本研究旨在比較國小六年級籃球隊和普通班學童，以及籃球隊和普通班 男、女生各別在體適能之間的差異情形。其中籃球隊男生10名、女生12名;普通 班男、女生各10名。對這些學童分別施以坐姿體前彎、折返跑(10公尺x4次)、60 公尺衝刺、800公尺耐力跑、波比測驗、引體向上、屈膝仰臥起坐、握力、哈佛 登階測驗、垂直跳高、立定跳遠測驗等11項目。研究結果顯示(p<.05):籃球隊學生 在體適能上明顯的優於普通班學生，只有在坐姿體前彎、波比測驗並未有明顯的 差異;籃球隊男生和普通班男生在坐姿體前彎、波比測驗、引體向上和握力四項 測驗並未有明顯的差異，其餘各項均顯示籃球隊男生比較優異;而籃球隊女生和 普通班女生在體重、坐姿體前彎、波比測驗、屈膝仰臥起坐四項測驗並未達到顯 著的差異，其餘各項顯示籃球隊女生比較優異。建議爾後該隊在訓練時，應多加 強柔軟度和全身協調性，以降低運動傷害機率。

　　　　　This research is to compare the difference in fitness between two six-grade groups ofelementary school: the students from school basketball team (Group 1) and those fromcommon classes (Group 2), genders considered. In Group 1, there are 10 male and 12female students. In Group 2, there are 10 male and 10 female students. Eleven tests aretaken: Modified Sit-and-Reach Test, Shuttle Run (10M X 4), Sixty-Meter Dash,Eight-Hundred-Meter Run-Walk Test, Burpee Test, Modified Pull ups, 1-minute flexed-legsit-up test. Dynamometer Test, Harvard Step Test, Vertical Jump, and Standing Long Jump.The result shows p < .05. The fitness of Group 1 is obviously better than that of the othergroup. Only in the two tests. Modified Sit-and-Reach Test and Burpee Test, there isn'tsignificant difference. The male students from both groups show no significant difference onlyin four tests: Modified Sit-and-Reach Test, Burpee Test, Modified Pull ups, andDynamometer Test. In the other tests, the performance of male students in Group 1 is better.The female students from both groups show no significant difference also in four tests: weight,Modified Sit-and-Reach Test, Burpee Test, and 1-minute flexed-leg sit-up test. In the othertests, the performance of the female students in Group 1 is better. We do suggest theemphasis on flexiability and all-body compatibility to reduce the frequency of sport damage.