|
一、歐洲聯盟官方文件
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion Guidelines on the Implementation of the Court of Justice of the European Union Judgment on “Google Spain And Inc V. Agencia Española De Protección De Datos (Aepd) And Mario Costeja González” C-131/12 (2014), WP 225.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 1/2008 on Data Protection Issues Related to Search Engines (2008), WP 148.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 1/2010 on the concepts of "controller" and "processor" (2010), WP 169.
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 8/2010 on Applicable Law (2010), WP 179.
Case C-97/96, Verband deutscher Daihatsu-Händler eV v. Daihatsu Deutschland GmbH,1997 ECR I- 06843.
Case C-101/01, Criminal proceedings against Bodil Lindquvist, 2003 ECR I-12971.
Case C-131/12, Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), 2014 ECR 317.
Case C‑138/11, Compass-Datenbank GmbH v. Republik Österreich, ECLI:EU:C:2012:449.
Case C-274/99, Bernard Connolly v Commission of the European Communities, 2001 ECR I-01611.
Case 325/09, L’Oréal SA and Others v eBay International AG and Others, 2011 ECR I-06011.
Case C‑360/10, Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v. Netlog NV, ECLI:EU:C:2012:85.
Case C-398/15, Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Lecce v. Salvatore Manni, ECLI:EU:C:2017:197.
Case C‑413/14, Intel Corporation Inc. v. European Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2017:632.
Case C-507/17, Google LLC v. Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), ECLI:EU:C:2019:772.
Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union, O.J. (C 326), 26. 10. 2012, pp.391-407.
Communiation SEC (73) 4300 final “Community Policy on Data-Processing”. 21.11.1973.
Communication COM (2010) 609 final “A comprehensive approach on personal data protection in the European Union”, 4.11.2010.
Communication COM (2012) 9 final “Safeguarding Privacy in a Connected World”, 25.1.2012.
A European Data Protection Framework for the 21st Century”
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 “on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data”, OJ L 281, 23. 11. 1995, p. 31–50.
Directive 2000/31/EC of 8 June 2000 “on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (E-Commerce Directive)”, OJ L 178, 17.07.2000, pp. 1-15.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 March 2014 (COM(2012)0011 – C7-0025/2012 – 2012/0011(COD)), OJ C 378, 9.11.2017, p. 399–492.
Joined Cases C‑92/09 and C‑93/09, Volker und Markus Schecke GbR and Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen, 2010 ECR I-11063.
Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08, Google France SARL v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA, 2010 ECR I-2417.
Joined Case C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01, Rechnungshof v Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others and Christa Neukomm and Joseph Lauermann v Österreichischer Rundfunk, 2003 ECR I-04989.
Joined Case C-468/10 and C-469/10, Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF), Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD) v Administración del Estado, 2011 ECR I-20181.
Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen in Case C-131/12, Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD), 2014 ECR 317.
Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen in Case C‑138/11, Compass-Datenbank GmbH v. Republik Österreich, ECLI:EU:C:2012:449.
Opinion of Advocate General Bot in Case C-398/15, Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Lecce v. Salvatore Manni, ECLI:EU:C:2017:197.
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Case C-507/17, Google LLC v. Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), ECLI:EU:C:2019:772.
Proposal for A Regulation COM (2012) 11 final “on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data”, OJ L 119 4.5.2016, pp. 1-88.
Regulation No 236/2012 of 14 March 2012 “on Short Selling And Certain Aspects Of Credit Default Swaps”, OJ L 86, 24.03.2012, pp. 1-24.
Regulation No 648/2012 of 4 July 2012 “on Otc Derivatives, Central Counterparties And Trade Repositories”, OJ L 201, 27.07.2012, pp. 1-59.
二、歐洲人權法院文件
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended) (ECHR)
Aleksey Ovchinnikov v. Russia, no. 24061/04 (2010).
B.B. v. France, no. 5335/06 (2010).
Gardel v. France, no.16428/05 (2010).
Niemietz v. Germany, no. 13710/88 (1992).
The Observer And The Guardian v. United Kingdom, no. 13585/88 (1991).
Times Newspapers Ltd v. The United Kingdom, no. 3002/03 and 23676/03 (2009).
Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00 (2005).
Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2), no. 40660/08 and 60641/08 (2012).
三、專書
王泰銓：歐洲共同體法總論，台北：三民書局，1997年。
丘宏達（著）∕陳純一（修訂）：現代國際法，台北：三民書局，2012年。
姜皇池：國際公法導論，台北：新學林出版股份有限公司，2008年。
許慶雄∕李明峻：現代國際法入門，台北：月旦出版中心，1993年。
陳麗娟：歐洲共同體經濟法，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2005年。
陳麗娟：里斯本條約後歐洲聯盟新面貌，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2018年。
Mattias Herdegen著∕張恩民譯：歐洲法，台北：韋伯文化國際出版有限公司，2006年。
羅傳賢：立法程序與技術，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2012年。
Berlee, Anna: Access to Personal Data in Public Land Registers: Balancing Publicity of Property Rights with the Rights to Privacy and Data Protection, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2018.
