:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區環境政策與人力資本對環境品質影響之研究
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:許舒翔施孟隆 引用關係黃炳文 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Shu-hsiangShih, Meng-longHuang, Biing-wen
出版日期:2000
卷期:9:2
頁次:頁45-60
主題關鍵詞:環境政策人力資本環境品質綠化條件Environmental policyHuman capitalEnvironmental qualityGreen condition
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:26
     本文採用臺灣省21縣市之混合資料(pooling data),探討臺灣地區環境政策、人力資本對環境品質影響之主要實證發現,政府採用社會策略對水污染減少及綠化條件增加是具有效果;法規策略並未有顯著的效果;財政支出對空氣污染及水污染之減少與綠化條件之提升並未有顯著的效果;而採用提高國人所得,對減少空氣污染及水污染並提升綠化條件是具有效果。政府財政支出與空氣污染呈 U 型關係,而與水污染及綠化條件呈倒U型關係。擁有較高教育程度的縣市,具有較佳的環境品質,故政府可考慮運用提高國民教育程度作為改善環境品質的策略之一。
     This project is based on the pooling data from 21 cities and counties in Taiwan to explore the impact of environmental policy and human capital on environmental quality in Taiwan area. The research results indicate that the social strategy has an effective impact on decreasing water pollution and increasing green conditions. The strategy of regulation does not work effectively. The governmental financial expenditure does not show great effects on decreasing air pollution and water pollution and increasing green conditions. On the other hand, increasing GNP does reveal the great effectiveness. The relationship between the financial expenditure for government and air pollution shows a U-shaped relationship. And the relationship between water pollution and green condition indicates an inverted U-shaped relationship. The cities with higher education level have better environmental conditions, so the government may consider increasing citizens' educational level as one of the strategies to improve environmental quality.
期刊論文
1.吳珮瑛、葉淑琦(19961200)。多環境品質改善之效益分析--各種福利衡量指標之比較。經濟論文,24(4),519-557。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Becker, Gary S.、Murphy, Kevin M.、Tamura, Robert F.(1990)。Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth。Journal of Political Economic,98(5),S12-S37。  new window
3.Grossman, Gene M.、Krueger, Alan B.(1995)。Economic Growth and the Environment。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(2),353-377。  new window
4.吳珮瑛、謝雯華(19950500)。環境財需求函數之估計:封閉式條件評估模型之比較分析。農業經濟叢刊,1(1),1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Dijk, J.、Leneman, H.、van der Veen, Marianne(1996)。The Nutrient Flow Model for Dutch Agriculture: A Tool for Environmental Policy Evaluation。Journal of Environmental Management,46,43-55。  new window
6.Goetz, S. J.、Debertin, D. L.、Pagoulatos, A.(1998)。Human Capital, Income, and Environmental Quality: A State-Level Analysis。Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,200-208。  new window
7.鄭蕙燕(1995)。臺灣毛豬生產之環境與貿易混合模型。農業經濟半年刊,58,129-146。  延伸查詢new window
8.Reinhard, S.、Lovell, C. A. Knox、Thijssen, Geert(1999)。Econometric Estimation of Technical and Environmental Efficiency: An Application to Dutch Dairy Farms。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,81,44-60。  new window
學位論文
1.彭克仲(1995)。自然資源、環境保護與兩部門成長模型之研究,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE