臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以書目耦合及共被引探討不同引用區間之研究前沿：以OLED領域為例
作者：張嘉彬
作者(外文)：Chia-Pin Chang
校院名稱：臺灣大學
系所名稱：圖書資訊學研究所
指導教授：黃慕萱
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2011
主題關鍵詞：研究前沿；書目耦合；共被引；引用區間；有機發光二極體；research fronts；bibliographic coupling；co-citation；citation windows；OLED
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:113
研究前沿是一專業領域處於最前鋒的研究，通常掌握研究前沿之發展，可瞭解專業領域的研究焦點及未來發展趨勢，對於規劃國家發展藍圖及制定科技發展政策而言，亦是相當重要的參考資訊，因此其在近年來受到相當多的關注及重視。本研究以210篇OLED領域高被引文獻為對象，結合使用書目耦合及共被引等兩種分析方法，探討固定引用區間、半衰期引用區間（包含文獻引用半衰期及文獻被引用半衰期）及逐年引用區間等三種引用區間所產生之研究前沿，以探究2000年至2009年10年來OLED研究前沿之演進情形，並分析研究前沿之時效性及穩定係數等2項指標，應採用何值，以作為預測研究前沿出現之最佳指標。
研究結果顯示，三種不同引用區間中，逐年引用區間可找出最多之研究前沿，固定引用區間是最簡易且有效找出研究前沿之方式，半衰期引用區間則可作為固定引用區間及逐年引用區間找出研究前沿之補充方式。又研究前沿包含新興前沿、成長前沿、穩定前沿、衰退前沿及消失前沿等五種類型，其中新興前沿是未來研究趨向的象徵，最受到高度學者專家的重視，而三種不同引用區間中以逐年引用區間可找出最多項新興前沿。
如利用書目耦合及共被引針對三種不同引用區間所找出之研究前沿進行比較分析可知，兩種分析方法的效益相當，所找出之研究前沿可以互相補充，而為有效找出三種不同引用區間之研究前沿，固定引用區間建議採用書目耦合方式，逐年引用區間建議採用書目耦合方式，半衰期引用區間則建議採用文獻引用半衰期。此外，為能以精確及系統化的方法找出研究前沿，本研究利用時效性及穩定係數等2項指標驗證下一個引用區間出現相同研究前沿的能力。研究發現，時效性0.500及穩定係數0.400之數值，能夠當作預測研究前沿出現之最佳指標。
基於上述研究結果，建議為以最簡易及有效的方式找出研究前沿，應採用固定引用區間，為找出最多之研究前沿及新興前沿，應採用逐年引用區間。此外，在兩種分析方法中，應採用書目耦合方式，以找出最多且能夠較早探知研究前沿之出現。另為有效預測研究前沿之出現，以掌握專業領域的最新發展趨勢，則建議可將時效性及穩定係數納入相關研究。
Research fronts are the most pioneering studies of specialities. With the command of the development of research fronts, one can easily realize the focus of study in present specialities and the future development trends. In the point of planning blueprint on national development and making policies on science and technology development, research fronts are also an important reference. Consequently, it nowadays receives a great many attention and emphasis.
This study is targeted at 210 highly-cited articles on OLED field, combining both bibliographic coupling and co-citation methods, exploring research fronts produced by the following three citation windows which include fixed citation window, sliding window and half life（including citing half life and cited half life）. It is undertaken to explore the advance of OLED research fronts from 2000 to 2009 and aims to analyze the values of currency index and the values of stability index and so as to decide from which values can be taken as important bases to predict the emergence of research fronts.
The results show that among the above mentioned three citation windows, sliding window can find out the most many research fronts; fixed citation window is the easiest and the most effective way to find out research fronts; and half life can be a complement way for sliding window and fixed citation window to find out research fronts. In addition, research fronts has five different types, including emerging fronts, growing fronts, stable fronts, shrinking fronts, and existing fronts. Among which, emerging fronts is the symbol of future research trend and highly emphasized by scholars and experts. Furthermore, sliding window can discover the most many emerging fronts.
