:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺北市鄰里公園之景觀美質評估
書刊名:造園學報
作者:林晏州
作者(外文):Lin, Yann-jou
出版日期:2000
卷期:6:1/2
頁次:頁91-115
主題關鍵詞:鄰里公園心理物理模式景觀美質評估法景觀美質評值偏好Neighborhood parkPsychophysical modelScenic beauty estimation methodScenic beauty estimatesPreference
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:25
心理物理模式是應用最多的景觀偏好預測模式,本研究之目的在於應用此模式預測都市鄰里公園之景觀美質。首先由臺北市選擇54個鄰里公園當做實證研究地點,每個公園以固定方式拍攝六張幻燈片,並以這些幻燈片及複製之相片進行景觀美質之評搶。本研究共建立兩組心理物理模式之景觀偏好預測模式,這些模式之應變項均為公園景觀美質評質(SBE*),分別由大學景觀專業之學生、鄰里公園使用者、及大安森林公園使用者加以評估,自變項則分別由現地調查公園屬性與相片測量取得。本研究之重要結果摘要如下:1.在模式預測能力方面,利用相片測量資料所校估之心理物理模式有較高之解釋能力,而利用現地調查資料所校估之模式解釋能力較低。2.公園實質環境屬性確實會影響公園景觀美質。但對不同之受測者而言,影響景觀美質之因素不完全相同。
The psychophysical model is the most widely used landscape preference predictive models. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the landscape esthetics of neighborhood parks with the psychophysical model. The author selected fifty-four neighborhood parks from Taipei city as cases for this study. We took six color slides and photographs from each park. These slides or photographs were used as medium for measuring the landscape esthetics of parks by the Scenic Beauty Estimation method (SBE). Two sets of psychophysical models were developed. The dependent variables of these models were the scenic estimates of parks that were measured by three groups of respondents-university students, neighborhood park users, and Da-An park users. The values of physical landscape attributes measured on-site and measured from the photographs were two sets of explanatory variables for the psychophysical models. The findings of this study are summarized as follows: 1.As the predictive capabilities, the psychophysical models calibrated from the variables measured by photographs have higher predictive capabilities. 2.The physical attributes of park do affect users perceived park landscape esthetics. However, the attributes affecting landscape esthetics are different for different user groups.
期刊論文
1.Brown, T. C.(1986)。Production and cost of scenic beauty: Examples for a ponderosa pine forest。Forest Science,33(2),394-410。  new window
2.Brown, C. T.、Daniel, T. C.(1986)。Predicting science beauty of timber stands。Forest Science,32,471-487。  new window
3.Buhyoff, G. J.、Wellman, J. D.(1980)。The specification of a non-linear psychophysical function for visual landscape dimensions。Journal of Leisure Research,12,257-272。  new window
4.Buhyoff, G. J.、Gauthier, L. J.、Wellman, J. D.(1984)。Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements。Forest Science,30(1),71-82。  new window
5.Buhyoff, G. J.、Wellman, J. D.、Daniel, T. C.(1982)。Predicting scenic quality for mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas。Forest Science,28,827-838。  new window
6.Buhyoff, G. J.、Hull, R. B. IV、Lien, J. N.、Cordell, H. K.(1986)。Prediction of scenic quality for southern pine stands。Forest Science,32(3),769-778。  new window
7.Gregory, K. H.、Davis, R. J.(1993)。The perception of riverscape aesthetics: an example from two Hampshire rivers。Journal of Environmental Management,39,171-185。  new window
8.Hammitt, W. E.、Patterson, M. E.、Noe, F. P.(1994)。Identifying and predicting visual prefer­ence of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas。Landscape and Urban Planning,29,171-183。  new window
9.Hampe, G. D.、Noe, F. P.(1983)。A study in the aesthetics of boundaries: fences along a national parkway。Journal of Environmental Management,17(3),239-248。  new window
10.Hull IV, R. B.(1986)。The scenic beauty temporal distribution method : An attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts。Forest Science,32(2),271-286。  new window
11.Hull, R. B.、Buhyoff, G. J.(1983)。Distance and scenic beauty: A nonmonotonic relationship。Environment and behavior,15(1),7-91。  new window
12.Kaplan, R.、Talbot, J. F.(1988)。Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: A review and recent findings。Landscape and Urban Planning,15,107-117。  new window
13.Ribe, R. G.(1990)。A general model for understanding the perception of scenic beauty in north­ern hardwood forests。Landscape Journal,9,86-101。  new window
14.Schroeder, H. W.(1986)。Estimating park tree densities to maximize landscape esthetics。Journal of Environmental Management,23(4),325-333。  new window
15.Schroeder, H. W.(1991)。Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: combining quantitative and qualitative data。Journal of Environmental Psychology,11,231-248。  new window
16.Schroeder, H. W.、Brown, T. C.(1983)。Alternative functional forms for an inventory-based landscape perception model。Journal of Leisure Research,15,156-163。  new window
17.Schroeder, H. W.、Cannon, W. N.(1987)。Visual quality of residential streets: both street and yard trees make a difference。Journal of Arboriculture,13(10),236-239。  new window
18.Shafer, E. L.、Hamilton, J. F. Jr、Schmidt, E. A.(1969)。Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model。Journal of Leisure Research,1(1),1-19。  new window
19.Sommer, R.、Summit, J.、Clements, A.(1993)。Slide ratings of street tree attributes: some methodological issues and answers。Landscape Journal,12,17-22。  new window
20.Vining, J.、Daniel, T. C.、Schroeder, H. W.(1984)。Predicting scenic values in forested residential landscapes。Journal of Leisure Research,16,124-135。  new window
21.陳惠美、林晏州(19970600)。景觀知覺與景觀品質關係之研究。造園學報,4(1),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.陳惠美、林晏州(19970900)。鄰里公園景觀美質預測模式之研究。中國園藝,43(3),225-236。  延伸查詢new window
23.Anderson, L. M.、Schroeder, H. W.(1983)。Application of Wildland Scenic Assessment Methods to the Urban Landscape。Landscape Planning,10,219-237。  new window
24.Lien, J. N.、Buhyoff, G. J.(1986)。Extension of visual quality models for urban forests。Journal of Environmental Management,22(3),245-254。  new window
25.Sommer, R.、Summit, J.(1995)。An Exploratory Study of Preferred Tree Form。Environment and Behavior,27(4),540-577。  new window
26.Gold, S. M.(1986)。User characteristics and response to vegetation in neighborhood park。Arboricultural Journal,10(4),275-287。  new window
27.Schroeder, H.、Daniel, T. C.(1981)。Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes。Forest Science,27(1),71-80。  new window
28.Zube, Ervin H.、Sell, James L.、Taylor, Jonathan G.(1982)。Landscape perception: Research, application and theory。Landscape Planning,9(1),1-33。  new window
研究報告
1.Brown, T. C.、Daniel, T. C.(1990)。Scaling of Ratings: Concepts and Methods。  new window
2.Brown, T. C.、Daniel, T. C.、Schroeder, H. W.、Brink, G. E.(1990)。Analysis of Ratings: A Guide to RMRATE。  new window
3.Schroeder, H. W.、Gobster, P. H.、Frid, R.(1989)。Visual quality of human-made clearings in central Michigan conefers。  new window
4.Daniel, T. C.、Boster, R. S.(1976)。Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method。  new window
圖書論文
1.Daniel, T. C.、Vining, J.(1983)。Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality。Behavior and the Natural Environment。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
2.Vining, J.、Stevens, J. J.(1986)。The assessment of landscape quality: major methodological considerations。Foundations for Visual Project Analysis。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top