資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.147.60.239)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Rules vs. Analogy in Mandarin Classifier Selection
書刊名:
語言暨語言學
作者:
myers, james
出版日期:
2000
卷期:
1:2
頁次:
頁187-209
主題關鍵詞:
Analogy
;
Rule
;
Classifier
;
Default rule
;
漢語
;
量詞
;
分類詞
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(
1
)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:0
點閱:52
A long-running debate concerns whether human language is processed solely by analogy to memorized exemplars, as connectionists have claimed, or instead may be processed by symbol-manipulating rules (e.g. Pinker 1999). In this paper we bring this debate to the Mandarin noun classifier system, arguing that the so-called general classifier 個 ge is selected by a default rule. Reviewing evidence from a variety of sources, including new corpus analyses, we first argue that the selection of most classifiers is lexically mediated, and then show that ge has no lexical semantics. Finally, we show that ge is used in a variety of situations that have nothing in common except for the inability to form analogies with examples in memory: when nouns are too dissimilar from lexical exemplars, are derived from other syntactic categories, or cooccur with classifiers too infrequently, and when speakers have memory access problems.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Tai, H-Y. James、Chao, Fangyi(1994)。A semantic study of the classifier zhang。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,29(3),67-78。
2.
Loke, Kit-Ken(1996)。Norms and realities of Mandarin shape classifiers。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,31(2),1-22。
3.
Ahrens, Kathleen(1994)。Classifier production in normals and aphasics。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,22(2),203-248。
4.
Allen, Keith(1977)。Classifiers。Language,53(2),285-311。
5.
王紹新(1989)。量詞「個」在唐代前後的發展。語言教學與研究,2,98-119。
延伸查詢
6.
Rosch, Eleanor H.(1973)。Natural categories。Cognitive Psychology,4(3),328-350。
7.
戴浩一、Wang, L. Q.(1990)。A semantic study of the classifier tiao。中文教師學會學報,25(1),35-56。
8.
Tzeng, Ovid J. L.、Chen, Sylvia S. Y.、Hung, Daisy L.(1991)。The classifier problem in Chinese aphasia。Brain and Language,41(2),184-202。
9.
Collins, A. M.、Loftus, E. F.(1975)。A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing。Psychological Review,82(6),407-428。
10.
Marcus, Gary F.、Pinker, Steven A.、Ullman, Michael、Hollander, Michelle、Rosen, T. John、Xu, Fei、Clahsen, Harald(1992)。Overregularization in language acquisition。Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,57(4),1-182。
11.
Church, Kenneth Ward、Hanks, Patrick(1990)。Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography。Computational Linguistics,16(1),22-29。
12.
Loke, Kit-Ken(1994)。Is ge merely a "general classifier"?。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,29(3),35-50。
13.
Yau, Shun-chiu(1986)。"There is something...": How to use a classifier in Chinese in case of lexical breakdown。Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale,15(1),59-64。
14.
Bybee, Joan L.、Moder, Carol Lynn(1983)。Morphological classes as natural categories。Language,59(2),251-270。
15.
Hare, Mary、Elman, Jeffrey L.、Daugherty, Kim G.(1995)。Default generalisation in connectionist networks。Language and Cognitive Processes,10(6),601-630。
16.
Jaeger, Jeri、Lockwood, Alan H.、Kemmerer, David L.、Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.、Murphy, Brian W.、Khalak, Hanif G.(1996)。A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English。Language,72(3),451-497。
17.
MacWhinney, Brian、Leinbach, Jared(1991)。Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model。Cognition,40,121-157。
18.
Marcus, Gary F.、Brinkmann, Ursula、Clahsen, Harald、Wiese, Richard、Pinker, Steven A.(1995)。German inflection: The exception that proves the rule。Cognitive Psychology,29(3),189-256。
19.
McRae, Ken、de Sa, Virginia R.、Seidenberg, Mark S.(1997)。On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126(2),99-130。
20.
Pinker, Steven A.(1991)。Rules of language。Science,253,530-535。
21.
Pinker, Steven A.、Prince, Alan(1988)。On language and connectionism: Analysis of a Parallel Distributed Processing model of language acquisition。Cognition,28,73-193。
22.
Plunkett, Kim、Marchman, Virginia(1991)。U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition。Cognition,38(1),43-102。
23.
Plunkett, Kim、Marchman, Virginia(1993)。From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets。Cognition,48(1),21-69。
24.
Polio, Charlene(1994)。Non-native speakers' use of nominal classifiers in Mandarin Chinese。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,29(3),51-66。
25.
Prasada, Sandeep、Pinker, Steven A.(1993)。Similarity-based and rule-based generalizations in inflectional morphology。Language and Cognitive Processes,8,1-56。
26.
Shi, Yu-Zhi(1996)。Proportion of extensional dimensions: The primary cognitive basis for shape-based classifiers in Chinese。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,31(2),37-59。
27.
Wiebusch, Thekla(1995)。Quantification and qualification: Two competing functions of numeral classifiers in the light of the radical system of the Chinese script。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,23,1-41。
會議論文
1.
Erbaugh, Mary S.(1986)。Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children。Symposium on categorization and noun classification,(會議日期: October 1983)。John Benjamins Publishing Company。399-436。
研究報告
1.
(1994)。CKIP Technical Report。Taipei。
學位論文
1.
Kuo, Jenny Yi-chun(1998)。A Semantic and Contrastive Analysis of Mandarin and English Measure Words(碩士論文),Chia-yi。
2.
Hu, Qian(1993)。The Acquisition of Chinese Classifiers by Young Mandarin-Speaking Children。
3.
田意民(1996)。漢語分類詞與名詞的語義確認歷程之分析,嘉義。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Pinker, Steven A.(1989)。Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。
2.
Pinker, Steven A.(1999)。Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language。New York:Basic Books。
3.
Pinker, Steven(1997)。How the mind works。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。
4.
Li, Charles Na、Thompson, Sandra Annear(1981)。Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar。University of California Press。
5.
Wieger, Léon(1965)。Chinese Characters。Chinese Characters。
6.
Kiparsky, Paul(1988)。Phonological Change。Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey-I Linguistic Theory: Foundations。New York。
7.
Miao, Xiao-Chun、Zhu, Man-Shu(1992)。Language development in Chinese children。Language Processing in Chinese。Amsterdam/New York。
8.
戴浩一(1992)。Variation in Classifier Systems Across Chinese Dialects: Towards a Cognition-Based Semantic Approach。中國境內語言暨語言學(第一輯)。臺北。
延伸查詢
其他
1.
陳克健,黃居仁,Chang, Li-Ping,Hsu, Hui-Li(1996)。Sinica Corpus: Design Methodology for Balanced Corpra,Seoul Korea。
2.
Wu, Xiu-Zhi Zoe,李芳(1997)。Da-le ge luohualiushui: An activity classifier and complement marker。
3.
Zubin, David A.,Shimojo, Mitsuaki(1993)。How "general" are general classifiers? with special reference to ko and tsu in Japanese。
4.
Ahrens, Kathleen,黃居仁(1996)。Classifiers and semantic type coercion: Motivating a new classification of classifiers,Seoul Korea。
5.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.(1997)。Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices。
圖書論文
1.
Tai, James H.-Y.(1994)。Chinese classifier systems and human categorization。In honor of Professor William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change。Taipei:Pyramid Publishing Company。
2.
Rumelhart, David E.、McClelland, James L.(1986)。On learning the past tenses of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing?。Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
From Counting to Classifying: Unpacking the Challenges of Chinese Classifiers for Vietnamese L2 Learners
2.
More on the Licensing Conditions of NP-ellipsis and the Structure of Noun Phrases in Mandarin
3.
華語分類詞的界定與教學上的分級
4.
臺灣閩南語分類詞之檢驗
5.
數詞與量詞系統在民族接觸下的變化:以藏緬語Sunwar和Rabha為例
6.
西方漢學視域下漢語量詞的性質與特徵
7.
Structure of Classifiers and Measure Words: A Lexical Functional Account
8.
The Constituency of Classifier Constructions in Mandarin Chinese
9.
On the Separation and Relatedness of Classifiers, Number, and Individuation in Niuean
10.
嘉靖刊《荔鏡記》量詞研究
11.
プロトタイプ性の検証--日本語分類辞「本」に関する母語話者と非母語話者の判断
12.
Nouns or Classifiers: A Non-Movement Analysis of Classifiers in Chinese
13.
Two Types of Classifier Languages: A Typological Study of Classification Markers in Paiwan Noun Phrases
14.
漢語方言的名量詞
15.
Classifier and Construction: The Interaction of Grammatical Categories and Cognitive Strategies
無相關博士論文
1.
Semantic Features of Counting Units in a Syntagmatic Perspective
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code