:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣的世代貧窮現象:貧窮陷阱或福利陷阱?
作者:黃上豪
作者(外文):Shang-Hao Huang
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:社會工作學研究所
指導教授:古允文
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2021
主題關鍵詞:世代貧窮貧窮陷阱劣勢累積福利陷阱社會救助intergenerational povertypoverty trapaccumulation of disadvantageswelfare trapsocial assistance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:8
  迄今為止,我國政府對於長期待在社會救助體系或是世代貧窮之家戶,仍缺乏積極性的作為,甚至連最基本的追蹤調查都闕如;然而,世代貧窮不僅是個別家庭的損失,還可能造成整個國家嚴重的經濟負擔,因此阻斷貧窮世襲乃是社會救助工作之首要任務。惟我國目前對於世代貧窮家戶的瞭解仍十分不足,因而引發研究者欲深入瞭解世代貧窮家戶,以及社會救助制度在協助這些家戶時所面臨之阻礙。
  研究者在檢閱國外世代貧窮相關文獻後,發現貧窮世代傳遞主要有兩種模式,第一種是「貧窮陷阱」,第二種則是「福利陷阱」。據此,本論文進而衍生出三項研究目的:(1)瞭解世代貧窮家戶的特徵與風險因子;(2)探討福利陷阱與貧窮陷阱是否存在,及其如何影響世代貧窮家戶自立脫貧;(3)蒐集社會救助專業人員對於社會救助制度的反饋,作為政府未來修訂相關政策之參考。本研究採取實用主義典範,以質量併用的混合研究方法回應研究目的。其中量化方法係以「台灣貧窮兒少資料庫」與「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」進行次級資料分析;質性方法則透過立意取樣選取8名社會救助專業人員進行深度訪談。
  研究結果顯示:(1)成長於世代貧窮家庭者常見的特徵包含:女性、單親家庭、父母親教育程度以及早年家庭收入偏低;(2)早年的營養不良以及青少年時期學業表現不佳為影響貧窮家庭子女落入世代貧窮的重要風險因子;(3)貧窮陷阱確實存在,其中早年的營養攝取、家庭支持以及青少年時期學業表現可謂是構成貧窮陷阱的三大要素;(4)我國社會救助體制的確存在福利陷阱,並且主要有三大弊病:過渡性福利措施名不符實、缺乏鼓勵受助者投入勞動市場之經濟誘因、過多福利資源以低(中低)收入戶資格作為發放標準之一;(5)社會救助專業人員所面臨之阻礙與困境主要有六:審查業務繁重、貧窮第二代累積人力資本受阻、福利邊緣戶未受到保障、貧窮家庭之就業障礙未有效排除、現行脫貧計畫缺乏懲罰機制以及福利資格認定缺乏彈性等等。
  根據研究發現,研究者進一步提出具體的政策建議,主要涉及五個面向:(1)勞、社政整合與積極勞動市場政策;(2)工作與家庭平衡政策;(3)社會福利申請流程改造以及電子化;(4)社會福利總歸戶以及所得設算制度改革;(5)貧窮家庭之親職教育。除此之外,研究者亦建議我國政府應針對參與「兒童及少年未來教育與發展帳戶」之家庭發展貧窮動態資料庫,以供後續研究者得以更加深入地探討世代貧窮議題。
  So far, the Taiwanese government has lacked active countermeasures for long-term poor families or intergenerational poor families, and even the most basic follow-up surveys have been lacking. However, intergenerational poverty is not only a loss for individual families but also a serious economic burden for the entire country. Therefore, blocking the intergenerational transmission of poverty is the primary task of social assistance. Due to the lack of understanding of intergenerational poor families in our country, this study wants to have a deeper understanding of intergenerational poor families and the obstacles faced by the social assistance system in assisting these families.
  After reviewing the literature on intergenerational poverty abroad, I found that there are two main modes of intergenerational poverty transmission. The first is the poverty trap, and the second is the welfare trap. Based on this, this study derives three research purposes: (1) understand the characteristics and risk factors of intergenerational poor households; (2) explore whether welfare traps and poverty traps exist and how they affect intergenerational poor families to escape from poverty; (3) collect the feedback of social assistance professionals on the social assistance system as a reference for the government to revise relevant policies in the future. This research adopts the paradigm of pragmatism and responds to the research purposes with mixed methods. The quantitative method uses the “Taiwan Database of Children and Youth in Poverty” and the “Taiwan Education Panel Survey” for secondary data analysis; the qualitative method uses purposeful sampling to select 8 social assistance professionals for in-depth interviews.
  The research results show that: (1) common characteristics of those who grew up in intergenerational poor families include: women, single-parent families, low parental education, and low family income in the early years; (2) early malnutrition and poor academic performance during adolescence are important risk factors affecting children from poor families falling into intergenerational poverty; (3) early malnutrition, low family support, and poor academic performance during adolescence can be described as the three major elements of the poverty trap; (4) the failure to implement transitional welfare measures, the lack of economic incentives to encourage recipients to enter the labor market, and excessive welfare resources using the statutory poverty status as one of the criteria for payment constitute the welfare trap in Taiwan's social assistance system. (5) The main obstacles and difficulties faced by social assistance professionals are six: Welfare qualification review is heavy, the accumulation of human capital by children from poor families is hindered, the protection of near-poor families is insufficient, the employment barriers of poor families have not been effectively eliminated, the current poverty alleviation program lacks a punishment mechanism, the granting of statutory poverty status is inflexible.
  According to research findings, my policy recommendations mainly involve five levels: (1) integrate labor and social administrations and promote active labor market policies; (2) work-family balance policies; (3) improvement and digitization of the social welfare application process; (4) the integration of social welfare and the reform of the imputed income system; (5) parental education for poor families. In addition, I suggest that the Taiwanese government should develop a poverty dynamic database for the families participating in the “Children Future Education and Development Account” so that poverty researchers can explore intergenerational poverty issues in more depth.
內政部戶政司(2021)。結婚年齡中位數及平均數。檢索日期:2021-07-23。https://www.ris.gov.tw/info-popudata/app/awFastDownload/file/y4s5-00000.xls/y4s5/00000/。
王仕圖(2001)。貧窮持續時間與再進入的動態分析:以1990-1998年之嘉義縣低收入戶為例。國立中正大學社會福利學系博士論文。
王仕圖、王德睦(2007)。低收入老年戶長家戶的動態研究:嘉義縣的實證分析。社會政策與社會工作學刊,11(2),110-147。
王仕圖、王德睦、蔡勇美(2001)。貧窮持續時間的動態分析:以嘉義縣 1990-1998 年之低收入戶爲例。臺灣社會學刊,26,211-249。
王正、鄭文輝、吳明儒、鄭清霞、傅從喜、王舒芸(2007)。我國社會福利資源整合與合理化之研究。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
王永慈(2005)。台灣的貧窮問題:相關研究的檢視。台大社會工作學刊,10,1-54。
王守玉、Carol Windsor、Patsy Yates(2012)。簡介紮根理論研究法。護理雜誌,59(1),91-95。
王明仁、魏季李(2009)。對現代貧窮家庭服務的省思-從家扶基金會的扶助經驗談起。社區發展季刊,124,101-117。
王順民(1996)。貧窮的歷史性解構:以英、美兩國爲例。人文及社會科學集刊,8(1),79-113。
王德睦(1997)。貧窮的動態分析—嘉義縣貧戶的追蹤研究(I)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
王德睦(1998)。貧窮的動態分析—嘉義縣貧戶的追蹤研究(II)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
王德睦、何華欽、劉一龍(2008)。所得成長、所得不均與家戶變遷對貧窮率之影響:以台灣地區1990年至2004年爲例。臺灣社會福利學刊,7(1),29-63。
王篤強(2013)。當前社會救助政策問題與趨勢:積極促進政策批判性省察。2013年兩岸三地社會福利研討會-社會政策與社會品質(1-11頁)。浙江:浙江大學。
古允文(2008)。台灣貧窮問題的本質。載於古允文、李易駿、孫健忠、詹宜璋、吳明儒(合著),臺灣大未來—社福:回到根本重構臺灣的基本生還安全網(45-71頁)。台北:財團法人厚生基金會。
古允文、李易駿、黃建忠、施世駿(2014)。我國社會福利體系中之基本所得保障研究。台北:國家發展委員會。
古允文、林宏陽、葉崇揚(2016)。臺灣公共治理研究中心:我國就業促進目標下之勞、社政福利服務整合規劃。台北:國家發展委員會。
石泱(2008)。單親家庭青少年偏差行爲成因之研究:權力控制理論的觀點。犯罪與刑事司法研究,10,51-90。
全國宗教資訊網(2021)。原住民宗教。檢索日期:2021-08-03。https://religion.moi.gov.tw/Knowledge/Content?ci=2&cid=45。
吳怡銘(2014)。英國搶救貧窮大作戰,既給魚,也給釣竿。台北:國家發展委員會社會發展處。
呂建德(2001)。從福利國家到競爭式國家?:全球化與福利國家的危機。台灣社會學,2,263-313。
呂朝賢(2007)。貧窮動態及其成因-從生命週期到生命歷程。台大社會工作學刊,14,167-210。
呂朝賢、王德睦(2000)。1960s以降的美國貧窮理論:回顧與整合。人文及社會科學集刊,12(1),149-195。
呂朝賢、王德睦(2011)。我國社會救助法令與措施的二項弔詭-區域性差別待遇和貧窮陷阱。社區發展季刊,133,187-196。
呂朝賢、王德睦、陳俊全(2007)。臺灣的貧窮動態:趨勢、型態與轉變事件(I)。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
呂朝賢、陳俊全、王德睦(2008)。臺灣的社會救助動態:趨勢、型態與成因。人文及社會科學集刊,20(4),441-479。
呂朝賢、陳柯玫、陳琇惠(2015)。童年剝奪及其成因。臺灣社會福利學刊,13(1),151-194。
李佳頤(2010)。彈性勞動是就業促進的良藥還是社會夢魘的開始?借鏡荷蘭經驗。臺灣經濟研究月刊,33(2),102-108。
李政道、盧禹璁、吳景峰(2009)。貧窮家計的陷入與跳脫-以台南市南區2001-2007年爲例。嘉南學報,35,820-834。
李健鴻(2010)。台灣新貧階級的特徵與因應對策。新社會政策,10,16-20。
李唯君(1996)。收支動態長期追蹤研究起源與發展。調查研究,2,159-178。
李淑容(2018)。八年以後:新貧家庭貧窮動態追蹤研究。東吳社會工作學報,35,37-75。
杜慈容(2015)。脫離福利能否走出貧窮?兼論社會救助制度的作用。社區發展季刊,151,116-133。
林大森(2002)。高中/高職的公立/私立分流對地位取得之影響。教育與心理研究,25,35-62。
林郁淇(2013)。工作與家庭生活平衡政策比較研究:日本、 荷蘭、瑞典、美國與我國。國立中正大學勞工關係學系碩士論文。
林萬億(2010)。社會福利。台北:五南。
邱皓政(2021)。量化研究法(二):統計原理與分析技術(二版增修版)。台北:雙葉書廊。
洪瑋薇、莊坤洋、莊媖智(2009)。台灣鄉鎮市區因子對青少女生育率的影響。台灣公共衛生雜誌,28(6),491-502。
紀惠容(2014)。未成年懷孕服務資源手冊。新北:財團法人勵馨社會福利事業基金會。
唐淑華(2011)。理解貧困的一種框架。當代教育研究季刊,19(1),195-206。
孫健忠(2008)。社會救助的現況檢討與改革。載於古允文、李易駿、孫健忠、詹宜璋、吳明儒(合著),臺灣大未來—社福:回到根本重構臺灣的基本生還安全網(73-89頁)。台北:財團法人厚生基金會。
孫健忠(2009)。「工作」與「福利」連結的試析:從「勞役所試煉」、「工作福利」到「工有酬」。臺灣社會福利學刊,8(1),119-147。
財團法人台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會(2017)。貧窮循環高出3.78倍 超過七仟名兒少無法和父母吃團圓飯。檢索日期:2018-11-11。https://www.ccf.org.tw/?action=news1&class_id=3&did=244。
康文聰(2009)。公務人員高等考試錄取者人口特性之比較分析。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
張芳華(2015)。家庭社經地位、社會資本對高中學生教育抱負影響之分析。教育研究學報,49(2),19-40。
張清富(2009)。從理論觀點談工作與貧窮。社區發展季刊,124,58-71。
張緡鏐、蘇映伊、王聖基(2018)。台灣貧困家庭親職化兒童的生活樣貌與需求。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,8(2),43-86。
畢恆達(2015)。研究倫理。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(主編),社會及行為科學研究法:總論與量化研究法(37-64頁)。台北:臺灣東華書局股份有限公司。
莊曉霞、曹宜蓁(2014)。花蓮縣未成年懷孕處遇服務策略之研究報告。花蓮:花蓮縣政府。
許菁君、蔡宗益(2016)。青年就業與工資差距之實證研究。全球商業經營管理學報,8,89-99。
許雅惠、張英陣(2006)。「有效的」弱勢家庭服務策略─以愛爾蘭為例。社區發展季刊,114,205-218。
郭俊巖(2003)。工作福利的發展與理論:英美經驗的探討與借鏡。國立中正大學社會福利學系博士論文。
郭俊巖(2006)。論福利國家的內在危機:從Offe與Hayek觀點的探討。東吳社會工作學報,14,125-155。
郭俊巖(2010)。美國工作福利政策的形成與轉化:以AFDC改革爲例。臺灣社會福利學刊,8(2),329-371。
郭玲玲、洪瑄、董旭英(2021)。青少年偏差行為發生與否及發生頻率之模型建構。 教育研究集刊,67(1),29-63。
陳志勇、許繼峰(2013)。工作與家庭平衡政策之探討。台北:行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所。
陳杏容(2016)。家庭危險因子對少年之學業成就、偏差行為與憂鬱情緒發展的影響:累積危險指數模型探討。臺大社會工作學刊,34,41-83。
陳杏容、陳易甫(2019)。早期家庭經濟劣勢與成年初顯期發展成果之潛在剖析分析與其影響因子。中華心理衛生學刊,32(1),89-117。
陳柯玫(2008)。「貧窮文化」的詛咒?─臺北市安康社區次文化之研究。國立中正大學社會福利學系碩士論文。
陳盈方、呂建德、葉秀珍(2013)。朝向積極勞動市場政策(1996-2011):台灣政黨的差異與趨同。台灣社會學,26,37-96。
陳秋玲(2002)。世界資料庫介紹。SRDA通訊,3,25-30。
陳英傑(2018)。資訊服務流程改造-以花蓮縣社福電子化推動為例。政府機關資訊通報,356,1-8。
陳憶、陳柯玫(2020)。家庭關係對弱勢青少年主觀幸福感之影響。人文社會科學研究,14(1),39-58。
傅從喜(2007)。從轉型國家與開發中國家年金改革經驗論台灣年金體系的建構。臺灣社會福利學刊,5(2),31-66。
黃上豪(2015)。青年工作貧窮之趨勢與決定因素分析。國立臺北大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
黃上豪、古允文(2018)。臺灣青年非典型就業的特徵與風險因子探究。財務社會工作與貧窮研究學刊,1(1),1-40。
黃志隆(2013)。歐洲社會投資理念的發展與分歧。臺灣社會福利學刊,11(1),157-172。
黃紀(2015)。質量並用法。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(主編),社會及行為科學研究法:總論與量化研究法(439-463頁)。台北:臺灣東華書局股份有限公司。
黃煥榮(2009)。運用友善家庭政策平衡工作與家庭-制度與經驗的探討。人事月刊,48(1),2-18。
黃毅志(2001)。臺灣地區多元勞力市場的事業成就之比較分析。國科會人文社會彙刊,11(4),356-370。
楊瑩(1988)。台灣地區教育擴展過程中不同家庭背景子女受教機會差異之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
葉崇揚、古允文(2017)。從生產性福利體制到社會投資福利國家:臺灣與韓國的比較。社會政策與社會工作學刊,21(1),97-147。
詹宜華、張楓明、董旭英(2012)。國中生接觸偏差同儕在其衝動性格、知覺父母監督與偏差行為間關聯性之中介效果。犯罪與刑事司法研究,18,89-123。
廖錦文、鄭博文(2019)。經濟弱勢學生學習態度與學業表現之縱貫研究。教育實踐與研究,32(1),71-105。
劉一龍、石玉麗(2018)。財務教育對資產累積方案重要性:社工督導經驗之探討。財務社會工作與貧窮研究學刊,1(2),67-94。
劉任昌、殷向真(2011)。貧窮國家是否有脫離貧窮陷阱的可能?。德明學報,35(2),31-46。
劉燕萍、陳毓文(2019)。經濟弱勢少年從事部分工時工作對未來導向的影響。財務社會工作與貧窮研究學刊,2(1),87-128。
劉獻文(2000)。當代福利國家危機之研究。三民主義學報,21,93-112。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理。
蔡培元(2017)。由國際比較觀點檢視我國的幼兒照顧休假政策。社區發展季刊,159,110-125。
衛生福利部(2021)。強化社會安全網第二期計畫(110-114年)。台北:衛生福利部。
衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2021)。110年社會福利績效實地考核(社會救助業務組)。台北:衛生福利部社會及家庭署。
衛生福利部統計處(2014)。低收入戶輔導就業服務。檢索日期:2018-06-11。http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOSAASW/mp-113.html。
衛生福利部統計處(2018)。低收入戶及中低收入戶。檢索日期:2019-03-11。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-2972-113.html。
鄭怡世(2006)。台灣戰後社會工作發展的歷史分析。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系博士論文。
鄭浩(2012)。貧困陷阱:風險、人力資本傳遞和脆弱性。武漢大學經濟與管理學院博士論文。
鄭麗珍(1999)。女性單親家庭的資產累積與世代傳遞過程。臺大社會工作學刊,1,111-147。
鄭麗珍(2001)。工作貧窮與社會救助之關係。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。
鄭麗珍(2005)。脫貧相關理論及案例介紹:資產累積模式。載於林萬億主編,自立脫貧方案操作手冊。台北:內政部。
鄭麗珍(2017)。105年度積極性社會救助發展研究計畫。台北:衛生福利部。
鄭麗珍(2018)。106年脫離貧窮措施成效評估研究計畫。台北:衛生福利部。
澤涵(2018)。我該有個「低收入戶」的模樣嗎?:過得「好」補助被取消,過得「不好」卻窮得不夠格。檢索日期:2018-11-05。https://npost.tw/archives/40461。
蕭仲廷、黃毅志(2015)。台灣國三生原漢族群與其他出身背景透過社會資本、文化資本、財務資本對學業成就之影響。教育研究學報,49(1),29-54。
蕭琮琦(2013)。台灣家庭經濟安全探析—生命歷程與貧窮動態觀點的詮釋。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系博士論文。
薛承泰(1995)。台灣的地位取得研究:回顧與前瞻。載於章英華、傅仰止、瞿海源主編,社會調查與分析:社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一(357-395頁)。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
薛承泰(2004)。台灣地區貧窮女性化現象之探討:以1990 年代為例。人口學刊,29,95-121。
謝志偉(2007)。教育研究典範的未來趨勢混合方法論(Mixed Methodology)介紹。屏東教育大學學報,26,175-194。
謝志龍(2017)。不平等的累積:從生命歷程理論探討臺灣貧窮兒少的預期生命軌道、教育成就取得與家庭貧窮動態—應用TPSCY與TEPS資料庫。台北:科技部。
謝志龍(2018)。家庭生命事件與人類動力對於貧窮少年學業表現的影響:以臺灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會經濟扶助對象為例。當代教育研究季刊,26(2),25-72。
謝青屏(1995)。貧窮文化之傳承—台中市低收入家庭生活方式的個案研究。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
簡守邦(2008)。Workfare:贊成與反對。政治與社會哲學評論,25,143-203。
簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。
鐘琳惠、詹火生(2008)。台灣青少年失業問題防範對策之剖析-從歐盟就業政策經驗來探討。弘光人文社會學報,8,199-220。
Agnew, R. (2016). A theory of crime resistance and susceptibility. Criminology, 54(2), 181-211.
Alcock, P. (2004). The influence of dynamic perspectives on poverty analysis and anti-poverty policy in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 33(3), 395-416.
Aldaz-Carroll, E., & Morán, R. (2001). Escaping the Poverty Trap in Latin America: The Role of Family Factors. Cuadernos de economía, 38(114), 155-190.
Andersen, L. E. (2000). Social Mobility in Latin America. Kiel: Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
Andersen, L. E. (2001). Low social mobility in Bolivia: Causes and consequences for development (No. 1046). Kiel: Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
Antel, J. J. (1992). The Intergenerational Transfer of Welfare Dependency: Some Statistical Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3), 467-473.
Aspy, C. B., Oman, R. F., Vesely, S. K., McLeroy, K., Rodine, S., & Marshall, L. (2004). Adolescent violence: The protective effects of youth assets. Journal of Counseling & development, 82(3), 268-276.
Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Oesterle, S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2009). Parenting practices and problem behavior across three generations: monitoring, harsh discipline, and drug use in the intergenerational transmission of externalizing behavior. Developmental psychology, 45(5), 1214-1226.
Barrientos, A., & Niño‐Zarazúa, M. (2011). Social transfers and chronic poverty: objectives, design, reach and impact. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Report.
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Beaver, K. M., & Belsky, J. (2012). Gene-environment interaction and the intergenerational transmission of parenting: Testing the differential-susceptibility hypothesis. Psychiatric Quarterly, 83(1), 29-40.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industry Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic.
Betcherman, G., Dar, A., & Olivas, K. (2004). Impacts of active labor market programs: New evidence from evaluations with particular attention to developing and transition countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Bird, K. (2013). The Intergenerational Transmission of Poverty: An Overview. In A. Shepherd & J. Brunt (Eds.), Chronic Poverty: Concepts, Causes and Policy (pp. 60-84). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blanden, J., & Gibbon, S. (2006). The Persistence of Poverty across Two Generation: A View from Two Cohort. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley.
Bloom, D., Kemple, J. J., Morris, P., Scrivener, S., Verma, N., & Hendra, R. (2000). The family transition program: Final report on Florida’s initial time-limited welfare program. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Bloom, D., Scrivener, S., Michalopoulos, C., Morris, P., Hendra, R., Adams-Ciardullo, D., & Walter, J. (2002). Jobs First: Final Report on Connecticut's Welfare Reform Initiative. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Bonoli, G. (2012). Active labour market policy and social investment: a changing relationship. In N. Morel, B. Palier, J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state (pp. 181-204). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
Bonoli, G. (2013).The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bos, J. M., Huston, A. C., Granger, R. C., Duncan, G. J., Brock, T. W., & McLoyd, V. C. (1999). New Hope for People with Low Incomes: Two-Year Results of a Program To Reduce Poverty and Reform Welfare. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Boschman, S., Maas, I., Kristiansen, M. H., & Vrooman, J. C. (2019). The reproduction of benefit receipt: Disentangling the intergenerational transmission. Social science research, 80, 51-65.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, Culture. Beverly Hills: Califi Sage.
Bourgois, P. (2001). Culture of Poverty. In Smelser N. J., & Baltes P. B. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 11904-11907). New York: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Brook, J. S., Zhang, C., Balka, E. B., & Brook, D. W. (2012). Pathways to children's externalizing behavior: A three-generation study. The Journal of genetic psychology, 173(2), 175-197.
Buvinic, M. (1998). The Costs of Adolescent Childbearing: Evidence from Chile, Barbados, Guatemala and Mexico. Studies in Family Planning, 29(2), 201-209.
Case, A., & Ardington, C. (2006). The Impact of Parental Death on School Outcomes: Longitudinal Evidence from South Africa. Demography, 43(3), 401-420.
Central Intelligence Agency (2019). The World Factbook. Retrieved 2019-02-14. from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/221.html.
Chang, I. H., Chin, J. M. C., Ching, G. S., & Chuang, C. P. (2019). Could disadvantaged students’ academic achievements be improved through after-school learning and self-efficacy? An empirical study in Taiwan. International Journal of Research, 8(3), 77-93.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Cheng, L. C. (1995). The Intergenerational Effects of Poverty Vulnerability Among Female Headed Families. Washington University.
Cheng, T. L., Johnson, S. B., & Goodman, E. (2016). Breaking the intergenerational cycle of disadvantage: the three generation approach. Pediatrics, 137(6), e20152467.
Christiaensen, L., & Alderman, H. (2004). Child Malnutrition in Ethiopia: Can Maternal Knowledge Augment the Role of Income?. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(2), 287-312.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1998). Personal Experience Methods. in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp. 150–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Corcoran, M. (1995). Rags to rags: Poverty and mobility in the United States. Annual review of sociology, 21(1), 237-267.
Cordero-Guzman, H. (2014). Community-Based Organizations, Immigrant Low-Wage Workers, and the Workforce Development System in the United States. New York: Baruch College at the City University of New York.
Coughlin, C., & Vuchinich, S. (1996). Family experience in preadolescence and the development of male delinquency. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(2), 491-501.
Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31-47.
Daguerre, A. (2004). Importing workfare: policy transfer of social and labour market policies from the USA to Britain under New Labour. Social Policy & Administration, 38(1), 41-56.
Daguerre, A. (2007). Active labour market policies and welfare reform: Europe and the US in comparative perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Dahrendorf, R. (1979). Life Changes: Approaches to social and political theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Danziger, S. K., Danziger, S., Seefeldt, K. S., & Shaefer, H. L. (2016). Increasing work opportunities and reducing poverty two decades after welfare reform. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 241-244.
Dar, A., Blunch, N. H., Kim, B., & Sasaki, M. (2002). Participation of Children in Schooling and Labor Activities: A Review of Empirical Studies. Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0221. Washington, DC: Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network, World Bank.
Dasgupta, P. (2007), Poverty Traps: Exploring the Complexity of Causation. 2020 Focus Brief on the World’s Poor and Hungry People. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
Dewilde, C. (2003). A life‐course perspective on social exclusion and poverty. The British journal of sociology, 54(1), 109-128.
Diamond, P., & Lodge, G. (2014). Dynamic Social Security after the crisis: Towards a new welfare state?. International Social Security Review, 67(3-4), 37-59.
Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Strycker, L. A. (2002). A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems. Prevention science, 3(2), 125-133.
Duvander, A. Z., & Haas, L. (2013). Sweden. In P. Moss, (Ed.), International review of leave policies and related research (pp. 267-276). London: Institute of Education University of London.
Ebdon, R. (2000). Working children’s futures: child labor, poverty, education and health. London: Save the Children
Edmark, K., & Hanspers, K. (2015). Is welfare dependency inherited? Estimating causal welfare transmission effects using Swedish sibling data. European Journal of Social Security, 17(3), 338-360.
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2004). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shannhan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3-19). New York: Springer.
Emerson, P. M., & de Souza, A. P. F. (2009). The Intergenerational Persistence of Child Labor. In P. Orazem, Z. Tzannatos, & G. Sedlacek (Eds.), Child Labor and Education in Latin America: An Economic Perspective (pp. 103-115). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eni, R., & Phillips-Beck, W. (2013). Teenage pregnancy and parenthood perspectives of First Nation women. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 4(1), 1-25.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). After the Golden Age? Welfare State Dilemmas in a Global Economy. In G. Esping-Andersen (Ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies (pp. 1-31). London: Sage.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2007). Sociological explanations of changing income distributions. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(5), 639-658.
Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Epidemiology of juvenile violence. Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America, 9(4), 733-748.
Feagin, J. R., & Ducey, K. (2018). Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Fomby, P., Krueger, P. M., & Wagner, N. M. (2014). Age at childbearing over two generations and grandchildren's cognitive achievement. Research in social stratification and mobility, 35, 71-88.
Freedman, L., Waldman, R., De Pinho, H., and Wirth, M. (2005). Who's got the power? Transforming Health Systems for Women and Children. UN Millennium Project Task Force on Child Health and Maternal Health. London: Earthscan.
Gatta, M. L. (2005). Not Just Getting By: The New Era of Flexible Workforce Development. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.
Gennetian, L. A., & Miller, C. (2000). Reforming welfare and rewarding work: Final report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program, vol. 2: Effects on children. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Gennetian, L. A., & Miller, C. (2002). Children and welfare reform: A view from an experimental welfare program in Minnesota. Child development, 73(2), 601-620.
George, V., & Wilding, P. (2002). Globalization and Human Welfare. New York: Palgrave.
Ghana National Commission on Children (1997). Ghana’s children: Country report. Accra: Ghana National Commission on Children.
Gibbons, S., & Blanden, J. (2006). The persistence of poverty across generations: A view from two British cohorts. Bristol, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Gottschalk, P. (1996). Is the correlation in welfare participation across generations spurious?. Journal of Public Economics, 63(1), 1-25.
Green, D. (1998). Hidden Lives: Voices of Children in Latin America and the Caribbean. London: Cassell.
Hagan, J. (1988). Structural Criminology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Handler, J. F. (2004). Social citizenship and workfare in the United States and Western Europe: The paradox of inclusion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 676-719.
Harper, C. (2004a). Child Ill Health and Mortality: How Can We Prevent the Preventable?. CHIP Policy Briefing No. 7. London: Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre.
Harper, C. (2004b). Breaking Poverty Cycles: The Importance of Action in Childhood. CHIP Policy Briefing No. 8. London: Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre.
Harper, C., Marcus, R., & Moore, K. (2003). Enduring poverty and the conditions of childhood: lifecourse and intergenerational poverty transmissions. World development, 31(3), 535-554.
Hartley, R., Lamarche, C., & Ziliak, J. P. (2017). Welfare reform and the intergenerational transmission of dependence. Discussion Paper no. 10942. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
Heady, C. (2000). What is the effect of child labour on learning achievement? Evidence from Ghana. Florence: UNICEF.
Hemerijck, A. (2015). The quiet paradigm revolution of social investment. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(2), 242-256.
Holzer, H. J., Schanzenbach, D. W., Duncan, G. J., & Ludwig, J. (2008). The economic costs of childhood poverty in the United States. Journal of Children and Poverty, 14(1), 41-61.
Iceland, J. (2003). Why Poverty Remains High: The Role of Income Growth, Economic Inequality and Changes in Family Structure, 1949-1999. Demography, 40(3), 499-519.
Iceland, J. (2013). Poverty in America: A handbook. Oakland: University of California Press.
Ilahi, N., Orazem, P. F., & Sedlacek, G. (2005). How Does Working as a Child Affect Wage Income and Poverty as an Adult?. Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0514. Washington, DC: World Bank.
International Labour Organization (2019). What is child labour. Retrieved 2019-08-05. from https://www.ilo.org/ipec/facts/lang--en/index.htm.
Iversen, V. (2002). Autonomy in child labor migrants. World development, 30(5), 817-834.
Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in American. New York: Basic Books.
Jenson, J. (2009). Redesigning citizenship regimes after neoliberalism: moving towards social investment. In N. Morel, B. Palier and J. Palme (Eds.), What Future for Social Investment? (pp. 27–44). Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies Research Report.
Jordan, A. B. (2006). Make yourself at home: the social construction of research roles in family studies. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 169-185.
Katz, M. B. (1996). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. New York: Basic Books.
Kesner, J. E., & McKenry, P. C. (2001). Single parenthood and social competence in children of color. Families in Society, 82(2), 136-144.
Kristensen, G. K., & Ravn, M. N. (2015). The voices heard and the voices silenced: Recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 722-737.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265-275.
Leslie, J. (1988). Women's work and child nutrition in the Third World. World development, 16(11), 1341-1362.
Letherby,G.(2003) Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Levine, P. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (1996). The Intergenerational Correlation in AFDC Participation: Welfare Trap or Poverty Trap? (pp. 1100-1196). Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Lewis, O. (1966). The Culture of Poverty. Scientific American, 215(4), 19-25.
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. (2003). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. In Lincoln, Y. S., Denzin, N. K. (Eds.), Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (pp. 219-238). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Luxembourg Income Study Database (2019). Inequality and Poverty Key Figures. Retrieved 2019-06-07. from https://www.lisdatacenter.org/lis-ikf-webapp/app/search-ikf-figures.
Mahbub ul Haq Human Development Center (2000). Human development in South Asia 2000: The gender question. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manning, W. D., & Lamb, K. A. (2003). Adolescent well-being in cohabiting, married, and single‐parent families. Journal of marriage and family, 65(4), 876-893.
Mayer, S. E. (1997). What Money Can’t Buy: The Effect of Parental Income on Children’s Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McLanahan, S. S. (1988). Family structure and dependency: Early transitions to female household headship. Demography, 25(1), 1-16.
McLaughlin, M., & Rank, M. R. (2018). Estimating the Economic Cost of Childhood Poverty in the United States. Social Work Research, 42(2), 73-83.
Mennemeyer, S. T., & Sen, B. (2006). Undesirable juvenile behavior and the quality of parental relationships. Southern Economic Journal, 73(2), 437-460.
Mills, E. (2002). Hazel the Dental Assistant and the Research Dilemma of (Re)presenting a Life Story. in W. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers (pp. 107–123). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Miranne, K. B., & Young, A. H. (1998). Women Reading the World: Challenging Welfare Reform in Wisconsin. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 25(2), 155-176.
Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qualitative research, 6(1), 45-59.
National Urban League Institute for Opportunity and Equality (2002). Negative effects of TANF on college enrollment. Washington, DC: National Urban League Institute for Opportunity and Equality.
Neppl, T. K., Conger, R. D., Scaramella, L. V., & Ontai, L. L. (2009). Intergenerational continuity in parenting behavior: mediating pathways and child effects. Developmental psychology, 45(5), 1241-1256.
Neuman, L. W. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Nolan, B., Esping-Andersen, G., Whelan, C. T., Maitre, B., & Wagner, S. (2010). The role of social institutions in inter-generational mobility. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin.
OECD (2019). Poverty rate (indicator). Retrieved 2019-06-05. from https://data.oecd.org/inequality/poverty-rate.htm.
Oliver, M., & Shapiro, T. (1995). Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Payne, R. K. (2005). A framework for understanding poverty. Highlands, TX: aha! Process.
Pearce, D. (1978). The Feminization of Poverty: Women, Work, and Welfare. Urban and Social Change Review, 11, 28-36.
Pearson, A. F. (2007). The new welfare trap: Case managers, college education, and TANF policy. Gender & Society, 21(5), 723-748.
Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1971). Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Random house.
Plant, M. W. (1984). An empirical analysis of welfare dependence. The American Economic Review, 74(4), 673-684.
Prinz, R. J. (2016). Parenting and family support within a broad child abuse prevention strategy: Child maltreatment prevention can benefit from public health strategies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 51, 400-406.
Punch, K. (2005). Introduction to Social Research Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches (2nd ed). London: Sage
Quaid, M. (2002). Workfare: Why good social policy ideas go bad. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Rank, M. R. (2011). Rethinking American Poverty. Contexts, 10(2), 16-21.
Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2015). The Likelihood of Experiencing Relative Poverty over the Life Course. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133513.
Rogers, D. L., & Weil, A. (2000). Welfare Reform and the Role of Tax Policy. National Tax Journal, 53(3), 385-402.
Roker, D. (1998). Worth more than this: Young people growing up in family poverty. London: Children's Society.
Rowntree, B. S. (1901). Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Macmillan.
Sachs, J. D. (2006). The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York: Penguin.
Scaramella, L. V., Neppl, T. K., Ontai, L. L., & Conger, R. D. (2008). Consequences of socioeconomic disadvantage across three generations: parenting behavior and child externalizing problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(5), 725-733.
Schiller, B. R. (1989). The economics of poverty and discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting the political back into political economy by bringing the state back in yet again. World Politics, 61(3), 516-546.
Schofield, T. J., Martin, M. J., Conger, K. J., Neppl, T. M., Donnellan, M. B., & Conger, R. D. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of adaptive functioning: A test of the interactionist model of SES and human development. Child development, 82(1), 33-47.
Schram, S. F. (2002). Praxis for the poor: Piven and Cloward and the future of social science in social welfare. NewYork: New York University Press.
Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). Education, Occupation, and Earnings. New York: Academic Press.
Shaw, I. (2008). Ethics and the practice of qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 7(4), 400-414.
Shaw, K. M., Goldrick-Rab, S., Mazzeo, C., & Jacobs, J. A. (2006). Putting poor people to work: How the work-first idea eroded college access for the poor. New York: Russell Sage.
Sloth-Nielsen, J. (2004) Realising the Rights of Children Growing up in Child-headed Households: A Guide to Laws, Policies and Social Advocacy. Cape Town: Creda Communications, Community Law Centre, University of the Western Cape.
Snell, E. K., Castells, N., Duncan, G., Gennetian, L., Magnuson, K., & Morris, P. (2012). Promoting the positive development of boys in high-poverty neighborhood: Evidence from four anti-poverty experiements. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(2), 357-374.
Stapleton, D. C., O'day, B. L., Livermore, G. A., & Imparato, A. J. (2006). Dismantling the poverty trap: Disability policy for the twenty‐first century. The Milbank Quarterly, 84(4), 701-732.
Suryadarma, D., Pakpahan, Y. M., & Suryahadi, A. (2009). The Effects of Parental Death and Chronic Poverty on Children's Education and Health: Evidence from Indonesia. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 133. Manchester, UK: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.
Svensson, R. (2003). Gender differences in adolescent drug use: The impact of parental monitoring and peer deviance. Youth & Society, 34(3), 300-329.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Teachman, J. D., Tedrow, L. M., & Crowder, K. D. (2000). The changing demography of America's families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1234-1246.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angles: Sage.
Thaxton, S., & Agnew, R. (2018). When criminal coping is likely: An examination of conditioning effects in general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(4), 887-920.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2015). welfare indicators and risk factors: fourteenth report to congress. Retrieved 2018-10-17. from https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/welfare-indicators-and-risk-factors-fourteenth-report-congress.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2004). Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program: Sixth annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
UNFPA (2013). Motherhood in Childhood: Facing the challenge of adolescent pregnancy. New York: United Nations Population Fund.
UWCA (2012). Review of support for Pregnancy and Parenting Aboriginal students. Calgary: UWCA.
Wagmiller, R. L., & Adelman, R. M. (2009). Childhood and intergenerational poverty: The long-term consequences of growing up poor. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.
Wahba, J. (2001). Child labor and poverty transmission: no room for dreams. Cairo: Economic Research Forum for the Arab Countries, Iran and Turkey.
Weir, S. (2000). Intergenerational transfers of human capital: Evidence on two types of education externalities. Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies, Department of Economics, University of Oxford.
Whelan, C. T., Nolan, B., & Maître, B. (2013). Analysing intergenerational influences on income poverty and economic vulnerability with EU-SILC. European Societies, 15(1), 82-105.
Wilson, W. J. (2016). Urban Poverty, Race, and Space. In D. Brady & L. M. Burton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty (pp. 394-413). New York: Oxford University Press.
Yunus, M. (2007). Banker to the Poor: Micro-Lending and the Battle against World Poverty. New York: Public Affairs.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE