資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.119.159.1)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
臺北市鄰里公園之景觀美質評估
書刊名:
造園學報
作者:
林晏州
作者(外文):
Lin, Yann-jou
出版日期:
2000
卷期:
6:1/2
頁次:
頁91-115
主題關鍵詞:
鄰里公園
;
心理物理模式
;
景觀美質評估法
;
景觀美質評值
;
偏好
;
Neighborhood park
;
Psychophysical model
;
Scenic beauty estimation method
;
Scenic beauty estimates
;
Preference
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:
11
點閱:25
心理物理模式是應用最多的景觀偏好預測模式,本研究之目的在於應用此模式預測都市鄰里公園之景觀美質。首先由臺北市選擇54個鄰里公園當做實證研究地點,每個公園以固定方式拍攝六張幻燈片,並以這些幻燈片及複製之相片進行景觀美質之評搶。本研究共建立兩組心理物理模式之景觀偏好預測模式,這些模式之應變項均為公園景觀美質評質(SBE*),分別由大學景觀專業之學生、鄰里公園使用者、及大安森林公園使用者加以評估,自變項則分別由現地調查公園屬性與相片測量取得。本研究之重要結果摘要如下:1.在模式預測能力方面,利用相片測量資料所校估之心理物理模式有較高之解釋能力,而利用現地調查資料所校估之模式解釋能力較低。2.公園實質環境屬性確實會影響公園景觀美質。但對不同之受測者而言,影響景觀美質之因素不完全相同。
以文找文
The psychophysical model is the most widely used landscape preference predictive models. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the landscape esthetics of neighborhood parks with the psychophysical model. The author selected fifty-four neighborhood parks from Taipei city as cases for this study. We took six color slides and photographs from each park. These slides or photographs were used as medium for measuring the landscape esthetics of parks by the Scenic Beauty Estimation method (SBE). Two sets of psychophysical models were developed. The dependent variables of these models were the scenic estimates of parks that were measured by three groups of respondents-university students, neighborhood park users, and Da-An park users. The values of physical landscape attributes measured on-site and measured from the photographs were two sets of explanatory variables for the psychophysical models. The findings of this study are summarized as follows: 1.As the predictive capabilities, the psychophysical models calibrated from the variables measured by photographs have higher predictive capabilities. 2.The physical attributes of park do affect users perceived park landscape esthetics. However, the attributes affecting landscape esthetics are different for different user groups.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Brown, T. C.(1986)。Production and cost of scenic beauty: Examples for a ponderosa pine forest。Forest Science,33(2),394-410。
2.
Brown, C. T.、Daniel, T. C.(1986)。Predicting science beauty of timber stands。Forest Science,32,471-487。
3.
Buhyoff, G. J.、Wellman, J. D.(1980)。The specification of a non-linear psychophysical function for visual landscape dimensions。Journal of Leisure Research,12,257-272。
4.
Buhyoff, G. J.、Gauthier, L. J.、Wellman, J. D.(1984)。Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements。Forest Science,30(1),71-82。
5.
Buhyoff, G. J.、Wellman, J. D.、Daniel, T. C.(1982)。Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas。Forest Science,28,827-838。
6.
Buhyoff, G. J.、Hull, R. B. IV、Lien, J. N.、Cordell, H. K.(1986)。Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands。Forest Science,32(3),769-778。
7.
Gregory, K. H.、Davis, R. J.(1993)。The perception of riverscape aesthetics: an example from two Hampshire rivers。Journal of Environmental Management,39,171-185。
8.
Hammitt, W. E.、Patterson, M. E.、Noe, F. P.(1994)。Identifying and predicting visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas。Landscape and Urban Planning,29,171-183。
9.
Hampe, G. D.、Noe, F. P.(1983)。A study in the aesthetics of boundaries: fences along a national parkway。Journal of Environmental Management,17(3),239-248。
10.
Hull IV, R. B.(1986)。The scenic beauty temporal distribution method : An attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts。Forest Science,32(2),271-286。
11.
Hull, R. B.、Buhyoff, G. J.(1983)。Distance and scenic beauty: A nonmonotonic relationship。Environment and behavior,15(1),7-91。
12.
Kaplan, R.、Talbot, J. F.(1988)。Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: A review and recent findings。Landscape and Urban Planning,15,107-117。
13.
Ribe, R. G.(1990)。A general model for understanding the perception of scenic beauty in northern hardwood forests。Landscape Journal,9,86-101。
14.
Schroeder, H. W.(1986)。Estimating park tree densities to maximize landscape esthetics。Journal of Environmental Management,23(4),325-333。
15.
Schroeder, H. W.(1991)。Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: combining quantitative and qualitative data。Journal of Environmental Psychology,11,231-248。
16.
Schroeder, H. W.、Brown, T. C.(1983)。Alternative functional forms for an inventory-based landscape perception model。Journal of Leisure Research,15,156-163。
17.
Schroeder, H. W.、Cannon, W. N.(1987)。Visual quality of residential streets: both street and yard trees make a difference。Journal of Arboriculture,13(10),236-239。
18.
Shafer, E. L.、Hamilton, J. F. Jr、Schmidt, E. A.(1969)。Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model。Journal of Leisure Research,1(1),1-19。
19.
Sommer, R.、Summit, J.、Clements, A.(1993)。Slide ratings of street tree attributes: some methodological issues and answers。Landscape Journal,12,17-22。
20.
Vining, J.、Daniel, T. C.、Schroeder, H. W.(1984)。Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes。Journal of Leisure Research,16,124-135。
21.
陳惠美、林晏州(19970600)。景觀知覺與景觀品質關係之研究。造園學報,4(1),1-16。
延伸查詢
22.
陳惠美、林晏州(19970900)。鄰里公園景觀美質預測模式之研究。中國園藝,43(3),225-236。
延伸查詢
23.
Anderson, L. M.、Schroeder, H. W.(1983)。Application of Wildland Scenic Assessment Methods to the Urban Landscape。Landscape Planning,10,219-237。
24.
Lien, J. N.、Buhyoff, G. J.(1986)。Extension of visual quality models for urban forests。Journal of Environmental Management,22(3),245-254。
25.
Sommer, R.、Summit, J.(1995)。An Exploratory Study of Preferred Tree Form。Environment and Behavior,27(4),540-577。
26.
Gold, S. M.(1986)。User characteristics and response to vegetation in neighborhood park。Arboricultural Journal,10(4),275-287。
27.
Schroeder, H.、Daniel, T. C.(1981)。Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes。Forest Science,27(1),71-80。
28.
Zube, Ervin H.、Sell, James L.、Taylor, Jonathan G.(1982)。Landscape perception: Research, application and theory。Landscape Planning,9(1),1-33。
研究報告
1.
Brown, T. C.、Daniel, T. C.(1990)。Scaling of Ratings: Concepts and Methods。
2.
Brown, T. C.、Daniel, T. C.、Schroeder, H. W.、Brink, G. E.(1990)。Analysis of Ratings: A Guide to RMRATE。
3.
Schroeder, H. W.、Gobster, P. H.、Frid, R.(1989)。Visual quality of human-made clearings in central Michigan conefers。
4.
Daniel, T. C.、Boster, R. S.(1976)。Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method。
圖書論文
1.
Daniel, T. C.、Vining, J.(1983)。Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality。Behavior and the Natural Environment。New York:Plenum Press。
2.
Vining, J.、Stevens, J. J.(1986)。The assessment of landscape quality: major methodological considerations。Foundations for Visual Project Analysis。New York:John Wiley & Sons。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
視覺與非視覺環境偏好對景觀偏好與注意力恢復之影響--以溪頭自然教育園區為例
2.
綠建築評估系統外觀意象指標之研究--以低層建築為例
3.
景觀知覺與景觀偏好對餐廳消費者行為意圖之影響
4.
森林步道環境特性對心理評價反應之影響
5.
環境認知與美感品味之關聯分析--以景觀設計學生對鄉野景觀之視覺分析為例
6.
環境偏好與環境恢復性知覺關係之研究--以山景景觀為例
7.
景觀美感主客體因素之研究
8.
臺北市街道植栽與人行道舖面對行人偏好之影響
9.
都市公園綠地區位景觀生態評估之研究
10.
臺北都會區醫院庭園調查及景觀配置研究
11.
行道樹景觀美質評估方法之研究
12.
公園入口類型初探--以臺中市為例
13.
行道樹景觀美質之評估
14.
景觀評估中之心理學模式之研究
15.
高雄都會公園使用後之評估
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code