By using bibliographic coupling and co-citation methods to make comparison in the research fronts produced by the above mentioned three citation windows, it illustrates that the effect is quite equal and can be supplement for one another. In order to find out research fronts effectively among the three citation windows, it is suggested to adopt bibliographic coupling for fixed citation window, bibliographic coupling for sliding window, and citing half life for half life. Moreover, on purpose of seeking out research fronts in a precise and systematical way, the study demonstrates the capability to predict the emergence of research fronts in the next citation window with the indexes of currency and stability. The results show that currency index 0.500 and stability index 0.400 can be the best indicator to forecast the emergence of research fronts.
Based on the above research results, it is recommended that adopting fixed citation window is the easiest and the most effective way to find out research fronts; adopting sliding window can find out the most many research fronts and also discover emerging fronts at most. Last but not least, between two methods, it is suggested to adopt bibliographic coupling to find out the most many research fronts and discover the emergence of research fronts earlier. Finally, this study advises to add currency index and stability index to relative studies in order to predict the emergence of research fronts effectively and have a better command of the latest development trends of specialities.
日本科學技術政策研究所原著；洪文琪編譯（民93）。科學技術中長期發展全瞻性預測調查：急速發展之研究領域調查—平成15年度調查報告書。台北市：行政院國家科學委員會科學技術資料中心。
王立學、冷伏梅（2010）。簡論研究前沿及其文獻計量識別方法。情報理論與實踐，33(3)，54-58。
王孝寧、崔雷（2007）。2001-2006年國際情報學研究的引文分析。情報學報，26(3)，399-407。
古俊能（民100）。白光有機發光元件技術。上網日期：民100年7月20日。網址：http://www.materialsnet.com.tw/DocPrint.aspx?id=9354
邱均平（1988）。文獻計量學。上海市：科學技術文獻出版社。
李亞蘭（民89）。從引用文分析探討臺灣地區傳播學研究特質：以國立政治大學新聞學研究所博碩士論文為例。淡江大學教育資料科學學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北縣。
李金建、貢金濤（2010）。基于JASIST的情報學研究前沿及趨勢分析。圖書館學研究（應用版），2010年第6期（2010），3-6。
何孟寰、黃孝文、陳金鑫（民94）。有機電激磷光材料與OLED 磷光元件之發展近況。上網日期：民100年7月20日。網址：http://proj3.sinica.edu.tw/~chem/servxx6/files/paper_2914_1231745522.pdf
季昀（民97）。OLED發光材料的發展與趨勢。上網日期：民100年7月20日。
網址：http://www.display-all.com/news/news_detail.php?language_page=taiwan&button=news&adtype=news_ptech&cate=tech&serial=9213&check_o=21775
李榮和（民95）。藍光高分子材料之合成及其在白光電激發光顯示器之應用研究。工程科技通訊，85，109-112。
林晉聲（民98）。白光OLED材料技術。化工資訊與商情，78，26-35。
拓墣產業研究所（民95）。OLED技術發展暨市場戰局剖析。台北市：拓墣科技。
侯海燕（2006）。基于知識圖譜的科學計量學進展研究。大連理工大學科學學與科技管理研究所博士論文，未出版，大連市。
侯海燕、劉則淵、陳悅、姜春林、尹麗春、龐傑（2006）。當代國際科學學研究熱點演進趨勢知識圖譜。科研管理，27(3)，90-96。

姜國成、鄭華川、崔雷、卓仁杰（2002）。利用引文時序和同被引聚類分析探索抗原CD44研究歷史及現況。醫學情報工作，2002(4)，201-202。
唐俊、詹佳佳（2010）。基于信息可視化的國內競爭情報領域前沿演進分析。圖書情報工作，54(16)，73-77。
孫健夫、陳蘭杰（2010）。基于知識圖譜的國際信息政策研究熱點與前沿分析。情報科學，28(3)，389-394。
馬楠、官建成（2006）。利用引文分析方法識別研究前沿的進展與展望。中國科技論壇，4，110-113。
馬瑞敏、邱均平（2005）。基於CSSCI的論文同被引實證計量研究—以圖書館學、情報學為例。圖書•情報•知識，107，77-79。
夏景珉、劉玉鳳（1994）。中西醫結合科研課題選向的研究—《中國中西醫結合雜誌》引文同被引分析。中國中西醫結合雜誌，14(3)，175-177。
陳光華（民95）。引文索引之建置與應用。台北市：文華圖書館管理。new window
黃孝文、陳金鑫。（民93）。有機發光二極體技術及應用。台北市：行政院國科會光電小組。
陳志強（民96）。OLED有機發光二極體顯示器技術。台北市：全華。
陳定權（2005）。同引分析與可視化技術。情報科學，23(4)，532。
陳金鑫、黃孝文（民94）。OLED有機電激發光材料與元件。台北市：五南。
陳金鑫、黃孝文（民96）。OLED：Materials and Devices of Dream Displays夢幻顯示器：OLED材料與元件。台北市：五南。
陳悅（2006）。管理學學科演進的科學計量研究。大連理工大學科學學與科技管理研究所博士論文，未出版，大連市。
張倩、潘雲濤（2007）。基於Web of Science數據的圖書情報學研究聚類分析。情報雜誌，26(2)，82-84。
許家榮（民99）。探究書目耦合與共同引用之智識構圖與內容差異。國立台北大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
崔雷（1995）。專題文獻高被引文獻的時間分布與同被引聚類分析。情報學報，14(1)，54-61。
崔雷（1996）。專題文獻高被引文獻的連續同被引聚類分析。情報理論與實踐，19(1)，46-48。
陳鈺坤（民94）。蓄勢待發的OLED平面顯示器。產經資訊，34，24-27。
黃慕萱、黃玫溱（民97）。電腦科學領域高被引文獻與一般文獻之書目計量比較分析。圖書資訊學研究，3(1)，27-50。new window

陳蘭杰、董芳（2010）。基于知識圖譜的國際競爭情報研究熱點與前沿的信息可視化分析。醫學信息學雜誌，31(8)，7-11。
葉永輝（民95）。主動式有機發光二極體（AMOLED）顯示器簡介。工業材料，232，131-136。
楊木（2006）。公共管理學演進態勢的計量學研究。大連理工大學科學學與科技管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，大連市。
蔡明月（民90）。引用文獻分析與引用動機研究。教育資料與圖書館學，38(4)，387-390。new window
劉林青（2005）。作品共被引分析與科學地圖的繪制。科學學研究，23(2)，155-159。
趙悅陽、崔雷（2005）。專題文獻的同被引聚類分析在表現學科專業發展歷史的可靠性評價。情報學報，24(4)，414-421。
趙蓉英、許麗敏（2010）。文獻計量學發展演進與研究前沿的知識圖譜探析。中國圖書館學報，36(189)，60-68。
環球資源（2006）。DisplayBank：今年OLED出貨量可望破億。上網日期：100年7月20日。網址：http://www.eettaiwan.com/ART_8800409607_480702_NT_1951b661.HTM。
簡金雄、陳金鑫（民90）。新世紀的”鑫”科技—有機電激發光二極體平面顯示器技術。物理學月刊，23(2)，307-311。
羅式勝（1994）。文獻計量學概論。廣州：中山大學出版社。
羅思嘉（民90）。引用文獻分析與學術傳播研究。中國圖書館學會會報，66，98-112。new window
顧鴻壽（民95）。有機電激發光顯示器技術及應用。台北縣中和市：新文京開發。
顧鴻壽（民97）。有機電激發光顯示器技術及應用第2版。台北縣中和市：新文京開發。
Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: an author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 14, 619-639.
Aguillo, I. F. (1996). Increasing the between-year stability of the impact factor in the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 35(2), 279-282.
Ahlgren, P., & Jarneving, Bo. (2008). Bibliographic coupling, common abstract stems and clustering: a comparison of two document-document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping. Scientometrics, 76(2), 273-290.

Ahlgren, P., & Colliander, C. (2009). Document-document similarity approaches and science mapping: experimental comparison of five approaches. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 49-63.
Ahmed, T., Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C., & Peck, C. (2004). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Part II. The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA. Scientometrics, 61(2), 147-156.
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 161-164.
Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen G. (2004). The effect of highly cited papers on national citation indicators. Scientometrics, 59(2), 213-224.
AlSalhi, M. S., Alam, J., Dass, L. A., Raja, M. Recent advances in conjugated polymers for light emitting sevices. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 12(3), 2036-2054.
Analytic Technogies. (2011). The UCINET website. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet/
Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS researchfFront: time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957.
Bernal, J. D. (1959). The Transmission of scientific information: a user’s analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information (Vol, pp85-95), Seattle, Washington: The National Academies Press.
Bichteler, J., & Eaton III, E. A. (1980). The combined use of bibliographic coupling and cocitation for document retrieval. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 31(4), 278-282.
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002).Scholoary communication and bibliometrics. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 36, pp3-72). Medford: Learned Information Inc.
Boyack, K. W., Tsao, J. Y., Miksovic, A., & Huey, M. (2009). A recursive process for mapping and clustering technology literatures: case study in solid-state lighting. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 8(1), 51-87.
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately？Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251.
Bricker, R. (1989). An Empirical investigation of the structure of accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 27(2), 246-262.
Campanario, J. M. (2011). Empirical study of journal impact factors obtained using the classical two-year citation window versus a five-year citation window. Scientometrics, 87(1), 189-204.
Charvet, F. F., Cooper, M. C., & Gardner, J. T. (2008). The intellectual structure of supply chain management: a bibliometric approach. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 47-73.
Chen, C., Cribbin, T., Macredie, R., & Morar, S. (2002). Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms: two case studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 678-689.
Chen, C., McCain, K., White, H., & Lin, X. (2002). Mapping scientometrics (1981-2001). In Toms, E. G., (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting (Vol, 39, pp25-34). Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc.
Chen, C., & Kuljis, J. (2003). The rising landscape: a visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 435-446.
Chen, C., & Morris, S. A. (2003). Visualizing evolving networks: minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (pp67-74), Seattle, Washington:IEEE Computer Society Press.
Chen, C. (2004a). Detecting and mapping thematic changes in transient networks. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Visualization (pp1023-1034). Seattle, Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Chen, C. (2004b, April 6). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. PNAS, 101, suppl. 1, 5303-5310. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0307513100v1.pdf
Chen, C. (2005). Measuring the movement of a research paradigm. In Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T: Visualization and Data Analysis (pp.63-76). San Jose, CA: The International Society for Optical Engineering.


Chen, C. (2006, Feb. 1). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/doc/jasist2006.pdf
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7):1382–1402.
Cornelius, B., LandstrÖm, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: the dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375-398.
Culnan, M. J. (1986). The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972-1982: a co-citation analysis. Management science, 32(2), 156-172.
Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980-1985: A co-citation analysis. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 341-353
Culnan, M. J., O’Reilly III, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2000). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972-1984: a cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 453-458.
Devi, B. M.. (2007). Bibliographic coupling in toxicology journals. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54(2), 103-105.
Diamond, Jr. A. M. (1988, Sep. 22). Most-cited economics papers and current research fronts. Current Contents, #2, 3-8. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v12p010y1989.pdf
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: an author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science, 25(1), 67-78.
Divayana. Y. (2011). Electroluminescence in organic light-emitting diodes: Basics, processes, and optimizations. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informatics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation, and information science. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55(3), 349-361.

Eom, S. B. (1999). Decision support systems research: current state and trends. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(5), 213-220.
Foresight Taiwan. About Foresight Taiwan. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://foresight.iis.sinica.edu.tw
Fukagawa, H., Watanabe, K., Tsuzuki, T., & Tokito, S. (2008). Highly efficient, deep-blue phosphorescent organic light emitting diodes with a double-emitting layer structure. Applied Physics Letters, 93(13), 133312 - 133312-3.
Garfield, E., Malin, M. V., & Small, H. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In Yehuda E. (Ed.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators (pp179-207). N. Y.: John Wiley & Sons Press.
Garfield, E. (1979). Is citatin analysis a legitimate evaluation tool？Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.
Garfield, E.. (1983). Citation indexing, its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Philadelphia : ISI Press
Garfield, E., & Welljams-Dorof, A. (1992). Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making. Science & Public Policy, 19(5), 321-327.
Garfield, E. (1994). Research fronts. Current Contents, 41, 3-7.
Garfield, E. (2001). From Bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/drexelbelvergriffith92001.pdf
Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1995). A bibliometric study on aging and reception processes of scientific literature. Journal of Information Science, 21, 37-53.
Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1995). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to reearch-front and other core documents. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informatics (pp167-176). Medford: Learned Information Inc.
Glänzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195-221.
Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.norslis.net/2004/Bib_Module_KUL.pdf

GmÜr, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: a methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57.
Golub, K., & Larsen, B. (2005). Different approaches to automated classification: Is there an exchange of ideas？In Ingwersen, P., & Larsen, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of ISSI 2005—the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp270-274). Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska University Press.
Greer, S. (2004). Converging technologies speed up OLED development. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://electronicdesign.com/article/components/components-converging-technologies-speed-up-oled-d.aspx
Grégoire, D., Déry, R., Noël, M., & Béchard, J.-P. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research？A co-citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981-2004. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 333-373.
Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.
Hall, B. H. (1985). Collection assessment manual for college and university libraries. Phonix, Ariz.: The Oryx Press.
Hand, Jeff. (2003). Feasibility of using citations as document summaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Drexel University, Philadelphia.
Heinzkill, R. (1980). Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals. Library Quarterly, 50(3), 352-365.
Hicks, D. (1987). Limitations of co-citation analysis as a tool for science policy. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 295-316.
Holland Smith, D., Mathew, A., Kemp, N. M., & Katz, J. S. (2004). A review of the co-citation based science foresight process. London: Dstl.
Hou, J., Zhang, C., & Wang, X., K. (2008). The information visualization analysis of the study in International S&T Policy. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/HouJianhuaWIS2008iva.pdf
Huang, M. H., Chiang, L. Y., & Chen, D. Z. (2003). Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: a study of Taiwan’s high-tech companies. Scientometrics, 58(3), 489-506.

Hyun, A., Kim, S., Kang, I., Park, J., Shin, J., & Song, O. (2007). New Zn complex derivatives for red OLEDs host materials. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, 463(1), 33-39.
Jacsó, P. (2009). Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports. Online Information Review, 33(3), 603.
Jankovic, M. P., Kaufmann, M., & Kindler, C. H. (2008). Active research fields: a document co-citation analysis of the anesthetic literature. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 106(5), 1524-1533.
Janssens, F., TranQuoc, V., Glänzel, W., & De Moor, B. (2006). Integration of textual content and link information for accurate clustering of science fields. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Multidisciplinary Information Sciences and Technologies 2006 (pp.615-619).
Jarneving, B. (2001). The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular research. Scientometrics, 50(3), 365-389.
Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263.
Jarneving, B. (2007a). Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: a test of the applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of cognitive cores on the field level. Journal of Informatics, 1(4), 338-356.new window
Jarneving, B. (2007b). The outbreak of SARS mirrored by bibliometric mapping: combining bibliographic coupling with the complete link cluster method. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.lisr.ro/en11-jarneving.pdf
Jarneving, B. (2007c). Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Journal of Informatics, 1(4), 287-307.
Kajikawa, Y., Yoshikawa, J., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: toward a roadmap for sustainable energy. Technological Forcasting & Social Chang, 75, 771-782.
Kajikawa, Y., & Takeda, Y. (2009). Citation network analysis of organic LEDs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8), 1115-1123.
Kärki, A. (1996). Searching for bridges between disciplines: an author co-citation analysis on the research into scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 323-334.
Kessler, M. M. (1963a). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Kessler, M. M. (1963b). Bibliographic coupling extended in time: Ten case histories. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1, 169-187.
Kessler, M. M. (1965). Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject index. American Documentation, 16(3), 223-233.
King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13, 261-276.
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuusi, O., & Meyer, M. (2007). Anticipating technological breakthroughs: using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm. Scientometrics, 70(3), 759-777.
Lai, K. K., & Wu, S. J. (2005). Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing and Management, 41, 313-330.
Lambeth III, R. H. (2004). Electroluminescence of conjugated aromatic polymers in organic light emitting diodes. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://chemistry.illinois.edu/research/organic/seminar_extracts/2004_2005/2_Lambeth_Abstract_SP05.pdf
Lee, Y. S., Lee, S. M., Jung, S. K., Lee, S. J., Lee, S. H., Hong, Y. H., Kim, H. J., & Park, L. S. (2009). Gas barrier of plastic substrate and performance of white OLED. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, 498(1), 203-213.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Patterns of annual citation of highly cited articles and the prediction of their citation ranking: a comparison across subjects. Scientometrics, 77(1), 41-60.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited library and information science articles: interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics, 78(1), 45-67.
Leydesdorff, L. (2007). The position of Tibor Braun’s Oeuvre: bibliographic journal coupling. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.leydesdorff.net/braun75/index.htm
Lin, Y., & Kaid, L. L. (2000). Fragmentation of the intellectual structure of political communication study: Some empirical evidence. Scientometrics, 47(1), 143-164.
Liu, J., Min, C., Zhou, Q., Cheng, Y., Wang, L., Ma, D., Jing, X., & Wang, F. (2006). Blue light-emitting polymer with polyfluorene as the host and highly fluorescent 4-dimethylamino-1,8-naphthalimide as the dopant in the sidechain. Applied Physics Letters 88(8), 083505-083505-3.
Liu, Z. (2005). Visualizing the intellectual structure in urban studies: A journal co-citation analysis (1992-2002). Scientometrics, 62(3), 385-402.
Locke, J., & Perera, H. (2001). The intellectual structure of international accounting in the early 1990s. The International Journal of Accounting, 36, 223-249.
MacRoberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3) , 435-444.
Marshakova, I. V. (1973). System of document connection based on references. Nauchno-Teknichescaya Informatisya, Series II,6, 3–8.
Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20(4), 236
McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: an experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296.
Meho, L. I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/media/paper/PWJan07meho.pdf
Miguel, S., Moya-Anegón, F,. & Herrero-Solana, V. (2008). A new approach to institutional domain analysis: multilevel research fronts structure. Scientometrics, 74(3), 331-344.
Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 413-422.
Morris, S. A., & Boyack, K. W. (2005). Visualizing 60 years of anthrax research. Retrieved Jan. 11, 2011, from http://www.conceptsymbols.com/web/publications/2005_final_issi_anthrax.pdf.
Moya-Anegón, F. D., Contreras, E. J., & Corrochano, M. M. (1998). Research fronts in library and information science in Spain(1985-1994). Scientometrics, 42(2), 229-246.
Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: a review of literature II. Libri, 46, 217-225.
Park, Y. W., Kim, Y. M., Choi, J. H., Park, T. H., Huh, J. W., Kim, H. S., Cho, M. J., Choi, D. H., & Ju, B. K. (2009).Highly efficient tris(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum-based organic light-emitting diodes utilized by balanced energy transfer with cosensitizing fluorescent dyes. Applied Physics Letters, 95(14), 143305-143305-3.
Pečarić, Đ. (2009). Relationship between scientific paradigm and research front. On Example of Information Science Research Production. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/445023.2009_INFuture_Pecaric.pdf
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.
Peters, H. P. F., Bramm, R. R., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1995). Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 9-21.
Phelan, T. J. (1999). A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 45(1), 117-136.
Pilkington, A. (2004). Defining technology management: A citation/co-citation study. In IEEE , (Ed.), Proceedings of the Engineering Management Conference 2004 (pp337-341) . N.Y.: Etats-Unis.
Pilkington, A, & Fitzgerald, R. (2006). Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: a forward retrospective of IJOPM. Internation Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(11), 1255-1275.
Pilkington, A. and Teichert, T. (2006). A citation/co-citation of research policy. School of Management Research Paper Series, SoM-0604. London, UK, ISBN: 1-905846-01-0.
Ponzi, L. J. (2002). The intellectual structure and interdisciplinary breadth of knowledge management: a bibliometric study of its early stage of development. Scientometrics, 55(2), 259-272.
Price, D. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
Price, N., & Schiminovich, S. (1968). A clustering experiment: first step towards a computer-generated classification scheme. Information Storage and Retrieval, 4, 271-280.
Reader, D., & Watkins, D. (2006). The social and collaborative nature of entrepreneurship scholarship: a co-citation and perceptual analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 417-441.
Rice, R. E. (1990). Hierarchies and clusters among communication and library and information science journals, 1977-1987. In Borgman, Christine L. (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, (pp. 139-153). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Rogers, E. M., & Cottrill, C. A. (1990). An author co-citation analysis of two research traditions: technology transfer and the diffusion of innovations. In Borgman, Christine L. (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, (pp. 157-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Saka, A., & Igami, M. (2007). Mapping modern science using co-citation analysis. In Banissi, Ebad et al., (Ed.), 11th International Conference Information Visualization (pp.453-458). Seattle, Washington: IEEE Computer Society Press.
Samoylenko, I., Chao, T. C., Liu, W. C., & Chen, C. M. (2006). Visualizing the scientific world and its evolution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1461-1469.
Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholaryly communities in entrepreneurship research: a co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399-415.
Schwechheimer, H., & Winterhager, M. (2001). Mapping interdisciplinary research fronts in neuroscience: a bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia. Scientometrics, 51(1), 311-318.
Segal, M., Singh, M., Rivoire, K., Difley, S., Voorhis, T. V., & Baldo, M. A. (2007). Extrafluorescent electroluminescence in organic light-emitting devices. Nature Materials 6, 374-378.
Sen, S. K., & Gan, S. K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30, 78-82.
Sharabchiev, J. T. (1989). Cluster analysis of bibliographic references as a scientometric method. Scientometrics, 15(1-2), 127-137.
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28, 758-775.
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2010). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571-580.
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2011). Detecting emerging research fronts in regenerative medicine by the citation network analysis of scientific publications. Technological Forcasting & Social Chang, 78, 274-282.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.
Small, H., & Griffith, B.C. (1974). The Structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
Small, H. (1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139-166.
Small, H., & Koenig, E. D. (1977). Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method. Information Processing & Management, 13, 277-288.
Small, H. (1981). The relationship of information science to the social sciences: a co-citation analysis. Information Processing & Management, 17, 39-50.
Small, H., & Greenlee, E. (1986). Collagen research in the 1970s. Scientometrics, 10, 95-117.
Small, H., & Greenlee, E. (1989). A co-citation study of AIDS research. Communication Research, 16(5), 642-666.
