為了解某五專不同管道入學學生，在學校生活適應上是否有差異存在，本研究採問卷調查法，以某專校八十七學年度五專部醫管科推薦甄試的學生與參加聯考的學生為研究對象，進行追蹤研究。使用「修訂學生在校行為問卷」、學期學業平均成績、操行成績與轉科或休學情形為研究工具，評估聯考生與推甄生學校生活適應的情形。以卡方檢定、二獨立樣本t檢定、二子變異數分析等統計方法，進行資料分析。結果發現：推甄生的家庭社經地位沒有優於聯考生。在學校生活適應方面，除各學期的學業平均成績及同儕關係外，其餘各項，包括：勤學適應、常規適應、師生關係、自我接納、操行成績及不順利就學率，均顯示聯考生與推甄生相同，沒有顯著差異。可見「推荐甄選入學」在某五專是可採行的，但應審慎選定甄選標準及比率，以免漏失素質佳的學生。

　　　　　This study compares how examinees and junior high school recommended students majoring in health administration at a junior college differ in terms of school adjustment. Assessing instruments include revised behavior in-school questionnaire, grade point average (GPA), as well as conduct and satisfaction. In addition, X2 test, two-sample t–test for independent sample, two way classification analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. Based on those results, we conclude the following: (1) the social economic status of recommended students is not better than that of the examinees. (2) The two groups do not significantly differ in terms of studiousness, compliance, student-teacher relationship, self-acceptance and satisfaction except the GPA and peer group relationship. Above results indicate that, although the "Recommended Entrance" is adoptable, the recommendation criteria and percentage should be more objective and discriminating when selecting better students.