Bygrave, Lee A.: Data Privacy in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Barnard, Catherine /Peers Steve : European Union Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Chalmers Damien, et al. : European Union Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Hijmans, Hielke: The European Union as Guardian of Internet Privacy- The Story of Art 16 TFEU, Switerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
Jones, Meg Leta: Control+Z: The Right to Be Forgotten, New York & London: New York University Press, 2016.
Lynskey, Orla : The Foundations of EU Data Protection Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Mayer-Schönberger,Viktor: Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
Nissenbum, Helen : Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life, California: Stanford University Press, 2010.
Rallo, Artemi: The Right to Be Forgotten on the Internet: Google v Spain, Washington, D.C.: Electornic Privacy Information Center, 2018.
Rothfeder, Jeffrey: Privacy for Sale: How Computerization Has Made Everyone's Private Life an Open Secret, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.
Rowland, Diane/Kohl, Uta/Charlesworth, Andrew: Information Technology Law, New York, NY: Routledge, 2017.
Strumpf, Felix: Das Recht auf Vergessenwerden—Das Google Urteil des EuGH: Verbote der zwwiten Chance im digitalen Zeitalter oder Ende der freien Kommunikation im Internet? Baden-Baden: Tectum Verlag, 2017.
Swire, Peter/Kennedy-Mayo, DeBrae: U. S. Private-sector Privacy, Portsmouth: International Association of Privacy Professional, 2020.
Van Alesnoy,Brendan: Data Protection Law in the EU: Roles, Recponsibilities And Liability, Cambridge, Intersentia, 2019.
Weber, Rolf H/Staiger, Dominic: Transatlantic Data Protection in Practice, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2017.
Weismantel, Jan: Das „Recht auf Vergessenwerden”im Internet nach dem „Google-Urteil“ des EuGH, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2017.
四、專書論文
李震山：基因資訊利用與資訊隱私權之保障，刊載於：法治斌：法治斌教授紀念論文集—法治與現代行政法學，台北：元照出版，2004年，頁83-110。
吳志光：歐盟法院訴訟類型，刊載於：洪德欽∕陳淳文（編）：歐盟法之基礎原則與實務發展（上），台北：國立臺灣大學出版中心，2015年，頁151-212。
蔡柏毅：歐盟「個人資料保護規則」導讀，刊載於：財團法人金融聯合徵信中心編輯委員會（編）：歐盟個人資料保護規則，台北：金融聯合徵信，2016年，頁1-14。
Azurmendi, Ana: Spain - The right to be forgotten. The right to privacy and the initiative facing the new challenges of the information society,in: Schünemann Wolf J. and Baumann, MaxOtto (eds.) Privacy, Data Protection and Cybersecurity in Europe, Cham: Springer, pp.17-30.
Chiu,Wen-Tsong, Limits and Prospects of the Right to Be Forgorrten in Taiwan, in Werro, Franz (ed): The Right To Be Forgotten: A Comparative Study of the Emergent Right's Evolution and Application in Europe, the Americas, and Asia Cham: Springer, pp.311-318.
Guadamuz, Andres: Developing a Right to Be Forgotten, in: Synodinou, Tatiana-Eleni et al. (eds.): EU Internet Law: Internet Law Regulation and Enforcement, Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 59-76.
Graux, Hans, et al.: The Right of Forgetting in the Internet Era, in: The Debate On Privacy And Security Over The Network: Regulation And Markets, Madrid and Barcelona: Ariel and Fundación Telefónica, 2012, pp. 93-106.
Haga, Yuriko: Right to Be Forgotten: A New Privacy Right in the Era of Internet, in: Corrales, Marcelo, et al. (eds.): New Technology, Big Data and the Law, Singapore: Springer, 2017, pp.97-126.
Hustinx, Peter: EU Data Protection Law: The Review of Directive 95/46/EC and the General Data Protection Regulation, in: Cremona, Marise (ed.): New Technologies and EU Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp.123-173.
Kuner, Christopher: The Internet and the Global Reach of EU Law, in: Cremona, Marise et al. (eds.): EU Law Beyond EU Borders: The Extraterritorial Reach of EU Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 112-145.
Lavrysen, Laurens: Protection by the Law: The Positive Obligation to Develop a Legal Framework to Adequately Protect ECHR Rights, in: Haeck, Yves et al. (eds): Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century, Dordrecht: Springer, 2014, pp. 69-129.
Markou, Christiana: The ‘Right to Be Forgotten’: Ten Reasons Why It Should Be Forgotten, in: Gutwirth, Serge et al. (eds.): Reforming European Data Protection Law, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015, pp.203-226.
Vested-Hansen, Jens: Article 7 – Respect for Private and Family Life (Private Life, Home and Communications), in: Steve, Peers (eds.): The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights:
A Commentary, Baden-Baden/Munich/Oxford: Nomos/C.H.Beck/Hart Publishing, 2014.
Zanfir, Gabriela: Tracing the Right to Be Forgotten in the Short History of Data Protection Law: The ‘New Clothes’ of an Old Right, in: Gutwirth,Serge et al. (eds.): Reforming European Data Protection Law, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015, pp. 227-249.
五、期刊論文
何明瑜：歐盟競爭法調查程序中當事人權利之保障—以歐盟水泥案為中心，刊載於：公平交易季刊，第16卷第2期，2008年04月，頁1-42。
吳兆琰：論政府資料探勘應用之個人資料保護爭議，刊載於：科技法律透析，第19卷第11期，2007年11月，頁21-39。
邱文聰：從資訊自決與資訊隱私的概念區分—評「電腦處理個人資料保護法修正草案」的結構性問題，刊載於：月旦法學，第168期，2009年5月，頁172-189。
林玫君：論歐盟最新個人資料保護法制，刊載於：科技法律透析，第26卷第11期，2014年11月，頁51-68。
林其樺：歐盟個人資料保護新展望─改革包裹立法通過後之因應，刊載於：科技法律透析，第28卷第5期，2016年5月，頁2-4。
范姜真媺：網路時代個人資料保護之強化──被遺忘權利之主張，刊載於：興大法學，第11期，2016年5月，頁61-106。
徐彪豪：M2M時代下的資料保護權利之進展－歐盟與日本觀察，刊載於：科技法律透析，第25卷第11期，2013年11月，頁47-62。
徐彪豪：從歐盟法院實務看資料保護在智慧聯網時代下發展－以資料保存指令無效案和西班牙Google案為例，刊載於：科技法律透析，第26卷第8期，2014年8月，頁60-66。
徐彪豪：被遺忘權近期發展－歐盟法院判決週年後回顧與本土觀察刊載於：科技法律透析，第27卷第11期，2015年11月，頁50-70。
徐彪豪：日最高院被遺忘權判決提供搜尋引擎業者受理請求衡量判準：科技法律透析，第29卷第3期，2017年3月，頁7-9。
翁清坤：論個人資料保護標準之全球化，刊載於：東吳法律學報，第22卷第1期，2010年7月，頁1-60。
郭戎晉，論歐盟個人資料保護立法域外效力規定暨其適用問題，刊載於：政大法學評論，第161期，2020年6月，頁1-70。
陳思廷： ASP產業促進會呼籲歐盟個人資料保護指令須跟上科技的腳步，刊載於：科技法律透析，第13卷第6期，2001年6月，頁12-13。
陳起行：資訊隱私權法理探討──以美國法為中心，刊載於：政大法學評論，第64期，2000年12月，頁297-341。
許炳華：被遺忘的權利：比較法之觀察，刊載於：東吳法律學報，第27卷第1期，2015年7月，頁125-163。
張志瑋，記憶或遺忘，抑或相忘於網路－從歐洲法院被遺忘權判決，檢視資訊時代下的個人資料保護，刊載於：政大法學評論，第 148 期，2017年3月，頁1-68 。
張陳宏：個人資料之認定－個人資料保護法適用之啟動閥，，刊載於：法令月刊，第67卷5期，2016年5月，頁67-101。
黃源浩： 法國行政第三人撤銷訴訟之研究，刊載於：臺大法學論叢，第48卷第4期，2019年12月，頁1863-1926。
彭金隆等著：巨量資料應用在台灣個資法架構下的法律風險，刊載於：臺大管理論叢，第27卷第2期特刊，2017年5月，頁93-118。
葉芳如：歐盟有關個人資料保護指令生效，刊載於：資訊法務透析，第10卷第12期，1998年12月，頁12-13。
葉志良：大數據應用下個人資料定義的檢討：以我國法院判決為例，刊載於：資訊社會研究，第31期，2016年7月，頁1-33。
詹文凱：美國法上個人資訊隱私的相關判決，刊載於：律師雜誌，第233期，1999年2月，頁30-40。
楊立新∕韓煦：被遺忘權的中國本土化及法律適用，刊載於：法律適用，第2卷，2015年2月，頁24-34。
楊智傑：個人資料保護法制上『被遺忘權利』與『個人反對權』：從 2014 年西班牙 Google v. AEPD 案判決出發，刊載於：國會月刊，第43卷第7 期，2015年7月，頁19-43。
廖欣柔：歐盟被遺忘權簡介暨我國實務見解觀察整理，刊載於：萬國法律，第223期，2019年2月，頁46-59。
劉定基：大數據與物聯網時代的個人資料自主權，刊載於：憲政時代季刊，第42卷第3期，2017年1月，頁265-308。
劉靜怡：網路社會規範模式初探，刊載於：臺大法學論叢，第28卷第1期，1998年10月，頁1-45。
劉靜怡：社群網路時代的隱私困境：以Facebook為討論對向，刊載於：臺大法學論叢，第41卷第1期，2012年3月，頁1-70。
劉靜怡：淺談GDPR的國際衝擊及其可能的因應之道，刊載於：月旦法學雜誌，第286期，2019年2月，頁5-31。
樓一琳、何之行：個人資料保護於雲端運算時代之法律爭議初探暨比較法分析：以健保資料為例，刊載於：臺大法學論叢，第46卷第2期，2017年6月，頁339-422。
蔡昀臻∕樊國楨：個人資料管理系統驗證要求事項標準化進程初探：根基於 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27 在 2017-01 公布的框架，刊載於：資訊安全通訊，第23卷第4期，2017年，頁1-36。
蔡孟芩，如何「被遺忘」？──歐盟法院2019年9月24日C 136/17及C 507/17兩件Google案對「被遺忘權」的闡釋，刊載於：月旦裁判時報，第93期，2020年3月，頁79-90。
謝祥揚：論『資訊隱私權』，刊載於：東吳法研論集，第3卷， 2007年4月，頁123-156。
蘇慧婕，歐盟被遺忘權的概念發展——以歐盟法院Google Spain v. AEPD判決分析為中心，刊載於：憲政時代，第41卷第4期，2016年5月，頁473-516。
Abramson, Jeffrey: Searching for Reputation: Reconciling Free Speech and the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’, in: North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 17, No. 1, June 2015, pp. 1-78.
Abril, Patricia Sanchez/Moreno, Eugenio Pizarro: Lux In Arcana: Decoding the Right to BE Forgotten in Digital Archives, in: Laws, Vol. 5, No. 3, August 2016, pp. 38-39.
Ambrose, Meg Leta: It’s About Time: Privacy, Information Lifecycles, and the Right to be Forgotten, in: Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, May 2013, pp. 369-380.
Ambrose, Meg/Ausloos, Jef: The Right to Be Forgotten Across the Pond, in: Journal of Information Policy, Vol. 3, September 2013, pp. 1-23.
Ausloos, Jef: The 'Right to Be Forgotten' - Worth Remembering?, in: Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, April 2012, pp. 143-152.
Azzi, Adèle: The Challenges Faced by the Extraterritorial Scope of the General Data Protection Regulation, in: Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, Vol. 9, No. 2, October 2018, pp. 126-137.
Bartolini, Cesare/Siry, Lawrence: The Right to Be Forgotten in the Light of the Consent of the Data Subject, in: Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 32, No. 2, April 2016, pp. 218-237.
Bennett, Steven C. : The ‘Right to Be Forgotten’: Reconciling EU and US Perspectives, in: Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 30, No. 1, April 2012, pp. 161-195.
Bolton, Robert: The Right to Be Forgotten: Forced Amnesia in a Technological Age, in: The Right to Be Forgotten: Forced Amnesia in a Technological Age, Vol. 31, No. 2, October 2015, pp. 133-144.
Bygrave, Lee A. :Privacy Protection in A Global Context–A Comparative Overview, in: Scandinavian Studies in Law, Vol. 47, September 2004, pp. 319-348.
Caravà, Eleonora: Personal Data Kept in Companies Registers: The Denial of the ‘Right to be Forgotten’, in: European Data Protection Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 2, February 2017, pp. 287-292.
Cate, Fred H.: The EU Data Protection Directive, Information Privacy, and the Public Interest, in: Iowa Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 3, March 1995, pp. 431–443.
Chenou, Jean-Marie/Radu, Roxana: The ‘Right to Be forgotten’: Negotiating Public and Private Ordering in the European Union, in: Business & Society, Vol. 58, No. 1, June 2017, pp. 1-29.
De Baets, Antoon: A Historian’s View on the Right to Be Forgotten, in: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Vol. 30, No. 1-2, February 2016, pp. 57-66.
Erdos, David: From the Scylla of Restriction to the Charybdis of Licence? Exploring the Scope of the ‘Special Purposes’ Freedom of Expression Shield in European Data Protection, in: Common Market Law Review, Vol. 52, No. 1, February 2015, pp. 119-154.
Frosio, Giancarlo F.: The Right To Be forgotten: Much Ado About Nothing, in: Colorado Technology Law, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2017, pp.307-336.
Frantziou, Eleni: Further Developments in the Right to be Forgotten: The European Court of Justice's Judgment in Case C-131/12, Google Spain, SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos, in: Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, October 2014, pp. 761-777.
Friesen, Jessica: The Impossible Right to Be Forgotten, in: Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, Vol.47 No.1, Jan. 2021, pp.173-196.
Fried, Charles: Privacy, in: The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 77, No. 3, January 1968, pp. 475-493.
Frenzel, Eike Michael: Facilitating the Flow of Public Information: The CJEU in Favour of Distinctive Rule/Exception Regulation in Member Stataes, in: European Data Protection Law Review, Vol.3, No.2, 2017, pp. 283-286.
Gilbert, Francoise: European Data Protection 2.0: New Compliance Requirement in Sight - What the Proposed EU Data Protection Means for U.S. Companies, in: Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, September 2012, pp. 815-863.
Gömann, Merlin: The new territorial scope of EU data protection law: Deconstructing a revolutionary achievement, in: Common Market Law Review. Vol. 54, Iss. 2, April 2017, pp. 567-590.
