孔為捷(2018)。地圖記憶創意教學對國中學生地理學習表現與創造力之影響（碩士論文）。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/48zy24
方瑀紳(2015)。科技教育研究主題的演進與研究前沿：1970 ∼ 2013 年研究文獻的共被引分析（博士論文）。取自https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=HAirf5/record?r1=1&h1=2
方瑀紳、李隆盛(2016)。資訊教育系所學位論文研究趨勢與課題：2004～2013學年的文獻計量分析。教育研究集刊，62（1），35-69。doi: 10.3966/102887082016036201002
王孝雷、崔雷(2007)。2001-2006年國際情報學研究的引文分析。情報學報，26（3），399-407。取自https://www.ixueshu.com/document/9f14684a15af2d2fa047ac47ae6bf587318947a18e7f9386.html
王崇德(1996)。21世紀的資訊科學。「21世紀資訊科學與技術的展望國際學術研討會」發表之論文。世界新聞傳播學院圖書資訊學系。
朱乙真(2016)。英國創造力教育計畫─突破傳統模式，學習充滿無限可能。未來Family，7。取自https://gfamily.cwgv.com.tw/content/index/2272
何光國(1994)。文獻計量學導論。台北市：三民書局。
吳明隆(2010)。論文寫作與量化研究。台北市：五南圖書出版（股）公司。
吳雅萍(2008)。創造性問題解決教學對學生學習成效影響之後設分析（碩士論文）。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7zfbs7
吳靜吉(1999)。創造力、創新和創業精神。今周刊名人專欄，667。取自https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/154685/post/200910010026/%E5%89%B5%E9%80%A0%E5%8A%9B%E3%80%81%E5%89%B5%E6%96%B0%E5%92%8C%E5%89%B5%E6%A5%AD%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E
吳靜吉（總編輯）(2005)。教育部創造力教育中程發展計畫-Creative Partnerships創意伙伴計畫【專刊】。創造力雙月刊，10。
吳靜吉、李澄賢、林偉文(2008)。臺灣創造力教育研究之回顧。New Horizons in Education, 55（3）。
吳靜吉、陳嘉成、林偉文(1998)。創造力量表簡介。「『技術創造力』研討活動（二）：研究方法探討」研討會發表之論文，國立中山大學。
杜志强、支少瑞(2015)。微課在新媒體時代的「位」與「為」。高校教育管理，9（2）。 doi: 10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.2015.02.002
孟連生(1996)。試問引文索引法的性質與功能。資訊傳播與圖書館學，3（1）， 15-19。
林巧敏(2011)。歷史論文引用檔案文獻之特性分析。「2010年海峽兩岸檔案暨微縮學術交流會」發表之論文。臺北市：中華檔案暨資訊微縮管理學會編印。
林偉文(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育－以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊，100，53-74。
林頌堅（民102）。利用網路結構分析的研究主題視覺化。教育資料與圖書館學，50（4），565-596。
侯海燕(2006)。基於知識圖譜的科學計量學進展研究（博士論文）。取自 http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?filename=2006064884.nh&dbcode=CDFD&dbname=CDFD2006&v=
施乃華(2002)。創造思考教學成效之後設分析（碩士論文）。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6jx53e
洪蘭(2018)。發呆、放空，讓你更有創造力。天下雜誌。641。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5087920
夏景珉、劉玉鳳(1994)。中西醫結合科研課題選項的研究─《中國中西醫結合雜誌》引文同被引分析。中國中西醫結合雜誌，14（3），175-177。
馬楠、官建成(2006)。利用引文分析方法識別研究前沿的進展與展望。中國科技論壇，4，110-113。
馬楠、官建成(2006)。利用引文分析識別研究前沿的進展與展望。中國科技論壇，2006（4），110-113。
張于紳(2020)。美國培育與吸納STEM人才政策芻議。國家實驗研究院科技政策觀點電子報，53。取自https://portal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/article/10581;jsessionid=EF65A336FEFAF1BB148972DED1F57758
張世彗(2011)。創造力教學、學習與評量之探究。教育資料與研究雙月刊，100，1-21。
張世彗(2018)。創造力：理論、技法與教學。台北市：五南圖書出版（股）公司。
張郁蔚(1999)。以直接引用、書目耦合及共同作者探討圖書資訊學跨學科之變遷（博士論文）。doi: 10.6342/NTU.2009.00503
張嘉彬(2011)。以書目耦合及共被引探討不同引用區間之研究前沿：以OLED領域為例（博士論文）。取自 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=U0001-1708201116091600
教育部(2016)。新一代數位學習計畫─106年度綱要計畫書。台北：教育部。
教育部(2003a)。創造力教育白皮書。台北：教育部。
教育部(2003b)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市：作者。
許健將(2019)。文獻計量學在教育研究上之應用。教育科學期刊，18（1），51-69。
郭旭展(2007)。臺灣創造力教育之指標建構與執行成效評估（碩士論文）。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3hkw3p
陳珮芸(2019)。臺灣、香港、新加坡創造力教育政策實踐與研究發展之比較分析研究（碩士論文）。取自http://163.21.239.102:2084/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=U0026-2407201902125000
陳雅慧(2012)。學習，動起來1英國：創造力的學習。臺北市，親子天下。
陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析。臺北市：華泰總經銷。
陳龍安(2010)。臺灣的創造力教育發展與突破之道。創造學刊，1（1），5-37。
彭富源(2009)。臺灣初等教育改革重點與省思。教育資料集刊，41，1-24。
彭漣漪、黃啟菱(2016)。創造力怎麼教？未來Family，7。取自https://gfamily.cwgv.com.tw/content/index/2249
彭瓊慧(2001)。我國資優教育研究之回顧與後設分析研究（碩士論文）。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2bm2vn
曾元顯(2015)。文獻內容探勘工具-CATAR-之發展和應用。圖書館學與資訊科學，37（1），31-49。
曾建銘(2015)。21世紀評量的發展趨勢。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊，1，156-164。
黃雨柔(2016)。臺灣之創造力研究回顧：以1998-2015臺灣博碩士論文為例（碩士論文）。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qr975e
黃柏叡(2011)。創造力的教育實踐及其限制。教育學誌，26，79-99。
詹啟德(2011)。2000至2011年創造力文獻之研究趨勢（碩士論文）。取自https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/login?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22100NSYS5331020%22.&searchmode=basic
榮泰生(2011)。企業研究方法。台北市：五南圖書出版（股）公司。
榮泰生(2013)。UCINET在社會網絡分析(SNA)之應用。台北市：五南圖書出版（股）公司。
趙麗、呂文皎、邰鹭明(2015)。創造力教育在國內外的研究現狀級發展趨勢。當代教育理論與實踐，7（11）。
劉林青(2005)。範式視覺化與共被引分析：以戰略管理研究領域為例。情報學報，24（1），20-25。
劉則淵、陳悅、侯海燕(2008)。科學知識圖譜：方法與應用。北京：人民出版社。
潘慧玲(1996)。教育研究。載於黃光雄（主編），教育導論，341-368，台北市: 師大書苑。
蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館。
蔡明月、沈東玫(2012)。「資訊社會」之知識地圖建構。圖書館學與資訊科學，38（1），15-42。
霍秉坤、葉慧虹(2010)。香港課程改革十年回顧：脈絡視角的評析。課程研究，5（1），1-37。
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40. doi:10.2307/4134367
Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2008). The dark side of creativity: Biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1677-1686.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Analytic Technogies. (2011). The UCINET website. Retrieved from http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet/
Andiliou, A., & Murphy, P. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers’ and teachers’ conceptualizations of creativity: A review and synthesis of contemporary research. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.003.
Andres, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Andrews, J. E. (2003). An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics. Journal of Medical Library Association, 91(1), 47-56.
Aris, A., Shneiderman, B., Qazvinian, V., & Radev, D. (2009). Visual Overviews for Discovering Key Papers and Influences Across Research Fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2219-2228. doi: 10.1002/asi.21160
Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957. doi: 10.1002/asi.20567
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of research on mood and creativity: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 739–756.
Banaji, S., Burn, A., & Buckingham, D. (2006). The Rhetorics of Creativity: A Review of the Literature. London: Arts Council of England.
Banaji, S., Burn, A., & Buckingham, D. (2010). The Rhetorics of Creativity: A literature review. London: Creativity, Culture and Education.
Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows : a preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70(3), 859-880.
Batdi, V., & Batdi, H. (2015). Effect of creative drama on academic achievement: A meta analytic and thematic analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1459-1470. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.6.0156
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–464). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Intellectual estuaries: Connecting learning and creativity in programs of advanced academics. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 296–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902000205.
Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The Relationship Among Schooling, Learning, and Creativity: "All Roads Lead to Creativity" or "You Can't Get There from Here"? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp 316–332). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606915.019
Beghetto, R. A., Plucker, J. A. & MaKinster, J. G. (2001). Who Studies Creativity and How Do We Know?. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 351-357. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_12
Bereczki, E. & Kárpáti, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25-56. Retrieved from 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.003.
Biçer, N. (2017). The Influence of Student-centered Methods in Turkish Language Instruction on Academic Success: A Meta-analysis Study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5, 687-697. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050419
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (pp. 17-66). Dordrecht: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Bogilović, S., & Černe, M. (2018). The Intellectual Structure and Outlooks for Individual Creativity Research: A Bibliometric Analysis for the Period 1950–2016. Roni, Reiter-Palmon., Victoria, L. K., & James, C. K. (Eds.), Individual Creativity in the Workplace. (pp. 153-188). Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00007-3
Borner, B., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255. doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255.
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 252-266. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<252::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-G
Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship of state and trait anxiety to performance on figural and verbal creative tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 269–283. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210392788
Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 809–830. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027652
Carolan, B. V. (2013). Social network analysis and education: Theory, methods &applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Castillo-Vergara, M., Alvarez-Marin, A. & Placencio-Hidalgo, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics. Journal of Business Research, 85, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.011
Chen, C. & Morris, S. (2003). Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus Pathfinder Networks. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (pp. 67-74). Seattle, WA. doi: 10.1109/INFVIS.2003.1249010
Chen, C. (2005). Measuring the movement of a research paradigm. In Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T: Visualization and Data Analysis (pp.63-76). San Jose, CA: The International Society for Optical Engineering.
Chen, C. M. (2012). Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431-449. doi:10.1002/asi.21694
Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.
Conrad, F., & Asher, J. W. (2000). Self-concept and self-esteem through drama: A meta-analysis. Youth Theatre Journal, 14, 78–84. doi:10.1080/08929092.2000.10012519
Craft, A. (1999). Creative development in the early years: Some impli-cations of policy for practice. The Curriculum Journal, 10, 135-150.
Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 113-127. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229.
Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., & Leibling, M. (2001). Creativity in Education. Continuum: London.
Creswell, J.W. (2007)。研究設計：質化、量化、與混合方法取向(Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches)（張宇樑、吳樎椒譯）。台北市：學富。
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY: HarperCollins.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P. & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004.
Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.001
Diamond, Jr. A. M. (1988). Most-cited economics papers and current research fronts. Current Contents, 2, 3-8. Retrieved from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v12p010y1989.pdf
Feist, G. J., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Trends in the creativity literature: An analysis of research in the Journal of Creative Behavior (1967–1989). Creativity Research Journal, 6(3), 271–286. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419309534483
Feldhusen, J. F. & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and assessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8 (3), 231-247.
Feldman, D., & Benjamin, A. (2006). Creativity and education An American retrospective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 319-336.
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
Gao, J. P., Ding, K., Teng, L., & Pang, J. (2012). Hybrid documents co-citation analysis: Making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion. Scientometrics, 93(2), 459-471. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0691-z
Garfield, E. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In Y. Elkana (Ed.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators (pp.183). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Press.
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York : Wiley.
Garfield, E. (1994). Research fronts. Current Contents, (41), 3-7.
Garfield, E., Malin, M. V., & Small, H. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In Yehuda E. (Ed.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators (pp. 179-207). N. Y.: John Wiley & Sons Press.
Gauthier, E. (1998). Bibliometric analysis of scientific and technological research: A user’s guide to the methodology. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/88F0006X1998008
Gruber, H. E. (1984). The emergence of a sense of purpose: A cognitive case study of young Darwin. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 3-27). New York: Praeger.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x
Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way vbeyound the iq. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation, Inc.
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 1-16. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436.
Hanneman, R. A. (1998). 1ntroduction to Social Network Method. CA: University of Califomia, Riverside.
Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric review of the literature (1975-2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
Hsiao, C. H., & Yang, C. (2011). The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 128-136. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.07.003
Hung, J. l. (2012). Trends of e‐learning research from 2000 to 2008: use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5-16.
Hursen, C., Kaplan, A., & Ozdal, H. (2014). Assessment of Creative Thinking Studies In Terms of Content Analysis. Social and Behavioral Sciences 143, 1177–1185.
Hussain, A., Fatima, N., & Kumar, D. (2011). Bibliometric Analysis of the 'Électronic Library' Journal (2000-2010). Webology, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.webology.org/2011/v8n1/a87.html
Jacobs D. (2001). A bibliometric study of the publication patterns of scientists in South Africa 1992-96, with special reference to gender difference. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 275-285.
Jain, S., Basavaraj, P., Singla, A., Singh, K., Kundu, H., & Vashishtha, V. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (Dentistry Section; 2007-2014). Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9(4), 47-51.
Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263.
Jeffrey, R., & Craft, A. (2001). The universalization of creativity. In A. Craft, R. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.). Creativity in education (pp. 1–13). London: Continuum.
Jesson, J. (2012). Developing creativity in the primary school. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Jesson, J. (2012). Developing creativity in the primary school. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Kardash, C.M., & Wright, L. (1987). Does Creative Drama Benefit Elementary School Students: A Meta-Analysis. Youth Theatre Journal, 1(3), 11-18.
Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York, NY: Springer.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Kessler, M. M. (1965). Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject index. American Documentation, 16(3), 223-233.
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can Only Intelligent People Be Creative? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 57–66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473
Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Kodama, H., Watatani, K., & Sengoku, S. (2013). Competency-based assessment of academic interdisciplinary research and implication to university management. Research Evaluation, 22(2), 93-104. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs040
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., & van Geert, P. (2018). Children’s creativity: A theoretical framework and systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318815707.
Kuusi, O., & Meyer, M. (2007). Anticipating technological breakthroughs: using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm. Scientometrics, 70(3), 759-777.
Kyaga S, Landén M, Boman M, Hultman CM, Långström N, Lichtenstein P. (2013). Mental illness, suicide and creativity: 40-year prospective total population study. J Psychiatr Res, 47(1), 83‐90. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.010
Lee, P. C., & Su, H. N. (2011). Quantitative mapping of scientific research: The case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(1), 132-151.
Long, H., Plucker, J., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., & Kaufman, J. (2014). Research Productivity and Performance of Journals in the Creativity Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 353-360. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2014.929425.
Loveless, A (2002). A Literature Review in Creativity, New Technologies and Learning: A Report for Futurelab. Bristol: Futurelab.
Loveless, A. (2007). Creativity, technology and learning – a review of recent literature. Slough, UK: Futurelab.
Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1987). Creative and Mental Growth (8th Ed). New York: Macrnillan.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2006)。質性研究：設計與計畫撰寫(Designing qualitative research)（李政賢譯）。台北市：五南圖書出版（股）公司。
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433-443.
Medaglia, R. (2010). eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006-2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346-360. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010
Milojevic, S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Information metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity?. Scientometrics, 95(1), 141-157. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0861-z
Miwa, S., & Ando, S. (2012). Research fronts analysis : A bibliometric to identify emerging fields of research. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 55(5), 329-338. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.55.329
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Netherlands: Springer.
Montuori, A., & Donnelly, G. (2016). The creativity of culture and the culture of creativity research: The promise of integrative transdisciplinarity. In V. P. Glăveanu(Ed.). The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 743–765). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morris, S. A. & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213-295.
Morris, S., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 54, 413-422. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10227
Moya-Anegón, F. D., Contreras, E. J., & Corrochano, M. M. (1998). Research fronts in library and information science in Spain(1985-1994). Scientometrics, 42(2), 229-246.
Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., Lamb, K. N., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001
Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1993). Patent citation cycles. Library Trends, 41(4), 700-709.
Nemeth, C. J., & Goncalo, J. A. (2005). Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent authors. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 1–8.
Osenberg, C.W., Sarnelle, O. & Cooper, S.D. (1997). Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis. American Naturalist, 150, 798–812.
Özdas, F., & Batdi, V. (2017). A Thematic-based meta analytic study regarding the effect of creativity on academic success and learning retention. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(3), 53. doi: 10.11114/jets.v5i3.2043
Persson, O. (1994). The Intellectual Base and Research Fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 31-38. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0
Peters, H. P. F., Bramm, R. R., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1995). Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 9-21.
Plucker, J. A. (2000). Positive approaches to violence prevention: Peacebuilding in schools and communities. NASSP Bulletin, 84(614), 1–4.
Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education: Status of the field and considerations for the future. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527244.
Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48–73). New York: NY: Cambridge University Press.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory & methodology. London: Sage.
Price, D. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3683.510
Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515. doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Ricciardelli, L. A. (1992). Bilingualism and cognitive development in relation to threshold theory. J Psycholinguist Res, 21(4), 301–316. doi: 10.1007/BF01067515
Roberts, L. (2003). Creativity. Tech Directions, 63, 12-14.
Runco, M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 62-92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, L. H., & Lin, H. T. (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 11-22. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00985.x
Roy S.B., & Basak M. (2013). Journal of Documentation: a bibliometric study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-10. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/945/
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
Runco, M. A., & Pagnani, A. R. (2011). Psychological research on creativity. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 63–71). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Ryhammar, L., & Brolin, C. (1999). Creativity research: Historical considerations and main lines of development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383990430303.
Ryhammar, L., & Brolin, C. (1999). Creativity research: Historical considerations and main lines of development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383990430303.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
Sawyer, K. (2015). A Call to Action: The Challenges of Creative Teaching and Learning. Teachers College Record, 117(10), 1-34.
Scott, J. (2013). Social network analysis (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Sengupta, I. (1985). Bibliometrics: a bird’s eye view. IASLIC Bulletin, 30(4), 67-74.
Shagoury Hubbard, R. (1996). Workshop of the possible: Nurturing children’s creative development. Maine: Stenhouse.
Sharabchiev, J. T. (1989). Cluster analysis of bibliographic references as a scientometric method. Scientometrics, 15(1-2), 127-137.
Shilbury, D. (2011). A bibliometric analysis of four sport management journals. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 434-52.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Quality and purpose, quantity and chance. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 68–74. doi: 10.1080=10400418809534289
Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406
Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, Citations, and Maps of Science: A Personal History. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 54(5), 394-399. doi:10.1002/asi.10225
Small, H.(2006). Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 595-610.
Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
Smith, L. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020601027773
Takeda, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2009). Optics: a bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases. Scientometrics, 78(3), 543-558.
The Scottish Executive Education Department (SEED). (2006) Achieving the standard for headship-providing choice and alternatives. Outline of proposal. Edinburgh, UK: SEED.
Torrance, E. P. (1973). Dyadic interaction in creative thinking and problem. New York: Tice-Hall.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Norms technical manual: Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Lexington, Mass: Ginn and Co.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43-75). Cambridge University Press.
Treffinger, D. J., Sortore, M. R., and Cross, J. A., Jr. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In Heller, K., Mönks, F., and A. H. Passow (eds.). International Handbook of Research and Development of giftedness and Talent, (pp. 555–567). Pergamon: Oxford.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
UCINET (2013). UCINET Software.
Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home
Ulubey, Ö. (2018). The Effect of Creative Drama as a Method on Skills: A Meta-analysis Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 6(4), 63-78. doi: 10.11114/jets.v6i4.296
Upham, S.P., & Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83(1), 15–38. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0051-9
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2013). VOSViewer. Retrieved from http://www.vosviewer.com/
Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet psychology, 5(3), 6-18.
Wagner, T. (2014). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need-and what we can do about it. NY: Basic Books.
White, H. D. & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 4.
Willerson, A. & Mullet, D. R. (2017). Creativity Research in Education from 2005-2015: A Systematic Review and Synthesis. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 27(2). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15087.84643.
Williams, R., Runco, M., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the Themes, Impact, and Cohesion of Creativity Research over the Last 25 Years. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 385-394. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1230358
Zhang, T., Liu, Z., & Zhao T. (2008). Timeline and landscape: A case study of visualizing the evolution of science communication research front. Retrieved from http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/ZhangWIS2008tal.pdf