Small, H. (1993). Macro-level changes in the structure of co-citation clusters: 1983-1989. Scientometrics 26(1), 5-20.
Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: a personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 394-399.
Small, H. (2004). Why authors think their papers are highly cited. Scientometrics, 60(3), 305-316.
Small, H.(2006). Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 595-610.
Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1) , 83-106.
So, F., Krummacher, B., Mathai, M. K., Poplavskyy, D., Choulis, S. A., & Choong, V. (2007). Recent progress in solution processable organic light emitting devices. Journal of Applied Physice, 102(9), 091101 - 091101-21.
Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., & Premkamolnetr, N. (2004). A modified method for calculating the impact factors of journals in ISI Journal Citation Reports: polymer science category in 1997-2001. Scientometrics, 60(2), 217-235.

Takeda, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2009). Optics: a bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases. Scientometrics, 78(3), 543-558.
Thomson Reuters. (2009). Research Front Methodology. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://esi-topics.com/RFmethodology.html
Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002) Benchmarking international scientific excellence: are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference. Scientometrics, 54(3), 381-397.
Tsay, M. Y., Xu, H., & Wu, C. W. (2003a). Journal co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 57(1), 7-25.
Tsay, M. Y., Xu, H., & Wu, C. W. (2003b). Author co-citation analysis of semiconductor literature. Scientometrics, 58(3), 529-545.
Türker, L., Tapan, A., & Gümüş, S. (2009). Electroluminescent properties of certain polyaromatic compounds: part 1–characteristics of oled devices based on fluorescent polyaromatic dopants. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds, 29(3), 123-138.
Upham, S. P., Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83(1), 15-38.
Urs, S. R. (1995). Mapping the paradigm of information science based on cluster analysis of citation data. In Koenig, M.E.D., & Bookstein, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth biennial international conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp587-596). Medford: Learned Information Inc.
Van Den Besselaar, P., & Heimeriks, G. (2006). Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: a method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 68(3), 377-393.
Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed. H. F., & Reedijk, J. (1999). Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(6), 489-498.
Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed. H. F. (2002). Development and application of journal impact factor measures in the Dutch science systems. Scientometrics, 53(2), 249-266.
Vijayakumar, K. P. (1997). Applications of bibliometrics in libraries and information centers. In G. Devarajan (Ed.), Bibliometric studies, (pp25-30). New Delhi, India: Ess Ess Publications.

Vladutz, G. & Cook, J. (1984). Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 21, 204-207.
Watkins, D. (2004). Identifying current trends in entrepreneurship research: A new approach. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.kmu.unisg.ch/rencontres/RENC2004/Topics/Watkins_Renc_2004_Topic_A.pdf
Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling：a review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10, 189-196.
Weisband, S., Thatcher, S. M. B., & Xu, J. (2005). Using bibliometric analysis to evaluate scientific progress in virtual teams research. Retrieved July 20, 2011. from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.90.5579 &rep=rep1&type=pdf
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In Borgman, Christine L. (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
Wu, M. F., Yeh, S. J., Chen, C. T., Murayama, H., Tsuboi, T., Li, W. S., Chao, I., Liu, S. W., & Wang, J. K. (2007). The quest of high-performance host materials for electrophosphorescent blue dopants. Advanced Functional Materials, 17 (12), 1887-1895.
Yang, L., Morris, S. A., & Barden, E. M. (2009). Mapping institutions and their weak ties in a research specialty: a case study of cystic fibrosis body composition research. Scientometrics, 79(2), 421-434.
Zhang, T., Liu, Z., & Zhao T. (2008). Timeline and landscape: A case study of visualizing the evolution of science communication research front. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/ZhangWIS2008tal.pdf.
Zhang, T. , Morris, S. A., Liu, Z. Y., & Wang, Q. (2008 submitted). Visualizing the life cycle of a reactive specialty: A case study of SARS research. Submitted to Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in informaiton science 1996-2005: introducing author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：585（臺灣：580，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67511124
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上