Hatzopoulos, Vassilis/Roma, Sofia: Caring for sharing? The Collaborative Economy under EU law, in: Common Market Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 1, February 2017, pp. 81-127.
Hijmans, Hielke/Scirocco, Alfonso: Shortcomings in EU data protection in the third and the second pillars. can the Lisbon Treaty be expected to help? in: Common Market Law Review, October, Vol. 46, No. 5, October 2009, pp. 1485-1525.
Hoffman, David, et al. : The Right To Obscurity: How We Can Implement The Google Spain Decision, in: North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 3, No. 4, March 2016, pp. 437- 468.
Keller, Daphne: The Right Tools: Europe’s Intermediary Liability Laws And The EU 2016 General Data Protection Regulation, in: Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, June 2018, pp. 287-364.
Kelly, Michael J./Satola, David: The Right to Be Forgotten, in: University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 1, May 2017, pp. 1-65.
Koops, Bert-Jaap: Forgetting Footprints, Shunning Shadows. A Critical Analysis of the "Right to Be Forgotten" in Big Data Practice, in: SCRIPTED, Vol. 8, No. 3, December 2011, pp. 229-256.
Kerr, Julia: What Is a Search Engine? The Simple Question the Court of Justice of the European Union Forgot to Ask and What It Means for the Future of the Right to be Forgotten, in: Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 1, July 2016, pp. 217-243.
Lee, Edward: The Right to Be Forgotten v. Free Speech, in I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, August 2015, pp. 85-112.
Mantelero, Alessandro: The EU Proposal for a General Protection Regulation and the Roots of the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’, in: Computer Law & Security Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, June 2013, pp. 229-235.
Mantelero, Alessandro: Right to Be Forgotten and Public Registers. A Request to the European Court of Justice for A Preliminary Ruling, in: European Data Protection Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, April 2016, pp. 231-235.
Meeusen, Johan, The “Logic of Globalization” Versus the “Logic of the Internal Market”: A New Challenge for the European Union, in: Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica, Vol. 66, No. 4, December 2020, pp.19-29.
Padova, Yann: Is The Right to Be Forgotten A Universal, Regional, or ‘Glocal’ Right?, in: Internattional Data Privacy Law, Vol. 9, No. 1, February 2019, pp. 15-29.
Post, Robert C. : Data Privacy and Dignity Privacy: Google Spain, the Right to Be forgotten, and the Construction of Public Sphere, in: Duke Law Journal, Vol. 67, No. 5, February 2018, pp. 981-1072.
Rosen, Jeffrey Rosen: The Right to Be Forgotten, in: Stanford Law Review Online, Vol. 64, February 2012, pp. 88-92.
Rustad, Michael L./Kulevska, Sanna: Reconceptualizing the Right to Be Forgotten to Enable Transatlantic Data Flow, in: Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 2, July 2015, pp. 349-417.
Schwartz, Paul M.: The EU-US Privacy Collision: A Turn to Institutions and Procedures, in: Harvard Law Review, Vol. 126, No. 7, May 2013, pp. 1966-2009.
Scott, Joanne: The New EU ‘Extraterritoriality’, in: Common Market Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 5, October 2014, pp.1343-1380.
Stute, David. J. : Prviacy Almighty? The CJEU’s Judgment in Google Spain SL v. ADPD, in: Michgan Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, No. 4, December 2015, pp. 649-680.
Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.: The Extraterritoriality of EU Data Privacy Law - Its Theoretical Justification and Its Practical Effect on U.S. Businesses, in: Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 50, No. 1, December 2014, pp. 53-102.
Tamo, Aurelia/George, Damian: Oblivion, Erasure and Forgetting in the Digital Age, in: Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, Vol. 5, No. 2, September 2014, pp. 71-87.
Tourkochoriti, Ioanna: The Snowden Revelations, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Divide between U.S.-E.U. in Data Privacy Protection, in: University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, July 2014, pp. 161-176.
Voss, W. Gregory/Castets-Renard, Céline: Proposal for an International Taxonomy on the Various Forms of the 'Right to Be Forgotten': A Study on the Convergence of Norms, in: Colorado Technology Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2016, pp. 281-344.
Weber, Rolf: The Right to Be Forgotten—More Than a Pandora’s Box, in: Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, Vol. 2, No. 2, July 2011, pp. 120-130.
Warren, Samuel D. / Brandeis.Louis D.: The Right to Privacy, in: Harvard Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 5, December 1890, pp. 193-220.
Whitman, James Q.: The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty, in: The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 113, No. 6, April 2014, pp. 1151-1221.
Wolters, Pieter: The Territorial Effect of the Right To Be Forgotten after Google v CNIL, in: International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 29, No. 1, January 2021,pp.57-76.
