臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：教師評鑑制度--優先事項及必要性
書刊名：資訊傳播與圖書館學
作者：曾孝明
作者(外文)：Tseng, Shiao-min
出版日期：2000
卷期：6:3
頁次：頁19-39
主題關鍵詞：排列；效果；效率；定位；學術評鑑；科技政策；Benchmarking；Effectiveness；Efficiency；Positioning；Research assessment；Science and technology policy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
國內大學存在極多的問題，人脈文化、山頭林立、泛政治化都是缺乏管理的表象
。根據國際文獻資料顯吾國內整體的學術水準不但大幅落後國際平均值，縱使學術論文刊登
在較高影響係數期刊已有一定數目，但平均層次與水準多年來也汳有明顯進步。極少數公立
大學的學術主管已向國內媒體宣稱該單位己具國際一流潛能與希望，這極不相稱的國內說辭
與國際評比資料已暗示國內學術風氣敗壞。國內大學缺乏歐、美大學特有的教師及相關評鑑
制度是重要原因，而整體科研發展及高等教育嚴重缺乏全方位規劃、專業經理人才及企業化
管理才是問題核心所在。制定及推動一個具深遠影響的制度，必需先了解現有問題、問題相
關性及預期新制度可能產生的結果與景遠。因此本文彙整科技先進國高等教育重要統計資料
及文獻記載的學術評比結果及作法，進而從國內外差異指出末來方向所在。國家最高科研管
理單位其理念與價值觀衝擊其高等教育，國內國科會一直有同儕評鑑作法並建立起相關的學
術及薪資獎勵措施，可是這些努力不但無法有效提昇整體學術，反而淪成學術界的「洗錢機
構」，這些問題是本文檢視重點。良好學術風氣的建立是教師評鑑制度的最基本面，本文陳
述這些問題參考報導科技政策及高教研發代表性刊物 << 自然 >> 及 << 科學 >> 期刊作法
，針對國內高教問題指出一些優先工作。在建立認知過程中嘗試凝聚共識是本文特色。高等
教育因觀念上偏差所產生的錯誤也在文中有所敘述。科研規劃、管理及高等教育策略等是本
文討論議題，教師及相關評鑑的作法在本文最後有扼要說
There are many problems such as a mesh of human relationship, academic
feudalism and pan-politicized cultures, in our higher educational systems. All
these symbolize lack of management. According to international research
assessment, the average academic quality of Taiwan is far behind that the
international average even though more and more local papers were published in
high-impact international journals. Few administration heads of our national
universities informed local media of their institutes to be international. The
contradiction between the former assertion and the international research
assessment implies a low ethical standard here. A major reason causing the
previous contradiction is the lack of assessment, conducted in European and
American universities. However, the key issues of our higher education, are
lack of a clear science and technology policy plus higher educational policy,
professional managers included. Enacting and implementing a far-reaching
regulations, we need to know current problems, their intrications and possilbe
impacts in detail. For comparison, collections of important statistics and
assessment of international higher education and research are provided. From
these, we point out directions for local higher education. The research council
of any a government affects her higher education. The National Science Council
(NSC) established a peer-review system and a bonus system for academic research.
These efforts didn't effectively promote the quality of the local academy.
Technically, the local academic societies ransack the NSC for money instead.
These subjects will be questioned here. Good practice of academy is the
pre-requisite in establishing the performance evaluation of the
university faculty. To present these issuew, this work follows the
styles of the two highly regarded journals-NATURE and SCIENCE. Trying to form
consensus is the main objection of this work. Research plannings, management
issues and strategies of higher education are discussed. At the end of this
work, method of faculty performance evaluation and of assessment are briefly
explained.
期刊論文
1.May, R. M.(1997)。The Scientific Wealth of Nations。Science，275，793-796。  new window
2.黃光國(19990800)。臺灣當前的文化危機與科技創新。歷史月刊，139，28-37。  延伸查詢new window
3.Amabile, T. M.(1998)。How to kill creativity。Harvard Business Review，76(5)，77-87。  new window
4.Krugman, Paul R.(1994)。The Myth of Asia's Miracle。Foreign Affairs，73(6)，62-78。  new window
5.曾孝明(1999)。科技年報與科技白皮書。科技報導，210。  延伸查詢new window
6.Williams, N.(1997)。U. K. universities: jostling for rank。Science，275，18。  new window
7.(1997)。News: Reviews of UK university research have helped to raise standards。Nature，385，3。  new window
8.(1997)。Editorial: Research assessment's ups and downs。Nature，385，99。  new window
9.Williams, N.(1997)。U. K. universities: the end of equality。Science，277，628。  new window
10.O'Brien, C.(1996)。Oxford and Cambridge still dominate UK citation list。Nature，384，398。  new window
11.Swinbank, D.(1997)。Western research assessment meets Asian Cultures。Nature，389，113。  new window
12.曾孝明(1998)。從'98年光電及通訊國際會議談起─我國科學研究的水準低落與改進之道。科技報導，203。  延伸查詢new window
13.曾孝明(1999)。從英國學術評鑑談起─我國學術研究的改進之道。科技報導，207。  延伸查詢new window
14.曾孝明(1999)。科技品牌與科研水準。科技報導，209。  延伸查詢new window
15.David, P.(1997)。Survey University。The Economist，4。  new window
16.(1999)。A day in the life of a topfight lab。Science，285，1531。  new window
17.Levin, S. G.、Stephan, P. E.(1999)。Are the foreign born a source of strength for U. S. science?。Science，285，1213。  new window
18.(1999)。Postdocs working for respect。Science，285，3。  new window
19.Ball, D. F.(1997)。Quality measurement as a basis for resource allocation: research assessment exercises in United Kingdom universities。R&D Management，27，281。  new window
20.Moed, H. F.、Hesselink, F. Th.(1996)。The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: biblometric analysis and policy implications。Research Policy，25，819。  new window
21.Rinia, E. J.(1998)。Research Policy。Research Policy，27，95。  new window
22.黃光國(1998)。建立『學術實踐的主體性』。楓城研發報導，13。  延伸查詢new window
23.林俊義(1999)。科學哲學基礎薄弱─臺灣發展隱憂。楓城研發報導，14。  延伸查詢new window
24.Tagaya, M.(1999)。The Japan's professors fear evaluation?。Nature，398，745。  new window
25.Adams, J.(1998)。Benchmarking international research。Nature，396，615。  new window
26.Adams, A.(1998)。Citation analysis。Science，281，1936。  new window
27.Mendel, J.(1995)。A new identification algorithm for allpass systems by higher-order statistics。Signal Processing : the Official Publication of the European Association for Signal Processing (EURASIP)，41，239。  new window
28.Ledley, R. S.(1994)。Ethical integrity and standard。Pattern Recognition，27(1)，181。  new window
29.曾孝明(1999)。從教授治校到32億的TRR-II計劃。科技報導，212。  延伸查詢new window
30.吳文桂(1993)。臺灣科研成績單的剖析。教師聯會會訊。  延伸查詢new window
31.(1999)。Dutch researchers' freedoms and responsibilities。Nature，400，387。  new window
32.劉廣定(1999)。不重視教育品質，何有學術卓越？兼評『教改』。科技報導，206。  延伸查詢new window
33.Dickson, D.(1997)。UK universities told: think strategically。Nature，388，413。  new window
34.Williams, N.(1998)。Government stalls on Dearing Challenge。Science，279，1446。  new window
35.Margolis, R. M.、Kammen, D. M.(1999)。Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&D policy challenge。Science，285，690。  new window
36.劉廣定(1999)。研究所考試閱卷有感—從大學生有機化學水準談起。科技報導，211。  延伸查詢new window
37.何子樂(1999)。臺灣生枳，美國產橘？。科技報導，212。  延伸查詢new window
38.(1995)。電子資訊。電子資訊，2(1)。  延伸查詢new window
39.(1998)。The biocomplex world of Rita Colwell。Science，281，1944。  new window
40.Jensen, M. N.(1999)。Reinventing the science master's degree。Science，284，1610。  new window
41.Abbott, A.(1999)。Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud。Nature，398，13。  new window
42.郭震坤(1999)。提昇管理學界創新姓學術研究風氣。楓城研發報導，17。  延伸查詢new window
43.Freemantle, M.(1998)。Talent thrives at ETH Zurich。Chemical and engineering news: "news edition" of the American Chemical Society。  new window
44.Abbott, A.(1998)。German scientist may escape fraud trial。Nature，395，532。  new window
45.(1997)。Fraud claim shake German complacency。Nature，387，750。  new window
46.Rousseau, S. R.(1998)。The scientific wealth of European Nations: taking effectiveness into account。Scientometrics，42，75。  new window
47.Schwarz, A. W.、Schwarz, S.、Tijssen, Robert J.W.(1988)。Research and research impact of a technical university-a biblometric study。Scientometrics，41，371。  new window
48.Kostoff, R. N.(1998)。The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation。Scientometrics，43，27。  new window
研究報告
1.(1997)。The Quality of the UK Science Base。Department of Trade and Industry (U. K.)。  new window
圖書
1.Thurow, L.(1992)。Head to Head: The Coming Economic Battle Among Japan, Europe, and America。New York, NY：William Morrow and Company, Inc.。  new window
2.Fukuyama, F.(1995)。Trust: The Social Values and the Creation of Prosperity。New York：Free Press。  new window
3.Porter, Michael E.(1990)。The Competitive Advantage of Nations。New York：Free Press。  new window
4.Drucker, P. F.(1993)。Post-Capitalist Society。Butterworth Heinemann。  new window
5.Morris-Suzuki, Tessa(1994)。The Technological Transformation of Japan: From the Seventeenth to the Twenty-First Century。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Irvine, J.、Martin, B. R.、Isard, P.(1990)。Investigating in the Future: An International Comparison of Government Funding of Academic and Related Research。Investigating in the Future: An International Comparison of Government Funding of Academic and Related Research。  new window
8.Martin, B. R.、Irvine, J.(1989)。Research Foresight: Priority-Setting in Science。London：Pinter Publishers。  new window
9.Charles, D.、Howells, J.(1992)。Higher education mechanisms for technology transfer in Technology Transfer in Europe: Public and Private Networks。London：Belhaven Press。  new window
10.HEFCE(1996)。1996 Research Assessment Exercise: the Outcome。1996 Research Assessment Exercise: the Outcome。  new window
11.Tassey, G.(1992)。Technology Infrastructure and Competition Position。Technology Infrastructure and Competition Position。  new window
12.(1995)。Progress Through Partnership: Report from the Steering Group of the Technology Foresight Programme。Progress Through Partnership: Report from the Steering Group of the Technology Foresight Programme。  new window
其他
1.曾孝明。Industrial roadmap and wealth of knowledge-based economy。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：922（臺灣：908，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68011106
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上