:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:辯論在歷史教學上的應用--以「鹽鐵論」為例
書刊名:臺北科技大學學報
作者:楊麗祝 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Li-chu
出版日期:2000
卷期:33:1
頁次:頁235-248
主題關鍵詞:歷史教學歷史教材鹽鐵論辯論Teaching of historyHistorical materialDebate
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:50
     辯論是一種思稚的訓練,可培養歸納分析及說理的能力,透過語言的交鋒可闡明 已方的論點也批評對方的誤謬,將辯論用於歷史教學,以經典史籍為材料,重演歷史上著名 的辯論,不失為提高學生學習興趣的方法之一。漢代桓寬的《鹽鐵論》生動地紀錄了西漢時 期朝野對外交、財經政策、治國理念等的討論,讓學生在課堂上以分組辯論的方式重新解讀 這本書是筆者這兩年的教學試驗,雖二千年是不易跨越的時空,但政府官員與民間代表因所 處立場不同所產生的歧異古今皆然,政治、財經的議題今昔對有雷同之處,經狺引導,學生 通常有不錯的表現。透過批判與反省,舊材料也有了新的意義,既可增長學生的歷史知識, 也可培育其理性思辨、容忍歧異的能力,對從事歷史教學者而言,教材教法的更新及改進其 重要性自不待言。
     debate is one of the ways to strengthen critical thinking, conductive to the training of inductive, analytical as well as reasoning ability. Through verbal interactions, your argument is clearly explicated and the fallacy of your opponent is exposed. It is stimulatingly interesting to employ debated and the fallacy of your opponent is exposed. It is stimulatingly interesting to employ debated as a teaching method in history class. Based on historical classics, students are required to simulate the debating scenes in history. In Yen T'ieh Lun: Discourses on Salt and Iron, Huan Kuan of Han Dynasty vividly depicted the arguments among the government and the public, debating on issues concerning foreign relations, economic policies, as well as principles and ideas of managing the state. During these two years, I have been experimenting this new method in my teaching. Although the world today is completely different form that of two millennia ago, the tension between the officials and the people has not changed much, especially in political and economic issues. Through my well-planned guidance, students usually have a great performance. In such a way, historical materials are thus endowed with new significance due to the process of questioning, reflection and discussion. On the one hand, the debate teaching method helps broaden students' knowledge in history and develop their critical thinking and reasoning. On the other hand, students will learn how to respect different opinions. For historical education, this new approach contributes a lot to the improvement of teaching method and teaching material in the historical field.
期刊論文
1.錢穆(19570400)。論中國歷史教學問題。民主評論,8(8),2-3。  延伸查詢new window
2.張元、陳華(1986)。大學中國通史改進的幾點意見。史學評論,11,87-112。  延伸查詢new window
3.出版與研究雜誌社(1978)。社論:大學歷史教育。出版與研究,32,4-13。  延伸查詢new window
4.出版與研究雜誌社(1978)。專題座談:大學歷史教育。出版與研究,32,4-13。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈雲龍(1985)。感慨話史盲。傳記文學,278,17-19。  延伸查詢new window
6.李明仁(1996)。專學校新學制中的歷史課程教育之省思。臺灣歷史學會通訊,2,44-45。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊玉鄉(1988)。當前高職歷史教育之研究。歷史教學,1(3),8-11。  延伸查詢new window
8.李國祁(1983)。今日歷史教育所發生的問題。師大史學會刊,27,2。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃俊傑(1995)。當前大學通識教的實踐及其展望。通識教育,2(2),41。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Carr, E.。歷史論集。  延伸查詢new window
2.桓寬。鹽鐵論。  延伸查詢new window
3.桓寬、盧烈紅、黃志民(1995)。新譯鹽鐵論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.王仲孚(1997)。大專院校歷史課程之改進。大專院校歷史課程之改進。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.中國歷史學會(1992)。中國歷史教學研討會論文集。中國歷史教學研討會論文集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.徐復觀(1976)。鹽鐵論中的政治社會文化問題。兩漢思想史(卷3)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.詹宏志(1995)。鹽鐵論:漢代財經大辯論。鹽鐵論:漢代財經大辯論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳豐祥Chen, Feng-shiang(1994)。歷史教學的評量與實際。歷史教學的評量與實際。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.余英時(1983)。史學、史家與時代。歷史與思想。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.漢書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE