akers, R. L. & M. D. Krohn & L. Lanza-Kaduce & M. Radosevich(1979).,Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of ageneraltheory. American Sociological Review. 44,pp 636-665.
Bartlett, M. L.,& Zizzi, S. J.(2010). A mixed-method evaluation of a college student fitness program using the RE-AIM framework. Californian Journal of Health Promotion,8(1),46-59.
Belza, B., Toobert, D. J.,& Glasgow, R. E.(2007). RE-AIM for program planning: Overview and applications. Washington, DC: National Council on Aging,165.
Berg,B.L.(1998).Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Massachusettes:Allyn & Bacon.
Bernard,Thomas J(1987).,Testing Structural Strain Theories,Journal of research in Crime and Delinquency,4,pp262-280.
Bonyani,A.,Safaeian,L.,Chehrazi,M.,Etedali,A.,Zaghian,M., & Mashhadian,F.(2018). A high school-based education concerning drug abuse prevention.Journal of education and health promotion,7.
Brezina, T(1996)., Adapting to strain:an examination of delinquent coping responses. Criminology, 34(1),pp39-60.
Broidy,L.& Agnew,R(1997).,Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective ,Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,34(3),pp275-306.
Broidy,M.L(2001).,A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39(1) ,pp9-35.
Burton and Cullen(1992),The Empirical Status of Strain Theory.Journal of Crime and Justice,45,pp1-30.
Burton, Cullen and Dunaway(1995),Reconsidering Strain Theory:Operational izqtion,Rival Theories, and Adult Criminality,Journal of Quantitative Criminology,10,pp213-239,1994.
Cautin, R.L., Overholser, J.C.&Goetz, P(2001)., Assessment of mode of anger expression in adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Adolescence, 36(3),pp163-171.
Cernkovich, Stephen A(1978).,Evaluating Two Models of Delinquency Causation: Structural Theory and Control Theory.Criminology ,16,pp335-352.
Cloward,Richard A. and Lloyd E.Ohlin(1960).,Delinquency and opportunity:A theory of delinquency gangs.NY:The free press.
Cohen,Albert K.(1959),Delinquency Boys. Glencoe,I.L.:Free press.
Cuijpers,P.(2002),Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs:A systematic review. Addictive Behaviors,27(6),1009-1023.
D.Kandel and K.Yamaguchi(1993).From beer to crack:Developmental patterns of drug involvement. American Journal of Public Health,83(6):851-855.http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/reprint/83/6/851.pdf。
Denzin,N.K.,& Lincoln,Y.S.,(1998).Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London:Sage Publications.
Diana, Nenadic-Bilan & Teodora,Vigato(2010).Puppet Play as Interactive Approach in Drug Abuse Prevention. US-China Education Review,7,29-35.
Elliott, Delbert S.,David Huizinga, and Suzanna S. Ageton(1985).,Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use.Beverly Hills, C.A.: Sage.
Emerson, R. M.(1983).Introduction. In R. M. Emerson(Ed.),Contemporary Field Research. Boston:Little,Brown.
Empey, L.T(1985).,Its Meaning and Construction. American Delinquency.The Porsey Press.
Erickson, M.T(1997).,Behavior Disorders of Children and Adolescents: Assessment, Etiology and Intervention. Prentice Hall.
Evans, D., Francis T.C., Burton, V. S., Jr., R.Gregory Dunaway and Michael L. B(1997).,The Social Consequences of Self-Control: Testing the General Theory of Crime. Criminology 35.
Farnworth , Margaret and Michael J. Leiber(1989),Strain Theory Revisited: Economic Goals, Educational Means, and Delinquency,American sociological Review, 54,pp263-274.
Farrel,A(1992). Risk factors for drug use in rural adolescents. Journal of Drug Education,22,313-328.doi:10.2190/3v12-D8FV-U07X-MN7F.
Filstead,W.J.(1979).Qualitative methods: A needed perspective in evaluation research.In T.D. Cook and C.S. Reichardt(Eds.),Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Bever Hills,CA:Sage.
Gibbs, J.J., Giever D. and Martin S.J(1998)., Parental management and self-control: An emoirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,35.
Glueck, S. and Glueck, E(1950)., Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency. MA: Harverd University Press.
Gottfredson, M. R. and Hirschi, T(1990)., A General Theory of Crime., Standford, CA: Standford University.
Gottfredson,D.C.& Wilson,D.B.(2003).Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science,4(1),27-38.
Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Barsik, Jr.R.J. and Arneklev, B.J(1992).,Testing to Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30(1).
Guba, E.G.(1990).The alternative paradigm dialog. In Cuba, E. G.(Ed.),The paradigm Dialog. London:Sage Publications.
Hagan,Frank E.(2003).Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology. Person Education,Inc.
Hirschi(1969).Cause of Deliquence.Berkeley:University of California Press.
Jennifer Di Noia, Traci M.Schwinn,Zubin A. Dastur & Steven P. Schinke(2003).The relative efficacy of pamphlets, CD-ROM,and the Internet for disseminating adolescent drug abuse prevention programs: an ex-ploratory study. Preventive Medicine,37,646-653.
King, D.K.,Glasgow, R. E. Leeman-Castillo, B.(2010). Reaiming RE-AIM: using the model to plan, implement, and evaluate the effects of environmental change approaches to enhancing population health. American Joural of Public Health, 100(11): 2076-84.
King,D.K.,Glasgow, R. E.,Vogt, T. M.,& Boles, S. M.(1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American joural of public health,89(9),1322-1327.
Krohn, M.D. and Massey, J.L(1980).,Social Control and Delinquency Behavior: An Examination of the Elements of the Social Bond. The Sociological Quarterly,21.
Krohn, M.D., Skinner, W.F., Massey, J.L. and Akers, R.L(1985).,Social Learning Theory and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Longitudinal Study. Social Problem,32.
Liska, Allen E(1971).,Aspirations, Expectations, and Delinquency: Stress and Additive Models. The Sociological Quarterly,12,pp99-107.
Longshore, D., Turner, and Stein, J.A(1996)., Self-control in a Criminal Sample: An Examination of Construct Validity. Criminology 34(2).
Maccoby, E. E. and J. A. Martin(1983)., Socialization in the context of the family:Parent-child interaction.Handbook of Child Psychology:For merly Carmichaels Manual of Child Vol.4.
Manoj Sharma & Paul Branscum(2013).School-Based Drug Abuse Prevention Programs in High School Students. Joural of Alcohol & Drug Education,57,3.
Maury Nation,Cindy Crusto,Abraham Wandersman,Karol L. kumpfer,Diana Seybolt,Erin Morrissey-Kane & Katrina Davino(2003).What works in prevention. Principles of effective prevention programs.Am Psychol,58,449-456.
Menard, Scott(1995).,A Developmental Test of Mertonal Anomie Theory.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,32,pp162-174.
Merton,Robert K(1938).,Social Structure and Anomie.『American Sociological Review』,3,pp672-682.
Merton,Robert K(1968a).,Social Structure and Anomie,pp158-242 in Social Theory and Social Structure,Enlarged ed. New York:The Free Press.
Merton,Robert K(1968b).,Continuing in the Theory of Social Structure and Anomie,pp215-248, in Social Theory and Social Structure,Enlarged ed.New York:Free Press.
Messner,Steven F(1988).,Merton’s Social Structure and Anomie:The Road Not Taken,Deviant Behavior,9,pp33-53.
Nagin, D.S(1993).,Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime. Law and Society Review 27(3).
National Institute on Drug Abuse(NIDA)(1997). Preventing drug use among chidren and adolescents.Rockville,MD,DHHS.
Neuman, W. L.(1997).Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Apporaoches.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
Ogle, R.S., Katkin, D.M.&Bernard, T.J(1995)., A theory of homicidal behavior among women. Criminology, 33(2), pp173-193.Ohannessian, C.M., Lerner, R.M., Lerner, J.V.&Alexander von Eye.(1999).Does self-competence predict gender difference in adolescent depression and anxiety. Journal of Adolescence, 22,pp397-411.
Paone, D.(2014).Using RE-AIM to evaluate implementation of an evidence-based program: A case example from Minnesota. Joural of gerontological social work,57(6-7),602-625.
Robert, H.A., Susan, G. & Jennifer G(2000)., Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, pp256-275.
Scheier,L.M.,Newcomb,M.D.,& Kager,R.(1994). Risk,protection,and vulnerability to adolescent drug use:Latent models of three ages groups. Journal of Drug Education,24,49-82.doi:10.2190/2MJD-Y7UK-ANYM-VK3A.
Theornberry and Farnworth(1982).,Social correlates of criminal involvement:Further evidence of the relationship between social status and cuiminal behavior.American Socilolgical Review.47,pp508-518.
Van Manen, M.(1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy(2nd ed.). New York: State University of New York Press.
Voss, Harwin L(1971).,Ecology, crime, and delinquency. New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Wiatrowiski, Michael D., David B, Griswold, and Mary K. Robert(1985)., Social control theory and delinquency. American Sociology Review,46.



 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE