Human Beings possess the knowledge to differentiate between right and wrong, the true and the false. Due to the complexities of different theories or practices, however, and to differences in customs and educational backgrounds, it is hard to avoid mistakes in judgment. This is especially true in the realm of ethics where it is easy to become confused and difficult to make accurate assessments. This leads easily to the occurance of ethical sceptism and relativism. We will not discuss the possibility of truth here, but rather concentrate on ethical matters. Sceptism and Relativism were born in ancient Greek philosophy. People today are even more adamant as to the lack of any unifying or universal model of existence. This misconception, whether it be from ancient or modern moralists, has led to the belief that it is ethically sufficient to just act well and avoid evil. Does not this sort of statement admit to an absolute and universal morality? Moral skeptics and relativists neither doubt their own tenets nor slip into the quagmire of self denial; would not this in itself lead to a model of universal value?