六、博碩士論文(未出版)
孔德澔，被遺忘權的實然與應然 : 以數位上改過自新權的理論為中心，國立政治大學法律學系碩士論文，2020年6月，頁1-208。
彭麟之，數位化時代下被遺忘權之探討與建構 : 兼論與言論自由之衝突，東吳大學法律學系碩士班碩士論文，2018年1月，頁1-172。
楊柏宏，被遺忘權之研究－以歐盟個資保護規章及歐盟法院Google Spain SL案為中心，國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文，2017年6月，頁1-84。
劉孟涵，論被遺忘權之發展與在我國建構之可能性，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所，2019年7月，頁1-153。
七、網路資料
王泰銓：如何正確使用（翻譯）歐盟機構的名稱：以the European Council為例，刊載於：台灣歐洲聯盟研究協會，22. 10. 2018。資料引自：https://www.eusa-taiwan.org.tw/europe_detail/49.htm（檢索日期：2021年10月15日）
中华人民共和国个人信息保护法，刊載於：中国人大网。資料引自：http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202108/a8c4e3672c74491a80b53a172bb753fe.shtml（檢索日期：2021年10月15日）
私隱專員欲推「被遺忘權」憂打壓言論及新聞自由，刊載於：獨立媒體電子網站，16. 04. 2015。資料引自：http://www.inmediahk.net/node/1033436.（檢索日期：2021年10月15日）
『忘れられる権利』認められるべきか グーグル検索結果『違法決定』の妥当性は，刊載於：産経ニュース電子網站，29. 10. 2014。資料引自：http://www.sankei.com/economy/news/141029/ecn1410290004-n1.html.（檢索日期：2020年10月15日）
依歐洲隱私權保護法規提出的內容撤除要求，刊載於：Google 資訊公開報告，08. 09. 2021。資料引自：https://transparencyreport.google.com/eu-privacy/overview（檢索日期：2022年2月22日）
范姜真媺，歐盟及日本個人資料保護立法最新發展之分析報告，刊載於：法務部，30. 12. 2016。資料引自：https://www.moj.gov.tw/media/6788/73169381670.pdf?mediaDL=true，頁1-212。
個人情報の保護に関する法律，刊載於：e-GOV Japan。資料引自：https://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=415AC0000000057 （檢索日期：2021年10月15日）
財團法人金融聯合徵信中心：歐盟個人資料保護規則本文部分，刊載於：國家發展委員會。資料引自：https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMTY5MS9iNGZiZTA0OS1jYWQ1LTQ3MGEtYjhlMy00ZGU0NjhmOWIxMGMucGRm&n=5q2Q55uf5YCL5Lq66LOH5paZ5L%2bd6K236KaP5YmH5pys5paH6YOo5YiGLnBkZg%3d%3d&icon=..pdf.（檢索日期：2021年10月15日)
黃渝之：「歐盟對於「被遺忘權」公布指導方針與實施準則」，刊載於：資策會科技法律研究所，12. 2014。資料引自：https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=64&tp=1&d=6719 （檢索日期：2021年10月15日）
歐洲聯盟第二十九條資料保護工作組的相關文件，刊載於澳門個人資料保護辦公室，04. 05. 2018。資料引自：https://www.gpdp.gov.mo/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=19&id=7.（檢索日期：2021年10月15日)
歐盟第 29 條工作小組適足性參考文件，刊載於：國發會，26. 05. 2021。資料引自： https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMTY5MS80Njk5OGUwYi05NDRhLTQ5MDQtYTFiOS03Y2U4ZTI4YmM4ODcucGRm&n=V1AyNTTpganotrPmgKflj4PogIPmlofku7bkuK3oi7Hnv7vora%2FlsI3nhacucGRm&icon=..pdf. （檢索日期：2021年10月15日)
EU簡介，刊載於：經濟部國際貿易局經貿資訊網，28.07.2021。資料引自： https://www.trade.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=4494&pid=725834 （檢索日期：2021年10月15日）。
Google，Googlebot，刊載於：Google搜尋中心，02. 02. 2021。資料引自：https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/182072?hl=zh-Hant. (檢索日期：2021年10月15日)
About the council, in: Google, 02, 2015. Available from: https://www.google.com/advisorycouncil (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Belgian DPA imposes €600.000 fine on Google Belgium for not respecting the right to be forgotten of a Belgian citizen, and for lack of transparency in its request form to delist, in : EDPB, 16. 7. 2020. Available from : https://edpb.europa.eu/news/national-news/2020/belgian-dpa-imposes-eu600000-fine-google-belgium-not-respecting-right-be_en (Accessed 15. 10. 2021) .
Bowcott, Owen/Willsher, Kim: Google’s French arm faces daily €1,000 fines over links to defamatory article, in: The Guardian, 13.11.2014. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/13/google-french-arm-fines-right-to-be-forgotten (Accessed 15. 10. 2021).
Conclusions Mme Aurélie Bretonneau, rapporteur public, in: Conseil d'État,19. 7. 2017. Available from: https://www.conseil-etat.fr/fr/arianeweb/CRP/conclusion/2017-07-19/399922?download_pdf (Accessed 15. 10. 2021).
Decision no.2016-54 of March 10, 2016 of Restricted Committee issuing Google Inc. With a financial penalty, in Law & Economics Home Sites: Available from: https://sites.les.univr.it/cybercrime/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2016-google.pdf (Accessed 10. 15. 2021), pp. 3.
Fleischer, Peter: Foggy thinking about the Right to Oblivion, Peter Fleischer: Privacy...?, in: Peter Fleischer: Privacy...?, 09. 03. 2011. Availabe from: http://peterfleischer.blogspot.tw/2011/03/foggy-thinking-about-right-to-oblivion.html (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Google Advisory Council: “The Advisory Council to Google on the Right to be Forgotten”, in: Google, 06. 02. 2015. Availabe from: https://drive.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0B1UgZshetMd4cEI3SjlvV0hNbDA/view?pli=1 (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Alan Travis/Charles Arthur: “EU court backs 'right to be forgotten': Google must amend results on request”, in: The Guardian, 13. 05. 2014. Availabe from: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/13/right-to-be-forgotten-eu-court-google-search-results (Accessed 15/10/2021)
Brown, Colleen Theresa/Manoranjan, Tasha D.: South Korea Releases Guidance on Right to Be Forgotten, in: Lexology, 9. 5. 2016. Available from: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=21be3837-0c43-4047-b8b5-9e863960b0b9. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Britons ask Google to delete 60,000 links under ‘right to be forgotten’, in: The Guardian, 12. 10. 2014. Availabe from: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/12/google-60000-links-right-to-be-forgotten-britons (Accessed 15.10. 2021)
Commission Europeenne: À Monsieur Le Président Et Aux Membres De La Cour De Justice De L’Union Européenne--Observations Écrites, in: European Commission, 27. 06 2012. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/submissions/c2012_131_obs_fr.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Cour de cassation chambre civile 1-- Audience publique du jeudi 12 mai 2016--N° de pourvoi: 15-17729, in: Legifrance, 12. 05. 2016. Available from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?idTexte=JURITEXT000032532166 (Accessed: 15. 10. 2021)
Debate: Should The U.S. Adopt The 'Right To Be Forgotten' Online?, in: National Public Radio, 18. 03. 2015. Available from: http://www.npr.org/2015/03/18/393643901/debate-should-the-u-s-adopt-the-right-to-be-forgotten-online. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Di Blasi, Gabriel: A twist on the brazilian right to be forgotten, 31. 05. 2018. Available from: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4284eba6-69d2-42fa-816d-7439733146ca. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Goodman, Ellen P.: Open Letter to Google From 80 Internet Scholars: Release RTBF Compliance Data”, in: Medium, 13. 05. 2015. Available from: https://medium.com/@ellgood/open-letter-to-google-from-80-internet-scholars-release-rtbf-compliance-data-cbfc6d59f1bd. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Google Advisory Council: The Advisory Council to Google on the Right to be Forgotten, in: Google, 06. 02. 2015. Available from: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/archive.google.com/zh-TW//advisorycouncil/advisement/advisory-report.pdf (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Google Spain, S.L. et Google, Inc.:Résumé Des Observations Écrites Présentées Le 2 Juillet 2012 Par Google Spain, S.L. Et Google Inc. Dans L’Affaire C-131/12 Conformément À L’Article 23, Paragraphe 2, Du Protocole Sur Le Statut De La Cour De Justice De L’Union Européenne, in: FP Logue, 22. 10. 2012. Available from: http://www.fplogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Google-Spain-C-131-12fr_Redacted.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Gouvernement hellénique: Observations de la Grèce Affaire C-131/12’’, in: FP Logue, 22. 10. 2012. Available from: http://www.fplogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Greece-C-131-12fr.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Hsu,Piao-Hao,The Right To Be Forgotten And Its Ramifications in Taiwan, China And Japan, in: blogdroiteuropéen, 30. 06. 2017. Available from: https://blogdroiteuropeen.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/bobby-article-taiwan-final-version.pdf (Accessed 15.11.2021)
Inclusion in National Sex Offender Database Did Not Infringe The Right To Respect For Private Life, in: European Court of Human Rights, 17.12, 2009. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-4480954-5400075&filename=003-4480954-5400075.pdf (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Korenhof, Paulan/Ausloos, Jef/Szekely, Ivan/Jones, Meg /Sartor, Giovanni/Leenes, Ronald E., Timing the Right to Be Forgotten: A Study into 'Time' as a Factor in Deciding About Retention or Erasure of Data, 5.13.2014. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2436436 (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Kuner, Christopher: The European Commission's Proposed Data Regulation: A Copernican Revolution in European Data Protection Law, in: BNA Privacy & Security Law Report, 06. 02. 2012. Available from: https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2012/02/Kuner-EU-regulation-article.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
La République de Pologne: Observations de la Pologne Affaire C-131/12, in: FP Logue, 22. 10. 2012. Available from: http://www.fplogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Poland-C-131-12fr_Redacted.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
L’Autriche: Observations de l’Autriche Affaire C-131/12, in: FP Logue, 22. 10. 2012. Available from: http://www.fplogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Austria-C-131-12fr_Redacted.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
La République italienne: Avvocatura generale dello stato Cour de justice de l’Union européenne--Observations, in: FP Logue, 22. 10. 2012. Available from: http://www.fplogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Italy-C-131-12fr_Redacted.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
LOI INFORMATIQUE ET LIBERTES ACT N°78-17 OF 6 JANUARY 1978 ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, DATA FILES AND CIVIL LIBERTIES, in: CNIL, Available from https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/typo/document/Act78-17VA.pdf (Accessed: 15. 10. 2021).
Mayer, Andre: Right to be forgotten': How Canada could adopt similar law for online privacy, in: CBC News, 16. 06. 2014. Available from: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/right-to-be-forgotten-how-canada-could-adopt-similar-law-for-online-privacy-1.2676880. (Accessed 15. 10. 2021)
Ordonnance du 16 Septembre 2014 (Google France Case), in: Global Freedom of Expression. Available from: https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/ordonnance-du-16-septembre-2014-google-france-case. (Accessed: 15. 10. 2021)
Palmer, Aeryn: Wikimedia Foundation files petition against decision to extend the 'right to be forgotten' globally, in: Wikimedia Foundation, 19. 10. 2016. Available from:https://diff.wikimedia.org/2016/10/19/petition-right-to-be-forgotten/. (Accessed 15. 10. 2021)
Perotti, Elena: French judge establishes prevalence of freedom of the press on Right to be Forgotten, in : Media Laws, 25. 05. 2016. Available from: http://www.medialaws.eu/french-judge-establishes-prevalence-of-freedom-of-the-press-on-right-to-be-forgotten (Accessed: 15. 10. 2021)
Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019), in: Electronic Transactions Development Agency, https://www.etda.or.th/app/webroot/content_files/13/files/The%20Personal%20Data%20Protection%20Act.pdf (Accessed: 15. 10. 2021).
Plambeck Joseph: Daily Report: Google and the Spread of the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’, in: The New York Times, 06. 08. 2015. Available from: https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/08/06/daily-report-google-and-the-spread-of-the-right-to-be-forgotten. (Accessed 15. 10. 2021)
Princess Caroline's Husband Killed as Boat Flips Over : Monaco: Tragedy revisits the royal family: Princess Grace died in car accident eight years ago, in Los Angeles Times, 04. 10. 1990. Available from: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-10-04-mn-2171-story.html (Accessed 15. 10. 2021)
Privacy considerations of online behavioural tracking, in: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security, 14. 11. 2012. Available from: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/privacy-considerations-of-online-behavioural-tracking (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Rees, Marc: Devant la Cour de cassation, la liberté de la presse peut l’emporter sur le droit à l’oubli, in: Next Inpact, 31. 05. 2016. Available from: https://www.nextinpact.com/article/22495/100059-devant-cour-cassation-liberte-presse-peut-l-emporter-sur-droit-a-l-oubli. (Accessed: 15. 10. 2021)
Request to Block Bing Search Results In Europe, in: Bing.com, Available from: https://www.bing.com/webmaster/tools/eu-privacy-request. (Accessed 10.15.2021)
Royaume D’Espagne: Observations de l’Espagne Dans L’Affaire C-131/12, in: FP Logue, 22. 10. 2012. Available from: http://www.fplogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Spain-C-131-12fr.pdf. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Search removal request under data protection law in Europe, Available from: https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_eudpa?product=websearch. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Searc b &b, in: Google https://www.google.com/search?q=b%26B&rlz=1C1GCEU_zh-TWTW882TW882&oq=b%26B&aqs=chrome..69i57j46i199i291i433i512j46i175i199i512l2j0i512l6.2639j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 (Accessed: 22. 02. 2022)
Status & Composition, in: CNIL, 28. 12. 2015.Available from:https://www.cnil.fr/en/node/287 (Accessed: 15. 10, 2021)
Study on data collection and storage in the EU, in: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security, 23. 02. 2012. Available from: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/data-collection (Accessed 15.10.2021)
The right to be forgotten - between expectations and practice, in: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security, 20. 11. 2012. Available from: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/the-right-to-be-forgotten (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Tillsyn enligt EU:s dataskyddsförordning 2016/679 – Googles hantering av begäranden om borttagande från dess söktjänster,in: Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection, 10. 3. 2020, https://www.imy.se/globalassets/dokument/beslut/2020-03-11-beslut-google.pdf (Accessed 15. 10. 2021) .
Travis, Alan /Arthur, Charles: EU court backs 'right to be forgotten': Google must amend results on request, in: The Guardian, 13. 05. 2014. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/13/right-to-be-forgotten-eu-court-google-search-results. (Accessed 15. 10. 2021)
Trai wants you to have right to be forgotten: What that means for your data, in: Business Standard, 18. 07. 2018. Available from: https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/trai-wants-you-to-have-right-to-be-forgotten-what-that-means-for-your-data-118071800401_1.html. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
Yuniar, Resty Woro: Indonesia’s ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Raises Press Freedom Issues”, 31. 10. 2016. Available from: http://www.wsj.com/articles/indonesias-right-to-be-forgotten-raises-press-freedom-issues-1477908348. (Accessed 15.10.2021)
|